您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (7): 109-115.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.1404

• 公共卫生与预防医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于潜在剖面分析的临床护理带教老师感知上级社会支持类型及与工作投入的关系

孙相洁1,尹海燕1,刘春兰2,赵风娥1   

  1. 1.山东大学齐鲁医院骨外科, 山东 济南 250012;2.山东大学齐鲁医院护理部, 山东 济南 250012
  • 发布日期:2025-07-08
  • 通讯作者: 赵风娥. E-mail:18560082565@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东大学齐鲁医学院本科教学改革与研究项目(qlyxjy-201881)

The relationship between perceived supervisory social support types with work engagement among clinical nursing teachers based on latent profile analysis

SUN Xiangjie1, YIN Haiyan1, LIU Chunlan2, ZHAO Fenge1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Nursing, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Published:2025-07-08

PDF (PC)

24

摘要： 目的 探究临床护理带教老师感知上级社会支持的潜在类别及其特征,分析不同感知上级社会支持类别与工作投入的关系,为优化临床护理带教老师的管理策略提供理论依据。 方法 采用便利抽样法,选取山东省5所医学院校附属三级甲等医院的临床护理带教老师作为研究对象。采用一般资料调查表、感知上级社会支持量表和工作投入量表进行调查。采用潜在剖面分析识别临床护理带教老师感知上级社会支持的潜在类别。采用单因素方差分析及多因素线性回归分析不同感知上级社会支持类别与工作投入的关系。 结果 抽取临床护理带教老师421名,收回有效问卷406份。潜在剖面分析结果显示,感知上级社会支持分为3个类别:“监工型-低支持组”(26%)、“伙伴型-中支持组”(39%)和“教练型-高支持组”(35%)。3种类别的工作投入得分高到低依次是教练型-高支持组、伙伴型-中支持组和监工型-低支持组;类别是工作投入的预测因素(P<0.05)。 结论 临床护理带教老师的感知上级社会支持存在异质性,其中监工型-低支持组的工作投入水平最低,应重点关注。

关键词: 临床护理带教老师, 潜在剖面分析, 感知上级社会支持, 工作投入

Abstract: Objective To provide a theoretical basis for optimizing their work engagement by exploring the latent profiles and characteristics of perceived supervisory social support among clinical nursing teachers, and analysising the relationship between different profiles of perceived supervisory social support with work engagement. Methods Convenience sampling method was used to select clinical nursing teachers from five tertiary teaching hospitals in Shandong Province as participants. General information questionnaire, the Perceived Supervisory Social Support Scale, and the Work Engagement Scale were used to conduct the survey. Latent profile analysis was employed to identify potential profile of clinical nursing teachers perceived supervisory social support. One way ANOVA and multifactor linear regression were applied to examine the relationship between these profiles and work engagement. Results Among 421 clinical nursing teachers surveyed, 406 valid questionnaires were collected. Latent profile analysis revealed 3 profiles of perceived supervisory social support: supervisor-low support group(26%), partner-moderate support group(39%)and coach-high support group(35%). Three profiles scores of work engagement were ranked as follows: coach-high support group>partner-moderate support group > supervisor-low support group. Different profiles were predictors of work engagement(P<0.05). Conclusion Clinical nursing teachers exhibit heterogeneity in perceived supervisory social support, with the supervisor-low support group demonstrating the lowest work engagement, which should be emphasized.

Key words: Clinical nursing teachers, Latent profile analysis, Perceived supervisory social support, Work engagement

中图分类号: 

  • R471
[1] 范华美, 杨丽黎, 王锦云. 临床护理教师核心能力测评工具的研究进展[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(8): 997-1003. FAN Huamei, YANG Lili, WANG Jinyun. Research progress on core competency assessment tools for clinical nursing teachers[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education, 2023, 20(8): 997-1003.
[2] 徐霞, 田晓翠, 徐铭, 等. 临床护理教师胜任力现状及与护生的评价比较[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(8): 58-61. XU Xia, TIAN Xiaocui, XU Ming, et al. Comparison of competency level rated by clinical nursing teachers themselves and by nursing students[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2022, 37(8): 58-61.
[3] Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-romá V, et al. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach[J]. J Happiness Stud, 2002, 3(1): 71-92.
[4] 尹海燕, 刘春兰. 临床护理教师工作投入与角色压力和感知上级社会支持的相关性研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2021, 36(7): 15-18. YIN Haiyan, LIU Chunlan. Relationship of work engagement, role stress, and perceived social support from supervisors among clinical nursing teachers[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2021, 36(7): 15-18.
[5] Wei H, Horsley L, Cao Y, et al. The associations among nurse work engagement, job satisfaction, quality of care, and intent to leave: a national survey in the United States[J]. Int J Nurs Sci, 2023, 10(4): 476-484.
[6] 李洁, 黄仁辉, 申荷永, 等. 护士群体工作倦怠的工作要求-资源模型探索[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(5): 881-884. LI Jie, HUANG Renhui, SHEN Heyong, et al. Job demands-resources model of nurses job burnout[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2014, 22(5): 881-884.
[7] 崔英锦, 邰琳, 樊香麟. 特殊教育教师道德认同与工作投入的关系: 利他行为的中介作用[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2024(1): 82-89. CUI Yingjin, TAI Lin, FAN Xianglin. The relationship between moral identity and work engagement of special education teachers: the mediating role of altruistic beha-viors[J]. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 2024(1): 82-89.
[8] 张佳佳, 陈昱伶, 汤芙蓉. 领悟社会支持对公安民警工作投入的影响: 心理授权的中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30(8): 1213-1216. ZHANG Jiajia, CHEN Yuling, TANG Furong. Effect of perceived social support on policework engagement: The mediating role of psychological empowerment[J]. China Journal of Health Psychology, 2022, 30(8): 1213-1216.
[9] Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout[J]. Annu Rev Psychol, 2001, 52: 397-422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
[10] Bhanthumnavin D. Perceived social support from supervisor and group members psychological and situational characteristics as predictors of subordinate performance in Thai work units[J]. Hum Resour Dev Q, 2003, 14(1): 79-97.
[11] 任雁北, 高凤, 马冬冬. 护士的不同来源社会支持与工作-家庭平衡的关系[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2022, 36(6): 519-525. REN Yanbei, GAO Feng, MA Dongdong. Relationship between different sources of social support and work-family balance in nurses[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2022, 36(6): 519-525.
[12] 潘杰, 邓玉环, 付利, 等. 妇幼专科医院护理带教老师心理健康状况及与社会支持的相关性[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(2): 88-90. PAN Jie, DENG Yuhuan, FU Li, et al. Relationship between mental health and social support among nursing instructors in maternity and child health care hospital[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2020, 35(2): 88-90.
[13] 李天民, 孙英娜. 护理带教老师职业倦怠与社会支持的相关性研究[J]. 中国社区医师, 2017, 33(8): 163-164, 166. LI Tianmin, SUN Yingna. Study on the correlation between job burnout and social support of nursing teachers[J]. Chinese Community Doctors, 2017, 33(8): 163-164, 166.
[14] Yang Q, Zhao A, Lee C, et al. Latent profile/class analysis identifying differentiated intervention effects[J]. Nurs Res, 2022, 71(5): 394-403.
[15] 路梦新, 杨瑶瑶, 封丹珺. 公务员职业倦怠亚型与神经质、生活质量的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59(10): 114-119. LU Mengxin, YANG Yaoyao, FENG Danjun. Relationships between occupational burnout profiles and neuroticism, life quality among civil servants[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2021, 59(10): 114-119.
[16] 倪平, 陈京立, 刘娜. 护理研究中量性研究的样本量估计[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2010, 45(4): 378-380. NI Ping, CHEN Jingli, LIU Na. The sample size estimation in quantitative nursing research[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2010, 45(4): 378-380.
[17] 芦桂芝, 林竹, 王书佳, 等. “双师型” 临床护理带教教师培训现状与需求调查[J]. 护理研究, 2017, 31(27): 3464-3467. LU Guizhi, LIN Zhu, WANG Shujia, et al. Survey of training status quo and demand of “double qualification” clinical nursing teachers[J]. Nursing Research of China, 2017, 31(27): 3464-3467.
[18] 方秀新. 临床护理教师规范化管理模式的构建与实施[J]. 护理学杂志, 2010, 25(15): 11-13. FANG Xiuxin. Construction and implementation of standardized management model for clinical nursing teachers[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2010, 25(15): 11-13.
[19] 王凤佐. 员工对上级的社会支持的感知及对其工作压力感的影响[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2004.
[20] Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire[J]. Educ Psychol Meas, 2006, 66(4): 701-716.
[21] 赵光利. 企业员工组织支持感、心理资本与员工敬业度的关系研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2011.
[22] Berlin KS, Williams NA, Parra GR. An introduction to latent variable mixture modeling(part 1): overview and cross-sectional latent class and latent profile analyses[J]. J Pediatr Psychol, 2014, 39(2): 174-187.
[23] 蒋莉莉, 吴柳柳, 徐新阳, 等. 疾控人员职业倦怠潜在剖面分析及与工作特征的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2023, 61(2): 102-109. JIANG Lili, WU Liuliu, XU Xinyang, et al. Latent profile analysis of burnout and its relation with work characteristics among CDC staff[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2023, 61(2): 102-109.
[24] Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests[J]. Psychometrika, 1951, 16(3): 297-334.
[25] Ramaswamy M, Viswanathan R, Kaniyarkuzhi BK, et al. The moderating role of resonant leadership and workplace spirituality on the relationship between psychological distress and organizational commitment[J]. Int J Hum Resour Manag, 2023, 34(4): 855-877.
[26] 敖博, 郎玉玲, 林英. 教练型领导感知评价量表的汉化和信度效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2018, 18(2): 213-217. AO Bo, LANG Yuling, LIN Ying. Reliability and vali-dity of the Chinese version of coaching leadership perception assessment scale[J]. Chinese Nursing Management, 2018, 18(2): 213-217.
[27] 单楠, 孔令娜, 胡平. 教学医院双师型护理教师工作投入现状及影响因素分析[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2023, 41(9): 124-127. SHAN Nan, KONG Lingna, HU Ping. The work engagement status and influencing factors analysis of double-qualified nursing teacher in teaching hospitals[J]. Health Vocational Education, 2023, 41(9): 124-127.
[28] 郎爽, 王静, 刘倩倩, 等. 血液透析护士心理资本、组织支持感对工作投入影响分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(4): 478-479. LANG Shuang, WANG Jing, LIU Qianqian, et al. Effects of psychological capital and perceived organizational support on work engagement among nurses working in hemodialysis rooms[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2019, 35(4): 478-479.
[29] 倪云霞, 吴丹, 李继平. 四川省护士职业成长基本心理需要满足现状分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2022, 22(5): 645-650. NI Yunxia, WU Dan, LI Jiping. Analysis on the status of nurses basic psychological needs during career growth process in Sichuan province[J]. Chinese Nursing Manag-ement, 2022, 22(5): 645-650.
[1] 蒋莉莉,吴柳柳,徐新阳,张晓荣,曹枫林,辛育恒. 疾控人员职业倦怠潜在剖面分析及与工作特征的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 102-109.
[2] 路梦新,杨瑶瑶,封丹珺. 公务员职业倦怠亚型与神经质、生活质量的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(10): 116-121.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发