新型倒刺缝线在髋膝关节置换深层组织缝合中的应用

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.092

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探索髋膝关节置换术切口闭合中,新型倒刺缝线是否比传统缝线更加高效安全.方法采用前瞻对照研究,选取计划行全关节置换(TJA)患者64例,其中全髋关节置换(THA)35例,全膝关节置换(TKA)29例.将患者按照住院号奇偶分为倒刺缝线组和传统缝线组,并由专人记录切口长度和切口闭合时间.倒刺缝线组,2号双向倒刺线连续缝合深筋膜,0号连续缝合皮下组织层.传统缝线组:采用1号可吸收缝线间断缝合深筋膜;采用0号间断缝合皮下脂肪层.分别于术后2、6周及3个月进行随访,评估刀口情况并记录切口并发症.结果两组在年龄、性别、体质量指数等方面差异无统计学意义(P >0.05).两组切口长度无明显差异(P=0.74).倒刺缝线组切口关闭时间明显小于传统缝线组(P< 0.001),深部组织缝合速度(时间/长度)倒刺缝线组优于传统缝线组(P< 0.001).两组均未发生切口感染、裂开等严重并发症,两组轻微切口并发症差异无统计学意义(P=0.80).结论与传统缝线相比,新型倒刺缝线可使髋膝关节置换切口闭合更加高效,且不增加切口并发症发生的风险.

关键词: 全髋关节置换, 全膝关节置换, 深层组织缝合, 倒刺缝线, 并发症

Abstract: Objective To determine whether the barbed surgical suture, a new type of knotless and biodegradable suture, was associated with higher efficiency and better healing in hip and knee replacement. Methods A total of 64 total joint arthroplasty (TJA), including 35 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 29 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were elected to this prospective and controlled study. The subjects were divided into barbed suture group and conventional suture group randomly according to the odevity of the last figure of the ID number. A designated personnel was responsible to record the operative incision length and its closure time. In the barbed suture group, the deep fascial layer was closed with running stitches of 2 # barbed suture and the subcutaneous layer was closed with running stitches of 0 # barbed suture. In the conventional suture group, the deep fascial layer was closed with interrupted stitches of 1 # biodegradable suture and the subcutaneous layer was closed with interrupted stitches of 0 # biodegradable suture. Two weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months after operation, the patients' healing status of incisions were evaluated and their complications were recorded. In the end, statistical analysis was performed. Results There were no differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and length of incision (P=0.74). The closure time of the barbed suture group was significantly shorter than that of conventional suture group (P <0.001). As for suturing speed (time/length), the barbed suture group had an advantage over conventional suture group (P <0.001). In both groups, no serious complications occurred. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in mild complications (P=0.80). Conclusion Compared to the conventional suture group, barbed suture group can make the wound closure in hip and knee replacements faster and better. And this novel suture is not associated with incidence of complications.

Key words: Total knee arthroplasty, Complications, Total hip arthroplasty, Barbed suture, Suture of the deep tissue

中图分类号:

R687.4

赵恒, 殷庆丰, 刘文广, 刘胜厚, 肖士鹏, 王韶进. 新型倒刺缝线在髋膝关节置换深层组织缝合中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(8): 53-56.

ZHAO Heng, YIN Qingfeng, LIU Wenguang, LIU Shenghou, XIAO Shipeng, WANG Shaojin. Application of a novel barbed suture in wound closure of hip and knee replacement[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2015, 53(8): 53-56.

参考文献

[1] Eickmann T, Quane E. Total knee arthroplasty closurewith barbed sutures[J]. J Knee Surg, 2010, 23(3):163-167.
[2] Murtha AP, Kaplan AL, Paglia MJ, et al. Evaluation of anovel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2006, 117(6):1769-1780.
[3] Vakil JJ, O'Reilly MP, Sutter EG, et al. Knee arthrotomy repair with a continuous barbed suture: a biomechanical study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(5):710-713.
[4] Paul MD. Barbed sutures for aesthetic facial plasticsurgery: indications and techniques[J]. Clin Plast Surg, 2008, 35(3):451-461.
[5] Einarsson JI, Chavan NR, Suzuki Y, et al. Use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: evaluation of perioperative outcomes, safety, and efficacy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2011, 18(1):92-95.
[6] Van Kasteren ME, Mannin J, Ott A, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections following total hip arthroplasty: timely administration is the most important factor[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2007, 44(7):921-927.
[7] Zaruby J, Gingras K, Taylor J, et al. An in vivo comparison of barbed suture devices and conventional monofilament sutures for cosmetic skin closure: biomechanical wound strength and histology[J]. 2011, 31(2):232-240.
[8] Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Adams JB. Advancing suture technology: a stitch in time[J]. Semin Arthroplasty, 2011, 22(3):179-181.
[9] Ting NT, Moric MM, Della VCJ, et al. Use of knotless suture for closure of total hip and knee arthroplasties:a prospective, randomized clinical trial[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(10):1783-1788.
[10] Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Barney JK, et al. Barbed versus standard sutures for closure in total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter prospective randomized trial[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(9):135-138.
[11] Campbell AL, Patrick DA, Liabaud B, et al. Superficial wound closure compications with barbed sutures following knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(5):966-969.
[12] 贾宇东,刘又文,赵明媛,等.Quill可吸收自封缝线在髋关节置换中的应用[J].中医正骨,2013,25(8):567-569. JIA Yudong, LIU Youwen, ZHAO Mingyuan, et al. Application of Quill absorbable and self-retaining suture in total hip replacement[J]. The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology, 2013, 25(8):567-569.
[13] 韩文锋,毕岩,赵文,等.Quill缝线在膝关节初次置换中的临床应用[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2014,29(1):71-72. HAN Wenfeng, BI Yan, ZHAO Wen, et al. Clinical application of Quill absorbable and self-retaining suture in primary total knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury, 2014, 29(1):71-72.
[14] Schwarzkopf R, Hadley S, Weatherall JM, et al. Barbed sutures for arthroplasty closure: does it decrease the risk of glove perforation?[J]. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 2012, 70(4):250-253.
[15] Gililand JM, Anderson LA, Sun G, et al. Perioperative closure-related complication rates and cost analysis of barbed suture for closure in TKA[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(1):125-129.
[16] Levin BR, Ting NT, Della VCJ, et al. Use of a barbed suture in the closure of hip and knee arthroplasty wounds[J]. Orthopedics, 2011, 34(9):473-475.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭志华,赵大庆,邢园,王薇,梁乐平,杨静,赵倩倩. Ⅰ期端端吻合术治疗重度颈段气管狭窄临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 72-76.
[2]	张振堂,杨洋,韩福俊,陈向华,季晓康,王永超,王淑康,孙苑潆,李敏,陈亚飞,王丽,薛付忠,刘言训. 基于社区2型糖尿病患者的心脑血管事件5年风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(6): 108-113.
[3]	卢晔,崔会芳,陈旭君,黄溢华,吴奕群,黄建隆,陈辉民,熊贤俊,陈明红. 冷冻技术在呼吸介入治疗中的应用进展及其并发症防治浅析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(4): 19-22.
[4]	王娟,张宏涛,高贞,底学敏,王泽阳. 腹部肿瘤放射性粒子植入并发症处理及预防[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(2): 8-13.
[5]	林琦,张颖,戴建建,徐瑞彩,杨琦,耿宝成,韩明勇. CT引导放射性¹²⁵I粒子植入治疗23例浅表淋巴结转移瘤[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(2): 38-44.
[6]	梁飞,张文龙,张军,许崇恩,邹承伟. 不停跳冠脉旁路移植术后心肌酶明显升高的相关因素及早期并发症[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(10): 71-75.
[7]	房菲菲,张颖,林琦,袁苑,戴建建,徐瑞彩,耿宝成,韩明勇. CT引导放射性¹²⁵I粒子植入治疗转移性肝癌的临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(12): 53-57.
[8]	黄传旺, Salim Jeddo, 张元凯, 李德强, 刘培来, 李明. 矩形金属垫块在伴有胫骨骨缺损全膝关节置换术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(6): 90-93.
[9]	陆福鼎, 玄绪军, 许可慰, 毕良宽. 单纯性阴茎弯曲畸形手术治疗的选择及体会[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(10): 86-89.
[10]	胡亮，易永祥，丁海，韩建波，刘涛，赵亮. 肝癌切除同时行脾切除加断流术术后并发症的相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(1): 64-66.
[11]	张庆泉，宋西成，张华，王强，孙岩，陈秀梅，姜绍红. 内镜下影像导航技术在1250例鼻颅底手术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(7): 114-116.
[12]	赵立健,韩波,张建军,庄建新,靳有鹏,王玉林. 经导管介入治疗90例室间隔缺损疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(5): 89-92.
[13]	张俊勇1,蒯京华1,秦成勇1,李玮2. 血清钠与肝硬化并发症及其预后的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(11): 109-112.
[14]	杨德君，张海斌，司马辉，朱楠，杨广顺 . 肝移植后胆道并发症早期肝功能的变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(10): 98-100.
[15]	. 567例老年与非老年2型糖尿病患者的临床特点分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(9): 7-10.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed