您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (12): 94-100.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.0553

• • 上一篇    

67例血培养阳性成人布鲁菌感染者的临床特征

苏丽1,曹亚文2,刘耀敏1,张国民1,张建华1,崔凤梅1   

  1. 承德医学院附属医院 1.感染性疾病科;2.老年病科, 河北 承德 067000
  • 发布日期:2022-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 苏丽. E-mail:sulijiayouya@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    2018年承德市科学技术研究与发展计划(201801A054)

Clinical characteristics of 67 adult cases of blood culture-positive Brucella infection

SU Li1, CAO Yawen2, LIU Yaomin1, ZHANG Guomin1, ZHANG Jianhua1, CUI Fengmei1   

  1. 1. Department of Infectious Diseases;
    2. Department of Geriatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, Hebei, China
  • Published:2022-12-01

摘要: 目的 探究血培养阳性成人布鲁菌感染者临床特征。 方法 回顾性分析2015年1月至2020年1月收治的67例于血培养阳性成人布鲁菌感染者的临床资料,描述该类患者临床特征,同时按布鲁菌试管凝集试验抗体效价1∶400分为两组,定义高效价组(≥1∶400),低效价组(<1∶400),比较两组患者上述临床特征差异。 结果 67例患者急性期占86.15%,无发热症状患者4例(5.97%),并发肝损伤56例(83.58%),血清学检查阴性者4例(5.97%)。对两组不同布鲁菌试管凝集试验抗体效价组比较,高效价组男性占比较多(62.96% vs 37.04%,P=0.009),淋巴细胞比例更高34.08±11.87 vs 28.45±10.42,95%CI: 5.64(-11.16~0.12),P=0.045],余一般资料、临床症状、并发症、实验室检查、血培养报阳时间方面两组情况差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 收治的血培养阳性成人布鲁菌感染者临床分期以急性期为主,并发肝损伤概率较高,且有少部分患者无发热或血清学检查阴性,血培养检查可减少漏诊;布鲁菌试管凝集试验高效价组较低效价患者组男性更多,淋巴细胞比例更高。

关键词: 布鲁菌, 菌血症, 血流感染, 临床特征, 试管凝集试验

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics of adult Brucella infection with positive blood culture. Methods The clinical data of 67 adult patients with blood culture-positive Brucella infection admitted to our hospital during Jan. 2015 and Jan. 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and the clinical characteristics were described. According to the antibody titer of Brucella serum agglutination test(SAT)1∶400, the patients were divided into high-titer group(≥1∶400)and low-titer group(<1∶400). The differences in the clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Results The acute stage accounted for 86.15% of all patients, 4(5.97%)had no fever symptoms, 56(83.58%)were complicated with liver injury, and 4(5.97%)had negative serological tests. SAT indicated that the high-titer group had more males(62.96% vs 37.04%, P=0.009), and higher lymphocyte ratio [34.08±11.87 vs 28.45±10.42, 95%CI: 5.64(-11.16-0.12), P=0.045]. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in general information, clinical symptoms, complications, laboratory tests, and positive blood culture time(P>0.05). Conclusion Most adult cases of Brucella infection with positive blood culture are in the acute stage with high risk of liver injury. As a few patients have no fever, or have negative serological test results, blood culture test can reduce missed diagnosis. Compared with the low-titer group, the high-titer group has more males and a higher proportion of lymphocytes.

Key words: Brucella, Bacteremia, Bloodstream infection, Clinical features, Serum agglutination test

中图分类号: 

  • R516.7
[1] Kursun E, Turunc T, Demiroglu Y, et al. Evaluation of four hundred and forty seven brucellosis cases [J]. Intern Med, 2013, 52(7): 745-750.
[2] 任红, 李兰娟. 传染病学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 184-187.
[3] Li YJ, Li XL, Liang S, et al. Epidemiological features and risk factors associated with the spatial and temporal distribution of human brucellosis in China [J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2013, 13: 547. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-547.
[4] Chand P, Chhabra R, Nagra J. Vaccination of adult animals with a reduced dose of Brucella abortus S19 vaccine to control brucellosis on dairy farms in endemic areas of India [J]. Trop Anim Health Prod, 2015, 47(1): 29-35.
[5] Ke?瘙塂li R, Bilgin H,Yilmaz H. Determination of in vitro susceptibilities of Brucella spp. strains against 11 different antibacterial gents isolated from blood cultures [J]. Mikrobiyol Bul, 2017, 51(3): 260-268.
[6] Yagupsky P. Detection of brucella in blood cultures [J]. J Clin Microboil, 1999, 37(11): 3437-3442.
[7] Apa H, Devrim I, Memur S, et al. Factors affecting Brucella spp. blood cultures positivity in children [J]. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 2013, 13(3): 176-180.
[8] Gaifer Z, Ali MEM, AlJehani BH,et al. Risk factors, outcomes and time to detect positive blood culture among cases with acute brucellosis [J]. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 2022, 116(2): 133-138.
[9] Dokuzo guz B, Ergönül O, Baykam N, et al. Characteristics of B. melitensis versus B. abortus bacteraemias [J]. J Infect, 2005, 50(1): 41-45.
[10] Okan DH, Gökmen Z, Seyit B, et al. Mean platelet volume in brucellosis: correlation between brucella standard serum agglutination test results, platelet count, and C-reactive protein [J]. Afr health Sci, 2014, 14(4): 797-801.
[11] 孙华丽, 徐新民, 蒋荣猛, 等. 人布鲁杆菌感染血清学检测及其临床应用价值[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(2): 114-119。 SUN Huali, XU Xinmin, JIANG Rongmeng, et al. Detection and value of serological methods in the diagnosis of human brucellosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(2): 114-119.
[12] Sahinturk H, Baran B, Sisman G, et al. Liver involvement is associated with blood culture positivity and high agglutination titre in patients with brucellosis in Turkey [J]. J Med Microbiol, 2018, 67(8): 1078-1082.
[13] 中华人民共和国卫生部. 布鲁氏菌诊疗指南(试行)[J]. 传染病信息, 2012, 25(6): 323-324. Ministry of Health of the Peoples Republic of China. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Brucella(trial)[J]. Infectious Disease Information, 2012, 25(6): 323-324.
[14] 马红, 姚瑶, 赵梅, 等. 2018年宁夏某院血培养病原菌分布与报警时间分析[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2020, 17(21): 3126-3129. MA Hong, YAO Yao, ZHAO Mei, et al. Analysis of the distribution and alarm time of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture in a hospital in Ningxia in 2018 [J]. Laboratory Medicine and Clinic, 2020, 17(21): 3126-3129.
[15] 王平, 涂文校, 陈秋兰, 等. 2021年5月中国大陆需关注的突发公共卫生事件风险评估[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(5): 403-405. WANG Ping, TU Wenxiao, CHEN Qiulan, et al. Risk assessment of public health emergencies concerned in the mainland of China, May 2021 [J]. Disease Surveillance, 2021, 36(5): 403-405.
[16] 张东梅, 邢亮, 李进春, 等. 河北省坝上地区1200份布鲁菌病血清学检查结果分析[J].中国医药导刊, 2012(2): 627-628. ZHANG Dongmei, XING Liang, LI Jinchun, et al. Analysis of 1200 brucellosis serological test results in Bashang area of Hebei Province [J]. China Medical Journal, 2012(2): 627-628.
[17] 王静, 邵磊, 张叶, 等. 62例急性期布鲁菌病患者的流行病学特征及血液学变化[J]. 中华地方病学杂志, 2019, 38(2): 152-154. WANG Jing, SHAO Lei, ZHANG Ye, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and hematological changes of 62 patients with acute brucellosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Endemic Diseases, 2019, 38(2): 152-154.
[18] 张静怡, 柳念, 张婷, 等. 119例布鲁菌病患者的流行病学特征和临床分析[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2017, 35(6): 332-335. ZHANG Jingyi, LIU Nian, ZHANG Ting, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and clinical analysis of 119 patients with brucellosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2017, 35(6): 332-335.
[19] Demircan F, Mengeloglu Z, K ilinc F, et a1. Evaluation of epidemiological data of 541 patients with brucellosis in Siirt, a city in south-eastern Anatolia [J]. J Clin Exp Invest, 2013, 4(2): 136-140.
[20] Colmenero JD, Reguera JM, Martos F, et a1. Complications associated with Brucella melitensis infection: a study of 530 cases [J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 1996, 75(4): 195-211.
[21] 韩丽红, 刘志国, 刘永华, 等. 布鲁杆菌病患者肝功能损伤临床观察[J]. 中华地方病学杂志, 2015, 34(5): 373-375. HAN Lihong, LIU Zhiguo, LIU Yonghua, et al. Clinical observation of liver function damage in patients with brucellosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Endemic Diseases, 2015, 34(5): 373-375.
[22] Gür Ali, Faruk G M, Bunyamin D, et al. Complications of Brucellosis in Different Age Groups: a Study of 283 Cases in Southeastern Anatolia of Turkey [J]. Yonsei Med J, 2003, 44(1): 33-44.
[23] 王小军, 刘华, 潘辉, 等. 布鲁菌病55例临床分析[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2017, 35(12): 749-751. WANG Xiaojun, LIU Hua, PAN Hui, et al. Clinical analysis of 55 cases of brucellosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2017, 35(12): 749-751.
[24] Kadanali A, Ozden K, Altoparlak U, et al. Bacteremic and Nonbacteremic Brucellosis: Clinical and Laboratory Observations [J]. Infection, 2009, 37(1): 67-69.
[25] Qie C, Cui J, Liu Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of bacteremic brucellosis [J]. J Int Med Res, 2020, 48(7): 1-7.
[26] 吴奎海, 伍启康, 李炜煊. 布鲁菌感染患者降钙素原、C-反应蛋白、白细胞计数和血沉等炎性指标研究[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2017, 27(3): 363-365. WU Kuihai, WU Qikang, LI Weixuan. Study of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in Brucella infections [J]. China Journal of Health Technology, 2017, 27(3): 363-365.
[1] 巩雨,高震,王虎清,杨晶雯,张桂莲,展淑琴,张茹,吴海琴. 4例继发性肥大性下橄榄核变性的临床及影像学特点[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 37-42.
[2] 梁子婷,许长娟,曾荣,张锦涛,曾庆师,董亮. 9例儿童异基因造血干细胞移植后闭塞性细支气管炎综合征的临床特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(12): 58-62.
[3] 李燕,刘静,李娟,杨秋红. 50例孕产妇血流感染临床特征及胎盘病理分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 48-54.
[4] 游雪婷,田兴松. 3 514例乳腺癌9年间临床及病理学特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 49-54.
[5] 曹爱华,段春红,邱丙平,路苓,李可亮, 刘学工,周志远,孙建华,鞠秀丽. 山东省儿童新型冠状病毒感染者流行病学及临床特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(6): 34-40.
[6] 李杨, 王中素, 刘鲁祁, 刘天起, 王东, 柳雪, 王明华, 侯应龙. 某三甲医院80例感染性心内膜炎患者临床特征及内外科疗效比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(6): 22-27.
[7] 雷宇,陆婧,顾佳颖,周登峰,李园园,卢桥发. 新型冠状病毒肺炎51例临床特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(4): 65-70.
[8] 周生余,王春亭,张伟,王锡明,董亮. 山东省新型冠状病毒肺炎患者537例临床特征与救治效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(3): 44-51.
[9] 崔亮亮,耿兴义,赵小冬,杨国樑,常彩云,赵梦娇,李战,王春荣,刘岚铮,阮师漫. 济南市现阶段新型冠状病毒肺炎的流行特征与思考[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(3): 52-57.
[10] 张孝国,马艳,肖嘉安,张忠法. 济南市儿童新型冠状病毒肺炎的临床特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(3): 62-64.
[11] 马洁,田野,黄璐,孟维静,王素珍,石福艳. ARIMA乘积季节模型与广义回归神经网络模型在布鲁菌病发病预测的比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(6): 76-82.
[12] 苗萌,贾国勇,刘颖,王翠兰. 36例成人流行性乙型脑炎临床分析和影像学特点[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(2): 23-27.
[13] 崔毅,尹梅,李伟,李远,韩辉,单悌超,岳金凤,丁士芳,李琛,陈晓梅,吴大玮,王昊. 山东大学齐鲁医院金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染发生率、菌株耐药性、抗菌药物使用及预后变化[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(12): 33-38.
[14] 李劳冬,明莫瑜,蒋连强,蒋清柏,凌宙贵,吴昕. 气管血管球瘤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(12): 111-113.
[15] 聂思月,王震,孙靖宇,刘杰,李娟,魏小娟,路春晓,吕兴龑,王淑云,孙玉萍. ANGPTL5在人胃癌组织中的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(8): 61-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!