初次髋关节置换术后引流与否的Meta分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.757

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过Meta分析比较放置引流对髋关节置换术的疗效及安全性。方法计算机检索PubMed、EBSCO、The Cochrane Library、万方数据库、中国知网等中英文数据库,检索2000年1月至2015年8月关于髋关节置换术后引流与不引流的临床随机对照研究。按纳入、排除标准进行筛查和质量评估,采用RevMan 5.2软件进行Meta分析。结果纳入20个研究,2 270例患者,引流组1 134例,不引流组1 136例。Meta分析显示:与不引流组相比,髋关节置换术后引流不能显著减少患者感染率(RR=0.75,95%CI: 0.49~1.14,P =0.18)、血肿形成率(RR=0.98,95%CI: 0.25~3.91,P =0.98)、深静脉血栓(RR=2.56,95%CI: 0.86~7.68,P=0.09)、肺栓塞(RR=2.37,95%CI: 0.35~15.94,P=0.38)及疼痛,但显著增加患者输血率(RR=1.36,95%CI: 1.58,P<0.001)、输血量(WMD=0.64,95%CI: 0.21~1.07,P<0.05)及失血量(WMD=277.80, 95%CI: 118.88~436.73,P<0.05)。结论髋关节置换术后放置引流管与不放置相比无明显优势。

关键词: 疗效, Meta分析, 引流, 安全性, 髋关节置换

Abstract: Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of wound drainage in hip arthroplasty by meta-analysis. Methods The criteria for inclusion and exclusion were formulated. The following databases were searched, including PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, WanFang Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)for studies published during Jan. 2000 and Aug. 2015, and then the randomized trials on hip arthroplasty with wound drainage system and without drainage system were compared. Meta-analysis were conducted with Review Manager 5.2. Results A total of 20 studies involving 2 270 participants(1 134 drains and 1 136 without drains)were included in our meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of wound infections (RR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.49-1.14, P=0.18), wound hematomas(RR=0.98, 95%CI: 0.25-3.91, P=0.98), deep vein thrombosis (RR=2.56, 95%CI: 0.86-7.68, P=0.09), pulmonary embolism(RR=2.37, 95%CI: 0.35-15.94, P=0.38)or pain between the two groups. Our results demonstrated blood transfusion(RR=1.36, 95%CI: 1.18-1.58, P<0.001), transfusion unit(WMD=0.64, 95%CI: 0.21-1.07, P<0.05)and blood loss(WMD=277.80, 95%CI: 118.88-436.73, P<0.05)were more frequent in those who received drains. Conclusion The routine use of wound drainage for hip arthroplasty has no obvious advantages. However, there is a moderate possibility of selection bias and publication bias in this review. More samples and high-quality randomized trials are needed to increase the reliability of evidences.

Key words: Drainage, Safety, Hip arthroplasty, Effectiveness, Meta-analysis

中图分类号:

R681.6

徐闯,戚大春,李贤让,祖萌,李健,刘明廷. 初次髋关节置换术后引流与否的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(6): 43-49.

XU Chuang, QI Dachun, LI Xianrang, ZU Meng, LI Jian, LIU Mingting. Do we really need wound drainage in hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(6): 43-49.

参考文献

[1] Zhou X, Li J, Xiong Y, et al. Do we really need closed-suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis[J]. Int Orthop, 2013, 37(11):2109-2118.
[2] Li N, Li P, Liu M, et al. Comparison between autologous blood transfusion drainage and no drainage/closed-suction drainage in primary total hip arthroplasty:a meta-analysis[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2014, 134(11):1623-1631.
[3] Crevoisier XM, Reber P, Noesberger B. Is suction drainage necessary after total joint arthroplasty?[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1998, 117(3):121-124.
[4] Garvin KL, Konigsberg BS. Infection following total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011, 93(12):1167-1175.
[5] Matar WY, Jafari SM, Restrepo C, et al. Preventing infection in total joint arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(Supplement 2):36-46.
[6] Chen Z, Gao Y, Chen W, et al. Is wound drainage necessary in hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2014, 24(6):939-946.
[7] Niskanen RO, Korkala OL, Haapala J, et al. Drainage is of no use in primary uncomplicated cemented hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis:a prospective randomized study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2000, 15(5):567-569.
[8] Ravikumar KJ, Alwan T, Fordyce MJF, et al. Drainage versus non-drainage in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective randomised study[J]. Hip Int, 2001, 11(1):49-54.
[9] Mengal B, Aebi J, Rodriguez A, et al. A prospective randomized study of wound drainage versus non-drainage in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty[J]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 2001, 87(1):29-39.
[10] Widman J, Jacobsson H, Larsson SA, et al. No effect of drains on the postoperative hematoma volume in hip replacement surgery:a randomized study using scintigraphy[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 2002, 73(6):625-629.
[11] González DVA, Slullitel G, Vestri R, et al. No need for routine closed suction drainage in elective arthroplasty of the hip:a prospective randomized trial in 104 operations[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 2004, 75(1):30-33.
[12] Johansson T, Engquist M, Pettersson LG, et al. Blood loss after total hip replacement:a prospective randomized study between wound compression and drainage[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20(8):967-971.
[13] Walmsley PJ, Kelly MB, Hill RMF, et al. A prospective, randomised, controlled trial of the use of drains in total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2005, 87(10):1397-1401.
[14] Matsuda K, Nakamura S, Wakimoto N, et al. Drainage does not increase anemia after cementless total hip arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007, 458:101-105.
[15] Dora C, von Campe A, Mengiardi B, et al. Simplified wound care and earlier wound recovery without closed suction drainage in elective total hip arthroplasty. A prospective randomized trial in 100 operations[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2007, 127(10):919-923.
[16] 杨东, 张伟, 孙水, 等. 初次全髋关节置换术后引流管应用的必要性探讨[J]. 山东医药, 2008, 48(18):88-89.
[17] 陈巧玲, 全小明. 全髋关节置换术后引流放置的对比研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2009, 24(4):295-296.
[18] Strahovnik A, Fokter SK, Kotnik M. Comparison of drainage techniques on prolonged serous drainage after total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2010, 25(2):244-248.
[19] Cheung G, Carmont MR, Bing AJ, et al. No drain, autologous transfusion drain or suction drain? A randomised prospective study in total hip replacement surgery of 168 patients[J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2010, 76(5):619-627.
[20] 孙建辉. 加压包扎与负压引流预防全髋关节置换术后失血量效果比较[J]. 实用医药杂志, 2010, 27(3):202-204.
[21] Kleinert K, Werner C, Mamisch-Saupe N, et al. Closed suction drainage with or without re-transfusion of filtered shed blood does not offer advantages in primary non-cemented total hip replacement using a direct anterior approach[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2012, 132(1):131-136.
[22] von Roth P, Perka C, Dirschedl K, et al. Use of Redon drains in primary total hip arthroplasty has no clinically relevant benefits[J]. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(11):e1592-5.
[23] 陈科, 吕小华, 曾荣, 等. 初次髋关节置换后不放置引流管的安全性[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2012, 16(35):6494-6497.
[24] Zeng W, Zhou K, Zhou Z, et al. Comparison between Drainage and Non-drainage after Total Hip Arthroplasty in Chinese Subjects[J]. Orthop Surg, 2014, 6(1):28-32.
[25] 鲁娟, 陈珍珍, 洪雪佩, 等. 全髋关节置换术切口不引流的临床应用及效果观察[J]. 中国现代医生, 2014, 52(33):124-126.
[26] Koyano G, Jinno T, Koga D, et al. Is closed suction drainage effective in early recovery of hip joint function? Comparative evaluation in one-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(1):74-78.
[27] Snell S. On the suction-operation for cataract[J]. Br Med J, 1876, 1(802):595.
[28] Howe L. On the removal of hard cataract by suction[J]. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, 1893, 6:594.
[29] 翟生, 熊道海, 武忠炎. 切口闭合引流在髋关节置换术中作用的系统评价[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2010, 19(16):1959-1962.
[30] Zhang Q, Guo W, Zhang Q, et al. Comparison between closed suction drainage and nondrainage in total knee arthroplasty:a meta-analysis[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(8):1265-1272.
[31] Kim YH, Cho SH, Kim RS. Drainage versus nondrainage in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1998, 13(2):156-161.

相关文章 15

[1]	王兴山,张浩天,张云峰,周一新. 旋转铰链膝在复杂初次膝关节置换中的应用及临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 51-57.
[2]	罗淇,王霞,姜孟. 脑功能网络分析在失语症诊疗中的应用:病理机制分析、临床诊断与疗效评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 111-126.
[3]	苗壮,刘培来. 双柱活动平台单髁假体治疗膝关节前内侧骨关节炎的中期疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 62-67.
[4]	国科,陈绪军,郑宝石,施超,黄克力,曹勇,陈军,吴东凯,张晓慎,罗俊辉,申林,莫绪明,杨岷,王晓武,雷印胜,田茂州,王振东,孟自力,孙忠东,李有金,陆辉辉,孟春营,高峰,陈黔苏,郭能瑞,柳德斌,张楠,林宇,陈文生,宋保国,方智,王海晨,廖晓波,徐朝军. 快通道拔管在全动脉冠脉旁路移植术的多中心临床效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 26-32.
[5]	温学龙,刘安慧,陈经纬,吴梦婷,杨岷. 急性非ST抬高型心肌梗死行冠状动脉旁路移植手术时机Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 60-70.
[6]	王建旭,彭晓辉,丰浩田,安森博,董恣豪,黄子帅,刘喆,杨光. 应用内支撑技术辅助膝关节前交叉韧带全内重建术近期疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 22-27.
[7]	贾振存,吴晨睿,赵德龙,朱可嘉,丁森泰. 八宝丹胶囊联合米拉贝隆治疗女性膀胱过度活动症的有效性与安全性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(10): 72-79.
[8]	刘向荣,张新胜,杨荩冉,杨雪艳,刘钊,刘英华. ω-6/ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸比值对不同肿瘤发病风险的系统综述和Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 34-48.
[9]	甘琦晴,刘现虎,苟园,杨彬. 主动脉夹层合并截瘫诊断与治疗2例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 101-106.
[10]	孙晓丹,杨创. 多黏菌素B治疗ICU耐碳青霉烯类革兰阴性杆菌感染患者的效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 72-77.
[11]	冯绪强,高萍,孙超,陶琳,闫根全,冷冰. 替加环素治疗感染性疾病临床疗效及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 11-20.
[12]	林晓倩,封茂燕,牟正. 二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂的药学特点及临床应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 43-48.
[13]	马良,阎帅辰,李德强,姜淑伟,杨华璞,张元凯. 3例布氏杆菌引起的关节置换术后假体周围感染的诊断与治疗并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 90-95.
[14]	吴磊丽,蔡华丽,孙德胜,魏蔚霞. 超声引导穿刺硬化术联合地诺孕素治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 65-69.
[15]	邵长秀,贺青卿,庄晓璇,周鹏,李小磊,岳涛,徐婧,李陈钰,郭浩男,庄大勇. 甲状旁腺全切加微量腺体自体移植术治疗109例肾性继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的长期疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 42-48.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed