国产荧光定量PCR与COBAS Amplicor检测HBVDNA的结果比较

山东大学学报(医学版)

国产荧光定量PCR与COBAS Amplicor检测
HBVDNA的结果比较

薛艳¹，王磊¹，徐皖苏²

（1．山东大学第二医院感染病科，济南 250033； 2. 济南市传染病医院检验科，济南 250021）

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 发布日期:2009-04-16
通讯作者: 王磊

Domestic fluorescence quantitative PCR reagents and COBAS Amplicor assay in measuring HBVDNA: a comparison study

XUE Yan¹，　WANG Lei¹，　XU Wansu²

(1. Department of Infectious Disease, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, China;
2. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Jinan Hospital of Infectious Disease, Jinan 250021, China)

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2009-04-16
Contact: WANG Lei

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较国产实时荧光定量PCR（FQPCR）试剂与罗氏COBAS Amplicor方法检测乙型肝炎病毒（HBV）DNA的结果。方法据COBAS Amplicor 的FQPCR试剂（A）的检测结果，抽取151份慢性乙型肝炎（慢乙肝）血清标本，采用两种国产实时FQPCR试剂B、C对血清标本进行HBVDNA平行检测，以分析国产试剂的敏感度、特异度及与试剂A的相关性。结果试剂A、B、C测得的HBVDNA结果分别为（5.87±1.64）、（5.11±1.34）、（4.93±1.35）log10?copies/mL，试剂B、C与试剂A的相关系数分别为0.947、0.937。3种试剂检测结果总体差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），试剂B、C与试剂A检测结果相比差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。低HBV载量标本，试剂B、C与试剂A相关性较低。以试剂A为准，总体灵敏度、特异度分别为试剂B 90.4％、56.3%，试剂C 77.0%、100%。结论试剂B、C与试剂A在检测HBVDNA方面有较好一致性，但在低HBV载量时可靠性较低。试剂B灵敏度高，试剂C特异度高。

关键词: 肝炎病毒,乙型, 荧光定量PCR, 灵敏性, 特异性

Abstract: To compare the efficacy of two domestic real time fluorescence quantitative PCR(FQPCR) diagnostic kits and COBAS Amplicor HBVDNA monitor for HBVDNA determination. MethodsSerum samples from 151 patients with chronic hepatitis B were determined by COBAS Amplicor HBVDNA monitor (A). The serum samples were retested by FQPCR with domestic reagents (B and C). Concordance and correlation of the results were assessed and sensitivity and specificity of B and C were evaluated. ResultsThe serum HBVDNA levels determined by reagent A, B and C were (5.87±1.64)， (5.11±1.34), (4.93±1.35) log10?copies/mL, respectively (P＜0.05). And the HBVDNA level determined by A was higher than either of the latter two (P＜0.05)， while that by B and C were comparable (P＞0.05). The correlative coefficiency between results by A and B, and A and C were 0.947 and 0.937, respectively. Correlation between B, C and A in low virus load samples was not as good as that in high load samples. Overall sensitivity of reagent B and C was 90.4％ and 77.0%, and overall specificity was 56.3% and 100%, respectively. ConclusionBoth of the domestic fluorescence quantitative PCR reagents are fairly good in measuring serum HBVDNA, while they are less reliable in low virus load samples. Regent B is more sensitive and C is more specific.

Key words: Hepatitis B virus, Fluorescence quantitative PCR, Sensitivity, Specificity

中图分类号:

R446.61

薛艳1 ，王磊1 ，徐皖苏2
. 国产荧光定量PCR与COBAS Amplicor检测
HBVDNA的结果比较[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(04): 62-64.

XUE Yan¹，　WANG Lei¹，　XU Wansu²
.

Domestic fluorescence quantitative PCR reagents and COBAS Amplicor assay in measuring HBVDNA: a comparison study

[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2009, 47(04): 62-64.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	郑瑾,张江伟,王旭珍,匡陪丹,何晓丽,薛武军. 肾移植术后早期淋巴细胞及DSA监测在诊断移植排斥反应中的意义[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(7): 89-94.
[2]	彭斐,宋玲,戚向敏,李亚芹,刁艳菲,钊守凤,王莉莉,杨芳,卢恕来,吕文芳,郭大伟. 间歇性张应力对小鼠破骨细胞TRPV5基因表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(11): 22-26.
[3]	张琨,张孝国,崔杏杏,陈士俊. 慢性HBV感染者外周血单个核细胞凋亡相关因子的表达及其与乙肝慢性化的关系[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(7): 38-42.
[4]	于玉娟,高成杰,王晓鹏,李波. 帕瑞昔布钠对脑肿瘤切除术患者炎症反应的影响及脑保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(6): 65-68.
[5]	臧丽娇,仇杰,庄根苗,安丽. 血清S100B蛋白、神经元特异性烯醇化酶与新生儿低血糖脑损伤的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(4): 51-54.
[6]	王立敏,王旭东. 吸氧浓度对心肺复苏大鼠S100β蛋白和神经元特异性烯醇化酶表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(3): 5-8.
[7]	张志强,吴艳华,王茂水,王新锋,汪运山. 联合检测血清PCT和NSE对小细胞肺癌的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(11): 36-39.
[8]	孙昊,汪春娟,王戈,王宝洁,郭守刚. 视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病伴常见非器官特异性自身抗体的特点[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(10): 50-54.
[9]	刘京生, 刘桂华, 杜昆, 赵倩, 翁韶波, 赵学英, 张喜庄, 金讯波. 中国人群中血清TK1对不同恶性肿瘤诊断价值的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(9): 71-79.
[10]	蒋学文, 陈军, 张兆存, 朱耀峰, 孟辉, 史本康. 前列腺囊腺瘤的临床特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(3): 81-86.
[11]	韩潇, 刘锟, 史加海, 高福民, 尤庆生. 醒脑静在体外循环心脏手术中对脑功能的保护[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(1): 54-57.
[12]	付海燕, 胡占升, 杜红阳, 李潮, 包翠芬. 地黄多糖对过表达Notch1(NICD)大鼠骨髓间充质干细胞诱导分化及增殖的影响[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(1): 34-40.
[13]	孙越,刘香岚,王群,郭春,石永玉,张利宁. 人TIPE家族新成员TIPE3特异性抗体的鉴定及应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(1): 5-9.
[14]	侯贝贝，王妍，张娟，梁晓辉，李劲松. 软骨肉瘤WIF-1基因甲基化及Wnt-5a蛋白表达的临床病理意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(2): 70-74.
[15]	关恒云, 王春荣, 吕燕，张雯，杨国樑，刘岚铮. 2012年济南市手足口病病原学及流行特征[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(10): 101-104.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed