Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (6): 57-63.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.0034

Previous Articles    

Application value of modified S.T.O.N.E score in predicting the stone-free rate of one-stage renal FURL

SU Wengui1, XU Hailong2, YANG Meng3, CUI Wei3, NIE Qingsheng3   

  1. 1.Clinical College of Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Urology, Peking University Medical Zibo Hospital, Zibo 255051, Shandong, China;
    3. Department of Urology, Zibo Central Hospital, Zibo 255036, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-06-17

Abstract: Objective To explore the modified S.T.O.N.E scoring system in predicting the stone-free rate(SFR)of one-stage renal flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy(FURL). Methods The clinical data of 93 cases undergoing FURL during Jan. 2018 and Aug. 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the modified S.T.O.N.E score, the affected kidneys were divided into simple group(5-7 points, n=31), intermediate group(8-11 points, n=52)and complex group(12-17 points, n=10), and the 1-month SFR after surgery among the three groups were compared. The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve of the modified S.T.O.N.E, SHA.LIN, S.T.O.N.E and RUSS scores were plotted to compare the differences in the area under the ROC curve(AUC). Results The intraoperative and 1-month SFR were 74.19% and 80.65%, respectively(P=0.0412). The modified S.T.O.N.E score showed the intraoperative SFR in the simple, intermediate and complex group were 96.77%, 69.23% and 30.00%, respectively; the 1-month SFR were 96.77%, 80.77% and 30.00%, respectively. There were significant differences in the intraoperative and postoperative SFR in the intermediate group(P=0.041 2), while there was no difference between the simple and complex groups(P>0.05). Compared with the SHA.LIN and S.T.O.N.E scores, the modified S.T.O.N.E score showed no difference in AUC for predicting intraoperative SFR(all P>0.05); but there was difference compared with the RUSS score(P=0.007 2). There was no significant difference in the AUC among the modified S.T.O.N.E score, SHA.LIN, S.T.O.N.E and RUSS score in predicting 1-month SFR(all P>0.05). Conclusion Among the four renal stone scoring systems, the modified S.T.O.N.E score has the highest accuracy in predicting SFR during one-stage renal FURL and 1-month SFR after surgery, and it is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, Kidney stones, Modified S.T.O.N.E score, Stone-free rate

CLC Number: 

  • R692.4
[1] Lu P, Chen K, Wang Z, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy using 365 mum holmium laser for nephrolithiasis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial [J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(2): 481-487.
[2] 陶水祥, 张关富, 李俊龙, 等. 一期输尿管软镜碎石取石术(附96例报告)[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2020, 20(2): 145-147. TAO Shuixiang, ZHANG Guanfu, LI Junlong, et al. One-stage flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: report of 96 cases [J]. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2020, 20(2): 145-147.
[3] 朱澄村, 程帆, 饶婷, 等. 输尿管软镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石的疗效和安全性[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2020(1): 41-42. ZHU Chengcun, CHENG Fan, RAO Ting, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery for treatment of upper urinary calculi [J]. Chinese Journal of Urology, 2020(1): 41-42.
[4] 李武学, 许长宝, 赵兴华, 等. 改良RUSS肾结石评分预测输尿管软镜术后结石清除率的可行性[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2019(11): 843-844. LI Wuxue, XU Changbao, ZHAO Xinghua, et al. Feasibility study of modified RUSS to predict the stone free rate after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy [J]. Chinese Journal of Urology, 2019(11): 843-844.
[5] 苑海春, 种铁, 薛玉泉, 等. S.T.O.N.E评分系统及其改良对经皮肾镜碎石取石术后结石清除状态的预测研究[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2019, 25(8): 35-41. YUAN Haichun, CHONG Tie, XUE Yuquan, et al. Predictive value of S.T.O.N.E scoring system and its improvement on stone clearance after percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J]. Chinese Journal of Endoscopy, 2019, 25(8): 35-41.
[6] 王金河. 结石CT值对输尿管软镜钬激光清除单发肾结石效果的预测作用[J]. 应用激光, 2019, 39(5): 905-908. WANG Jinhe. Predictive value of CT value of renal calculi on flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy [J]. Journal of Applied Laser, 2019, 39(5): 905-908.
[7] Wu WJ, Okeke Z. Current clinical scoring systems of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes [J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2017, 14(8): 459-469.
[8] Okhunov Z, Friedlander JI, George AK, et al. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi [J]. Urology, 2013, 81(6): 1154-1159.
[9] 杨旭东, 王朝明, 林琳, 等. 改良RUSS评分、S.T.O.N.E.评分、CROES评分预测肾结石术后结石清除的价值对比[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 36(6): 439-443. YANG Xudong, WANG Chaoming, LIN Lin, et al. Comparison among modified RUSS score, S.T.O.N.E. score and CROES score in predicting stone clearance after operation for renal calculi [J]. Journal of Clinical Urology, 2021, 36(6): 439-443.
[10] 刘余庆, 郝一昌, 刘可, 等. 改良S.T.O.N.E.肾结石评分系统对输尿管软镜碎石术后一期结石清除率的评估价值[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2018, 43(4): 516-522. LIU Yuqing, HAO Yichang, LIU Ke, et al. Evaluation of modified S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system for predicting the one-phase stone-free rate of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2018, 43(4): 516-522.
[11] Molina WR, Kim FJ, Spendlove J, et al. The S.T.O.N.E. Score: a new assessment tool to predict stone free rates in ureteroscopy from pre-operative radiological features [J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2014, 40(1): 23-29.
[12] 黄建林, 吴克, 廖勇, 等. 改良S.T.O.N.E.结石评分系统在预测输尿管软镜碎石术后清石率中的应用[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 34(8): 617-620. HUANG Jianlin, WU Ke, LIAO Yong, et al. The application of modified S.T.O.N.E score in the treatment of upper urinary calculi with flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy [J]. Journal of Clinical Urology, 2019, 34(8): 617-620.
[13] 彭国辉, 李秉诚, 曹满超, 等. SHA.LIN评分在预测输尿管软镜碎石术结石清除率中的价值[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 25(11): 983-988. PENG Guohui, LI Bingcheng, CAO Manchao, et al. The clinical value of SHA.LIN score in the prediction of stone-free rate after RIRS for upper urinary tract lithiasis [J]. Journal of Modern Urology, 2020, 25(11): 983-988.
[14] Resorlu B, Unsal A, Gulec H, et al. A new scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery: the “resorlu-unsal stone score” [J]. Urology, 2012, 80(3): 512-518.
[15] Ather MH, Sulaiman MN. Flexible ureteroscopy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones of 1-2 cm [J]. Fac Rev, 2020, 9: 29.
[16] Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater [J]. Int J Urol, 2012, 19(3): 264-267.
[17] 蒋廷森, 吴锦昌, 陈宗证, 等. 6/7.5F输尿管硬镜钬激光碎石治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2017, 17(7): 641-643. JIANG Tingsen, WU Jinchang, CHEN Zongzheng, et al. Use of 6/7.5F ureteroscopic holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted upper ureteral calculi [J]. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2017, 17(7): 641-643.
[18] Fall B, Mouracade P, Bergerat S, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for kidney and ureter stone: indications, morbidity and outcome [J]. Prog Urol, 2014, 24(12): 771-776.
[19] 蒋立城, 徐忠华, 张英晨, 等. 非增强螺旋CT定位联合C臂微创经皮肾镜取石治疗复杂肾结石[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(3): 71-74. JIANG Licheng, XU Zhonghua, ZHANG Yingchen, et al. Unenhanced spiral CT localization combined with C-arm in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL)for complex renal calculi [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2012, 50(3): 71-74.
[20] 王小军, 张旭, 雷美, 等. 超声引导下标准通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的效果研究[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2021, 39(3): 412-416. WANG Xiaojun, ZHANG Xu, LEI Mei, et al. Effect of ultrasound-guided standard channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL)on staghorn calculi [J]. Chinese Journal of Image Science and Photochemistry, 2021, 39(3): 412-416.
[21] Sanguedolce F, Liatsikos E, Verze P, et al. Use of flexible ureteroscopy in the clinical practice for the treatment of renal stones: results from a large European survey conducted by the EAU Young Academic Urologists-Working Party on Endourology and Urolithiasis [J]. Urolithiasis, 2014, 42(4): 329-334.
[22] 朱学华, 刘余庆, 卢剑. 临床评分系统在预测肾结石逆行输尿管镜技术后结石清除率中的应用[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 8(3): 205-210. ZHU Xuehua, LIU Yuqing, LU Jian. The application of clinical scoring systems in predicting SFRs after retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal calculi treatment [J]. Microinvasive Urology, 2019, 8(3): 205-210.
[23] Ghani KR, Wolf JJ. What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones? [J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2015, 12(5): 281-288.
[24] Jessen JP, Honeck P, Knoll T, et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones: influence of the collecting systems anatomy [J]. J Endourol, 2014, 28(2): 146-151.
[25] Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater [J]. Int J Urol, 2012, 19(3): 264-267.
[26] Cakici MC, Kazan O, Cicek M, et al. Predictive risk factors of urinary tract infection following flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy [J]. Arch Esp Urol, 2021, 74(5): 503-510.
[27] Ma C, Lu J, Zhu Y, et al. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Combined with Pre- and Postoperative White Blood Cell Ratio Is a Better Criterion to Identify Septic Shock Patients After Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy [J]. J Endourol, 2021, 35(7): 973-978.
[28] Zhong W, Leto G, Wang L, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a study of risk factors [J]. J Endourol, 2015, 29(1): 25-28.
[29] 张际青, 张军晖. 妊娠期泌尿系结石的治疗[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 26(1): 74-80. ZHANG Jiqing, ZHANG Junhui. Urinary calculi during pregnancy [J]. Chinese Journal of Endoscopy, 2020, 26(1): 74-80.
[30] 陈明龙, 史晓博, 唐伟. 特殊类型肾结石应用输尿管软镜治疗的临床评估[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2016, 41(12): 1288-1291. CHEN Minglong, SHI Xiaobo, TANG Wei. Clinical evaluation of flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of special renal calculi [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2016, 41(12): 1288-1291.
[1] JIANG Li-cheng1,2, XU Zhong-hua1, ZHANG Ying-chen2, WANG Xue-ting2, DING Ji-yang2, CHENG Yu-feng2. Unenhanced spiral CT localization combined with C-arm in minimally invasive
percutaneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL) for complex renal calculi
[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2012, 50(3): 71-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!