您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 61-.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

胃癌中VEGF-A、VEGF-D和podoplanin的表达及其与淋巴道转移的研究

田小林,罗庆伟,蒋志庆,林静   

  1. 桂林医学院附属医院胃肠外科,广西  桂林 541001
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-23 出版日期:2011-05-10 发布日期:2011-05-10
  • 作者简介:田小林,男,副教授,副主任医师,硕士研究生导师,主要从事胃肠道肿瘤的研究。 E-mail:tianxiaolin@glmc.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    桂林市科学研究与技术开发计划项目(20080209)

Expressions  of  VEGF-A, VEGF-D and podoplanin in gastric carcinoma and  their relationship with lymph node metastases

TIAN  Xiao-lin,  LUO Qing-wei, JIANG Zhi-qing, LIN Jing   

  1. Department of Gastric & Intstinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital Guilin Medical College of Guilin, Guilin 541001, Guangxi, China
  • Received:2011-01-23 Online:2011-05-10 Published:2011-05-10

摘要:

目的     探讨胃癌患者血管内皮生长因子A和D ( vascular endothelial growth factor-A and-D,VEGF-A and VEGF-D)在胃癌组织、癌旁组织、正常胃组织中的表达及其在胃癌进展中的作用。观察淋巴管内皮细胞podoplanin的表达,为研究胃癌淋巴道转移的分子机制提供形态学依据。方法     应用免疫组织化学SP法检测54例胃癌组织、癌旁组织和12例正常胃组织中VEGF-A、VEGF-D、podoplanin的表达,检测胃癌组织及癌旁组织中的微淋巴管密度(lymphatic microvessel density, LMVD)。结果    胃癌癌组织、癌旁组织中VEGF-A和VEGF-D表达阳性率明显高于正常胃组织(P<0.01 ),其中在淋巴结转移组两者的表达明显高于淋巴结未转移组(P<0.05 )。VEGF-A和VEGF-D在胃癌组织中的表达呈正相关(r= 0.365, P=0.007),并与淋巴结转移有关(P<0.01)。胃癌癌组织血管内皮podoplanin不染色,淋巴管内皮细胞podoplanin阳性表达,经计数微淋巴管数量,癌组织和癌旁组织LMVD明显高于正常组织,VEGF-A、VEGF-D阳性组LMVD值分别为(9.23±2.49)、(9.29±2.18),较阴性组(7.53±1.81)、(7.44±1.88)显著增高。结论     胃癌中VEGF-A与VEGF-D高表达与胃癌淋巴结转移密切相关, podoplanin可选择性的在胃癌组织淋巴管内皮表达,能明确地区分血管及淋巴管成分,可作为一个淋巴管内皮细胞较特异的标记物。由于微淋巴管密度在VEGF-A与VEGF-D阳性表达组癌组织中的表达明显增高,表明淋巴管数量的增加可能与两者协同作用有关。

关键词: 胃癌;血管内皮生长因子A; 血管内皮生长因子D; Podoplanin;淋巴管;微淋巴管密度

Abstract:

