您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (11): 94-97.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

304例Rh阴性孕产妇的RhD同种免疫分析

郭伟1,徐群2,邵超鹏3   

  1. 1.  山东大学附属千佛山医院妇产科,济南  250014;2. 山东省血液中心血型参比研究室,济南 250014;
    3.  深圳市血液中心输血医学研究所,广东  深圳 518035
  • 出版日期:2010-11-16 发布日期:2010-11-16
  • 通讯作者: 徐群(1966- ),男,主任技师,博士研究生,主要从事免疫血液学诊断研究。 E-mail: xuqun88@126.com
  • 作者简介:郭伟(1966- ),女,副主任医师,硕士研究生,主要从事妇产科疾病治疗研究。 E-mail: gwei19@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(30670893)。

RhD isoimmunization analysis of 304 RhD-negative pregnant and lyingin women  

GUO Wei1,  XU Qun2, SHAO Chao-peng3   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250014, China;
    2. Research Laboratory of Blood Group Reference, Shandong Blood Center, Jinan 250014, China;
    3. Institute of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Shenzhen Blood Center, Shenzhen 518035, Guangdong,China
  • Online:2010-11-16 Published:2010-11-16

摘要:

目的     分析304例RhD阴性孕产妇RhD同种免疫发生情况,探讨RhD阴性孕产妇抗D抗体产生的影响因素,建立正确的围产期孕妇RhD新生儿溶血病监测方案。方法    采用标准血清学方法对孕产妇及其丈夫进行ABO及RhD抗原鉴定。对RhD抗原鉴定为阴性的样本,进一步采用间接抗人球蛋白法检测RhD抗原,以排除或确认弱D型或部分D表型。对所有RhD阴性孕产妇及其丈夫进行RhCcEe表型的血清学分型。采用抗人球蛋白法对所有RhD阴性孕产妇标本进行不规则抗体初筛,对初筛阳性者进一步用鉴定细胞做抗体鉴定及抗体效价测定并采用PCRSSP方法确定是否为Del型。结果     3975例孕产妇标本中,304例为RhD阴性,其中29例产生抗D抗体,夫妇ABO血型相合24例(82.76%),不合5例(17.24%)。本组调查中Rh阴性孕产妇抗D抗体产生的比例为9.54%(29/304)。经分子生物学方法鉴定,29例产生抗D的Rh阴性孕产妇均排除Del表型。 结论     RhD阴性孕产妇RhD同种免疫的发生受多种因素影响,Del型孕产妇产生抗D概率较低。应及时、定期监测RhD阴性围产期孕妇的抗D水平。对已产生抗D抗体的孕妇,密切监测其抗D水平,为临床治疗方案提供依据。

关键词: Rh血型;RhD阴性;RhD同种免疫;抗D抗体;新生儿溶血病

Abstract:

Objective     To analyze the RhD isoimmunization state of 304 RhD-negative pregnant and lying-in women, explore factors which affect production of the antiD antibody in them, and set up a correct prenatal testing method for RhD haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Methods   ABO and RhD blood types of pregnant and lyingin women and their husbands were identified by the standard serological method. For RhD-negative women, the D antigen was further tested with the indirect antiglobulin test to exclude or confirm weak D or partial D types. The RhC, c, E and e antigens were typed in all RhD-negative women and their husbands. The irregular antibody was screened in all RhD-negative women, and if the result was positive, the specificity and titer of the antibody were determined. At the same time, if phenotypes of the RhD-negative women with the anti-D antibody were Del type or not was determined with the PCR-SSP method.  Results     Among 3,975 pregnant and lying-in women, 304 were confirmed to be RhD-negative, of whom 29  produced the anti-D antibody; 24 carried compatible ABO antigens with their husbands(82.76%); 5 carried incompatible ABO antigens with their husbands(17.24%) . The production rate of the RhD antibody in D-negative pregnant and lyingin women was 9.54% (29/304) . All 29 RhD-negative women with anti-D were excluded from carrying the Del phenotype with the molecular biological method. Conclusions     RhD isoimmunization is affected by many factors. Pregnant women with the Del type seldom produce the anti-D antibody. The anti-D level should be timely and regularly tested among pregnant women. For women who have produced the anti-D antibody,  the antibody level should be closely detected during pregnancy, which will  provide evidence for clinical treatment.

Key words: Rh blood group; RhDnegativity; RhD isoimmunization; AntiD antibody; Haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn

中图分类号: 

  • R722.18
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!