您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (12): 35-43.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2025.0259

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

基于I-FEED评分系统观察益气导滞方对结直肠癌术后胃肠功能恢复的影响

俞静,王刚,王烨,邵明月,潘华峰,葛苗苗,王海锋,江志伟   

  1. 南京中医药大学附属医院普外科, 江苏 南京 210029
  • 发布日期:2025-12-19
  • 通讯作者: 江志伟. E-mail:surgeon34@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省重点学科项目(ZDXK202251);江苏省中医药学会振兴发展项目(ZXFZ2024001)

Effect of Yiqidaozhi Decoction in postoperative intestinal recovery of colorectal cancer patients based on I-FEED scoring system

YU Jing, WANG Gang, WANG Ye, SHAO Mingyue, PAN Huafeng, GE Miaomiao, WANG Haifeng, JIANG Zhiwei   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China
  • Published:2025-12-19

摘要: 目的 基于进食-恶心-呕吐-腹胀-症状持续时间(intake-feeling nauseated-emesis-physical exam-duration of symptoms, I-FEED)评分系统,探讨益气导滞方对结直肠癌术后肠功能恢复、胃肠激素水平及炎症反应的影响。 方法 纳入2021年1月至2022年12月期间接受手术治疗的114例结直肠癌患者,使用随机数字分配方法分为观察组和对照组,每组57例均采用加速康复外科围手术期处理措施。观察组口服益气导滞方浓煎剂100 mL,对照组口服等量水溶液100 mL。研究在术后第1~3天进行。对比两组患者术后I-FEED评分、肠功能恢复指标(术后肠鸣音恢复时间、术后首次排气时间、术后首次排便时间、术后首次经口进食时间、术后恢复半流质饮食时间、术后住院时间)、胃肠激素指标(血清胃泌素、胃动素)、炎症指标(CRP、IL-1β、IL-2、IL-6、TNF-α、IFN-γ),以及术后并发症情况。采用SPSS27.0进行数据统计分析。 结果 观察组术后进食(Z=-2.196,P=0.028)、恶心(Z=-2.068,P=0.039)、腹胀(Z=-2.293,P=0.022)、持续时间评分(Z=-2.538,P=0.011)均低于对照组,两组胃肠功能恢复情况差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.153,P=0.031)。观察组术后肠鸣音恢复时间术后首次排气时间术后首次排便时间术后恢复半流质饮食时间均提前(P<0.05)。术后住院时间缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后第3天,观察组血清胃泌素(Z=7.299,P<0.05)、胃动素水平升高(Z=2.717,P=0.008),CRP(Z=-2.581,P=0.010)、IL-6水平降低(Z=-3.678,P<0.05);两组术后并发症差异无统计学意义(P=0.788)。 结论 益气导滞方对于促进结直肠癌根治术后患者肠道功能恢复、减轻胃肠功能障碍方面已被证明是安全和有效的,其发生机制可能与调节胃肠激素分泌和减轻术后炎症有关。

关键词: 结直肠癌根治术, 胃肠功能, I-FEED评分, 术后胃肠功能障碍, 益气导滞方

Abstract: Objective To observe the effect of the Yiqidaozhi decoction(YQDZ)on the postoperative intestinal recovery of patients who had undergone radical resection for colorectal cancer,as assessed using the Intake, Nausea, Vomiting, Bloating and Duration of Symptoms(I-FEED)scoring system. Methods A total of 114 colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgery between January 2021 and December 2022 were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into two groups: intervention group(n=57)and control group(n=57). The randomisation process was conducted using a random number allocation method. Both groups received perioperative management of enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS). The intervention group ingested 100 mL of a concentrated solution of YQDZ, while the control group received 100 mL of an isocaloric solution of water. The present study was conducted from postoperative days 1-3. Postoperative I-FEED scores, intestinal function recovery indicators(times of bowel sound recovery, first flatus, first defecation, first oral intake and semi-liquid diet resumption, and postoperative hospital stay), gastrointestinal hormone levels(serum gastrin and motilin), inflammatory markers(CRP, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ), and postoperative complications. The statistical analysis of the data was conducted using SPSS 27.0. Results The YQDZ group demonstrated significantly superior I-FEED scores in the domains of intake(Z=-2.196, P=0.028), nausea(Z=-2.068, P=0.039), bloating(Z=-2.293, P=0.022)and symptom duration(Z=-2.538, P=0.011)when compared to the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in the recovery of gastrointestinal function between the two groups(Z=-2.153, P=0.031). The times of bowel sound recovery, first flatus, first defecation and semi-liquid diet resumption were all shortened in the intervention group(P<0.05). The duration of hospitalisation following surgery was found to be significantly longer in the YQDZ group(P<0.05). On the third day following the operation, the serum levels of gastrin(Z=7.299, P<0.05)and motilin(Z=2.717, P=0.008)were elevated in the intervention group, while the levels of CRP(Z=-2.581, P=0.010)and IL-6(Z=-3.678, P<0.05)were reduced. No statistically significant difference in postoperative complications was observed between the two groups(P=0.788). Conclusion The YQDZ decoction has been demonstrated to be both safe and effective in promoting postoperative intestinal function recovery and reducing gastrointestinal dysfunction in colorectal cancer patients following radical resection. The mechanism may be associated with the regulation of gastrointestinal hormone secretion and the inhibition of postoperative inflammation.

Key words: Radical resection of colorectal cancer, Gastrointestinal function, I-FEED score, Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction, Yiqidaozhi Decoction

中图分类号: 

  • R273
[1] 李偲, 刘克玄, 邓小明, 等. 术后胃肠功能障碍防治专家共识[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2021, 42(11): 1133-1142.
[2] 徐倩丽, 庄玲玲, 马蕾, 等. 中医外治法对结直肠癌术后胃肠功能障碍的研究进展[J]. 中国老年保健医学, 2024, 22(5):124-128.
[3] Mazzotta E, Villalobos-Hernandez EC, Harzman A, et al. Impact of minimal invasive robotic surgery on recovery from postoperative ileus and postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction[J]. Am J Biomed Sci Res, 2020, 8(6): 535-538.
[4] 陈瑱瑶, 陈育忠, 陈琦, 等. 雷火灸联合中药治疗对大肠癌术后胃肠功能恢复的疗效观察[J]. 广州中医药大学学报, 2022, 39(6): 1342-1347.
[5] Hedrick TL, McEvoy MD, Mythen MMG, et al. American society for enhanced recovery and perioperative quality initiative joint consensus statement on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction within an enhanced recovery pathway for elective colorectal surgery[J]. Anesth Analg, 2018, 126(6): 1896-1907.
[6] Alsharqawi N, Alhashemi M, Kaneva P, et al. Validity of the I-FEED score for postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing colorectal surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(5): 2219-2226.
[7] Wu CY, Lai CJ, Xiao FR, et al. Validity of the I-FEED classification in assessing postoperative gastrointestinal impairment in patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgery with general anesthesia: a prospective observational study[J]. Perioper Med(Lond), 2024, 13(1): 50. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00409-4
[8] 陈丽婵, 连叔薏, 郑娉婷, 等. I-FEED评分系统与结直肠癌患者术后胃肠功能评估的关系[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2024, 21(11): 1636-1642. CHEN Lichan, LIAN Shuyi, ZHENG Pingting, et al. Relationship between I-FEED scoring system and postoperative gastrointestinal function assessment in colorectal cancer patients[J]. Nursing Practice and Research, 2024, 21(11): 1636-1642.
[9] 刘颖, 葛东建, 朱炫姿, 等. 经皮耳迷走神经刺激对妇科腹腔镜手术患者术后胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 天津医药, 2025, 53(2): 189-193. LIU Ying, GE Dongjian, ZHU Xuanzi, et al. Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery in gynecological laparoscopic surgery patients[J]. Tianjin pharmaceutical, 2025, 53(2): 189-193.
[10] 付同, 侯宇, 韩明明, 等. 围术期经皮穴位电刺激对妇科腹腔镜手术患者术后恢复质量的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2023, 39(8): 789-794. FU Tong, HOU Yu, HAN Mingming, et al. Effects of perioperative transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction and quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2023, 39(8): 789-794.
[11] 中华医学会外科学分会, 中华医学会麻醉学分会. 中国加速康复外科临床实践指南(2021版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(9): 961-992.
[12] 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组, 中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会结直肠外科专家工作组, 等. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术操作指南(2023版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(1): 10-22.
[13] 朱宏, 朱永康. 朱永康运用“运脾法” 治疗外科腹部手术后胃肠功能障碍之经验[J]. 江苏中医药, 2024, 56(3): 23-25.
[14] 潘华峰, 龚冠闻, 柳欣欣, 等. 基于人工智能的连续肠鸣音听诊记录仪的临床应用[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2020, 100(40): 3157-3160. PAN Huafeng, GONG Guanwen, LIU Xinxin, et al. Clinical application of continuous bowel sounds auscultation recorder based on artificial intelligence[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2020, 100(40): 3157-3160.
[15] Ray S, Mehta NN, Mangla V, et al. A comparison between the comprehensive complication index and the clavien-dindo grading as a measure of postoperative outcome in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery-a prospective study[J]. J Surg Res, 2019, 244: 417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.093
[16] 张占华, 张念杰, 梁敏, 等. 腹腔镜手术对胃癌病人临床指标及创伤应激指标的影响[J]. 安徽医药, 2020, 24(4): 779-782. ZHANG Zhanhua, ZHANG Nianjie, LIANG Min, et al. Effects of laparoscopic surgery on clinical indexes and traumatic stress indexes in patients with gastric cancer[J]. Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal, 2020, 24(4): 779-782.
[17] 徐向迎, 宗晶, 王小洁. 重症劳力性热射病患者的胃肠道屏障破坏及对策探讨[J]. 海军医学杂志, 2023, 44(4): 414-416.
[18] Shi YN, Xu X, Liu T, et al. Shenhuang plaster application improves gastrointestinal motility in mice with postoperative ileus through intestinal microbiota[J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2022, 2022: 2823315. doi: 10.1155/2022/2823315
[19] Jiang Z, Chen QC, Zhang JH, et al. Wuda granule, a traditional Chinese herbal medicine, ameliorates postoperative ileus by anti-inflammatory action[J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2020, 216(3): 152605. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2019.152605
[20] Yang MM, Lu YX, Jin SF, et al. Postoperative Tongqi Formula ameliorates postoperative ileus via p38 MAPK signaling pathway and metabolic disorder[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 11(1): e41217. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41217
[21] Siby T, Shajimon A, Mullen D, et al. Leveraging nursing assessment for early identification of post operative gastrointestinal dysfunction(POGD)in patients undergoing colorectal surgery[J]. Curr Oncol, 2024, 31(7): 3752-3757.
[22] 胡洪嫱, 李林, 丛宇, 等. 中医药治疗肠易激综合征相关信号通路研究进展[J]. 国医论坛, 2025, 40(3): 61-68.
[23] 苏卫华. 通腑行气汤对妇科腹腔镜术后患者胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 新中医, 2022, 54( 9): 107-111.
[24] 梁海红, 任建雷, 沈晓娣. 腹针联合艾灸对胃切除术后患者胃肠功能及胃肠激素水平的影响[J]. 新中医, 2021, 53(3): 166-169. LIANG Haihong, REN Jianlei, SHEN Xiaodi. Effect of abdominal acupuncture combined with moxibustion on gastrointestinal function and gastrointestinal hormone levels in patients after gastrectomy[J]. Journal of New Chinese Medicine, 2021, 53(3): 166-169.
[25] 倪建成, 范永飞, 叶祖云. 太子参化学成分、药理作用和应用的研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2023, 54(6): 1963-1977. NI Jiancheng, FAN Yongfei, YE Zuyun. Research progress on chemical constituents, pharmacological effects and application of Pseudostellariae Radix[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2023, 54(6): 1963-1977.
[26] 陶铭, 尹苗苗, 王帅, 等. 白术多糖研究进展[J]. 中医药学报, 2025, 53(6): 109-116. TAO Ming, YIN Miaomiao, WANG Shuai, et al. Research progress on Atractylodes macrocephala polysaccharides[J]. Acta Chinese Medicine and Pharmacology, 2025, 53(6): 109-116.
[27] 郑威, 臧彬如, 于颖琦, 等. 枳术丸化学成分及治疗消化系统疾病的研究进展[J]. 中成药, 2022, 44(9): 2916-2923.
[28] 吕邵娃, 李影, 于新, 等. 陈皮黄酮类成分对六君子汤干预脾虚大鼠胃肠激素及CD3+、TFF3 mRNA表达水平的贡献研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2022, 47(4): 951-958. LYU Shaowa, LI Ying, YU Xin, et al. Contributions of flavonoids from citri reticulatae pericarpium to gastric hormones, CD3+ and TFF3 mRNA expression in rats with spleen deficiency intervened by Liujunzi Decoction[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2022, 47(4): 951-958.
[29] 江志伟, 王刚. 延迟性术后肠麻痹的概念及防治策略[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2020, 58(5): 1-5. JIANG Zhiwei, WANG Gang. Concept and prevention of prolonged postoperative ileus[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2020, 58(5): 1-5.
[30] 曾丽, 陈赛红, 赵佳梅, 等. 太子参参须多糖对RAW264.7细胞免疫调节作用的研究[J]. 中国预防兽医学报, 2023, 45(1): 79-87. ZENG Li, CHEN Saihong, ZHAO Jiamei, et al. Immuomodulatory effects of Radix Pseudostellariae fibrous root polysaccharides on RAW264.7 cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2023, 45(1): 79-87.
[31] Deng M, Chen HJ, Long JY, et al. Atractylenolides(I, II, and III): a review of their pharmacology and pharmacokinetics[J]. Arch Pharmacal Res, 2021, 44(7): 633-654.
[1] 王刚,徐鹏演,赵旭安,王海锋,葛苗苗,潘华峰,江志伟. ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸对腹腔镜结直肠癌术后迷走神经和肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 36-42.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!