您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (8): 14-21.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2014.023

• 基础医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

宫颈腺癌细胞与宫颈鳞癌细胞蛋白表达差异的质谱分析

袁首道, 王凤琴, 张娇, 赵蔚明, 陈健行   

  1. 山东大学癌症研究中心, 山东大学医学院, 山东 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-10 修回日期:2014-07-01 出版日期:2014-08-10 发布日期:2014-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 陈健行。E-mail:jjc12345.chen@gmail.com E-mail:jjc12345.chen@gmail.com

Mass spectrometry analysis of proteins differentially expressed between adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma of the cervix

YUAN Shoudao, WANG Fengqin, ZHANG Jiao, ZHAO Weiming, Jason J. Chen   

  1. The Cancer Research Center of Shandong University, School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Received:2014-01-10 Revised:2014-07-01 Online:2014-08-10 Published:2014-08-10

摘要: 目的 通过蛋白组学比较宫颈腺癌细胞与宫颈鳞癌细胞之间的蛋白表达差异,探讨宫颈腺癌预后不良与侵袭/转移率较高的原因。方法 通过高效液相色谱与Orbitrap Elite/Velos Pro质谱联用对宫颈腺癌细胞系与宫颈鳞癌细胞系的蛋白组进行鉴定,然后通过生物信息学分析发现两种细胞系之间的差异表达蛋白。结果 从两种细胞系中,共鉴定到2 373种高可信度蛋白,其中有787种差异表达蛋白。在腺癌细胞系高表达的蛋白中,有10.8%的蛋白与提高产能代谢相关;在腺癌细胞系低表达的蛋白中,有14.3%的蛋白与调节细胞凋亡相关。此外,细胞骨架蛋白在腺癌细胞系中呈现低表达。结论 高产能代谢和低细胞凋亡可能是宫颈腺癌与鳞癌相比预后不良的重要原因,而细胞骨架不稳定性的增加可能导致腺癌更易发生侵袭/转移。

关键词: 质谱, 生物信息学, 非标定量, 蛋白组学, 宫颈癌

Abstract: Objective To explore the mechanism for poor prognosis and high invasion/metastasis of cervical adenocarcinoma, and to compare the protein expression profiles of cervical adenocarcinoma cell line and squamous carcinoma cell line. Methods Differentially expressed proteins between cervical adenocarcinoma HeLa cells and cervical squamous carcinoma SiHa cells were identified by high performance liquid chromatography-Orbitrap Elite/Velos Pro mass spectrometry and analyzed by bioinformatics approaches. Results A total of 2 373 high-credibility proteins were identified in the two cell lines, and 787 of them were expressed differentially. Notably, 10.8% of the up-regulated proteins in the adenocarcinoma HeLa cells were related to energy-producing metabolism. On the other hand, 14.3% of the down-regulated proteins in the adenocarcinoma HeLa cells were related to apoptosis. In addition, cytoskeletal proteins were also down-regulated in the adenocarcinoma cell line. Conclusion High energy-productivity and low apoptosis may be the important mechanisms underlining poor prognosis in cervical adenocarcinoma. Further more, reduced cell cytoskeletal structure stability may be responsible for the invasive nature of adenocarcinoma.

Key words: Proteomics, Cervical cancer, Mass spectrometry, Bioinformatics, Label-free quantification

中图分类号: 