Objective    To explore expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) A and D in gastric cancer, pericancerous gastric tissue and normal gastric tissues and their relationship with progression of gastric carcinoma.To observe expression of podoplanin in lymphatic endothelial cells in gastric carcinoma  so as to provide morphological data for the study of the molecular mechanism of tumor metastasis. Methods     The immunohistochemical SP method was used to examine expressions of VEGF-A and D in 54 gastric cancer tissues,  54 peri-cancerous gastric tissues, 12 normal gastric tissues, and expression of podoplanin in gastric carcinoma and normal gastric tissue.Lymphatic microvessel density(LMVD) in gastric cancer tissue and  pericancerous gastric tissues were calculated. Results    Positive expression rates of VEGF-A and D in gastric cancer tissues and peri-cancerous gastric tissues were significantly higher than those in normal gastric tissues (P<0. 01), expressions of VEGF-A and D in the gastric cancer group and the lymph node metastasis group were significantly different(P<0. 05). And expressions of VEGF-A and D  were of significantly positivecorrelation(r=0.365,P=0.007). Expressions of VEGF-A and D in gastric carcinoma were positively correlated with lymph node metastasis (P<0. 01 ), podoplanin was not stained in blood vessels but was positively expressed in gastric carcinoma lymphatics. LMVD of gastric carcinoma tissues and pericancerous gastric tissues was obviously higher than that in normal gastric tissues. MLVD detected from the VEGF-A, D positive group respectively(9.23±2.49),(9.29±2.18) was significantly higher than that detected from the VEGF-A, D negative group respectively(7.53±1.81), (7.44±1.88). Conclusion     High expressions of VEGF-A and VEGF-D in gastric cancer cells are closely related to lymph nodemetastasis. Podoplanin is selectively expressed in lymphatics of gastric carcinoma and could correctly distinguish blood vessels from lymphatic vessels. It could be regarded as a specific marker of lymphatic vessels. LMVD of the VEGF-A and D positive groups increases in gastric carcinoma, therefore, the increase of the number of lymphatic vessels likely contributes to their synergism.

Key words: Gastric cancer;Vascular endothelial growth factor-A; Vascular endothelial growth factor-D; Ppodoplanin; Lymphatic vessel; Lymphatic micro-vessel density

中图分类号: 

  • R735.2
[1] 刘海燕1,李陪2,高辉3,朱长军2,董智雄2. 染色体驱动蛋白KIF4A对胃癌细胞迁移和转移的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(12): 25-28.
[2] 王晓蕾1,郏雁飞2,郑燕2,刘华2,汪运山2. STAT3真核表达质粒的构建及对胃癌细胞增殖的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(9): 45-49.
[3] 杜宪红1,邢召全2,焦晋山1. miR-200c在CIK细胞诱导胃癌细胞凋亡中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(06): 49-52.
[4] 耿超1,潘英芳2,林森1. 肿瘤坏死因子α诱导蛋白8对胃癌细胞转移能力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(5): 85-88.
[5] 王臣臣1,顾晓萌1,王妍2,黄山英3 . TFF3在胃癌、癌前病变中的表达及与血管生成的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(2): 99-103.
[6] 张艳霞1,章培军2,闫燕艳3,段爱旭4,李加善2,牛三强5. Ki-67、PCNA 和Survivin在胃肠道间质瘤组织中的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(1): 67-70.
[7] 戴新1,郑燕2,郏雁飞2,肖东杰2,童书青1,汪运山2. EC1基因真核表达质粒的构建及对胃癌细胞增殖的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(6): 75-.
[8] 陈宗营. HGC-1在胃癌中的表达及其与胃癌临床病理学因素和预后的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(4): 87-.
[9] 蒋崇辉1,艾小红2,杨小红3,罗琼3,曹建国3. 活性氧生成在8-硝基白杨素诱导人胃癌SGC-7901细胞凋亡中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(2): 34-37.
[10] 缪玉娥,王珏,王潍博. 胃癌及其癌旁黏膜中维生素D受体的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(2): 74-.
[11] 童书青1,肖东杰1,汪运山1,郏雁飞1,郑燕1,马晓丽1,戴新1,桑坦2. STAT3-siRN表达载体的构建及其对胃癌细胞株HGC-27细胞增殖的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(1): 76-80.
[12] 卞晓琨1,司元全1,陆楠3,李英杰1,郏燕飞2,张义1. [J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(1): 117-.
[13] 刘博学1,程欢欢2,董召刚3,王华阳2,尹作花3,宋庆旭2. MB-WCX联合SELDI-TOF-MS在胃癌诊断中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(9): 102-.
[14] 张梅娟1,2,马立宪3,徐昌青2,王义国2. Fas-670和FasL-844基因多态性与胃癌易感的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(9): 106-.
[15] 李艳,李玉,徐光辉. SELlL基因在胃癌组织中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(9): 110-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!