您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (7): 78-82.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2023.0067

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

颈动脉分叉处支架置入术后严重持续性低血压的危险因素

曲永强,赵泽宇,吴兴原,韩玮,段瑞生,李衍滨,李亨   

  1. 山东第一医科大学第一附属医院(山东省千佛山医院)神经病学, 山东省神经免疫研究所, 山东省风湿免疫病转化医学重点实验室, 山东 济南 250014
  • 发布日期:2023-07-04
  • 通讯作者: 李衍滨. E-mail:13864006933@163.com李亨. E-mail:liheng_sdu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东第一医科大学学术提升计划(2019QL013)

Risk factors of severe persistent hypotension after carotid artery bifurcation stenting

QU Yongqiang, ZHAO Zeyu, WU Xingyuan, HAN Wei, DUAN Ruisheng, LI Yanbin, LI Heng   

  1. Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
    Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Institute of Neuroimmunology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Rheumatic Disease and Translational Medicine, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
  • Published:2023-07-04

PDF (PC)

287

摘要： 目的 分析颈动脉分叉处支架置入术后严重持续性低血压的危险因素。 方法 回顾性分析2014年10月至2022年4月山东第一医科大学第一附属医院神经内科177例(181处病变)颈动脉分叉处狭窄并接受支架置入术患者术后严重持续性低血压的危险因素。采用单因素和多因素 Logistic 回归法分析术后严重持续性低血压的危险因素。 结果 177例患者术后严重持续性低血压的发生率为53.1%。单因素分析显示,支架直径较大、术中应用阿托品、球囊扩张直径>5 mm、偏心狭窄和狭窄程度较重是颈动脉分叉处支架置入术后严重持续性低血压的危险因素。多因素分析显示,术中应用阿托品、球囊扩张直径>5 mm和狭窄程度较重是颈动脉分叉处支架置入术后严重持续性低血压的独立危险因素。 结论 颈动脉分叉处支架置入术后发生血流动力学损害是常见的并发症,术中应用阿托品、球囊扩张直径>5 mm和狭窄程度较重是颈动脉分叉处支架置入术后严重持续性低血压的独立危险因素。

关键词: 颈动脉分叉处狭窄, 支架, 低血压, 危险因素

Abstract: Objective To analyze the risk factors of severe persistent hypotension after carotid artery bifurcation stenting. Methods Clinical data of 177 patients(181 lesions)with carotid artery bifurcation stenosis who underwent stenting during Oct. 2014 and Apr. 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors for postoperative severe persistent hypotension were analyzed with univariate and multivariate Logistic regression models. Results The incidence of severe persistent hypotension was 53.1%. Univariate analysis showed that large stent diameter, intraoperative use of atropine, balloon dilation diameter >5 mm, eccentric stenosis and severe stenosis were risk factors of severe persistent hypotension. Multivariate analysis indicated that intraoperative use of atropine, balloon dilation diameter >5 mm and severe stenosis were independent risk factors. Conclusions Hemodynamic impairment is a common complication after carotid artery bifurcation stenting. Intraoperative use of atropine, balloon dilation diameter > 5mm and severe stenosis are independent risk factors of severe persistent hypotension.

Key words: Carotid artery bifurcation stenosis, Stent, Hypotension, Risk factor

中图分类号: 

  • R574
[1] 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作二级预防指南2022[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2022, 55(10): 1071-1110. Chinese Society of Neurology, Chinese Society of Neurology and Cerebrovascular Disease. Chinese guidelines for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack 2022[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurology, 2022, 55(10): 1071-1110.
[2] Gupta A, Chazen JL, Hartman M, et al. Cerebrovascular reserve and stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(11): 2884-2891.
[3] Chaturvedi S, Bruno A, Feasby T, et al. Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Carotid endarterectomy - an evidence-based review: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology [J]. Neurology, 2005, 65(6): 794-801.
[4] 余波, 谭晋韵. 颈动脉狭窄闭塞性疾病及其外科治疗的再认识[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2022, 37(3): 161-164. YU Bo, TAN Jinyun.Re-recognition of carotid artery stenosis and occlusion disease and its surgical treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of General Surgery, 2022, 37(3): 161-164.
[5] Gökçal E, Niftaliyev E, Deniz Ç, et al. Prolonged hypotension after carotid artery stenting: incidence, predictors and consequences [J]. Acta Neurochir(Wien), 2017, 159(11): 2081-2087.
[6] Rubio G, Karwowski JK, DeAmorim H, et al. Predicting factors associated with postoperative hypotension following carotid artery stenting [J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2019, 54(1): 193-199.
[7] Bogniotti LAC, Teivelis MP, Cardozo FAM, et al.Hemodynamic depression after carotid surgery: Incidence, risk factors and outcomes [J]. Clinics(Sao Paulo), 2022, 77: 100090.
[8] Kim MJ, Ha SK. Outcomes following carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery atenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis: a retrospective study from a single center in South Korea [J]. Med Sci Monit, 2023, 29: e939223. doi: 10.12659/MSM.939223.
[9] Ouyang YA, Jiang Y, Yu M, et al. Efficacy and safety of stenting for elderly patients with severe and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a critical meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 2015, 10: 1733-1742. doi:10.2147/CIA.S91721.
[10] 潘晓妍. 基于UNet深度神经网络的颈动脉分叉分割研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2019.
[11] Lian X, Lin M, Liu M, et al. Complications and predictors associated with persistent hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2014, 124(9): 81-84.
[12] 徐格林, 樊新颖, 殷勤, 等. 颈动脉支架置入术后发生持续性低血压的危险因素分析 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2007, 4(5): 218-222. XU Gelin, FAN Xinying, YIN Qin, et al. Analysis of the risk factors for prolonged hypotension after carotid artery stenting [J].Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Disease, 2007, 4(5): 218-222.
[13] Jensen SK, Eesa M, Walker A, et al. Plaque characteristics on CT angiography do not improve the ability to predict hemodynamic instability during and after carotid angioplasty and stenting [J]. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology, 2021, 33(4): 337-342.
[14] Nonaka T, Oka S, Miyata K, et al. Prediction of prolonged postprocedural hypotension after carotid artery stenting [J]. Neurosurgery, 2005, 57(3): 472-477.
[15] 韩金涛, 赵海燕, 李选, 等. 颈动脉支架成形术血流动力学损害的相关因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(5): 804-808. HAN Jintao, ZHAO Haiyan, LI Xuan, et al. Related factors of hemodynamic damage after carotid artery stenting[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(5): 804-808.
[16] Chi Q, Chen Z, Zhu L, et al. Relationship between annular calcification of plaques in the carotid sinus and perioperative hemodynamic disorder in carotid angioplasty and stenting [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2022, 31(10): 106634. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106634.
[17] Oshin O, Varcoe R, Wong J, et al. Multivariable analysis of patients with severe persistent postprocedural hypotension after carotid artery stenting [J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2019, 26(6): 759-767.
[18] Fujii M, Satow T, Kodama H, et al. Severe hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting: The problem overcome with a transvenous temporary cardiac pacemaker [J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2021, 12: 255. doi: 10.25259/SNI_244_2021.
[19] Li B, Fan W, Yang Y, et al. Peri-procedural variables and outcomes of long-period hemodynamic instability after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting [J]. Vascular, 2022, 17085381221091369. doi: 10.1177/17085381221091369.
[20] Liu J, Han J, Yang L, et al. Short-term Outcome of straight vs tapered carotid stenting for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a prospective study [J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2018, 25(6): 765-770.
[21] Armstrong EJ, Bricker R. Commentary: hypotension after internal carotid artery stenting: is it predictable? [J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2019, 26(6): 768-770.
[22] Noori VJ, Aranson NJ, Malas M, et al. Risk factors and impact of postoperative hypotension after carotid artery stenting in the vascular quality initiative [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2021, 73(3): 975-982.
[23] van Waes JA, van Klei WA, Wijeysundera DN, et al. Association between intraoperative hypotension and myocardial injury after vascular surgery [J]. Anesthesiology, 2016, 124(1): 35-44.
[24] Arhuidese IJ, Ottinger ME, Shukla AJ, et al. Hemodynamic events during carotid stenting are associated with significant periprocedural stroke and adverse events [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2020, 71(6): 1941-1953.
[25] Chang A, Hung HF, Hsieh FI, et al. Beneficial effects of prolonged blood pressure control after carotid artery stenting [J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2017, 12(1): 103-109.
[26] Jenab Y, Hosseini K, Abtahi-Eivary SM. Treatment via oral midodrine in a patient with prolonged hypotension following carotid artery stenting: a case report [J]. J Med Case Rep, 2022, 16(1): 67. doi: 10.1186/s13256-022-03270-5.
[1] 张蒙,马伟. 1990—2019年中国人类免疫缺陷病毒/获得性免疫缺陷综合征流行趋势及疾病负担[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 84-89.
[2] 宋晗,王振华,韦铎亮,徐凯,李博文,赵鑫. 术前MELD分级对304例急性StandfordA型主动脉夹层患者术后早期结局的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 31-36.
[3] 穆彦熹,李金洲,陈康,梁红英,姚亚龙,汪文杰,陈晓. 443例胃癌根治术后发生肺部并发症的危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 37-41.
[4] 张博,高娜,席瑞,王协彬. 增材制造NiTi合金支架组织性能研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 63-70.
[5] 王振华,宋晗,韦铎亮,李博文,徐凯,房长存,赵鑫. 急性B型主动脉夹层Castor单分支支架置入术后近端主动脉的早期重塑[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 36-42.
[6] 邵长秀,贺青卿,庄晓璇,李小磊,周鹏,岳涛,高远,徐婧,李陈钰,郭浩男,庄大勇. 934例甲状腺微小乳头状癌颈淋巴结部位转移及危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 57-64.
[7] 姚雪,卢冉冉,孙淑玲,高翠平,肖茹,王书会. 风湿性心脏病患者瓣膜置换术后医院感染风险预测评分模型的构建[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 90-96.
[8] 杨丛品,罗卓野,许秀华,李爱民,郝桂敏. 河北省某医院体检3 512例育龄女性生育选择及压力现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 62-67.
[9] 吕岩红,张志勉. 2 809名体检人群中高血压与幽门螺杆菌感染的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 43-47.
[10] 陈丽宇,肖娟,吕仙忠,段宝敏,洪凡真. 影响孕产妇下肢深静脉血栓预后的危险因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 38-42.
[11] 司海朋,张文灿,李乐,周鑫. Kümmell's病的危险因素和诊治研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 25-32.
[12] 王纬,王凤琴,韩艳丽. 腹腔镜下右附件囊肿剥除术后发生心脏骤停1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 123-124.
[13] 陈擎仪,张烜,王娟,孙继伟,曹丹凤, 曹枫林. 妊娠期女性自杀意念的危险因素及其累积效应[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 91-94.
[14] 孙胜房,马会力,贾竹亭,李民涛. 车祸所致880例四肢开放性损伤并发早期感染的危险性因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 72-77.
[15] 张宁,杨燕,李锐,殷运红,李昊,曲仪庆. 慢阻肺患者感染鲍曼不动杆菌危险因素及耐药性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(9): 88-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发