Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences) ›› 2020, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 26-30.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.969

Previous Articles    

Effects of mechanical thrombus aspiration and catheter-directed thrombolysis on venous function in 87 cases of acute central deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity

SUN Xinguo, CHEN Kunhao, HU Zhang, DENG Xiaojun, DUAN Shijiao, XIE Weihua, YAN Qiong, ZHANG Hongwen   

  1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanhua University, Hengyang 421002, Hunan, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of mechanical thrombus aspiration and catheter-directed thrombolysis(CDT)on venous function of acute central deep venous thrombosis(DVT). Methods A total of 87 patients with acute central DVT treated during Jan. 2015 and Jan. 2017 were selected, including 45 males and 42 females. The patients were divided into 2 groups: mechanical group(n=39, thrombus aspiration with big catheter or sheath, supplemented with small dose of urokinase after operation), and CDT group(n=48). The effective internal diameter of superficial femoral vein(SFV), time of blood regurgitation of the first valve in SFV, reflux distance, and incidence of post-discharge postthrombotic syndrome(PTS)were compared 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after treatment. Results There 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)58卷1期 -孙鑫国,等. 机械性血栓抽吸和置管溶栓对87例急性中央型下肢深静脉血栓静脉功能的影响 \=-was significant difference in the diameter of SFV between the two groups(Ftreatment=10 197.500, P<0.001), the differences 6 months, 1 year and 2 years were statistically significant(Ftime=442.770, P<0.001), and there was a synergistic interaction effect between the treatment method and time(Ftreatment×time=317.749, P<0.001). There was significant difference in valvular regurgitation time between the two groups(Ftreatment=14 529.193, P<0.001), the differences 6 months, 1 year and 2 years were significant(Ftime=670.189, P<0.001), and there was a synergistic interaction effect between treatment method and time(Ftreatment×time=501.604, P<0.001). There was significant difference in reflux distance between the two groups(Ftreatment=4 842.897, P<0.001), the differences 6 months, 1 year and 2 years were significant(Ftime=413.343, P<0.001), and there was a synergistic interaction effect between the treatment method and time(Ftreatment×time=313.582, P<0.001). The incidence of PTS was [35.42%(17/48)] in CDT group, and [15.40%(6/39)] in the mechanical group, with statistical difference(χ2=106.350, P<0.001). Conclusion Mechanical thrombus aspiration can expand the cavity of SFV in the early stage, reduce the time and distance of blood reflux at the valve, reduce the incidence of long-term PTS, and better protect the venous function compared with CDT.

Key words: Thrombus aspiration, Catheterization, Deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities, Venous function of lower extremities

CLC Number: 

  • R543.6
[1] Bauersachs RM, Krabbe B. Deep vein thrombosis[M]. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2014: 4455-4481.
[2] Sommers BD. Routine screening for silent pulmonary embolism is harmful and unnecessary[J]. Am J Med, 2010, 123(12): 15.
[3] Liew NC, Alemany GV, Angchaisuksiri P, et al. Asian venous thromboembolism guidelines: updated recommendations for the prevention of venous thromboembolism[J]. Int Angiol, 2017, 36(1): 1-20.
[4] Streiff MB, Agnelli G, Connors JM, et al. Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism[J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2016, 41(1): 32-67.
[5] Scheres LJJ, Lijfering WM, Cannegieter SC. Current and future burden of venous thrombosis: Not simply predictable[J]. Res Pract Thromb Haemost, 2018, 2(2): 199-208.
[6] Michiels JJ, Michiels JM, Moossdorff W, et al. Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, and prevention of deep vein thrombosis recurrence and the post-thrombotic syndrome in the primary care medicine setting anno 2014[J]. World J Crit Care Med, 2015, 4(1): 29-39.
[7] Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA, et al. Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2008, 149(10): 698-707.
[8] 郭金和, 滕皋军, 何仕诚, 等. 下腔静脉滤器置入后大剂量尿激酶溶栓治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2002, 36(10): 908-912. GUO Jinhe, TENG Gaojun, HE Shicheng, et al. Thrombolysis for treating deep venous thrombosis by high-dose urokinase: the usefulness of preventive placement of inferior vena cava filte[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiology, 2002, 36(10): 908-912.
[9] Soosainathan A, Moore HM, Gohel MS, et al. Scoring systems for the post-thrombotic syndrome[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2013, 57(1): 254-261.
[10] 罗定远, 黎洪浩, 龙淼云, 等. 手术取栓与药物溶栓治疗急性髂股下肢深静脉血栓形成的疗效比较[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2010, 25(11): 876-879. LUO Dingyuan, LI Honghao, LONG Miaoyun, et al. Thrombectomy and pharmacological thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral lower extremity deep venous thrombosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Surgery, 2010, 25(11): 876-879.
[11] Zhu QH, Zhou CY, Chen Y, et al. Percutaneous manual aspiration thrombectomy followed by stenting for iliac vein compression syndrome with secondary acute isolated iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: a prospective study of single-session endovascular protocol[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2014, 47(4): 68-74.
[12] Park SI, Lee M, Lee MS, et al. Single-session aspiration thrombectomy of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis using large-size catheter without pharmacologic thrombolysis[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2014, 37(2): 412-419.
[13] 刘彦春, 杨植, 袁秀荣, 等. 急性中央型下肢深静脉血栓形成不同溶栓方法的比较[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(11): 61-63. LIU Yanchun, YANG Zhi, YUAN Xiurong, et al. Comparison of different thrombolysison in acute deep venous thrombosis[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2011, 49(11): 61-63.
[14] Wells PS, Forster AJ. Thrombolysis in deep vein thrombosis: is there still an indication[J]. Thromb Hemost, 2001, 86(1): 499-508.
[15] Oshima K, Kunimoto F, Hinohala H, et al. The effect of a temporary inferior vena cava filter in the treatment of deep veinthrombosis in critically-ill patients[J]. Int Heart J, 2008, 49(6): 713-721.
[16] Du GC, Zhang MC, Zhao JC. Catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation versus anticoagulation alone in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis-a meta-analysis[J]. VASA, 2015, 44(3): 195-202.
[17] Haig Y, Enden T, Slagsvold CE, et al. Determinants of early and long-term efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis in proximal deep vein thrombosis[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2013, 24(1): 17-24.
[18] Ageno W, Beyer-Westendorf J, Garcia DA, et al. Guidance for the management of venous thrombosis in unusual sites[J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2016, 41(1): 129-143.
[19] Heit JA, Spencer FA, White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism[J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2016, 41(1): 3-14.
[20] Oguzkurt L, Ozkan U, Gulcan O, et al. Endovascular treatment of acute and subacute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis using manual aspiration thrombectomy: long-term results of 139 patients in a single center[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2012, 18(10): 410-416.
[21] Kwak HS, Han YM, Lee YS, et al. Stents in common iliac vein obstruction with acute ipsilateral deep venous thrombosis: early and late results[J]. Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005, 16(6): 815-822.
[22] Lee JH, Kwun WH, Suh BY. The results of aspiration thrombecomy in the endovascular treatment for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis[J]. J Korean Surg Soc, 2013, 84(5): 292-297.
[1] WANG Qingwei1, YUE Qingzhu1, YAN Zhaohua2, LI Yongqiang1, LI Jing1, TENG Shuzhen1
. Safety of a unicameral dual purpose tracheal
catheter in esophagus operations
[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2009, 47(04): 91-93.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!