您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (6): 83-86.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.1163

• • 上一篇    

50例正颌外科手术中手套穿孔情况分析

张新莲1,吕霞1,贾婷婷1,孙志新2,李青3,张风河3   

  1. 1. 山东中医药大学附属医院口腔科, 山东 济南 250014;2. 山东中医药大学第一临床学院西医外科教研室, 山东 济南 250355;3.山东大学口腔医学院·口腔医院 口腔颌面外科 山东省口腔组织再生重点实验室 山东省口腔生物材料与组织再生工程实验室, 山东 济南 250012
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 张风河. E-mail:zfengh@sdu.edu.cn.李青. E-mail:lq580202@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81802709);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2018BH024)

Analysis of glove perforation in 50 cases of orthognathic surgery

ZHANG Xinlian1, LYU Xia1, JIA Tingting1, SUN Zhixin2, LI Qing3, ZHANG Fenghe3   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Western Surgery, the First Clinical College of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong, China;
    3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University &
    Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration &
    Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

PDF (PC)

37

摘要： 目的 研究正颌外科手术术中手套穿孔的情况,为降低手套穿孔率、预防交叉感染提供理论依据。 方法 收集2018年3月~2019年9月于山东大学口腔医院口腔颌面外科进行的50例正颌外科手术中使用的472只手套,分别采用术中、术后肉眼观察、术后手套内注水加压的方法,评价穿孔率、穿孔部位及好发的正颌外科手术类型。 结果 正颌外科手术中手术人员共穿孔84只手套,其中主刀医师手套穿孔率占30.07%,穿孔的部位主要为左手食指,下颌骨矢状劈开术最为好发正颌外科手术类型。 结论 正颌外科手术中以肉眼观察的方式发现居多,其中主刀医师、左手示指、下颌骨矢状劈开术发生手套穿孔率高,为减少医患交叉感染,建议戴双层手套加以防护。

关键词: 正颌外科手术, 手套穿孔率, 交叉感染, 手术团队

Abstract: Objective To explore the occurrence of glove perforation in orthognathic surgery in order to reduce its occurrence and prevent cross infection. Methods A total of 472 gloves used in 50 orthognathic surgeries were collected during Mar. 2018 and Sep. 2019 in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, of School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Shandong University. The gloves were observed with naked eyes during and after surgery, and then were filled with water to observe the perforation rate, site, and occurrence rate in different types of orthognathic surgeries. Results Altogether 84 gloves perforated, 30.07% of which were worn by dominant surgeons. Perforation was most likely to occur in the left index finger, and in operations like sagittal split of mandible. Conclusion In orthognathic surgery, most glove perforations were detected by visual observation, which are likely to occur in the dominant surgeons left index finger and in operations such as sagittal split of mandible. In order to reduce cross infection, surgeons had better put on double-layer gloves for protection.

Key words: Orthognathic surgery, Perforation rate of gloves, Cross infection, Surgical team

中图分类号: 

  • R782.2+3
[1] Childs T. Use of double gloving to reduce surgical personnels risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens: an integrative review[J]. AORN J, 2013, 98(6):585-596.
[2] Korniewicz D, El-Masri M. Exploring the benefits of double gloving during surgery[J]. AORN J, 2012, 95(3):328-336.
[3] Sayin S, Yilmaz E, Baydur H. Rate of glove perforation in open abdominal surgery and the associated risk factors[J]. Surg Infect(Larchmt), 2019, 20(4):286-291.
[4] Elce YA, Laverty S, Almeida DSE, et al. Frequency of undetected glove perforation and associated risk factors in equine Surgery[J]. Vet Surg, 2016, 45(8):1066-1070.
[5] Misteli H, Weber WP, Reck S, et al. Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection[J]. Arch Surg, 2009, 144(6):553-558.
[6] Kang MS, Lee YR, Hwang JH, et al. A cross-sectional study of surgical glove perforation during the posterior lumbar interbody spinal fusion surgery: Its frequency, location, and risk factors[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2018, 97(22):e10895. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000010895.
[7] Brandtner C, Borumandi F, Krenkel C, et al. Blunt wires in oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 53(3):301-302.
[8] Kuroyanagi N, Nagao T, Sakuma H, et al. Risk of surgical glove perforation in oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 41(8):1014-1019.
[9] Egeler K, Stephenson N, Stanke N. Glove perforation rate with orthopedic gloving versus double gloving technique in tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: a randomized trial[J]. Can Vet J, 2016, 57(11):1156-1160.
[10] Manjunath AP, Shepherd JH, Barton DP, et al. Glove perforations during open surgery for gynaecological malignancies[J]. BJOG, 2008, 115(8):1015-1019.
[11] Myers DJ, Epling C, Dement J, et al. Risk of sharp device-related blood and body fluid exposure in operating rooms[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2008, 29(12):1139-1148.
[12] Sinobad V, Dodic S, Strajnic L, et al. The effects of orthognathic surgery on mandibular movements in patients with mandibular prognathism[J].Srp Arh Celok Lek, 2012, 140(11-12):704-710.
[13] Driever R, Beie M, Schmitz E, et al. Surgical glove perforation in cardiac surgery[J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2001, 49(6):328-330.
[14] Laine T, Aarnio P. How often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system[J]. Am J Surg, 2001, 181(6):564-566.
[15] Li X, Li M, Li J, et al. Glove perforation and contamination in fracture fixation surgeries[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2017,45(4):458-460.
[16] Kumar D, Shantanu K, Kumar M, et al. A cross-sectional analysis of glove perforation in primary andrevision total hip arthroplasty[J]. Malays Orthop J, 2016, 10(3):31-35.
[17] Mingoli A, Brachini G, Sgarzini G, et al.Needlestick injuries, glove perforation and round-tipped blunt needles[J]. World J Surg, 2017, 41(9):2413.
[18] Gaujac C, Ceccheti MM, Yonezaki F, et al. Comparative analysis of 2 techniques of double-gloving protection during arch bar placement for intermaxillary fixation[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(10):1922-1925.
[19] Daeschlein G, Kramer A, Arnold A, et al. Evaluation of an innovative antimicrobial surgical glove technology to reduce the risk of microbial passage following intraoperative perforation[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2011, 39(2):98-103.
[20] Partecke LI, Goerdt AM, Langner I, et al. Incidence of microperforation for surgical gloves depends on duration of wear[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2009, 30(5):409-414.
[21] Phillips S. The comparison of double gloving to single gloving in the theatre environment[J]. J Perioper Pract, 2011, 21(1):10-15.
[22] Makama JG, Okeme IM, Makama EJ, et al. Glove perforation rate in surgery: arandomized, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of double gloving[J]. Surg Infect(Larchmt), 2016, 17(4):436-442.
[23] Mischke C, Verbeek JH, Saarto A, et al. Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014,(3): CD009573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009573.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发