中文简版共同反刍问卷在1 354名护生中应用的信效度评价

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.0039

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的为评估护生的共同反刍水平,对共同反刍问卷(CRQ)进行汉化和修订,探讨其因素结构,并评估其信度和效度。方法征得原量表作者同意后,对英文版CRQ进行汉化。选取1 354名山东省护理院校学生施测,用于调查个体在双向人际关系中过多探讨自身或者对方问题的共同反刍行为,并分析中文版CRQ的信效度。结果中文简版共同反刍问卷(CRQ-9)共9个条目;单维模型主要拟合指标良好(卡方自由度比值、渐进残差均方和平方根、适配度指数、调整后适配度指数、比较适配指数、增值适配指数以及非规准适配指数分别为2.584、0.048、0.986、0.965、0.989、0.989、0.978);CRQ得分与焦虑、抑郁、观点采择和个人痛苦均呈低度正相关(r为0.195~0.315,P均<0.001);Cronbach α系数为0.875,Guttman折半信度系数为0.899(P<0.01)。结论 CRQ-9与原量表的框架构想一致,具有良好的信效度,可用于我国护生群体中共同反刍水平的评估。

关键词: 护生, 共同反刍, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To assess co-rumination of college nursing students, translate the English version of Co-rumination Questionnaire(CRQ)into Chinese and revise it, and evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Methods After translating the English version of CRQ with the permission of the author of the original English scale, totally 1 354 nursing students completed the Chinese version of CRQ for investigating co-rumination in which individuals excessively discussed personal problems within a dyadic relationship. Then the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CRQ were tested. Results The simplified Chinese version of 9-item Co-rumination Questionnaire(CRQ-9)was obtained. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting degree of the single-dimensional model was good, with χ2/df and root mean square error of approximation(RMSEA)being 2.584 and 0.048, respectively, and goodness-of-fit index(GFI), adjusted goodness-of-fit index(AGFI), comparative fit index(CFI), incremental fit index(IFI), and Tacker-Lewis index(TLI)being more than 0.900. The score of CRQ-9 was positively correlated with anxiety, depression, perspective taking and personal distress(r=0.195-0.315, all P<0.001). Cronbach α coefficient was 0.875 and Guttman split-half reliability was 0. 899(P<0.01). Conclusion The single factor structure of CRQ-9 is consistent with the original scale and CRQ-9 has good reliability and validity, and can be generalized to evaluate co-rumination of Chinese college nursing students.

Key words: Nursing students, Co-rumination, Reliability, Validity

中图分类号:

R181

张云雪,解子惠,吕高荣,申世玉,厉萍. 中文简版共同反刍问卷在1 354名护生中应用的信效度评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 85-90.

ZHANG Yunxue, XIE Zihui, LYU Gaorong, SHEN Shiyu, LI Ping. Reliability and validity of Co-rumination Questionnaire in 1 354 college nursing students[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2021, 59(7): 85-90.

参考文献

[1] Rose AJ. Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys[J]. Child Dev, 2002, 73(6): 1830-1843.
[2] 吴宁,蒋京川.关注心灵的独白:从自我反刍到共同反刍[J].社会心理科学, 2011, 26(Z2): 140-143. WU Ning, JIANG Jingchuan. Pay close attention to the talking from our spirit: from self-rumination to co-rumination[J]. Science of Social Psychology, 2011, 26(Z2): 140-143.
[3] 范翠英,褚晓伟,王明忠,等.共同冗思的概念、测量和理论解释[J].心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(5): 631-640. FAN Cuiying, CHU Xiaowei, WANG Mingzhong, et al. Co-rumination: conceptualization, measurements and theoretical explanation[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(5): 631-640.
[4] Rose AJ, Carlson W, Waller EM. Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment: considering the socioemotional trade-offs of co-rumination[J]. Dev Psychol, 2007, 43(4): 1019-1031.
[5] 仇丽娜.自我表露与亲密关系的关系:共同反刍的调节作用[D].烟台:鲁东大学, 2019.
[6] Rose AJ, Schwartz-Mette RA, Glick GC, et al. An observational study of co-rumination in adolescent friendships[J]. Dev Psychol, 2014, 50(9): 2199-2209.
[7] Haggard DL, Robert C, Rose AJ. Co-rumination in the workplace: adjustment trade-offs for men and women who engage in excessive discussions of workplace problems[J]. J Bus Psychol, 2011, 26(1): 27-40.
[8] Stone LB, Hankin BL, Gibb BE, et al. Co-rumination predicts the onset of depressive disorders during adolescence[J]. J Abnorm Psychol, 2011, 120(3): 752-757.
[9] Rose AJ, Glick GC, Smith RL, et al. Co-rumination exacerbates stress generation among adolescents with depressive symptoms[J]. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 2017, 45(5): 985-995.
[10] Spendelow JS, Simonds LM, Avery RE. The relationship between co-rumination and internalizing problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Psychol Psychot, 2017, 24(2): 512-527.
[11] 赖丽足, 任志洪, 陶嵘. 过度“分享”负性事件与性别、心理健康和关系质量:对共同反刍的元分析[J].心理科学进展, 2018, 26(1): 42-55. LAI Lizu, REN Zhihong, TAO Rong. A meta-analysis on co-rumination[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(1): 42-55.
[12] 申世玉.高职在校护生专业承诺与归因风格的相关性[D].济南:山东大学, 2015.
[13] 尹红峰.青少年自尊、同伴反刍、自我妨碍的关系研究[D].曲阜:曲阜师范大学, 2011.
[14] Jose PE, Wilkins H, Spendelow JS. Does social anxiety predict rumination and co-rumination among adolescents? [J]. Clin Child Adolesc Psychol, 2012, 41(1): 86-91.
[15] Hankin BL, Stone L, Wright PA. Corumination, interpersonal stress generation, and internalizing symptoms: accumulating effects and transactional influences in a multiwave study of adolescents[J]. Dev Psychopathol, 2010, 22(1): 217-235.
[16] Dam A, Roelofs J, Muris P. Correlates of co-rumination in non-clinical adolescents[J]. J Child Fam Stud, 2014, 23(3): 521-526.
[17] Davidson CL, Grant DM, Byrd-Craven J, et al. Psychometric properties of the co-rumination questionnaire[J]. Pers Individ Dif, 2014, 70: 171-175.
[18] 于静, 王佳宁, 于淼. 共同冗思问卷在中学生中应用的效度和信度[J].中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(1): 16-20. YU Jing, WANG Jianing, YU Miao. Validity and reliability of the co-rumination questionnaire in middle school students[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2018, 26(1): 16-20.
[19] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[20] Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder-the GAD-7[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2006, 166(10): 1092-1097.
[21] Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2001, 16(9): 606-613.
[22] Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure[J]. Psychiat Ann, 2002, 32(9): 509-515.
[23] Davis MH. Measuring individual-differences in empathy-evidence for a multidimensional approach[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1983, 44(1): 113-126.
[24] 张凤凤,董毅,汪凯,等.中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)的信度及效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18(2): 155-157. ZHANG Fengfeng, DONG Yi, WANG Kai, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index-C[J].Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2010, 18(2): 155-157.
[25] 吴姗姗.青少年精神分裂症共情能力的研究[D].安徽:安徽医科大学, 2017.
[26] 方积乾.医学统计学与电脑实验[M].3版.上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2006: 437-441.
[27] 吴明隆.结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010: 212-243.
[28] 王艳荣,林萍珍,曹枫林.中文儿童期不良经历问卷修订版的效度与信度[J].中国心理卫生杂志, 2018, 32(9): 760-764. WANG Yanrong, LIN Pingzhen, CAO Fenglin. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Revised Adverse Childhood Experience Questionnaire[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2018, 32(9): 760-764.
[29] Waller JM, Silk JS, Stone LB, et al. Co-rumination and co-problem solving in the daily lives of adolescents with major depressive disorder[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2014, 53(8): 869-878.
[30] Smith RL, Rose AJ. The “Cost of Caring” in youths friendships: considering associations among social perspective taking, co-rumination, and empathetic distress[J]. Dev Psychol, 2011, 47(6): 1792-1803.
[31] 方鹏骞. 医学社会科学研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2010: 71-74.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed