两种声触诊组织定量技术鉴别乳腺包块良恶性的价值

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2017.1184

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较声触诊组织定量(VTQ)与声触诊组织量化(VTIQ)技术在乳腺包块良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法选取山东大学齐鲁医院经术后病理证实的102例患者,共136个乳腺包块,行常规超声、VTQ和VTIQ检查,VTQ技术测量剪切波速度SWV_VTQ,VTIQ技术测量SWV的最大值SWV_max、最小值SWV_min、平均值SWV_mean。分别绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,比较曲线下面积(AUC)。以病理结果为金标准,分析SWV_VTQ、SWV_max、SWV_min、SWV_mean 4种测值分别用于鉴别诊断乳腺包块良恶性的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果术后病理显示所有包块中,恶性包块94个,良性包块42个。二者的SWV_VTQ、SWV_max、SWV_min、SWV_mean测值均有差异(P<0.05);ROC曲线下面积比较,以SWV_mean诊断效能最佳(AUC=0.91);SWV_max诊断乳腺良恶性包块的敏感性最高(83.0%),而SWV_mean的诊断特异性最高(95.2%)。结论 VTQ和VTIQ弹性成像技术都可较好地应用于乳腺包块良恶性的鉴别诊断,其中以VTIQ 测量SWV_mean的诊断效能更佳。

关键词: 超声, 乳腺包块, 弹性成像技术, 声触诊组织定量, 声触诊组织量化

Abstract: Objective To compare the diagnostic value of two elastography techniques, virtual touch tissue quantification(VTQ)and virtual touch tissue imaging quantification(VTIQ), in differentiating benign breast masses from malignant ones. Methods A total of 102 patients in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University with 136 nodules were evaluated by conventional ultrasound, VTQ and VTIQ. Shear wave velocities(SWVs)of breast masses were measured by VTQ and VTIQ. The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves of VTQ SWV_VTQ and VTIQ SWV_max, SWV_min and SWV_mean were used to assess the value on differentiating benign and malignant masses. Areas under the curve(AUC)of the four groups were compared. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value(PPV)and negative predictive value(NPV)of the four measurements were respectively calculated. Results Pathologically, 94 breast masses were benign and 42 were malignant. Significant differences of SWV_max, SWV_min, SWV_mean and SWV_VTQ between 山东大学学报 (医学版)56卷4期 -李良,等.两种声触诊组织定量技术鉴别乳腺包块良恶性的价值 \=-benign and malignant groups were found(P<0.05). Of all these four measurements, the SWV_mean was the most valuable measurement(AUC=0.91), the diagnostic sensitivity of SWV_max was the highest(83.0%), and the diagnostic specificity of SWV_mean was the strongest(95.2%). Conclusion VTQ and VTIQ have good diagnostic performance on distinguishing malignant breast masses from benign ones. VTIQ SWV_mean shows better diagnostic performance than SWV_VTQ.

Key words: Ultrasound, Breast masses, Elasticity imaging techniques, Virtual touch tissue quantification, Virtual touch tissue imaging quantification

中图分类号:

R445.1

李良,葛娜,孙霄,李杰,朱江,李忠良. 两种声触诊组织定量技术鉴别乳腺包块良恶性的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(4): 70-75.

LI Liang, GE Na, SUN Xiao, LI Jie, ZHU Jiang, LI Zhongliang. Value of VTQ and VTIQ on differentation of benign and malignant breast masses[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2018, 56(4): 70-75.

参考文献

[1] 陈万青, 郑荣寿, 曾红梅, 等. 2011年中国恶性肿瘤发病和死亡分析[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2015, 24(1): 1-10. CHEN Wanqing, ZHENG Rongshou, ZENG Hongmei, et al. Report of cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2011[J]. China Cancer, 2015, 24(1): 1-10.
[2] Carvajal J, Patiiio JH. Mannographic findings after breast augmentation with autologous fat injection[J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2008, 28(2): 153-162.
[3] Giuliano V, Giuliano C. Volumetric breast ultrasound as a screening modality in mammographically dense breasts[J]. ISRN Radiol, 2013: 235270. doi:10.5402/2013/235270.
[4] 张建军, 丁洁. 彩色多普勒超声对乳腺肿块诊断的临床价值[J]. 新疆医学, 2015, 14(6): 764-767. ZHANG Jianjun, DING Jie. Clinical value of diagnosis of breast masses with color doppler ultrasound[J]. Xinjiang Medical Journal, 2015, 14(6): 764-767.
[5] Moy L, Mercado CL. Breast MRI preface[J]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2010, 18(2): 149-156.
[6] 智文祥, 陈亚青, 李文英, 等. 不同年资医师运用BI-RADS判断乳腺病灶特征的一致性[J].中国医学影像技术, 2009, 25(8): 1384-1386. ZHI Wenxiang, CHEN Yaqing, LI Wenying, et al. Interobserver variability for characteristics of breast lesions between junior and senior radiologists with BI-RADS[J]. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2009, 25(8): 1384-1386.
[7] 石健, 王彬, 刘荫华. 乳腺高频彩色多普勒超声检查中应用BI-RADS 分级诊断标准对乳腺疾病的诊断价值[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2010, 26(5): 877-880. SHI Jian, WANG Bin, LIU Yinhua. Diagnostic value of high-frequency color Doppler ultrasonography with BI-RADS lexicon for breast diseases[J]. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2010, 26(5): 877-880.
[8] Azizi G, Keller JM, Mayo ML, et al. Thyroid nodules and shear wave elastography: a new tool in thyroid cancer detection[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2015, 41(11): 2855-2865.
[9] Zhuo J, Ma Z, Fu WJ, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant thyroid nodules with acoustic radiation force impulse technique[J]. Br J Radiol, 2014, 87(1035): 20130263. doi:10.1259/bjr.20130263.
[10] Zhan J, Jin JM, Diao XH, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging(ARFI)for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules-a meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2015, 84(11): 2181-2186.
[11] 石秋玲, 张磊, 徐金锋, 等. 声触诊组织定量技术鉴别诊断乙肝相关性小肝癌与肝硬化增生结节的应用价值[J].临床超声医学杂志, 2017, 19(5): 305-308. SHI Qiuling, ZHANG Lei, XU Jinfeng, et al. Application value of virtual touch tissue quantification in differential diagnosis of patients with HBV infection between small-hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodule[J]. J Clin Ultrasound in Med, 2017, 19(5): 305-308.
[12] Matsuzuka T, Suzuki M, Saijo S, et al. Stiffness of salivary gland and tumor measured by new ultrasonic techniques: virtual touch quantification and IQ[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2015, 42(2): 128-133.
[13] Tabrizian P, Jibara G, Shrager B, et al. Recurrence of hepatocellular cancer after resection: patterns, treatments, and prognosis[J]. Annals of Surgery, 2015, 261(5): 947-955.
[14] 吴墅,徐辉雄,徐军妹,等.声触诊组织成像和定量(VTIQ)技术对TI-RADS4(a-b)级甲状腺结节良恶性鉴别应用价值初步探讨[J]. 影像诊断与介入放射学, 2015, 24(5): 369-375. WU Shu, XU Huixiong, XU Junmei, et al. Value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification(VTIQ)in the differential diagnosis of TI-RADS 4(a-b)thyroid noduleson ultrasound[J]. Journal of Diagnotic Imaging & Interventionanl Radiology, 2015, 24(5): 369-375.
[15] Ianculescua V, Ciolovana LM, Dunantb A, et al. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2014, 83(5): 773-777.
[16] 王敏, 崔可飞, 司彩凤. 定量剪切波弹性成像对乳腺癌假阴性诊断的分析[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(11): 974-976. WANG Min, CUI Kefei, SI Caifeng. Analysis of the false negative diagnosis of breast cancers by quantitative shear wave elastography[J]. Chinese J Ultrasound Med, 2014, 30(11): 974-976.
[17] Ianculescua V, Ciolovana LM, Dunantb A, et al. Added value of virtual touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2014, 83(5): 773-777.
[18] Golatta M, Martina MS, Harcosa A, et al. Normal breast tissue stiffness measured by a new ultrasound technique: virtual touch tissue imaging quantification(VTIQ)[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(11): 676-679.
[19] Golatta M, Martina MS, Harcosa A, et al. Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014: doi:10.1155/2014/960262.
[20] 唐力, 徐辉雄, 李建卫, 等. 声触诊组织成像定量剪切波弹性成像技术鉴别诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(12): 951-956. TANG Li, XU Huixiong, LI Jianwei, et al. Virtual touch tissue imaging quantification shear wave elastography for the differential diagnosis of breast lesions[J]. Chin J Med Ultrasound(Electronic Edition), 2015, 12(12): 951-956.
[21] 李小龙, 徐辉雄, 伯小皖, 等. 声触诊组织成像和定量技术对BI-RADS 4 类乳腺病灶良恶性的诊断价值[J]. 影像诊断与介入放射学, 2015, 24(4):290-293. LI Xiaolong, XU Huixiong, BO Xiaowan, et al. Novel technique of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification for the differential diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions[J]. Journal of Diagnotic Imaging & Interventionanl Radiology, 2015, 24(4): 290-293.
[22] 傅晓红, 沈燕, 刘淼, 等. 声触诊组织成像和定量技术鉴别并优化BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块的价值[J]. 中国临床医学, 2017, 24(2): 214-218. FU Xiaohong, SHEN Yan, LIU Miao, et al. Value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification for the differential diagnosis and optimization of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2017, 24(2): 214-218.
[23] 张杰, 隋秀芳, 王磊, 等. 声脉冲辐射力成像在新版BI-RADS分级诊断乳腺肿瘤中的价值[J]. 安徽医科大学学报, 2016, 51(11): 1684-1687.
[24] 杨舒萍, 吕国荣, 郑小云, 等. 不同弹性成像定量技术对乳腺肿瘤的诊断价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2016, 32(9): 780-782. YANG Shuping, LÜ Guorong, ZHENG Xiaoyun, et al. The value of different virtual touch imaging quantification in differential diagnosis of breast lesions[J]. Chinese J Ultrasound Med, 2016, 32(9): 780-782.
[25] Leong LC, Sim LS, Lee YS, et al. A prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of breast elastography versus conventional breast ultrasound[J]. Clin Radiol, 2010, 65(11): 887-894.
[26] 肖静, 李杰, 时丹丹, 等. 超声弹性成像面积比与Itoh评分法在乳腺病变诊断中的比较[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(6): 149-151. XIAO Jing, LI Jie, SHI Dandan, et al. Comparison of values of the area ratio and the Itoh scoring system with sonoelastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2011, 49(6): 149-151.

