您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版)

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

流动敏感交互反转恢复与MR磁敏感对比剂动态增强技术评价颅内肿瘤血流灌注的对照研究

张凯1,李传福1,刘影2,冯德朝1,孟祥水1,郑金勇1,丛培新1   

  1. 1. 山东大学齐鲁医院放射科, 山东 济南250012; 2. 安徽省立医院放射科, 安徽 合肥 230001
  • 收稿日期:2006-07-19 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-06-24 发布日期:2007-06-24
  • 通讯作者: 张凯

Comparison of flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery and dynamic susceptibility constrast MR perfusion technique in evaluating intracranial tumor vascularization

ZHANG Kai1,LI Chuan-fu1, LIU Ying2,FENG De-chao1,MENG Xiang-shui1,ZHENG Jin-yong1,CONG Pei-xin1   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University;2. Department of Radiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230001
  • Received:2006-07-19 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-06-24 Published:2007-06-24
  • Contact: ZHANG Kai

摘要: 目的:比较流动敏感交互反转恢复(FAIR)与MR磁敏感对比剂动态增强(DSCMR)技术评价颅内肿瘤血流灌注的价值。方法:对33例颅内肿瘤患者行FAIR和DSCMR脑灌注成像,分别测定FAIR值和脑血容量(CBV)值,对其进行相关分析,并比较良、恶性胶质瘤之间FAIR值与CBV值之间的差异。结果:FAIR值与CBV值之间呈正线性相关(r=0.450,P=0.009)。良性胶质瘤CBV值平均为164.31±109.20,恶性胶质瘤的CBV值平均为365.12±177.41,两者之间差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.213,P=0.027)。良性胶质瘤的FAIR值平均为37.83±46.07,恶性胶质瘤的FAIR值平均为101.90±103.83,两者之间差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.021,P=0.043)。结论:FAIR技术无需对比剂,所提供的血流灌注信息与DSCMR相符,有较大的临床应用潜力。

关键词: 中枢神经系统肿瘤 , 血液灌注, 自旋标记物, 磁共振成像

Abstract: Objective: To compare the effects of flowsensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) and dynamic susceptibility contrast MR (DSCMR) perfusion technique in evaluating intracranial tumor vascularization. Methods: Thirtythree patients suffering from intracranial tumors were determined by using the FAIR and DSCMR perfusion techniques. The values of FAIR and CBV were recorded and analyzed by the linear correlation analysis method. The values of FAIR and CBV between benign and malignant gliomas were statistically analyzed. Results: There was a positive linear correlation between FAIR and CBV(r=0.450,P=0.009). The difference of the CBV value between benign and malignant gliomas was statistical (Z=-2.213,P=0.027). So was that of the FAIR value (Z=-2.021,P=0.043). Conclusion: FAIR does not need a contrast agent and could offer some comparable perfusion information to DSCMR technique to clinicians, so it has the potential to be clinically applied.

Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging, Hemoperfusion, Spin labels, Central nervous system neoplasms

中图分类号: 

  • R445.2
[1] 金晨曦,沈薇,李娜,孙建锋,杨驰,郭泾. ADDWoR关节镜下盘复位术盘-髁运动的定量分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 54-61.
[2] 刘晶晶,庞婧,赵晓丹,林昕,付敏,陈静静. 基于乳腺X线摄影及DCE-MRI机器学习模型预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗后病理完全缓解:双中心研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 60-72.
[3] 刘小文,曹永泉,侯明源,于德新. EOB-MRI多定量参数对肝胆期乏血供低信号结节进展风险的评估价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 31-39.
[4] 吴思雨,沈业隆,王锡明. 影像组学预测原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的Ki-67标记指数[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 67-72.
[5] 靳新娟,左立平,邓展昊,李安宁,于德新. MRI影像组学对135例肝癌耐药蛋白PFKFB3的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 79-86.
[6] 王磊,张帅,刘钢,由胜男,王植,朱珊,陈超,马信龙,杨强. MRI诊断140例腰椎智能网络自动检测分型MCs方法的比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 71-79.
[7] 杨咏青,赵鹏,汪玉,马文静,田迷迷,程亚旎,祖璐,林祥涛. 细胞外容积分数对62例不同病理类型肺癌的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 88-94.
[8] 靳新娟,蔡大幸,范金蕾,邓展昊,李楠,于德新,李安宁. 显微镜高分辨率MRI鉴别皮肤良、恶性局灶隆起性结节[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(12): 51-61.
[9] 赵恩举,赵硕,郭云亮,王锡明. 282例颈动脉钙化与脑小血管病MRI总负荷评分的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(1): 38-44.
[10] 陶国伟,王芳,董向毅,徐亚瑄,赵琳丽,胡蓓蓓. 子宫腺肌病的超声与MRI诊断及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 56-65.
[11] 冯宝民,王舟,徐晗,李佳存,于乔文,修建军. 抗髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白IgG抗体相关疾病临床及影像特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 45-50.
[12] 左立平,蒋丰洋,周斌彬,范金蕾,梁永锋,邓展昊,于德新. 术前MRI在预测169例肝细胞肝癌微血管侵犯及早期复发的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 89-95.
[13] 刘学业,李齐明,唐弘毅,徐秋平,陈文倩,郭泾. 年轻成人颞下颌关节髁突体积、表面积与关节盘矢向位置的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 117-121.
[14] 张高瑞,张玉婷,赵雨萱,王方青,于德新. MnFe2O4@CNS纳米探针在胰腺癌诊疗一体化中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 48-55.
[15] 宋珍珍,孙小玲,李海鸥,王芳,张冉,于德新. 120例胶质瘤及瘤周水肿MRI影像组学在评估肿瘤复发中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 53-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!