经导管介入治疗主动脉瓣下边缘<2 mm的室间隔缺损疗效评价

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.1145

山东大学学报（医学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (8): 52-56.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.1145

经导管介入治疗主动脉瓣下边缘<2 mm的室间隔缺损疗效评价

赵立健,韩波,张建军,伊迎春,姜殿东,吕建利,王静

山东大学附属省立医院小儿心脏科, 山东济南 250021

收稿日期:2016-09-12 出版日期:2017-08-10 发布日期:2017-08-10
通讯作者: 韩波. E-mail:hanbo35@163.com E-mail:hanbo35@163.com
基金资助:
山东省科技攻关项目(2016GSF201101)

Feasibility and safety of transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect with subaortic rim <2 mm

ZHAO Lijian, HAN Bo, ZHANG Jianjun, YI Yingchun, JIANG Diandong, LÜ Jianli, WANG Jing

Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China

Received:2016-09-12 Online:2017-08-10 Published:2017-08-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨经导管介入治疗主动脉瓣下边缘<2 mm的室间隔缺损的可行性及疗效。方法回顾性分析2010年5月至2016年5月接受介入治疗的室间隔缺损患者156例临床资料。根据术前超声测量的主动脉瓣下边缘距离分为短边组(<2 mm,n=69)和长边组(≥2 mm,n=87)。对两组治疗效果及术后并发症进行比较,并对短边组介入治疗失败的危险因素等指标进行分析。结果短边组介入治疗成功率78.3%,长边组介入治疗成功率为96.6%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。短边组轻微主动脉瓣反流5例,术后心律失常23例,残余分流6例,无机械性溶血发生。长边组轻微主动脉瓣反流1例,心律失常14例,残余分流6例,其中2例出现轻微溶血。短边组Logistic回归分析结果显示,术前合并主动脉瓣脱垂(OR=8.8,95%CI: 1.4~54.9,P=0.02)及VSD缺损≥5 mm(OR=11.6,95%CI:2.37~57.11,P=0.003)为介入治疗失败独立危险因素。结论主动脉瓣下边缘<2 mm的VSD介入治疗成功率较低,术前合并主动脉瓣脱垂及缺损≥5 mm患者是介入治疗失败的危险因素,需严格掌握介入治疗适应证。

关键词: 残余分流, 房室传导阻滞, 主动脉残边, 主动脉瓣反流, 室间隔缺损

Abstract: Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect(VSD)with subaortic rim less than 2 mm. Methods The clinical data of 156 patients with VSD who underwent percutaneous interventional procedure during May 2010 and May 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. According to the subaortic rim by transthoracic echocardiography, the patients were divided into short rim group(<2 mm, n=69)and long rim group(≥2 mm, n=87). The success rate and complications were compared. The risk factors of failure in short rim group were studied with Logistic regression analysis. Results The success rate of short rim group and long rim group was 78.3% vs 96.6%(P<0.01). Complications in the short rim group included trivial aortic regurgitation in 5 cases, heart arrhythmia in 23 cases and trivial residual shunt without mechanical hemolysis in 6 cases. Complications in the long rim group included trivial aortic regurgitation in 1 case, heart arrhythmias in 14 cases, residual shunt in 6 cases and mechanical hemolysis in 2 cases. Logistic regression analysis revealed aortic valve prolapse before procedure(OR=8.8, 95%CI: 1.4-54.9, P=0.02)and defects ≥5 mm(OR=11.6, 95%CI: 2.37-57.11, P=0.003)were independent 山东大学学报 (医学版)55卷8期 -赵立健,等.经导管介入治疗主动脉瓣下边缘<2 mm的室间隔缺损疗效评价 \=-risk factors of failure. Conclusion Transcatheter closure of VSD with subaortic rim <2 mm has relatively lower success rate. Short subaortic rim combined with aortic valve prolapse before procedure and defects ≥5 mm were independent risk factors of failure. Therefore, indications of interventional procedure for VSD with short subaortic rim should be strictly selected.

Key words: Ventricular septal defect, Subaortic rim, Residual shunt, Atrioventricular block, Aortic regurgitation

中图分类号:

R725.4

赵立健,韩波,张建军,伊迎春,姜殿东,吕建利,王静. 经导管介入治疗主动脉瓣下边缘<2 mm的室间隔缺损疗效评价[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(8): 52-56.

ZHAO Lijian, HAN Bo, ZHANG Jianjun, YI Yingchun, JIANG Diandong, LÜ Jianli, WANG Jing. Feasibility and safety of transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect with subaortic rim <2 mm[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2017, 55(8): 52-56.

参考文献

[1] 中国医师协会心血管内科分会先心病工作委员会. 常见先天性心脏病介入治疗中国专家共识二、室间隔缺损介入治疗[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2011, 20(2): 87-92.
[2] 中华儿科杂志编辑委员会, 《中华医学杂志英文版》编辑委员会. 先天性心脏病经导管介入治疗指南[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2004, 42(3): 234-239.
[3] Kenny D, Tometzki A, Martin R. Significant aortic regurgitation associated with transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects with a deficient aortic rim[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2007, 70(3): 445-449.
[4] Chen GL, Li HT, Li HR, et al. Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect in patients with aortic valve prolapse and mild aortic regurgitation: feasibility and preliminary outcome[J]. Asian Pac J Trop Med, 2015, 8(4): 315-318.
[5] Gu M, You X, Zhao X, et al. Transcatheter device closure of intracristal ventricular septal defects[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2011, 107(1): 110-113.
[6] Lin K, Zhu D, Tao K, et al. Hybrid perventricular device closure of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defects: mid-term results[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 82(3): 225-232.
[7] Zhang S, Zhu D, An Q, et al. Minimally invasive perventricular device closure of doubly committed sub-arterial ventricular septal defects: single center long-term follow-up results[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 10(9): 119-126.
[8] Xing Q, Wu Q, Shi L, et al. Minimally invasive transthoracic device closure of isolated ventricular septal defects without cardiopulmonary bypass: long-term follow-up results[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015, 149(1): 257-264.
[9] Hongxin L, Wenbin G, Liang F, et al. Perventricular device closure of a doubly committed juxtaarterial ventricular septal defect through a left parasternal approach: midterm follow-up results[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 10(11):175-182.
[10] Bai Y, Xu XD, Li CY, et al. Complete atrioventricular block after percutaneous device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect: A single-center experience on 1046 cases[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2015, 12(10): 2132-2140.
[11] Zhou D, Pan W, Guan L, et al. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous and intracristal ventricular septal defects with the SHSMA occluder[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2012, 79(4): 666-674.
[12] Wei Y, Wang X, Zhang S, et al. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects(VSD)with VSD occluder: early and mid-term results[J]. Heart Vessels, 2012, 27(4): 398-404.
[13] Zhong QH, Zheng HY, Zhang ZW, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of arrhythmias after transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2014, 42(10): 840-845.
[14] Li JJ, Zhang ZW, Qian MY, et al. Transcatbeter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects: a comparative study between the asymmetric device and the symmetric device[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 2009, 17(6): 301-304.
[15] Topcuoglu MS, Atalay A, Gocen U, et al. An unusual complication of the ventricular septal defect closure by device: Late right aortic cusp perforation[J]. Heart Lung Circ, 2015, 24(7): 118-121.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

经导管介入治疗主动脉瓣下边缘<2 mm的室间隔缺损疗效评价

Feasibility and safety of transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect with subaortic rim <2 mm

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

多维度评价

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	冯致余, 郭锐, 杨彦亮, 李海明, 董明亮, 徐惠惠, 刘义敏, 郭凯, 王广震, 王辉. 右心室-肺动脉连接在分期治疗肺动脉闭锁/室间隔缺损中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(11): 41-45.
[2]	胡佳蓉, 范延玮, 施彬垚, 李振中. 心脏罕见畸形1例报告及分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(10): 108-110.
[3]	赵立健,韩波,张建军,庄建新,靳有鹏,王玉林. 经导管介入治疗90例室间隔缺损疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(5): 89-92.
[4]	张坤,王莉华,李福海,夏伟,孙若鹏,王一彪,郝芳之 . 先天性室间隔缺损对患儿心理行为的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(11): 1053-1056.