血浆渗透压评分对肝肾综合征的预后评价

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 103-106.

血浆渗透压评分对肝肾综合征的预后评价

崔海彬1，崔速南2，汪明明2，张秀珍2，刘葵花2，郭楠1

1.山东大学医学院，济南 250012； 2.济南市传染病医院肝病科，济南 250021

收稿日期:2010-12-29 出版日期:2011-06-10 发布日期:2011-06-10
通讯作者: 汪明明(1956- )，男，主任医师，主要从事病毒性肝炎研究。E-mail:wmmcsn@163.com
作者简介:崔海彬(1987- )，女，硕士研究生，主要从事病毒性肝炎研究。

Plasma osmotic pressure score in predicting prognosis of patients with hepatorenal syndrome

CUI Hai-bin1, CUI Su-nan2, WANG Ming-ming2, ZHANG Xiu-zhen2, LIU Kui-hua2, GUO Nan1

1. School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China;
2. Department of Liver Diseases, Jinan Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Jinan 250021， China

Received:2010-12-29 Online:2011-06-10 Published:2011-06-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨血浆渗透压评分对肝肾综合征(hepatorenal syndrome HRS)预后的评价作用。方法研究对象为106例HRS患者，按随访3月内的预后情况分为存活组(30例)和死亡组(76例)，分别进行血浆有效晶体渗透压评分、胶体渗透压评分、血浆渗透压综合评分、终末期肝病模型(model for end-stage liver disease MELD)评分和ChildPugh评分，进行统计学分析，比较各评分对HRS预后的评价能力。结果除血浆有效晶体渗透压评分外，HRS死亡组的其余各评分均显著高于存活组(P<0.01)。ChildPugh、MELD和血浆渗透压综合评分的曲线下面积(area under curve AUC)均>0.7，其余各项评分的AUC均<0.7。Youden指数以血浆渗透压综合评分为最高，MELD和ChildPugh评分次之。结论 Child-Pugh、MELD和血浆渗透压综合评分对HRS预后均具有良好的评价作用，其中以血浆渗透压综合评分的预测能力最佳。

关键词: 肝肾综合征；肝硬化；血浆渗透压评分；ChildPugh评分；MELD评分

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the usefulness of the plasma osmotic pressure score in predicting prognosis of patients with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Methods A total of 106 patients enrolled in the study were divided into a survival group (30 cases) and a death group (76 cases) by the prognosis in a 3-month follow-up. Five scores were performed: plasma crystal osmotic pressure score, plasma colloid osmotic pressure score, total plasma osmotic pressure score (the two combined), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and Child-Pugh score and these scores were compared in terms of reliability when used to predict the prognosis of HRS. Results The values for the death group evaluated by all but the crystal osmotic pressure score were significantly higher than those for the survival group(P<0.01). The area under curve(AUC)values of the Child-Pugh score, the MELD score and the total plasma osmotic pressure score were all above 0.7, while those of the other two scores were both below 0.7. The Youden′s indexes were in the order of the total plasma osmotic pressure score＞the MELD score＞the Child-Pugh score. Conclusions The total plasma osmotic pressure score, the MELD score and the Child-Pugh score can reliably predict prognosis of HRS patients, with the total plasma osmotic pressure score showing the best correlation with prognosis.

Key words: Hepatorenal Syndrome; Liver cirrhosis; Plasma osmotic pressure score; ChildPugh score; MELD score

中图分类号:

R512.6

崔海彬1，崔速南2，汪明明2，张秀珍2，刘葵花2，郭楠1. 血浆渗透压评分对肝肾综合征的预后评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(6): 103-106.

CUI Hai-bin1, CUI Su-nan2, WANG Ming-ming2, ZHANG Xiu-zhen2, LIU Kui-hua2, GUO Nan1. Plasma osmotic pressure score in predicting prognosis of patients with hepatorenal syndrome [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2011, 49(6): 103-106.

参考文献

相关文章 9

[1]	符晓莉，王磊，刘峰. 乙肝病毒感染不同阶段血清HBsAg定量值及其与HBV DNA水平和年龄的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(5): 94-98.
[2]	张秀珍,刘莉,刘倩. 慢性乙型肝炎患者血清瘦素水平与抗病毒治疗应答的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(9): 96-99.
[3]	孙超1，2, 解双双2, 肖迪2, 刘彩霞1,2, 于进红2, 刘莉2, 李强2. 急性乙型肝炎伴严重高胆红素血症的危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(8): 88-.
[4]	谭林,李莎莎,高学武. 抗病毒联合糖皮质激素和血浆置换早期干预肝衰竭倾向乙肝患者观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(3): 90-92.
[5]	关彦彦1，姚永远1，王刚1，邵丽华2，赛林涛1，马立宪1. DMSO、地塞米松对于HBV感染HepCHLine-4细胞能力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(10): 65-.
[6]	郭堑，农村立. 异甘草酸镁治疗伴高胆红素血症病毒性肝炎的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(8): 103-106.
[7]	李月荣1，2，韩增禄2，王磊1. 慢性乙型肝炎患者不同肝功能状况与胃黏膜病变的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(4): 94-97.
[8]	. 现有乙型肝炎多表位疫苗在中国人群中的理论免疫效果评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(10): 114-117.
[9]	. 基于GIS的中国人群乙肝多表位疫苗的预测[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(7): 125-132.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed