内镜下两种入路232例垂体瘤切除术对嗅觉功能影响的临床观察

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.0038

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过对接受经鼻直接蝶窦入路和经鼻中隔黏膜下入路垂体腺瘤切除术的两组患者进行嗅觉测试,结合临床数据资料,分析比较两组患者嗅觉功能的变化,探讨其对临床的指导意义。方法收集2017年1月至2018年4月在我院神经外科收治的232例垂体瘤患者,根据不同手术入路方式分为观察组和对照组;研究期间将经鼻中隔黏膜下入路手术的患者149例纳入观察组,将直接蝶窦入路手术的患者83例纳入对照组,采用五味试嗅法测试两组患者手术前后不同时间点嗅觉察觉阈值和识别阈值。结果术前观察组和对照组察觉阈值分别是1.70±0.30、1.67±0.36, 识别阈值分别是2.22±0.52、2.26±0.50,两组患者嗅觉阈值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1个月观察组和对照组察觉阈值分别是3.22±0.99、3.56±0.91(P=0.011), 识别阈值分别是3.79±0.84、4.34±0.82(P<0.001),两组患者的嗅觉阈值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且对照组较观察组患者的嗅觉察觉阈值和识别阈值高;术后3个月观察组和对照组察觉阈值分别是2.69±0.70、3.05±0.97(P=0.003),识别阈值分别是3.31±0.74、3.84±0.76(P<0.001), 两组患者的嗅觉阈值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后6个月时观察组和对照组察觉阈值分别是2.21±0.64、2.66±0.79(P<0.001), 识别阈值分别是2.98±0.64、 3.44±0.55(P<0.001),两组患者之间的嗅觉阈值差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),且对照组较观察组患者的察觉阈值和识别阈值高。结论两种术式均可导致患者的嗅觉功能降低,术后6个月随访时嗅觉功能仍不能恢复到术前水平。相比之下,经鼻中隔黏膜下入路垂体腺瘤切除术对患者的嗅觉功能影响较小。

关键词: 鼻中隔黏膜下入路, 直接蝶窦入路, 垂体腺瘤, 嗅觉障碍

Abstract: Objective To compare the changes of olfactory function in two groups of patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal approach(ETSA)and endoscopic nasal septum submucosal approach for pituitary adenoma resection. Methods A total of 232 patients with pituitary adenoma treated in our hospital during Jan. 2017 and Apr. 2018 were prospectively divided into the observation group(nasal septum submucosal approach, n=149)and control group(ETSA, n=83). Olfactory detection threshold(DT)and recognition threshold(RT)were measured at different time points before and after operation by five-taste method. Results Before operation, DT was 1.70±0.30 in the observation group and 1.67±0.36 in the control group, and RT was 2.22±0.52 and 2.26±0.50, respectively(P>0.05). One month after operation, DT rose to 3.22±0.99 and 3.56±0.91, respectively(P=0.011), and RT rose to 3.79±0.84 and 4.34±0.82(P<0.001). There were significant differences between the two groups(P<0.05), and the control group had higher DT and RT than the observation group. Three months after operation, DT was 2.69±0.70 in the observation group and 3.05±0.97 in the control group(P=0.003), and RT was 3.31±0.74 and 3.84±0.76, respectively(P<0.001). There were significant differences between the two groups(P<0.05). Six months after operation, DT was 2.21±0.64 in the observation group and 2.66±0.79 in the control group(P<0.001), and RT was 2.98±0.64 and 3.44±0.55, respectively(P<0.001). There were significant differences between the two groups(P<0.01), and the control group had higher DT and RT than the observation group. Conclusion Both approaches could affect the olfactory function, which could not return to the pre-operative level 6 months after operation. Compared with ETSA, the endoscopic nasal septum submucosal approach caused less damage to olfactory function.

Key words: Endoscopic nasal septum submucosal approach, Endoscopic transsphenoidal approach, Pituitary adenoma, Olfactory disfunction

中图分类号:

R619

王会,程莲,徐淑军. 内镜下两种入路232例垂体瘤切除术对嗅觉功能影响的临床观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(8): 95-100.

WANG Hui, CHENG Lian, XU Shujun. Clinical observation of the effects of two endoscopic approaches on olfactory function in 232 patients undergoing pituitary tumor resection[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2020, 58(8): 95-100.

参考文献

[1] Alsumali A, Cote DJ, Regestein QR, et al. The impact of transsphenoidal surgery on neurocognitive function: a systematic review [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2017, 42: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.01.015.
[2] Scangas GA, Laws ER. Pituitary incidentalomas [J].Pituitary, 2014, 17(5): 486-491.
[3] 中国垂体腺瘤协作组. 中国垂体腺瘤外科治疗专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2015, 95(5): 324-329.
[4] Primeau V, Raftopoulos C, Maiter D. Outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery in prolactinomas: improvement of hormonal control in dopamine agonistresistant patients [J]. Eur J of Endocrinol, 2012, 166(5): 779-786.
[5] Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Farah P, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2006—2010 [J]. Neuro Oncol, 2013, 15(Suppl 2): 1-56. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not151.
[6] Gao Y, Zhong C, Wang Y, et al. Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery: a meta-analysis [J]. World J of Surg Oncol, 2014, 12: 94. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-94.
[7] Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Solari D, et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary adenomas [J]. World Neurosurg, 2014, 82(6 suppl): S3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.07.019.
[8] Ammirati M, Wei L, Cirie I. Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2013, 84(8): 843-849.
[9] Morrison M, Momjian S, Friedrich H, Landis BN. Olfactory function after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery [J]. Rev Med Suisse, 2014, 10(444): 1806, 1808-1810.
[10] Wang S, Chen Y, Li J, et al. Olfactory function and quality of life following microscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery [J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2015, 94(4): e465. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000-000465.
[11] 孙安纳, 柳端金.五位试嗅液的研制及健康青年人嗅阈测试[J]. 中华耳鼻喉科杂志, 1992, 27(1): 35-38.
[12] Herz RS. The role of odor-evoked memory in psychological and physiological health [J]. Brain Sciences, 2016, 6(3): 22.
[13] Hoskison EE. Olfaction, pheromones and life [J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2013, 127(12): 1156-1159.
[14] Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, et al. Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability [J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2001, 127(5): 497-503.
[15] Kohli P, Soler ZM, Nguyen SA, et al. The association between olfaction and depression: a systematic review [J]. Chem Senses, 2016, 41(6): 479-486.
[16] Thompson CF, Kern RC, Conley DB. Olfaction in endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery [J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2015, 48(5): 795-804.
[17] 高伟, 郝华超, 王丽丽, 等. 内镜下经鼻-蝶窦垂体瘤切除术后并发嗅觉障碍分析[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2013, 12(6): 558-559.
[18] Zada G, Kelly DF, Cohan P, et al. Endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas and other sellar lesions: an assessment of efficacy, safety, and patient impressions [J]. J Neurosurg, 2003, 98(2): 350-358.
[19] Dusick JR, Esposito F, Mattozo CA, et al. Endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: the patients perspective—survey results from 259 patients [J]. Surg Neurol, 2006, 65(4): 332-341.
[20] Charalampaki P, Ayyad A, Kockro RA, et al. Surgical complications after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2009, 16(6): 786-789.
[21] Hart CK, Theodosopoulos PV, Zimmer LA. Olfactory changes after endoscopic pituitary tumor resection [J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2010, 142(1): 95-97.
[22] Hong SD, Nam DH, Kong DS, et al. Endoscopic modified transseptal transsphenoidal approach for maximal preservation of sinonasal quality of life and olfaction [J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 87: 162-169. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.050.
[23] 王其平, 徐军, 徐裕, 等. 内镜经鼻蝶切除垂体腺瘤术后并发症分析[J]. 江苏医药, 2016, 42(19): 2111-2113. WANG Qiping, XU Jun, XU Yu, et al. An analysis of complications in patients underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary[J]. Jiangsu Medical Journal, 2016, 42(19): 2111-2113.
[24] 严波, 张秋航, 吕海丽. 内镜下经鼻-蝶入路垂体腺瘤术后并发鼻窦炎的防治[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2010, 24(8): 353-355. YAN Bo, ZHANG Qiuhang, LYU Haili. Prevention and cure sinusitis complicated by endoscopic transnasal approach in surgical treatment of pituitary adenoma [J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2010, 24(8): 353-355.
[25] Yah B, Zhang Q, Lu H. Prevention and cure sinusitis complicated by endoscopic transnasal approach in surgical treatment of pituitary adenoma [J]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2010, 24(8): 353-355.
[26] Lee SH, Lim HH, Park HJ, et al. Olfactory mucosal findings in patients with persistent anosmia after endoscopic sinus surgery [J].Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2000, 109(8): 720-725.
[27] 王斌, 李勇. 嗅觉障碍和嗅觉功能检查的研究进展[J]. 浙江医学, 2016, 38(1): 67-69.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed