您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (6): 27-37.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.1059

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

疱疹病毒感染对重症肺炎患者临床预后及呼吸道微生态的影响

葛雪,赵红艳   

  1. 山东大学第二医院重症医学科, 山东 济南 250033
  • 发布日期:2025-07-08
  • 通讯作者: 赵红艳. E-mail:zhaohongyansdu@foxmail.com

Effect of herpesvirus infection on clinical prognosis and respiratory microbiota in patients with severe pneumonia

GE Xue, ZHAO Hongyan   

  1. Intensive Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Published:2025-07-08

摘要: 目的 探讨疱疹病毒感染对重症肺炎患者临床预后及下呼吸道微生态的影响。 方法 纳入114例ICU住院的重症肺炎患者,根据宏基因组二代测序(metagenomic next-generation sequencing, mNGS)结果分为疱疹病毒阳性组和疱疹病毒阴性组,收集其基本人口统计学及临床特征资料,使用独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验及χ2检验比较两组资料之间的差异,使用Cox回归模型分析影响预后的因素,使用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,使用对数秩(Log-Rank)检验比较两组生存曲线,绘制柱状图及热图比较两组之间下呼吸道微生物菌群的差异。 结果 疱疹病毒阳性组急性生理学和慢性健康评分(acute physiololgy and chronic health evaluation, APACHE Ⅱ)高于疱疹病毒阴性组,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.260,P=0.024),其他临床特征差异无统计学意义。疱疹病毒感染是影响重症肺炎患者临床预后的独立危险因素;疱疹病毒阳性组30 d死亡率高于阴性组(44.64% vs. 27.57%, χ2=4.040,P=0.044),差异有统计学意义;其中人类α疱疹病毒Ⅰ型(herpes simplex virus-1, HSV-1)、Epstein-Barr病毒(Epstein-Barr virus, EBV)、人类β疱疹病毒5型即巨细胞病毒(cytomegalovirus, CMV)阳性患者30 d死亡率均高于对应疱疹病毒阴性患者,差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.982,P=0.046; χ2=4.991,P=0.025; χ2=6.791,P=0.009)。疱疹病毒阳性组和疱疹病毒阴性组的微生物菌群分布上存在差异,各组优势菌群略有不同,疱疹病毒阳性组更易合并纹带棒杆菌、嗜肺军团菌、曲霉菌、耶氏肺孢子菌等病原体。 结论 疱疹病毒感染是重症肺炎患者临床预后的独立危险因素,与重症肺炎患者的30 d死亡率密切相关,尤其是HSV-1、EBV、CMV的存在与30 d死亡率增加有关。疱疹病毒阳性的重症肺炎患者呼吸道中富集了更多的条件致病菌,提示疱疹病毒可能通过改变微生态来影响疾病预后。

关键词: 重症肺炎, 疱疹病毒感染, 下呼吸道微生态, 30 d死亡率, 宏基因组二代测序

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of herpesvirus infection on the clinical prognosis and the microbiota of the lower respiratory tract in patients with severe pneumonia. Methods According to the results of metagenomic next-generation sequencing(mNGS), 114 patients with severe pneumonia hospitalized in ICU were divided into herpesvirus-positive group and herpesvirus-negative group. The basic demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Differences between the two sets of information were compared using the independent samples t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and χ2 test. Cox regression model was used to analyze the factors affecting prognosis. Kaplan-Meier method was used to conduct the survival analysis, and the Log-Rank test was applied to compare survival curves. Histograms and heat maps were generated to illustrate the differences in the lower respiratory tract microbiota between the two groups. Results The acute physiololgy and chronic health evaluation(APACHE II)score of the herpesvirus-positive group was higher than that of the negative group, and the difference was statistically significant(Z=-2.260, P=0.024). There were no significant differences in other clinical characteristics. Herpesvirus infection was an independent risk factor affecting the clinical prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia. The 30-day mortality rate of the herpesvirus-positive group was higher than that of the herpesvirus-negative group(44.64 % vs. 27.57 %, χ2=4.040, P=0.044), with a statistically significant difference. The 30-day mortality rate of herpes simplex virus-1(HSV-1),Epstein-Barr virus(EBV)and cytomegalovirus(CMV)positive groups were higher than that of the corresponding herpesvirus-negative groups, with a statistically significant difference(χ2=3.982, P=0.046; χ2=4.991, P=0.025; χ2=6.791, P=0.009). There were observable differences in the distribution of microbial flora between the herpesvirus-positive and herpesvirus-negative groups, with a distinct predominance of certain species in each group. The herpesvirus-positive group showed a higher likelihood of co-occurrence with pathogens such as Corynebacterium striatum, Legionella pneumophila, Aspergillus and Pneumocystis japonicus. Conclusion Herpesvirus infection is an independent risk factor for the clinical prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia, and is closely associated with the 30-day mortality of patients with severe pneumonia, particularly the presence of HSV-1, EBV, and CMV, which correlate with increased 30-day mortality rates. Furthermore, patients with severe pneumonia who were positive for herpesviruses tend to have a higher presence of conditional pathogenic bacteria in their respiratory tracts, suggesting that herpesviruses may influence disease prognosis by altering the microbiota.

Key words: Severe pneumonia, Herpesvirus infection, Lower respiratory tract microbiota, 30-day mortality, Metagenomic next-generation sequencing

中图分类号: 

  • R563
[1] Zhao JY, He XY, Min JM, et al. A multicenter prospective study of comprehensive metagenomic and transcriptomic signatures for predicting outcomes of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia[J]. EBioMedicine, 2023, 96: 104790. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104790
[2] 李骁, 孙志远, 张龙江. 影像人工智能在肺炎筛查、诊断及预测领域的应用研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2023, 61(12): 13-20. LI Xiao, SUN Zhiyuan, ZHANG Longjiang. Research advances of artificial intelligence-based medical imaging in the screening, diagnosis and prediction of pneumonia[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2023, 61(12): 13-20.
[3] Liu YA, Wen ZL, Fang Y, et al. Herpesvirus reactivation in respiratory tract is associated with increased mortality of severe pneumonia patients and their respiratory microbiome dysbiosis[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2023, 13: 1294142. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2023.1294142
[4] Fromentin M, Ricard JD, Roux D. Respiratory microbiome in mechanically ventilated patients: a narrative review[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2021, 47(3): 292-306.
[5] 董媛媛, 蒋卫东, 刘震, 等. 二代测序辅助诊断水痘-带状疱疹病毒性脑膜炎1例[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2023, 61(1): 121-124. DONG Yuanyuan, JIANG Weidong, LIU Zhen, et al. A case of varicella-zoster virus meningitis diagnosed with the aid of second-generation sequencing[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2023, 61(1): 121-124.
[6] Gooskens J, Templeton KE, Claas EC, et al. Quantitative detection of herpes simplex virus DNA in the lower respiratory tract[J]. J Med Virol, 2007, 79(5): 597-604.
[7] Simonnet A, Engelmann I, Moreau AS, et al. High incidence of Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and human-herpes virus-6 reactivations in critically ill patients with COVID-19[J]. Infect Dis Now, 2021, 51(3): 296-299.
[8] Li RM, Li J, Zhou XK. Lung microbiome: new insights into the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2024, 9(1): 19. doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01722-y
[9] Dickson RP, Schultz MJ, van der Poll T, et al. Lung microbiota predict clinical outcomes in critically ill patients[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2020, 201(5): 555-563.
[10] Bruynseels P, Jorens PG, Demey HE, et al. Herpes simplex virus in the respiratory tract of critical care patients: a prospective study[J]. Lancet, 2003, 362(9395): 1536-1541.
[11] Simoons-Smit AM, Kraan EM, Beishuizen A, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 1 and respiratory disease in critically-ill patients: real pathogen or innocent bystander?[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2006, 12(11): 1050-1059.
[12] Linssen CFM, Jacobs JA, Stelma FF, et al. Herpes simplex virus load in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is related to poor outcome in critically ill patients[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2008, 34(12): 2202-2209.
[13] Meyer A, Buetti N, Houhou-Fidouh N, et al. HSV-1 reactivation is associated with an increased risk of mortality and pneumonia in critically ill COVID-19 patients[J]. Crit Care, 2021, 25(1): 417. doi:10.1186/s13054-021-03843-8
[14] Bonizzoli M, Arvia R, di Valvasone S, et al. Human herpesviruses respiratory infections in patients with acute respiratory distress(ARDS)[J]. Med Microbiol Immunol, 2016, 205(4): 371-379.
[15] Jellinge ME, Hansen F, Coia JE, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 1 pneumonia-a review[J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2021, 36(12): 1398-1402.
[16] Hagel S, Scherag A, Schuierer L, et al. Effect of antiviral therapy on the outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with herpes simplex virus detected in the respiratory tract: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care, 2020, 24(1): 584. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03296-5
[17] Schuierer L, Gebhard M, Ruf HG, et al. Impact of acyclovir use on survival of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and high load herpes simplex virus replication[J]. Crit Care, 2020, 24(1): 12. doi:10.1186/s13054-019-2701-5
[18] Frobert E, Billaud G, Casalegno JS, et al. The clinical interest of HSV1 semi-quantification in bronchoalveolar lavage[J]. J Clin Virol, 2013, 58(1): 265-268.
[19] Costa C, Sidoti F, Saldan A, et al. Clinical impact of HSV-1 detection in the lower respiratory tract from hospitalized adult patients[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2012, 18(8): E305-E307.
[20] Xu J, Zhong L, Shao HZ, et al. Incidence and clinical features of HHV-7 detection in lower respiratory tract in patients with severe pneumonia: a multicenter, retrospective study[J]. Crit Care, 2023, 27(1): 248. doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04530-6
[21] Munford RS, Pugin J. Normal responses to injury prevent systemic inflammation and can be immunosuppressive[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001, 163(2): 316-321.
[22] 徐建桥, 解立新. 危重症患者免疫功能量化评估[J].中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(48): 3917-3920. XU Jianqiao, XIE Lixin. Advances in quantitative assessment of immune function in critically ill patients[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2021, 101(48): 3917-3920.
[23] 周溪, 黄霂晗, 任玉洁, 等. 新型冠状病毒感染与天然免疫及炎症反应[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59(5): 15-21. ZHOU Xi, HUANG Muhan, REN Yujie, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection, innate immunity and inflammatory response[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2021, 59(5): 15-21.
[24] Luyt CE, Combes A, Deback C, et al. Herpes simplex virus lung infection in patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2007, 175(9): 935-942.
[25] ODwyer DN, Ashley SL, Gurczynski SJ, et al. Lung microbiota contribute to pulmonary inflammation and disease progression in pulmonary fibrosis[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2019, 199(9): 1127-1138.
[26] de Steenhuijsen Piters WAA, Binkowska J, Bogaert D. Early life microbiota and respiratory tract infections[J]. Cell Host Microbe, 2020, 28(2): 223-232.
[27] Pan LG, Wu FS, Cai QQ, et al. Whole genome profiling of lung microbiome in solid organ transplant recipients reveals virus involved microecology may worsen prognosis[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2022, 12: 863399. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.863399
[1] 张学宇,张学海,孙文青,刘晗,姜金波,刘寒,李远,陈晓梅. 重症新型冠状病毒肺炎伴侵袭性肺曲霉病及反复致命性消化道出血1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 56-61.
[2] 安袁笑雪,杜以明,田甜,张一,薛玉文. 肺炎奴卡菌合并天美奴卡菌肺部感染1例报道并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 59-63.
[3] 温鹏,董亮,王欣,魏敏,刘岩,徐玉荣,孙文青,周明香. 重症新型冠状病毒肺炎1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(3): 58-61.
[4] 黄楚栓, 周锐, 洪海都, 刘建博. 二代测序法诊断腺病毒重症肺炎1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(12): 121-124.
[5] 许天一,吴萍,王爱玲,陈丽萍. 米力农雾化治疗小儿重症肺炎合并心力衰竭的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(7): 88-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!