3.0TMR腕关节软骨多序列成像实验研究

山东大学学报(医学版)

3.0TMR腕关节软骨多序列成像实验研究

亓恒新^1，2，孟祥水¹，郑金勇¹，李传福¹

1. 山东大学齐鲁医院影像中心，济南 250012；2. 章丘市人民医院影像科, 济南 250200

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-07-16 发布日期:2008-07-16
通讯作者: 李传福

3.0T multiple MR sequences imaging in wrist joint cartilage

QI Heng-xin ^1,2 , MENG Xiang-shui¹, ZHENG Jin-yong¹, LI Chuan-fu¹

1. Imaging Center, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012， China; 2． Department of Radiology, Zhangqiu People′s Hospital, Jinan 250200， China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-07-16 Published:2008-07-16
Contact: LI Chuan-fu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的〓〖HTK〗观察不同扫描序列及参数对腕关节软骨成像质量的影响，优化获取3D-FSPGR 序列最佳扫描参数。〖HTW〗方法〓〖HTK〗选择成人尸体腕关节3个，用GE SIGNA EXITE II 3.0T磁共振扫描仪检查,MRI序列包括自旋回波T1加权像（SE T1WI）、自旋回波T2加权像（SE T2WI）、质子密度加权像（PDWI）、脂肪抑制质子加权像（FS PDWI）及三维脂肪抑制扰像梯度回波像（3D-FSPGR），其中后者采用不同的TE时间［minimum(2.2ms)、minfull(6.6ms)、outphase(3.2ms)］结合不同翻转角（Flip，5°、10°、20°、30°、60°）进行扫描，分别得到每一序列的相同层面图像并计算不同参数成像关节软骨的信噪比（SNR）,软骨与骨髓、软骨与肌腱的对比噪声比（CNR）。〖HTW〗结果〓〖HTK〗① FS PD 序列、3D-FSPGR序列软骨信号-噪声比较高; 3D-FSPGR序列在TE/Flip (6.6ms/30°) 时具有最好的软骨与骨髓、软骨与肌腱的对比噪声比； ② PDWI、FS PDWI、及3D-FSPGR 序列间关节软骨的SNR对比，差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)；3D-FSPGR 序列软骨与骨髓、软骨与肌腱的CNR较PDWI、FS PDWI序列软骨与骨髓、软骨与肌腱的CNR差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01)；③ SE T1WI、SE T2WI序列关节软骨SNR、软骨与骨髓、软骨与肌腱的CNR均较低，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；与PDWI、FS PDWI、3D-FSPGR序列比较，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。〖HTW〗结论〓〖HTK〗3D-FSPGR 在TE/Flip (6.6ms/30°)时关节软骨显示最清晰，为关节软骨检查的最佳扫描序列；FS PDWI序列关节软骨显示较清晰，可作为关节软骨检查的常规扫描序列。

关键词: 参数优化, 软骨, 磁共振成像, 腕关节

Abstract:

Objective〓[WTBZ]To explore the effects of different scan sequences and parameters on image quality, and to obtain the optimal different 3D-FSPGR parametersequences. [WTHZ]Methods〓〖WTBZ〗Three normal cadaver wrists were imaged with GE SIGNA EXITE II 3.0T MR system. SE T1WI, FSE T2WI, PDWI, FS PDWI and 3D-FSPGR were determined, and the 3D-FSPGR sequences were achieved by varying flip angles (5,10,20,30, 60°) and combining each flip angle with different echo time(TE) ［minimum(2.2ms), minfull(6.6ms), inphase(2.2ms) and outphase(3.2ms)］. This gave the same layer imaging parameters for each scan sequence. Then the contrast-to-noise(C/N) ratios for cartilage versus bone marrow and the cartilage versus tendon were calculated. 〖WTHZ〗Results〓〖WTBZ〗① The highest CNR and better SNR between cartilage and adjacent tissues were found in the 3D-SPGR T1［TE/minfull(6.6ms), Flip(30′)］ sequence； ② The SNR of articular cartilage was not statistically different among PDWI, FS PDWI and 3D-FSPGR sequences； CNR of articular cartilage with adjacent tissues in the 3D-FSPGR sequence showed significant differences compared with the PDWI and the FS PDWI sequences. There were no significant differences in all groups of 3D-FSPGR sequences； ③ In the SE T1WI and the FSE T2WI sequences, both (signal to noise ratio)SNR of articular cartilage and(contrast to noise)CNR between cartilage and adjacent tissues were decreased but significant differences were not found between them（P＞0.05）. Compared with the other sequences, SE T1WI and FSE T2WI sequences showed statistical significances. 〖WTHZ〗Conclusions〓〖WTBZ〗Among the five sequences, the optimal parameters are the 3D-FSPGR TE/flipl(6.6ms/30°) sequence. The sequences have significant advantages compared with the other series in imaging normal cartilage of the wrist, and the 3D-FSPGR sequence is the optimal sequence for assessment of cartilage. As a conventional scan sequence, FS PDWI sequence can do a good job in imaging articular cartilage.

Key words: Wrist joint, Cartilage, Magnetic resonance imaging, Parameters-optimization

中图分类号:

R445.2

亓恒新,孟祥水,郑金勇,李传福 . 3.0TMR腕关节软骨多序列成像实验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(7): 668-671.

QI Heng-xin ,MENG Xiang-shui,ZHENG Jin-yong,LI Chuan-fu. 3.0T multiple MR sequences imaging in wrist joint cartilage[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2008, 46(7): 668-671.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	赵灿斌,邵将,管东辉,秦英,丁强,郭良,王伟伟,陈威,闫小龙,曾平. 木犀草素在炎症微环境下调控Wnt/β-catenin信号通路促进骨髓间充质干细胞成软骨分化的机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 11-22.
[2]	金晨曦,沈薇,李娜,孙建锋,杨驰,郭泾. ADDWoR关节镜下盘复位术盘-髁运动的定量分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 54-61.
[3]	马志虎,于晓凤,孙玉亮,王刚,裴艳涛,陈斌,史安浩,乔丽,朱磊. 加速康复外科综合治疗在三角纤维软骨复合体损伤患者围术期中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 28-35.
[4]	巩洁,于淼,李秀勇,陈颖,徐倩茹,李梅娟,李艺彤,刘秀美. 基于上转换纳米粒子多糖探针的构建及其在肿瘤成像中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 18-26.
[5]	刘晶晶,庞婧,赵晓丹,林昕,付敏,陈静静. 基于乳腺X线摄影及DCE-MRI机器学习模型预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗后病理完全缓解:双中心研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 60-72.
[6]	刘小文,曹永泉,侯明源,于德新. EOB-MRI多定量参数对肝胆期乏血供低信号结节进展风险的评估价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 31-39.
[7]	吴思雨,沈业隆,王锡明. 影像组学预测原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的Ki-67标记指数[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 67-72.
[8]	樊荣,李彬彬,马晓丽,汪运山,郏雁飞. 胃癌中DEC2、HIF-2α的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 12-18.
[9]	靳新娟,左立平,邓展昊,李安宁,于德新. MRI影像组学对135例肝癌耐药蛋白PFKFB3的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 79-86.
[10]	王磊,张帅,刘钢,由胜男,王植,朱珊,陈超,马信龙,杨强. MRI诊断140例腰椎智能网络自动检测分型MCs方法的比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 71-79.
[11]	杨咏青,赵鹏,汪玉,马文静,田迷迷,程亚旎,祖璐,林祥涛. 细胞外容积分数对62例不同病理类型肺癌的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 88-94.
[12]	靳新娟,蔡大幸,范金蕾,邓展昊,李楠,于德新,李安宁. 显微镜高分辨率MRI鉴别皮肤良、恶性局灶隆起性结节[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(12): 51-61.
[13]	盛璇,刘纪锋,张歌,尹虹,宋琳琳,王雯. 产前超声诊断胎儿肢根型点状软骨发育不良合并白内障1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(11): 121-124.
[14]	李磊,卢群山,张宝庆,韩凯飞,郑通,李炳龙,刘培来. 胫骨高位截骨患者术前软骨损伤与术后VAS评分的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(10): 69-73.
[15]	赵恩举,赵硕,郭云亮,王锡明. 282例颈动脉钙化与脑小血管病MRI总负荷评分的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(1): 38-44.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed