您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (9): 48-52.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.067

• • 上一篇    下一篇

声触诊组织量化技术在乳腺肿块定性诊断中的价值

范凤景1,2,张广英2,曹淑娟2,丁红宇2,刘德泉2   

  1. 1.泰山医学院, 山东 泰安 271016;2.山东大学附属千佛山医院超声科, 山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-18 出版日期:2016-09-10 发布日期:2016-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 丁红宇. E-mail:hongyuding@sina.com E-mail:hongyuding@sina.com

Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue quantification in the differential diagnosis of breast tumors

FAN Fengjing1,2, ZHANG Guangying2, CAO Shujuan2, DING Hongyu2, LIU Dequan2   

  1. 1.Taishan Medical University, Taian 271016, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-01-18 Online:2016-09-10 Published:2016-09-10

摘要: 目的 探讨声触诊组织量化(VTQ)技术在乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值。 方法 应用VTQ技术对102例共107个乳腺肿块内部、肿块边缘及周围乳腺组织行剪切波速度(SWV)测量,分别记为SWVi、SWVb、SWVg。以病理结果为标准,比较乳腺良性组与恶性组SWV差异,绘制ROC曲线确定判断乳腺病灶良恶性的最佳界值。 结果 所有肿块的SWVi值明显高于SWVb和SWVg,SWVb值明显高于SWVg,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。乳腺恶性组SWVi、SWVb分别为(6.70±1.75)、(4.58±1.38)m/s,良性组分别为(3.52±1.52)、(2.80±0.97)m/s,两组参数恶性组均高于良性组(P<0.01)。以SWVi值5.06m/s为界值诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的敏感性为83.7%、特异性为85.9%;以SWVb值3.51m/s为界值诊断肿块良恶性的敏感性为79.1%、特异性为81.2%。 结论 乳腺肿块内部与肿块边缘的SWV均有助于乳腺肿块良恶性的鉴别诊断。

关键词: 超声检查, 声触诊组织量化, 乳腺疾病, 鉴别, 诊断

Abstract: Objective To explore the diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue quantification(VTQ)in the differential diagnosis of breast masses. Methods A total of 102 patients with 107 breast masses were examined by means of VTQ technique. The shear wave velocity(SWV)was measured within the lesion(SWVi), in the boundary zone(SWVb)and in the normal glandular tissues(SWVg). With results of pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of VTQ and to find the optimal cut-off point in differentiating malignant from benign lesions. Results The SWVi was higher than SWVb and SWVg, and SWVb was higher than SWVg in both malignant and benign groups(P<0.05). The SWVi and SWVb were(6.70±1.75)and(4.58±1.38)m/s, respectively in malignant lesions, and were(3.52±1.52)and(2.80±0.97)m/s respectively in benign lesions, with significant differences between benign and malignant lesions(P<0.01). When the cut-off point of SWVi was determined as 5.06 m/s, the sensitivity was 83.7% and the specificity was 85.9%. When the cut-off point of SWVb was determined as 3.51 m/s, the sensitivity was 79.1% and the specificity was 81.2%. Conclusion The SWVi and SWVb can help the differential diagnosis of breast tumors.

Key words: Virtual touch tissue quantification, Breast diseases, Ultrasonography, differentiation, Diagnosis

中图分类号: 

  • R655.8
[1] Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, et al. The global burden of cancer 2013[J]. JAMA oncology, 2015, 1(4):505-527.
[2] 黄哲宙, 陈万青, 吴春晓, 等. 中国女性乳腺癌的发病和死亡现况—全国32个肿瘤登记点2003-2007年资料分析报告[J]. 肿瘤, 2012, 32(6):435-439. HUANG Zhezhou, CHEN Waning, WU Chunxiao, et al. Incidence and mortality of female breast cancer in China—a report from 32 Chinese cancer registries, 2003-2007[J]. TUMOR, 2012, 32(6):435-439.
[3] Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK, et al. Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(5):1209-1215.
[4] Hooley RJ, Scoutt LM, Philpotts LE. Breast ultrasonography: state of the art [J]. Radiology, 2013, 268(3):642-659.
[5] Balleyguier C, Ciolovan L, Ammari S, et al. Breast elastography: the technical process and its applications[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2013, 94(5):503-513.
[6] 肖静, 李杰, 时丹丹, 等. 超声弹性成像面积比与 Itoh 评分法在乳腺病变诊断中的比较[J].山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(6):149-151. XIAO Jing, LI Jie, SHI Dandan, et al. Comparison of values of the area ratio and the Itoh scoring system with sonoelastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2011, 49(6):149-151.
[7] Zhi H, Ou B, Lou BM, et al. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2007, 26(6):807-815.
[8] Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging—preliminary results [J]. Radiology, 2010, 256(1):297-303.
[9] Meng W, Zhang G, Wu C, et al. Preliminary results of acoustic radiation force impulse(ARFI)ultrasound imaging of breast lesions[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2011, 37(9): 1436-1443.
[10] Golatta M, Schweitzer-Martin M, Harcos A, et al. Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 960262. doi: 10.1155/2014/960262. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
[11] Wang ZL, Sun L, Li Y, et al. Relationship between elasticity and collagen fiber content in breast disease: a preliminary report [J]. Ultrasonics, 2015, 57: 44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
[12] Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses [J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2010, 12(6): R104. doi: 10.1186/bcr2787. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
[13] Zhou J, Zhan W, Chang C, et al. Role of acoustic shear wave velocity measurement in characterization of breast lesions [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2013, 32(2):285-294.
[14] 王荣, 王兴田, 胡春梅,等. 声脉冲辐射力成像对乳腺肿块鉴别诊断价值的初步研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2012, 21(2):142-145. WANG Rong, WANG Xingtian, HU Chunmei, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in differential diagnosis of breast masses[J]. Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography, 2012, 21(2):142-145.
[15] 吴长君, 张光晨, 孟巍, 等. 声触诊组织量化技术鉴别乳腺良性肿块的价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2011, 20(11):965-967. WU Changjun, ZHANG Guangchen, MENG Wei, et al. Diagnostic value touch tissues quantification in discriminating breast benign and malignant solid tumors [J]. Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography, 2011, 20(11):965-967.
[1] 李波波 李道堂 刘曙光 王兴武. 食管癌患者血清中DKK-1的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 58-61.
[2] 徐平 于国放 李霞. 不同类型甲状腺上动脉PSV对Graves病与桥本氏甲状腺炎鉴别诊断的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 62-64.
[3] 王欣,邢春燕,杨艳平. 血清磷酸丙酮酸水合酶检测对诊断侵袭性白念珠菌感染的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 92-94.
[4] 王凯,沈媛媛,程宪永,李彦敏,史宁. 嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(9): 119-121.
[5] 尹义龙,袭肖明,孟宪静. 阿尔兹海默病的智能诊断方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 14-21.
[6] 肖娟,肖强,丛伟,李婷,丁守銮,张媛,邵纯纯,吴梅,刘佳宁,贾红英. 两种甲状腺超声数据报告系统诊断效能的比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 53-59.
[7] 路璐,孙志钢,张楠. 继发性嗜血细胞综合征1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 122-124.
[8] 冯致余,杨彦亮,郭锐,徐惠惠,张健,郭凯,王广震,王辉. 肺动脉吊带合并气管狭窄的外科治疗[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(8): 48-51.
[9] 杜怡峰,井然. 阿尔茨海默病的诊断与治疗[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(10): 7-13.
[10] 唐毅. 阿尔茨海默病诊断标准:从临床诊断到病理生理诊断[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(10): 14-20.
[11] 李昀,仲万霞,姚宁,胡双纲,刘洪卯. 女性年龄对胚胎植入前遗传学诊断及筛查结局的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(1): 60-62.
[12] 左常婷, 连岩. 凶险性前置胎盘诊治现状[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(9): 1-6.
[13] 高萌,孙建民,蒋振松,崔新刚. MRI在布氏杆菌脊柱炎诊断中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(6): 27-30.
[14] 吴世秀,李杰,贾汇刚,李金娥,崔琳玲,路红. 彩色多普勒超声对下肢动脉硬化闭塞症胫前动脉窃血的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(6): 78-81.
[15] 李进叶,宋歌声,宋吉清,王大伟,靳先文,张成琪. 宝石能谱CT与常规超声对甲状腺结节良恶性诊断价值的对照分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(3): 81-86.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!