您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报（医学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (8): 66-70.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.041

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

成人安氏Ⅰ类双颌前突患者的上颌切牙区牙槽骨体积

刘璐, 李荣荣, 刘梦珺, 张琰, 刘东旭   

  1. 山东大学口腔医院正畸科, 山东 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-12 发布日期:2015-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 刘东旭.E-mail:liudongxu@sdu.edu.com E-mail:liudongxu@sdu.edu.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省科技计划项目合作研究(2010G0020232, 2010HM053, 2050205)

Alveolar bone volume around upper incisors in adult patients with Class Ⅰ bimaxillary protrusion

LIU Lu, LI Rongrong, LIU Mengjun, ZHANG Yan, LIU Dongxu   

  1. Department of Orthodontics, Stomatology Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-01-12 Published:2015-08-10

PDF (PC)

371

摘要： 目的 研究成人安氏Ⅰ类双颌前突患者上颌切牙区牙槽骨体积,为正畸诊断及治疗计划制定提供参考.方法 选择安氏Ⅰ类双颌前突患者22例(双颌前突组)及个别正常牙合志愿者18例(对照组),分别拍摄头颅侧位片及锥体束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),利用Mimics 16.0测量上颌4颗切牙牙槽骨体积.结果 双颌前突组上颌切牙区牙槽骨体积除中切牙唇侧根尖区、侧切牙唇侧根尖区及腭侧牙槽嵴顶区外,其他均较对照组小(P <0.05).此外,双颌前突组中切牙牙槽嵴顶区、根中区、腭侧牙槽骨区、牙槽骨总体积,侧切牙唇侧牙槽骨区、腭侧牙槽骨区、牙槽骨总体积及上颌4颗切牙牙槽骨体积之和均较对照组减少(P <0.001).结论 成人安氏Ⅰ类双颌前突患者上颌切牙区牙槽骨量较少,在制定矫治计划尤其是切牙压低内收过程中应更加谨慎.

关键词: 上颌切牙, 锥体束计算机断层扫描, 双颌前突, 牙槽骨体积

Abstract: Objective To investigate the alveolar bone volume around upper incisors in adult patients with Class Ⅰ bimaxillary protrusion and provide a reference for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Methods Twenty-two cases with Class Ⅰ bimaxillary protrusion (bimaxillary protrusion group) and Eighteen cases with individual normal occlusion (control group) were recruited. Lateral cephalograms and cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) scannings were taken respectively and the alveolar bone volume around four upper incisors in each subject were measured by Mimics 16.0. Results In bimaxillary protrusion group, alveolar bone volume around upper incisors decreased compared to the control group (P <0.05), apart from labial root apex zone of central incisors, labial root apex and palatal crest zone of the lateral incisors. Besides, alveolar crest zone, middle root zone, palatal alveolar bone, total alveolar bone of the central incisors, labial alveolar bone, palatal alveolar bone, total alveolar bone of the lateral incisors and total alveolar bone volume of four upper incisors in bimaxillary protrusion group were decreased compared to the control group (P <0.001). Conclusion The alveolar bone volume around upper incisors in adult patients with Class Ⅰ bimaxillary protrusion is fewer than that in the subjects with normal occlusion. It should be more cautious in the process of treatment planning, especially retraction or intrusion of the upper incisors.

Key words: Alveolar bone volume, Bimaxillary protrusion, Cone beam computed tomography, Upper incisor

中图分类号: 

  • R783.5
[1] Tan TJ. Profile changes following orthodontic correction of bimaxillary protrusion with a preadjusted edgewise appliance[J]. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 1996, 11(3): 239-251.
[2] Kim JR, Son WS, Lee SG. A retrospective analysis of 20 surgically corrected bimaxillary protrusion patients[J]. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg, 2002, 17(1): 23-27.
[3] Bills DA, Handelman CS, BeGole EA. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction[J]. Angle Orthod, 2005, 75(3): 333-339.
[4] Profitt WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics[M]. 4th edn. Mosby: Elsevier, 2007.
[5] Handelman CS. The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae[J]. Angle Orthod, 1996, 66(2): 95-110.
[6] Garib DG, Yatabe MS, Ozawa TO. Alveolar bone morphology under the perspective of the computed tomography: defining the biological limits of tooth Movement [J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2010, 15(5): 192-205.
[7] Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciger S, et al. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2002, 122(1): 15-26.
[8] Nayak Krishna US, Shetty A, Girija MP, et al. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth during orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric and computed tomography comparative study[J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2013, 24(6): 736-741.
[9] Mah JK, Huang JC, Choo H. Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2010, 141(3): 7-13.
[10] Timocak AM, Cook V, McDonald T, et al. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 140(5): 734-744.
[11] Meikle MC. The dentomaxillary complex and overjet correction in Class II, division 1 malocclusion: objectives of skeletal and alveolar remodeling[J]. Am J Orthod, 1980, 77 (2): 184 -197.
[12] Remmelink HJ, van der Molen AL. Effects of anteroposterior incisor repositioning on the root and cortical plate: a follow up study[J]. J Clin Orthod, 1984, 18(1): 42-49.
[13] Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Phillips C. Orthognathic surgery: a hierarchy of stability[J]. Int J Adult orthodon Orthognath Surg, 1996, 11(3): 191-194.
[14] Edwards JG. A study of the anterior portion of the palate as it relates to orthodontic therapy[J]. Am J Orthod, 1976, 69(3): 249-273.
[15] Nahm KY, Kang JH, Moon SC, et al. Alveolar bone loss around incisors in Class I bidentoalveolar protrusion patients: a retrospective three-dimensional cone beam CT study[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2012, 41(6): 481-488.
[16] 裴金莹,凌丽娟,惠雯婷,等.成人安氏Ⅰ类双颌前突切牙区牙槽骨形态结构的研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志, 2013, 29(3): 398-402. PEI Jinying, LING Lijuan, HUI Wenting, et al. A study of alveolar bone structure around incisors in adult patients with ClassI bimaxillary protrusion[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2013, 29(3): 398-402.
[17] Yu Q, Pan XG, Ji GP. The association between lower incisal inclination and morphology of the supporting alveolar bone-a cone-beam CT study[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2009, 1(4): 217-223.
[18] Mitra R, Londhe SM, Kumar P. A comparative evaluation of rate of space closure after extraction using E-chain and stretched modules in bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion cases[J]. Med J Armed Forces India, 2011, 67(2): 152-156.
[19] Gracco A, Lombardo L, Mancuso G. Upper incisor position and bony support in untreated patients as seen on CBCT[J]. Angle Orthod, 2009, 79(4): 692-702.
[20] 孙伟,周力,白丁,等.不同垂直骨面型正常牙合人切牙区颌骨形态结构正常值的建立[J].实用口腔医学杂志, 2005, 21(1): 124-127. SUN Wei, ZHOU Li, BAI Ding, et al. Cephalometric standards for incisal jaw morphology in the subjects with normal occlusion and different vertical facial skeletal types[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2005, 21(1): 124-127.
[1] 陈雪凌, 吴子忠, 刘东旭, 谢涌涛, 郭甜甜, 张士杰. 前方牵引联合快速扩弓对安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形患者上气道影响的CBCT研究[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(8): 71-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发