相关文章 15

[1]	徐平于国放李霞. 不同类型甲状腺上动脉PSV对Graves病与桥本氏甲状腺炎鉴别诊断的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 62-64.
[2]	王艳萍,王玉波,董林,唐娜,徐晴晴,郭广君,郭时金,杨丽梅,徐子贤,张浩天,张文勇,徐倩倩. 响应面优化超声辅助低共熔溶剂提取惠白菊总黄酮工艺[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(5): 29-41.
[3]	李懿原,马珊,李爱华,龙飞. 超声支气管镜引导下碘-125粒子植入治疗肺癌中央区淋巴结转移[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 26-34.
[4]	董向毅,刘昕,刘欣欣,徐亚瑄,赵琳丽,陶国伟. 盆腔深部子宫内膜异位症的超声评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(10): 34-42.
[5]	孙婧,杨瑞敏,王聪,张月,罗兵. 基于术前超声、炎症指标及超声影像组学联合模型预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 73-80.
[6]	卢晓颂,杨瑞敏,王义成,周海丰,罗兵,李晓宇,李娜娜. 含瘤周组织的超声影像组学在鉴别乳腺结节良恶性中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 90-98.
[7]	冯昌,郭岩,赵杰,赵鑫. 加速康复外科理念下超声引导区域阻滞在骨科手术中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 26-35.
[8]	李红梅,蔡敏,周立,姚欣雨,刘力. 不同膈肌超声功能指标在腹部手术后肺部并发症中的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 115-124.
[9]	于婷,李媛,吴梅. 超声诊断羊膜带综合征并胎头离断1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 122-124.
[10]	陈天杰,张晓华,王瑞霞,赵淑磊. 超声内镜引导下细针穿刺抽吸术诊断胰腺淋巴管瘤合并术后感染1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 121-124.
[11]	吴磊丽,蔡华丽,孙德胜,魏蔚霞. 超声引导穿刺硬化术联合地诺孕素治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 65-69.
[12]	徐帅娅,罗芳琼,巴晨曦,张鑫茹,马喆. 多模态超声对70例BI-RADS 4类乳腺病变的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 95-101.
[13]	盛璇,刘纪锋,张歌,尹虹,宋琳琳,王雯. 产前超声诊断胎儿肢根型点状软骨发育不良合并白内障1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(11): 121-124.
[14]	张英晨,赵帅,孙浩,毕文浩,吴志强,成小建,蒋立城. 局麻下非同步CT辅助联合超声定位微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石的效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(10): 46-50.
[15]	艾星子·艾里,郭铮宇,张晓霏. 子宫腺肌病高强度聚焦超声消融治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 36-42.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed