您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (7): 50-54.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2026.0066

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

支气管舒张试验评估371例哮喘患者不同肺功能阻塞程度

李彩瑜1,李岩1,许祥玉2   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁第二医院 1.呼吸与危重症医学科;2.心血管内科, 山东 济南 250033
  • 出版日期:2026-07-10 发布日期:2026-07-21
  • 通讯作者: 李岩. E-mail:469240086@qq.com许祥玉. E-mail:xuyulel@126.com

Bronchodilation testing to assess the different degrees of pulmonary function obstruction in 371 patients with asthma

LI Caiyu1, LI Yan1, XU Xiangyu2   

  1. 1. Department of Respiratory and Critcal Care Medicine;
    2. Department of Cardiology, The Second Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-07-21

摘要: 目的 探讨支气管舒张试验(bronchodilation test, BDT)在不同通气功能障碍阻塞程度评估中的价值。 方法 本研究为回顾性队列分析,纳入2022年1月1日至2024年12月31日呼吸与危重症医学科确诊的371例哮喘患者,其中男202例、女169例。根据基线一秒率,即第一秒用力呼气容积占用力肺活量的比例(forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio, FEV1/FVC%)和第一秒用力呼气容积(forced expiratory volume in one second, FEV1)占预计值的百分比分为轻度组(FEV1%≥70%,n=201)、中度组(FEV1%为50%~69%,n=93)和重度组(FEV1%<49%,n=77)。所有患者行BDT(吸入沙丁胺醇400 μg),记录舒张前后肺功能指标(FEV1、FVC、FEV1/FVC%)。 结果 中度组(80.6%)和重度组(79.2%)阳性率显著高于轻度组(36.8%)(χ2=48.865, P<0.001; χ2=40.077,P<0.001)。按年龄分为轻度组50(37,60)岁,中度组56(46,65.5)岁、重度组53(44,63)岁,Kruskal-Wallis H检验显示组间差异有统计学意义(H=7.202, P=0.027)。男性占比54.4%,女性占比45.6%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=5.904,P=0.052)。轻度组的FEV1改善量高于FVC(190 mL vs. 130 mL),差异有统计学意义(Z=-4.015, P<0.001);重度组FVC改善量高于FEV1(340 mL vs. 200 mL),差异有统计学意义(Z=-4.297, P<0.001)。舒张后轻度组、中度组的FEV1/FVC%明显升高(P<0.001)。重度组FEV1/FVC%舒张后下降(P<0.001)。 结论 相较于哮喘轻度阻塞患者,中度和重度阻塞患者的BDT阳性率更高,年龄更大。轻中度阻塞的哮喘患者舒张试验以FEV1改善为主,重度阻塞患者FVC改善明显。

关键词: 哮喘, 肺功能, 支气管舒张试验, 第一秒用力呼气容积, 用力肺活量, 一秒率

Abstract: Objective To explore the value of the bronchodilation test(BDT)in assessing the severity of obstruction in the different degrees of pulmonary function obstruction. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 371 patients(202 males, 169 females)diagnosed with asthma at the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2024. Based on baseline FEV1/FVC%(forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio)and FEV1%(forced expiratory volume in one second)predicted values, patients were stratified into three groups: the mild group(FEV1%≥70%, n=201), the moderate group(FEV1% being 50%-69%, n=93), and the severe group(FEV1%<49%, n=77). All patients underwent the BDT(inhaled salbutamol 400 μg), and lung function parameters(FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC%)were recorded before and after BDT. Results Positivity rates were significantly higher in the moderate(80.6%)and severe(79.2%)groups compared to the mild group(36.8%)(χ2=48.865,P<0.001; χ2=40.077, P<0.001). The patients in the mild, moderate and severe groups were 50(37, 60), 56(46, 65.5), and 53(44, 63)years old, respectively, with a statistically significant difference among groups(H=7.202, P=0.027). The cohort comprised 54.4% males and 45.6% females, with no statistically significant difference in sex distribution(χ2=5.904, P=0.052). In the mild group, the improvement in FEV1(190 mL )was significantly greater that that in FVC(130 mL), Z=-4.015, P<0.001. In the severe group, the improvement in FVC(340 mL)was significantly greater than that in FEV1(200 mL),Z=-4.297, P<0.001. After the bronchodilation, FEV1/FVC% increased significantly in both the mild and moderate groups(P<0.01). The FEV1/FVC% decreased in the severe group(P<0.001). Conclusion Compared with patients with mild asthma-related airway obstruction, those with moderate and severe obstruction had higher BDT positivity rates and were older. In patients with mild to moderate obstruction, the dilation test primarily results in improvement in FEV1, whereas patients with severe obstruction show significant improvement in FVC.

Key words: Asthma, Lung function, Bronchodilation test, Forced expiratory volume in one second, Forced vital capacity, Forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio

中图分类号: 

  • R562.2
[1] 周妍, 张旻. 中国《支气管哮喘防治指南(2024年版)》解读[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2025, 24(4): 415-422. Zhou Yan, Zhang Min. Interpretation of Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Bronchial Asthma(2024 Edition)[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2025, 24(4): 415-422.
[2] Louis R,Satia I,Ojanguren I,et al.European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in adults[J]. Eur Respir J, 2022, 60(3): 2101585. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01585-2021
[3] 尹硕淼, 陈远彬, 郑燕婵, 等. 不同肺功能检查方式在支气管哮喘指南中的诊断价值比较[J]. 中国全科医学, 2018, 21(32): 3911-3914. Yin Shuomiao, Chen Yuanbin, Zheng Yanchan, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value in different pulmonary function tests in the guidelines of bronchial asthma [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2018, 21(32): 3911-3914.
[4] 林琳, 邹映雪. 用力呼气肺功能联合BDT在儿童咳嗽变异性哮喘中的临床应用价值[J]. 中国处方药, 2021, 19(9): 11-14. Lin Lin, Zou Yingxue. Clinical application value of forced expiratory pulmonary function test combined with BDT in children with cough variant asthma[J]. Journal of China Prescription Drug, 2021, 19(9): 11-14.
[5] Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention, 2024[J]. Eur Respir J, 2024, 63: 1-180. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.000012024
[6] Graham B L, Steenbruggen I. Reply to Townsend: The American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society 2019 spirometry statement and occupational spirometry testing in the United States [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2020, 201(8): 1012. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201912-2530LE
[7] 国家呼吸系统疾病临床医学研究中心, 呼吸疾病国家重点实验室, 国家呼吸医学中心, 等. 呼吸系统疾病标准数据集[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2021: 129.
[8] 李岩, 牛瑞, 王超超. 122例哮喘患者舒张试验结果分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2020, 58(11): 81-84. Li Yan, Niu Rui, Wang Chaochao. Analysis of the bronchodilator test of 122 patients with asthma [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2020, 58(11): 81-84.
[9] Sorkness R L, Wenzel S E, Busse W W, et al. Lung function in adults with stable but severe asthma: air trapping and incomplete reversal of obstruction with bronchodilation[J]. J Appl Physiol, 2007, 102(6): 2171-2178.
[10] Louis R, Bougard N, Guissard F, et al. Bronchodilation test with inhaled salbutamol versus bronchial methacholine challenge to make an asthma diagnosis: do they provide the same information? [J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2020, 8(2): 618-625.
[11] 周妍, 张旻. 我国轻度支气管哮喘诊治现状及对策[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2023, 22(6): 520-526. Zhou Yan, Zhang Min. Current status and countermea-sures of diagnosis and treatment of mild bronchial asthma in China[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2023, 22(6): 520-526.
[12] 卓玛潘多. 不同肺功能检查在支气管哮喘诊断中的应用价值[J]. 西藏科技, 2022(6): 53-56.
[13] 马梓文, 张丽, 邓稞, 等. 轻中度哮喘支气管舒张试验预测模型构建研究[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2023, 22(3): 189-196. Ma Ziwen, Zhang Li, Deng Ke, et al. Construction of models in predicting the result of bronchodilator reversibility test in mild to moderate asthmatics [J]. Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2023, 22(3): 189-196.
[14] Schneider A, Schwarzbach J, Faderl B, et al. Whole-body plethysmography in suspected asthma: a prospective study of its added diagnostic value in 302 patients [J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2015, 112(24): 405-411.
[15] Schneider A, Brunn B, Hapfelmeier A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of FeNO in asthma and predictive value for inhaled corticosteroid responsiveness: a prospective, multicentre study[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2022, 50: 101533. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101533
[16] Zeng G S, Chen H, Chen L C, et al. Clinical implications of concentration of alveolar nitric oxide in asthmatic and non-asthmatic subacute cough[J]. J Breath Res, 2021, 16(1). DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/ac361b
[17] Amorim M M, Araruna A, Caetano L B, et al. Nasal eosinophilia: an indicator of eosinophilic inflammation in asthma[J]. Clin Exp Allergy, 2010, 40(6): 867-874.
[18] Tosca M A, Ciprandi G, Silvestri M. Nasal inflammation and reversible bronchial obstruction in asymptomatic allergic children[J]. Clin Exp Allergy, 2010, 40(10): 1581-1582.
[19] Brunn B, Hapfelmeier A, Jörres R, et al. Development of a diagnostic score using FeNO and symptoms to predict asthma[J]. Respir Med, 2023, 215: 107299. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107299
[20] 徐丰铭, 彭娟, 宋琳, 等. 支气管舒张试验阴性哮喘急性发作患者的临床特征分析[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2025, 30(8): 1150-1156. Xu Fengming, Peng Juan, Song Lin, et al. Clinical characteristics analysis of patients with acute exacerbation of asthma with negative bronchial dilation test [J]. Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, 2025, 30(8): 1150-1156.
[21] Rhoads S L, Seluk L, Wechsler M E. Asthma therapeutics: past, present, and future[J]. Pharmacol Rev, 2025, 77(4): 100062. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmr.2025.100062
[22] 柏海蓉, 柴培培, 赵燕, 等. 1990—2021年我国哮喘疾病负担变化及趋势分析[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2024, 43(12): 43-46. Bai Hairong, Chai Peipei, Zhao Yan, et al. Analysis of the disease burden and trend of asthma in China from 1990 to 2021 [J]. Chinese Health Economics, 2024, 43(12): 43-46.
[23] Radzikowska U, Golebski K. Sex hormones and asthma: the role of estrogen in asthma development and severity[J]. Allergy, 2023, 78(3): 620-622.
[24] Shan R, Newcomb D C. Sex bias in asthma prevalence and pathogenesis[J]. Front Immunol, 2018, 9: 2997. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02997
[25] Zhang G, Basna R, Mathur M B, et al. Exogenous female sex steroid hormones and new-onset asthma in women: a matched case-control study[J]. BMC Med, 2023, 21(1): 337. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03038-8
[26] Zhang W Y, Zhang S D, Hua L J, et al. Targeted knockdown of epithelial estrogen receptor α to mitigate ferroptosis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in eosinophilic asthma [J]. ACS Nano, 2025, 19(22): 21105-21117.
[1] 张秋萍,朱慧志,吕川,夏咏琪,张秀. 基于生物信息学分析鉴定哮喘潜在的关键自噬和铁死亡相关基因[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 74-87.
[2] 张政,王建伟,杨玉娟,张宇,宋西成. 哮喘儿童2008及2019年免疫球蛋白E变化及相关危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 32-36.
[3] 曹洛菲,王珊珊,王金荣,姜荷云,苗瑜,马光增. 哮喘发作期FeNO升高儿童肺功能舒张试验的特点分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 38-44.
[4] 张如岗,殷悦,李岱云,段梦琦,刘桂莲,王瑛. 支原体感染对成人肺功能及呼出气一氧化氮的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 71-75.
[5] 孙丛丛,崔文静,张锦涛,张东,刘晓菲,潘云,亓倩,徐嘉蔚,曾荣,郭红喜,董亮. 铁死亡在支气管哮喘气道重塑中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 1-9.
[6] 王静,刘晓菲,曾荣,许长娟,张锦涛,董亮. 基于机器学习算法鉴定哮喘的坏死性凋亡相关生物标志物[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 21-32.
[7] 闫金燕,杨春,李雷,吴福玲,焦永莉,张晓蔚,李晶,张瑞珍,王磊,马香. 山东省儿童百日咳感染与哮喘的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 33-41.
[8] 丁伊人,刘婉莹,姚蕾,姚欣. 大环内酯类抗生素治疗哮喘的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 21-27.
[9] 王婷,张丽,王刚. 神经心理性哮喘[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 28-34.
[10] 徐芳,田国雄,孙倍倍,陈馨怡,陈高莹,张睿琦,应颂敏,吴妙莲,张超,吴优倩. 重度哮喘的生物与细胞疗法研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 35-42.
[11] 石硕川,曾荣,张锦涛,张东,潘云,刘晓菲,许长娟,王莹,董亮. 基于生物信息学探索支气管哮喘中的潜在差异免疫基因和免疫浸润特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 43-53.
[12] 张锦涛,董亮. 气道上皮及其源性细胞因子与哮喘:思考与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 1-6.
[13] 徐新军,邵丽婷,陈颖,刘会芳,杨玉娟,张宇,王浛睿,宋西成. SYN008与Xolair®对过敏性哮喘小鼠治疗作用效果比较:炎症与重塑[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 1-10.
[14] 浩妍,崔丽梅,陈颖,杨玉娟,宋西成. 代谢组学在气道炎症性疾病中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(12): 117-124.
[15] 李瑞建,张建波,边圆,刘淑琴,刘艳伟. 国产体外膜肺氧合治疗急性呼吸循环衰竭8例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(1): 63-70.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!