  • R318.04
[1] Ferlay J, Shin H R, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008[J]. Int J Cancer, 2010, 127(12): 2893-2917.
[2] 曹泽毅.子宫颈癌治疗的变迁和思考[J].中华妇产科杂志, 2004, 39(3): 212-215.
[3] 王文艳.宫颈腺癌的诊治进展[J].蚌埠医学院学报, 2012, 37(12): 1548-1550.
[4] 董红,李双,王丹,等.宫颈腺癌与鳞癌生物学行为比较及宫颈腺癌预后相关因素分析[J],华中科技大学学报:医学版, 2010, 39(2): 254-257.
[5] Wiśniewski J R, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, et al. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis[J]. Nat Methods, 2009, 6(5): 359-362.
[6] Patel V J, Thalassinos K, Slade S E, et al. A Comparison of labelling and label-free mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches[J]. J Proteome Res, 2009, 8(7): 3752-3759.
[7] Huang da W, Sherman B T, Lempicki R A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources[J]. Nat Protoc, 2009, 4(1): 44-57.
[8] Lim R, Lappas M, Ahmed N, et al. 2D-PAGE of ovarian cancer: analysis of soluble and insoluble fractions using medium-range immobilized pH gradients[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2011, 406(3): 408-413.
[9] Hanahan D, Weinberg R A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation[J]. Cell, 2011, 144(5): 646-674.
[10] Vander Heiden M G, Cantley L C, Thompson C B. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation[J]. Science, 2009, 324(5930): 1029-1033.
[11] DeBerardinis R J. Is cancer a disease of abnormal cellular metabolism? New angles on an old idea[J]. Genet Med, 2008, 10(11): 767-777.
[12] Warburg O. On respiratory impairment in cancer cells[J]. Science, 1956, 124(3215): 269-270.
[13] 朱力,李宝珠.宫颈腺癌前驱病变的组织学及免疫组织化学观察[J].中华病理学杂志, 2001, 30(4): 249-252.
[14] 朱力,李宝珠.原发性宫颈腺癌的临床病理及免疫组织化学分析[J].中华病理学杂志, 1999, 28(4): 252-255.
[15] Evan G, Littlewood T. A matter of life and cell death[J]. Science, 1998, 281(5381): 1317-1322.
[16] 赵宗江. 细胞生物学[M]. 北京: 中国中医药出版社, 2004.
[17] 张红英,杨光华,步宏,等. 不同转移潜能的人体横纹肌肉瘤细胞系细胞骨架的研究[J].肿瘤, 2002, 22(4):291-293. (编辑:相峰)
[1] 张秋萍,朱慧志,吕川,夏咏琪,张秀. 基于生物信息学分析鉴定哮喘潜在的关键自噬和铁死亡相关基因[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 74-87.
[2] 王磊,常霄,王梓萌,李娇娇,崔书君,杨飞,朱月香. 瘤内及瘤周DCE-MRI影像组学对宫颈癌患者无进展生存期的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 45-54.
[3] 王静,刘晓菲,曾荣,许长娟,张锦涛,董亮. 基于机器学习算法鉴定哮喘的坏死性凋亡相关生物标志物[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 21-32.
[4] 刘超,刁婷婷,张红吉,刘红伟,杨永锐,李晓非. 飞行时间质谱在耐药结核病检测中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 61-67.
[5] 景凯,徐志伟,李乐平. 基于GEO数据库探究结直肠肿瘤相关基因及其功能[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(1): 21-30.
[6] 秦金金,曹辰媛,邢杰杰,安燕,黄煜湘. 子痫前期相关Siglec-6核心基因的预测及生物信息学分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(1): 31-37.
[7] 陈映均,刘同刚. 综合生物信息学分析鉴定乙型肝炎病毒相关肝细胞癌中异常甲基化修饰的差异表达基因[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(9): 101-117.
[8] 于丹凤,曹娟,于世佳,杜鲁涛,侯新国. 电化学发光法与液相色谱-串联质谱法评估糖尿病患者维生素D缺乏程度的效能比较与界值确定[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 90-95.
[9] 任慧欣,郑茂金,韩文灿,王超群,周云,裴冬生. 过氧化氢通过调控自噬增强宫颈癌的放疗敏感性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 22-28.
[10] 常晴,刘佳,曲爱林,杨咏梅. 利用数据库信息分析NAMPT与肝癌的病理特征和免疫浸润的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 26-36.
[11] 刘萌,侯丛哲,麻焕玉,张震,赵新蕊,张萍,朱琳. β-雌二醇对宫颈癌Hela细胞增殖的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 9-15.
[12] 刘腾,马迎春. 基于生物信息库病例分析ECT2在子宫内膜癌中的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 63-71.
[13] 李雁儒,李娟,李培龙,杜鲁涛,王传新. 胰腺癌不同进展期血清外泌体蛋白质组学分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(10): 33-41.
[14] 关恒云,刘岚铮,姜慧钰,白爱英,刘辉,赵小冬,高尚,李娜,阮师漫. 利用时间质谱检出312例6月龄内健康婴儿鼻咽部微生态菌群的分布特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(10): 49-56.
[15] 修德健,高正文,宋婷婷,崔楠,崔静,孙健平. 生物信息学方法分析与宫颈癌有关联的基因[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(10): 99-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!