高渗高胶溶液降低颅脑肿瘤患者颅内压的疗效观察

山东大学学报(医学版)

高渗高胶溶液降低颅脑肿瘤患者
颅内压的疗效观察

孙宝柱¹，侯莉莉²，张建民¹，范立霞¹，王新宇³

（1．山东大学齐鲁医院麻醉科，济南 250012； 2. 德州市人民医院手术室，山东德州 253014；
3. 山东大学齐鲁医院神经外科，济南 250012）

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-01-16 发布日期:2009-01-16

Effect of hypertonic saline/hetastarch solution on intracranial
pressure in patients with intracranial tumors

SUN Baozhu¹，　HOU Lili²，　ZHANG Jianmin¹，　FAN Lixia¹, WANG Xinyu³

(1. Department of Anesthesiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University,Jinan 250012， China； 2. Department of Operating Room， Dezhou People′s Hospital， Dezhou 253014， Shandong, China；3. Department of Neurosurgery，Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012， China)

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-01-16 Published:2009-01-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的观察高渗氯化钠羟乙基淀粉40溶液（HSS40）对颅脑肿瘤手术患者颅内压及循环稳定的影响。方法择期颅脑肿瘤手术患者26例，随机分为HSS40组和20％甘露醇组（M组），每组13例，局麻下经L3～4椎间隙穿刺置管监测脑脊液压(CSFP)。两组均采用静吸复合全麻，在15?min内静脉输注HSS40注射液200?mL和20％甘露醇250?mL，分别于输注前（T0）、输注完即刻（T1）、输注完15?min（T2）、30?min（T3）、60?min（T4）和120?min（T5）记录平均动脉压（MAP）、心率（HR）、中心静脉压（CVP）、CSFP及尿量，计算脑灌注压（CPP）。结果两组患者各时点MAP、HR比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。与T0比较，HSS40组CVP在T2～T4时升高， M组在T4、T5时降低；HSS40组CSFP在T2～T5时降低，M组在T3～T5时降低；HSS40组CPP在T3时升高，M组在T4时升高（P＜0.05）；与M组比较，HSS40组CSFP在T3时点降低，CVP在T4、T5时升高；HSS40组尿量在T23、T34、T45时段减少（P＜0.05）。结论在颅脑肿瘤手术中，HSS40溶液降低颅内压的作用优于20%甘露醇，并且有助于术中循环稳定。

关键词: 盐水,高渗, 羟乙基淀粉, 颅内压, 脑肿瘤

Abstract:

To explore the effect of hypertonic saline/hetastarch solution on intracranial pressure in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial tumours. MethodsTwentysix ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients, aged 2871 years and 5089?kg in weight undergoing intracranial tumor removal were randomly divided into two groups (13 in each ):groupⅠwith hypertonic saline/hetastarch solution(HSS40) and group Ⅱ with 20% mannitol (M). All patients were intramuscularly premedicated with 0.1g phenobarbital and 0.5?mg atropine. Under local anesthesia, an epidural catheter (17?G) was inserted into the subarachnoid space at the L34 interspace for measurement of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) pressure. Anesthesia was induced with 3?μg/kg fentanyl, 4?mg midazolam, 0.3?mg/kg etomidate and 0.1?mg/kg vecuronium. Then patients were mechanically ventilated (VT=10?mL/kg,RR=12?bpm,I∶E=1∶2,FiO2=100%). PETCO2 was maintained 3035?mmHg by adjusting the tidal volume and respiratory rate. Anesthesia was maintained with inhalation of 1.5% isoflurane. The left radial artery was cannulated for BP monitoring and blood sampling. The right internal jugular vein was cannulated for CVP monitoring. HSS40 200?mL or 20% mannitol 250?mL was intravenously given over 15?min when the hemodynamics were stable. MAP,HR,CVP and urine output were measured and recorded before HSS40 or mannitol infusion(T0), immediately after infusion(T1) and 15，　30，　60 and 120?min after infusion(T25).　Also CSFP was measured and CPP was calculated. ResultsThere were no significant differences in MAP and HR at all time points between the two groups. As compared with their baseline values at T0, CSFP was significantly decreased at T25 in the HSS40 group and at T35 in the mannitol group, and CVP was significantly increased at T24 in the HSS40 group but decreased at T45 in the M group.CSFP was significantly decreased at T3 and CVP increased at T45 in the HSS40 group as compared with the M group. Urine output was significantly higher after infusion(T25) in the mannitol group than in the HSS40 group. ConclusionHSS40 is more effective than 20% mannitol in reducing CSFP and improving hemodynamics during intracranial tumor removal.

Key words: Saline solution,hypertonic, Hetastarch, Intracranial pressure, Brain neoplasms

中图分类号:

R614.2

孙宝柱1 ，侯莉莉2 ，张建民1 ，范立霞1 ，王新宇3
. 高渗高胶溶液降低颅脑肿瘤患者
颅内压的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(01): 76-78.

SUN Baozhu¹，　HOU Lili²，　ZHANG Jianmin¹，　FAN Lixia¹, WANG Xinyu³
. Effect of hypertonic saline/hetastarch solution on intracranial
pressure in patients with intracranial tumors[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2009, 47(01): 76-78.

参考文献

相关文章 8

[1]	刘琚,吴强,于璐跃,林枫茗. 基于深度学习的脑肿瘤图像分割[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 42-49, 73.
[2]	吴彬, 张宁, 李志强, 王旭阳. 颅内压监测对颅内血肿术后治疗的指导价值[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(4): 92-94.
[3]	李志强1，戴新连1，沈冬青1，赵军1，刘宏伟1,2. 颅内压监测在142例颅脑损伤危重患者中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(2): 75-78.
[4]	孟祥继，杨洪安，丁锋，庞琦，辛涛. 颅脑肿瘤手术患者非计划再手术原因分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(12): 75-77.
[5]	孔大伟,庞琦,许尚臣,司志超,王汉斌,朱玉方. 人脑桥静脉流出端肌性超微结构及其对颅内压的作用 [J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(8): 763-765.
[6]	李科，王志云，王波，张源，展如才，王成伟. 苯丁酸钠体外诱导脑胶质瘤细胞分化的实验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(12): 1162-1165.
[7]	袁吴敏,赵志伦,王洁贞 . 吸烟和饮酒与颅内肿瘤关系的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(11): 1146-1149.
[8]	朱建新,李刚,邓林,商晓鹰,耿凤阳 . TCD参数与重型颅脑损伤患者颅内压及脑灌注压的相关性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(10): 1045-1047.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed