您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (1): 115-121.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.1078

• 公共卫生与管理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

疫情期间山东某高校预防医学本科生在线学习投入与学习收获的影响因素

李佳佳1,2,方峰1,李梦斐3,刘亚卓1,李士雪1,2   

  1. 1. 山东大学齐鲁医学院公共卫生学院卫生管理与政策研究中心, 山东 济南 250012;2. 国家卫生健康委员会卫生经济与政策研究重点实验室(山东大学), 山东 济南 250012;3. 复旦大学附属妇产科医院, 上海 200090
  • 发布日期:2021-01-09
  • 通讯作者: 李士雪. E-mail:shixueli@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    山东大学教育教学改革研究项目(2020Y265);山东大学齐鲁医学院本科教学改革与研究项目(qlyxjy-201720)

A Study on the influencing factors of online student engagement and learning outcome in preventive medicine undergraduates during COVID-2019 epidemic

LI Jiajia1,2, FANG Feng1, LI Mengfei3, LIU Yazhuo1, LI Shixue1,2   

  1. 1. Centre for Health Management and Policy Reasearch, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 200512, Shandong, China;
    2. NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    3. OB/GYN Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200090, Shanghai, China
  • Published:2021-01-09

PDF (PC)

372

摘要： 目的 以预防医学专业的本科教育为例,检验和评价“停课不停学”期间学生在线学习的投入度与学习收获,分析其主要影响因素。 方法 使用学习投入量表和学习收获量表,采用整群抽样,抽取山东某高校预防医学所有本科生对其所有在线课程中的学习投入和学习收获展开电子问卷调查,共获得3 092份有效问卷。采用t检验、one-way ANOVA单因素分析和OLS回归对在线学习投入度和学习收获的影响因素进行统计分析。 结果 预防医学本科生在线学习的学习投入度得分为42.31分,学习收获的平均得分为16.38。年级、最近一次班级排名、课程属性、教师是否布置预习任务、是否分享教学大纲、是否分享预习资料、2学时内提问/测验的次数、是否考核平时成绩是学习投入的影响因素。性别、年级、最近一次班级排名、课程属性、教师是否布置作业是学习收获的影响因素。 结论 预防医学本科生在线学习的投入度整体不高,自主学习能力较为欠缺。需要通过良好的平台和制度保障,促进智能时代教学的深入改革,进一步改善教学质量,提高学生的学习投入和学习收获。

关键词: 在线学习, 学习投入, 学习收获, 教学投入, 预防医学专业

Abstract: Objective Taking the undergraduate education and preventive medicine for example, this paper examines and evaluates the student engagement and learning outcome in online learning during the period of “suspending classes without stopping learning”, and to explore the influencing factors. Methods All undergraduates of preventive medicine in a university in Shandong Province were surveyed with electronic questionnaire of Student Engagement Scale and Learning Outcome Scale. A total of 3 092 questionairs were enroued. The influencing factors were analyzed with t-test, one-way ANOVA and OLS regression. Results The student engagement score was 42.31, and the learning outcome score was 16.38. Grade, ranking, course type, assignments of preview tasks, share of syllabus, share of preview materials, number of questions/quizzes, and assessment of general performance were the influencing factors of student engagement, while gender, grade, ranking, course type and assignments were the influencing factors of learning outcome. Conclusion On the whole, undergraduates of preventive medicine have medium or low level of online learning engagement, and their self-learning ability is relatively poor. Due attention should be paid to promote the in-depth reform of online teaching through good platform and institutional guarantee so as to increase the level of student engagement and learning outcome.

Key words: Online learning, Student engagement, Learning outcome, Teaching engagement, Preventive medicine

中图分类号: 

  • R195.1
[1] 教育部. 延期开学后, 孩子“宅家”咋学习?教育部: 利用网络平台, “停课不停学”[EB/OL].(2020-01-29)[2020-06-30]. http://wwwmoegovcn/ jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202001/t20200129_416993html.
[2] 谢幼如, 邱艺, 黄瑜玲, 等. 疫情防控期间“停课不停学”在线教学方式的特征、问题与创新[J]. 电化教育研究, 2020, 41(3): 20-28. XIE Youru, QIU Yi, HUANG Yuling, et al. Characteristics, problems and innovations of online teaching of "No suspension of classes" during the period of epidemic prevention and control[J]. E-Education Research, 2020, 41(3): 20-28.
[3] 万昆, 郑旭东, 任友群. 规模化在线学习准备好了吗?——后疫情时期的在线学习与智能技术应用思考[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2020, 38(3): 105-112. WAN Kun, ZHENG Xudong, REN Youqun. Does large-scale online learning prepare: The thinking of online intelligent learning in the post-epidemic period[J]. Journal of Distance Education, 2020, 38(3): 105-112.
[4] NSSE US. English Instrument [EB/OL].(2020-03-01)[2020-07-01]. https://nsseindianaedu/nsse/survey-instruments/us-englishhtml
[5] Dixson MD. Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging?[J]. J Scholar Teach Learn, 2010, 10(2): 1-13.
[6] Sinatra GM, Heddy BC, Lombardi D. The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science[J]. Educ Psychol, 2015, 50(1): 1-13.
[7] Kuh G. The national survey of student engagement: conceptual and empirical foundations[J]. New Direc Institut Res, 2009, 141: 5-20. doi:10.1002/ir.283.
[8] Pike GR. Measuring quality: a comparison of US News rankings and NSSE benchmarks[J]. Res High Educ, 2004, 45(2): 193-208.
[9] Spring KJ, Graham CR, Hadlock CA. The current landscape of international blended learning[J]. Int J Tech Enhanc Learn, 2016, 8(1): 84-102.
[10] 李爽, 喻忱. 远程学生学习投入评价量表编制与应用[J]. 开放教育研究, 2015, 21(6): 62-70. Ll Shuang, YU Chen. Development and implementation of distance student engagement scale[J]. Open Education Research, 2015, 21(6): 62-70.
[11] Khan A, Egbue O, Palkie B, et al. Active learning: engaging students to maximize learning in an online course[J]. Electron J E-Learn, 2017, 15(2): 107-115.
[12] 刘玉静, 杨洋. 基于学习投入的高校课程教学质量评价——基于华东地区17所本科高校的实证研究[J]. 教育发展研究, 2019, 38(9): 27-33. LIU Yujing, YANY Yang. Evaluation of instruction in higher education from the perspective of student engagement:An empirical study based on 17 undergraduate universities in east China[J]. Research in Educational Development, 2019, 38(9): 27-33.
[13] Cole AW, Lennon L, Weber NL. Student perceptions of online active learning practices and online learning climate predict online course engagement[J]. Interact Learn Envir, 2019. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1619593.
[14] Clark RE. Reconsidering research on learning from media[J]. Rev Educ Res, 1983, 53(4): 445-459.
[15] 陈纯槿, 王红. 混合学习与网上学习对学生学习效果的影响——47个实验和准实验的元分析[J]. 开放教育研究, 2013, 19(2): 69-78. CHEN Chunjin, WANG Hong. The effectiveness of blended learning and e-learning on student learning outcomes: A meta-snalysis of 47 experimental and quasi-experimental studies[J]. Open Education Research, 2013, 19(2): 69-78.
[16] Cho MH, Cho Y. Instructor scaffolding for interaction and students' academic engagement in online learning: Mediating role of perceived online class goal structures[J]. Internet High Educ, 2014, 21:25-30. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.008.
[17] 彭海虹, 杜翠叶. 自主学习能力现状调查与思考——开放教育学习者素质提升与能力培养探索之一[J]. 开放教育研究, 2013, 19(6): 102-107. PENG Haihong, DU Cuiye. Cultivating autonomic learning ability: An exploration of promoting open education learners quality and ability[J]. Open Education Research, 2013, 19(6): 102-107.
[18] Hew KF. Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS[J]. Brit J Educ Technol, 2016, 47(2): 320-341.
[19] Sun PC, Tsai RJ, Finger G, et al. What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction[J]. Comput Educ, 2008, 50(4): 1183-1202.
[20] 李爽, 钟瑶. 在线教师教学投入对学生学习绩效的影响—基于教师和学生的视角[J]. 开放教育研究, 2020, 26(3): 99-110. LI Shuang, ZHONG Yao. The influence of online teachers teaching engagement on students learning performance: from the perspectives of teachers and students[J]. Open Education Research, 2020, 26(3): 99-110.
[1] 韩璇,孙秀彬,刘铱,王淑康,刘静,袁中尚,张涛,李秀君,薛付忠,刘云霞. 预防医学专业学生《卫生统计学》学习满意度评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 109-113.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 郑敏,郝跃伟,刘雪平,赵婷婷. 血小板膜糖蛋白Ibα基因HPA-2、Kozak序列多态性与脑梗死的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(3): 292 -295 .
[2] 方英立,马玉燕,刘锡梅,周文 . 急诊剖宫产患者围手术期替硝唑合理应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(10): 995 .
[3] 姜红菊,李润智,王营,徐冬梅,张梅,张运,李继福 . 冠状动脉粥样硬化斑块形态及介入治疗与MMP-9的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(10): 966 -970 .
[4] 张杰,李振华,孙晋浩,暴丽华,刘岳鹏. 恒定磁场对Schwann细胞氧化损伤的保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(3): 229 -232 .
[5] 王术芹,齐 峰,吴剑波,孙宝柱. 罗哌卡因对大鼠离体主动脉收缩作用的钙离子调节机制[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(8): 773 -776 .
[6] 滕学仁,赵永生,胡光亮,周伦,李建民 . 两种方法保存同种异体髌腱移植重建膝关节交叉韧带的光镜电镜观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(10): 945 -950 .
[7] 赵鹏,毕万利,李宁 . 螺旋CT后处理技术对青少年先天性脊柱畸形的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(8): 825 -829 .
[8] 袁吴敏,赵志伦,王洁贞 . 吸烟和饮酒与颅内肿瘤关系的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(11): 1146 -1149 .
[9] 杨希1 ，高鹏2 ，薛玉文1 ，王妍2 ，刘文君2 ，张晓芳2
. 肺腺癌中DNA甲基转移酶1的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(01): 30 -33 .
[10] 焦芳芳,刘世青,李飞,李长生,王琴,孙青,鹿伟 . 化瘀理肺方对大鼠肺间质纤维化时Smad7和TGF-β表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(10): 1054 -1058 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发