JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES) ›› 2017, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (4): 71-75.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.692

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Tigecycline in treating ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients

MENG Wei1, WU Dawei1, SHAN Tichao1, ZHANG Fan1, GUO Haipeng1, LIU Yu1,2, DING Shifang1, ZHAI Qian1   

  1. 1. Intensive Care Unit, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Infection Management Office, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-06-10 Online:2017-04-10 Published:2017-04-10

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of tigecycline in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia(VAP). Methods A prospective study was conducted based on critically ill patients with VAP in Intensive Care Unit of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University during Jan 1, 2011 and May 31, 2013. All patients accepted intravenous infusion of tigecycline with a first dose of 100 mg and then 50 mg every 12 h. The course was directed by medical advice. The clinical and bacterial efficacy and safety were evaluated at the end of the therapy. Results A total of 37 patients were included at the beginning, and 33 patients were evaluable at the endpoint. The total clinical success rates was 60.6%. Thirty-six multidrug-resistance bacteria strains were detected in specimens obtained from all patients before the start of tigecycline treatment, and all these strains were sensitive to tigecycline. The total clearance rate was 61% while Acinetobacter baumannii predominated a 60% clearance rate. Adverse reactions were well tolerated with predominantly digestive symptoms, and all responded to symptomatic treatment afterwards. Six patients died within 28 days. Conclusion Tigecycline proved to be effective and safe for critically ill patients with VAP.

Key words: Tigecycline, Critical Illness, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

CLC Number: 

  • R563.1
[1] 管向东, 刘紫锰. 2013《呼吸机相关性肺炎诊断、预防和治疗指南》—目标性治疗的解读[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2014, 94(5): 333-334.
[2] 谭建龙, 张卫东, 柳威, 等. 替加环素治疗多或泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎的疗效观察[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2013, 12(6): 581-585. TAN Jianlong, ZHANG Weidong, LIU Wei, et al. Clinical experience with tigecycline in the treatment of multi/extensively drug-resistant acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia[J]. Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2013, 12(6): 581-585.
[3] Cai Y, Wang R, Liang B, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of tigecycline for treatment of infectious disease[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2011, 55(3): 1162-1172.
[4] Eckmann C, Heizmann WR, Leitner E, et al. Prospective, non-interventional, multi-centre trial of tigecycline in the treatment of severely ill patients with complicated infections: new insights into clinical results and treatment practice[J]. Chemotherapy, 2011, 57(4): 275-284.
[5] 中华医学会重症医学分会. 呼吸机相关性肺炎诊断、预防和治疗指南(2013)[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2013, 52(6): 524-543.
[6] 《抗菌药物临床试验技术指导原则》写作组. 抗菌药物临床试验技术指导原则[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2014(9): 844-856.
[7] Bhavnani SM, Rubino CM, Hammel JP. et al. Pharmacological and patient-specific response determinants in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia treated with tigecycline[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2012, 56(2): 1065-1072.
[8] 朱任媛, 张小江, 杨启文, 等. 卫生部全国细菌耐药监测网2011年ICU来源细菌耐药监测[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2012, 28(12): 905-909. ZHU Renyuan, ZHANG Xiaojiang, YANG Qiwen, et al. Ministry of health national antimicrobial resistance investigation net annual report of 2011: surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from intensive care units[J]. The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2012, 28(12): 905-909.
[9] Wu Yuhong, Shao Zonghong. High-dosage tigecycline for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia[J]. Chin Med J(Engl), 2014, 127(17): 3199.
[10] Ellis-Grosse EJ, Babinchak T, Dartois N, et al. Tigecycline 300 cSSSI study group; Tigecycline 305 cSSSI study group. The efficacy and safety of tigecycline in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections: results of 2 double-blind phase 3 comparison studies with vancomycin-aztreonam[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2005, 41(5): 341-353.
[11] Stein GE, Babinchak T. Tigecycline: an update[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2013, 75(4): 331-336.
[12] Tanaseanu C, Bergallo C, Teglia O, et al. Integrated results of 2 phase 3 studies comparing tigecycline and levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2008, 61(3): 329-338.
[13] Moya Cordero P, Ruiz-Aragón J, Molina Linde JM, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of tigecycline for treatment of respiratory tract infections. Systematic review of literature[J]. Revista Chilena De Infectologia, 2013, 30(6): 591-597.
[14] Shin JA, Chang YS, Kim HJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of tigecycline in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection[J]. Yonsei Med, 2012, 53(5): 974-984.
[15] Montravers P, Dupont H, Bedos JP, et al. Tigecycline use in critically ill patients: a multicentre prospective observational study in the intensive care setting[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2014, 40(7): 988-997.
[16] Cai Y, Bai N, Liu X, et al. Tigecycline: Alone or in combination?[J]. Infect Dis(Lond), 2016, 48(7): 491-502.
[1] LI An, CHEN Fengzhe, WANG Zheng, MENG Xiangzhu, XU Nannan, MA Lixian. In vitro synergy testing of sitafloxacin, cefoperazone-sulbactam and polymyxin E against extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2017, 55(4): 82-85.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!