您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (3): 22-27.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0998

• 骨科学临床诊疗 • 上一篇    

应用内支撑技术辅助膝关节前交叉韧带全内重建术近期疗效观察

王建旭1,彭晓辉2,丰浩田1,安森博1,董恣豪1,黄子帅1,刘喆1,杨光1,2   

  1. 1.山东第一医科大学附属省立医院骨关节科, 山东 济南 250022;2.山东省产品质量检验研究院, 山东 济南 250199
  • 发布日期:2025-04-08
  • 通讯作者: 杨光. E-mail:yangguang@sdfmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金青年项目(ZR2020QH073);山东第一医科大学附属省立医院横向课题(yg005;yg006)

Short-term efficacy of all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction assisted by internal brace technique

WANG Jianxu1, PENG Xiaohui2, FENG Haotian1, AN Senbo1, DONG Zihao1, HUANG Zishuai1, LIU Zhe1, YANG Guang<sup>1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Joint Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250022, Shandong, China;
    2. Shandong Product Quality Inspection and Research Institute, Jinan 250199, Shandong, China
  • Published:2025-04-08

摘要: 目的 探讨关节镜下应用内支撑技术辅助膝关节前交叉韧带全内重建术的近期临床效果。 方法 选取2022年7月至2023年6月收治于山东第一医科大学附属省立医院骨关节科应用内支撑技术辅助膝关节前交叉韧带全内重建术患者42例。所有患者以自体半腱肌作为移植物,股骨和胫骨端可调节袢钛板双悬吊固定,股骨端钛板穿入高强缝合线或线带,自胫骨端拉出后使用无结锚钉在胫骨骨皮质固定。通过随访术后Lysholm评分、国际膝关节文献委员会(International Knee Documentation Committee, IKDC)主观膝关节评分、拉赫曼试验、轴移试验评估手术的临床疗效。 结果 42例患者均手术成功,并获6~12个月随访,平均随访9.7个月。所有患者末次随访均未出现感染、韧带再断裂等并发症。Lysholm评分和IKDC主观膝关节评分分别由术前(50.10±3.19)分和(51.42±4.52)分恢复至末次随访(82.38±2.86)分和(84.89±3.39)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。拉赫曼试验术前均为阳性(Ⅱ度17例,Ⅲ度25例),末次随访仅1例阳性(Ⅰ度1例),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。轴移试验末次随访均阴性,显著少于术前42例(正常2例,Ⅰ级12例,Ⅱ级28例,Ⅲ级0例),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。 结论 应用内支撑技术辅助膝关节前交叉韧带全内重建术可获得满意的近期临床疗效,显著改善患者膝关节功能和稳定性。

关键词: 前交叉韧带断裂, 膝关节镜, 膝关节前交叉韧带全内重建术, 内支撑技术, 近期疗效

Abstract: Objective To investigate the short-term efficacy of all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(ACLR)assisted by internal brace technique under arthroscopy. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 42 patients with all-inside ACLR assisted by internal brace technique who were admitted to the Department of Joint Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from July 2022 to June 2023. The femoral and tibial ends were fixed by double suspension with adjustable loop titanium plates, and the autosemitendinosus for ACL graft. High-strength sutures or wire bands were inserted into the femoral ends of the titanium plates, and then fixed in the tibial cortex with knot-free anchors after pulling out the tibial ends. Clinical outcome was evaluated with International Knee Documentation Committee(IKDC)score, Lysholm score, and knee stability tests(Lachman test and pivot shift test). Results All of the 42 patients underwent successful surgery and were followed up for 6 to 12 months, with an average duration of 9.7 months. At the final follow-up, no complications, such as infection or ligament re-rupture, were observed in any of the patients. The Lysholm score and IKDC score recovered from preoperative 50.10±3.19 and 51.42±4.52 to the last follow-up 82.38±2.86 and 84.89±3.39, respectively, with statistical significance(P<0.001). All Lachman tests were positive before surgery(17 cases of grade Ⅱ and 25 cases of grade Ⅲ), and only 1 case was positive at the last follow-up(1 case of grade Ⅰ), the difference was statistically significant(P<0.001). The pivot shift test was negative at the last follow-up, significantly less than the 42 cases before surgery(2 cases in normal, 12 cases in grade Ⅰ, 28 cases in grade Ⅱ, 0 cases in grade Ⅲ), and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.001). Conclusion The application of all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction assisted by internal brace technique can obtain satisfactory short-term clinical outcomes, and has a significant improvement in the functional capacity and stability of the patients knee joint.

Key words: Anterior cruciate ligament rupture, Knee arthroscopy, All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Internal Brace, Short-term efficacy

中图分类号: 

  • R684.3
[1] Petersen W, Tillmann B. Anatomie und funktion des vorderen kreuzbandes[J]. Der Orthopäde, 2002, 31(8): 710-718.
[2] Duthon VB, Barea C, Abrassart S, et al. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament[J]. Knee Surg Phys Traumatol Arthrosc, 2006, 14(3): 204-213.
[3] Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ, et al. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2000, 8(3): 141-150.
[4] Sandon A, Engström B, Forssblad M. High risk of further anterior cruciate ligament injury in a 10-year follow-up study of anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed soccer players in the Swedish national knee ligament registry[J]. Arthroscopy, 2020, 36(1): 189-195.
[5] 王静宇,林小慧,李晓兰.前交叉韧带损伤研究进展[J].现代医药卫生, 2024, 40(1): 122-126. WANG Jingyu, LIN Xiaohui, LI Xiaolan. Research progress of anterior cruciate ligament inj ury[J]. Journal of Modern Medicine Health, 2024, 40(1): 122-126.
[6] 王钜忠.前交叉韧带损伤的治疗进展[J].中国城乡企业卫生, 2023, 38(12): 45-47. WANG Juzhong. Treatment progress of anterior cruciate ligament injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Urban and Rural Industrial Hygiene, 2023, 38(12): 45-47.
[7] Xergia SA, McClelland JA, Kvist J, et al. The influence of graft choice on isokinetic muscle strength 4-24 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Knee Surg Phys Traumatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19(5): 768-780.
[8] Spragg L, Chen J, Mirzayan R, et al. The effect of autologous hamstring graft diameter on the likelihood for revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2016, 44(6): 1475-1481.
[9] Snaebjörnsson T, Hamrin Senorski E, Ayeni OR, et al. Graft diameter as a predictor for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D values: a cohort study from the Swedish national knee ligament register based on 2240 patients[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2017, 45(9): 2092-2097.
[10] Genç AS, Güzel N, Yılmaz AK, et al. Post-operative modified all-inside ACL reconstruction techniques clinical outcomes and isokinetic strength assessments[J]. Diagnostics(Basel), 2023, 13(17): 2787.
[11] Monaco E, Redler A, Fabbri M, et al. Isokinetic flexion strength recovery after ACL reconstruction: a comparison between all inside graft-link technique and full tibial tunnel technique[J]. Phys Sportsmed, 2019, 47(1): 132-135.
[12] Bora M, Deshmukh P. Clinical and patient-reported functional outcome of semitendinosus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with FiberTape® InternalBraceTM all-inside technique: a prospective study[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(9): e44700.
[13] Phatama KY, Mustamsir E, Jaya AO, et al. Patellofemoral functional outcome of gracilis sparing compared to gracilis sacrificing ACL reconstruction[J]. Ann Med Surg(Lond), 2022, 84: 104940. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104940
[14] Kouloumentas P, Kavroudakis E, Charalampidis E, et al. Superior knee flexor strength at 2 years with all-inside short-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs a conventional hamstring technique[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(11): 3592-3598.
[15] Smith PA, Stannard JP, Pfeiffer FM, et al. Suspensory versus interference screw fixation for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a translational large-animal model[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(6): 1086-1097.
[16] Mayr R, Smekal V, Koidl C, et al. ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation[J]. Knee Surg Phys Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28(4): 1036-1044.
[17] Fu CW, Chen WC, Lu YC. Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21(1): 445.
[18] Schützenberger S, Keller F, Grabner S, et al. ACL reconstruction with femoral and tibial adjustable versus fixed-loop suspensory fixation: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2022, 17(1): 244.
[19] Lubowitz JH, Schwartzberg R, Smith P. Cortical suspensory button versus aperture interference screw fixation for knee anterior cruciate ligament soft-tissue allograft: a prospective, randomized controlled trial[J]. Arthroscopy, 2015, 31(9): 1733-1739.
[20] 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 刘伦, 等. 前交叉韧带重建术后移植物愈合的研究进展[J].实用骨科杂志, 2023, 29(1): 47-51.
[21] 高杰, 张芮, 甄杰. MRI 评估前交叉韧带重建术后假体恢复情况价值研究[J]. 人民军医, 2021, 64(6): 533-537.
[22] Smith PA, Bley JA. Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing internal brace augmentation[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2016, 5(5): e1143-e1147.
[23] Bachmaier S, Smith PA, Bley J, et al. Independent suture tape reinforcement of small and standard diameter grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical full construct model[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(2): 490-499.
[24] Wicks ED, Stack J, Rezaie N, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of suture tape internal brace reinforcement of soft tissue allografts for ACL reconstruction using a porcine model[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2022, 10(5): 23259671221091252.
[25] Aboalata M, Elazab A, Halawa A, et al. The crossing internal suture augmentation technique to protect the all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2017, 6(6): e2235-e2240.
[1] 阚娜娜,余丽春,孙书珍,李倩,栾春丽. 儿童肾病综合征型狼疮性肾炎30例临床、病理及近期疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(2): 54-59.
[2] 肖笠, 徐静, 冯江学. 膝关节镜下前交叉韧带解剖 单束和前内束单束重建的疗效比较[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S2): 85-87.
[3] 葛海涛,王志刚,潘顺,丁璇,王成伟,曲春城. 支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床应用分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(9): 955-957.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!