您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (12): 102-108.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0458

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

IOL Master700与Pentacam测量白内障患者角膜曲率及散光的对比研究

杜祥阁1,徐文文1,刘妍1,王琛2,常海燕1   

  1. 山东第一医科大学附属省立医院 1.眼科;2.耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 山东 济南 250012
  • 发布日期:2024-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 常海燕. E-mail:chy444574@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金(ZR2023MH087);山东省重点研发计划(2017GSF18178)

Comparative analysis of corneal keratometry and astigmatism measurements between IOL Master700 and Pentacam in cataract patients

DU Xiangge1, XU Wenwen1, LIU Yan1, WANG Chen2, CHANG Haiyan1   

  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology;
    2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology &
    Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Published:2024-12-09

摘要: 目的 探讨比较IOL Master700和Pentacam在白内障患者术前检测角膜曲率与散光的差异性、相关性及一致性。 方法 收集2023年6月至2023年10月白内障患者115例203眼。分别采用IOL Master与Pentacam测量患者的角膜前表面曲率及散光度数、后表面曲率及散光度数和全角膜曲率及散光度数,分析两种仪器的差异性、相关性和一致性。 结果 IOL Master700与Pentacam测量角膜后表面的Ks、Kf和Km的差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余结果差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两种仪器分别测量Ks、Kf、Km和△k的数据有较好的相关性,Ks、Kf、Km较△k相关性更高(P<0.001);Bland-Altman分析结果显示IOL Master与Pentacam测量患者的角膜前表面曲率的一致性较好,角膜后表面曲率及散光度数的一致性较差。 结论 IOL Master700与Pentacam在测量角膜前表面曲率方面差异性小,一致性好;在测量全角膜曲率方面差异性较小,一致性较好;在测量角膜后表面曲率方面存在差异,一致性较差;在测量角膜前后表面及全角膜散光度方面,差异性较小,但一致性较差。总体来说,两种仪器测量数据临床使用时不可相互替代,但可相互参考,需综合分析测量结果进行选择。

关键词: IOL Master700, Pentacam, 白内障, 角膜曲率, 散光

Abstract: Objective To investigate the difference and consistency of corneal keratometry and astigmatism measured by IOL Master700 and Pentacam in cataract patients. Methods A total of 115 cataract patients(203 eyes)were selected from June 2023 to October 2023. Corneal keratometry and astigmatism of the anterior corneal surface, posterior corneal surface and total cornea of cataract patients were measured by IOL Master700 and Pentacam, respectively. Differences, correlations and agreement between the two instruments were analysed. Results Significant differences were found in Ks, Kf and Km of the posterior corneal surface between IOL Master700 and Pentacam(P<0.05), while no significant differences were found in other parameters. Pearson correlation analysis showed a strong correlation between the two instruments in the measurement of Ks, Kf, Km and △k. The correlations for Ks, Kf and Km were more significant than those for △k(P<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed strong agreement between the anterior corneal surface Ks, Kf and Km measured by the two instruments, but poor agreement between the posterior corneal surface Ks, Kf and Km. Conclusion Firstly, the IOL Master700 and Pentacam show moderate differences and strong consistency in anterior corneal surface keratometry. Secondly, there are minimal differences and significant consistency in the measurement of total corneal keratometry. However, significant differences and poor consistency are observed in the posterior corneal surface keratometry. Although the differences in astigmatism measurements for the anterior corneal surface, posterior corneal surface and total cornea are minimal between two devices, the consistency is poor. Overall, measurement data from the IOL Master700 and Pentacam should not be used interchangeably in clinical practice, but can be cross-referenced. A comprehensive analysis of the measurement results is recommended for clinical decision making.

Key words: IOL Master 700, Pentacam, Cataract, Keratometry, Astigmatism

中图分类号: 

  • R778.2
[1] 李璟, 张辉, 王晶. 不同人工晶状体植入对视觉质量影响的临床研究[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2022, 36(2): 90-95. LI Jing, ZHANG Hui, WANG Jing. A clinical study on the effect of using different intraocular lens implants on visual quality[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2022, 36(2): 90-95.
[2] Du Y, Meng JQ, He WW, et al. Challenges of refractive cataract surgery in the era of myopia epidemic: a mini-review[J]. Front Med,2023,10:1128818. doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1128818.
[3] Zhao H, Chen X, Liu B, et al. Accuracy of refractive outcomes using standard or total keratometry for intraocular lens power formulas in conventional cataract surgery[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2023, 23:346. doi:10.1186/s12886-023-03094-x.
[4] Astrid Lucero Espinosa Soto, Jimena Ceja Martinez, Rosario Gulias-Canizo, et al. Accuracy of Astigmatism Calculation with the Barrett, Panacea, and enVista Toric Calculators [J]. Life, 2023,13(10):2009.doi: 10.3390/life13102009.
[5] 卢奕, 竺向佳. 屈光性白内障手术任重而道远[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2022, 58(7): 481-486. LU Yi, ZHU Xiangjia. Perfect refractive cataract surgery: still a long way to go[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2022, 58(7): 481-486.
[6] de Bernardo M, Borrelli M, Imparato R, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement before and after photorefractive keratectomy. Comparison between IOLMaster and Pentacam[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2020, 32:101976. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101976.
[7] Li ZY, Guo R, Hu XM, et al. Comparison of cataract patients with regular corneal astigmatism after implantation of extended range-of-vision and bifocal toric intraocular lenses[J]. Front Med, 2023, 10: 1105876. doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1105876.
[8] Goto S, Maeda N. Corneal topography for intraocular lens selection in refractive cataract surgery[J].Ophthalmology,2021,128(11): 142-152.
[9] 毕宏生. 精准屈光性白内障手术规划[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2017, 31(4):1-4. BI Hongsheng.Design of treatment protocol in refractive cataract surgery is important for postoperative visual outcomes[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2017, 31(4):1-4.
[10] 杨文利. 屈光性白内障手术的手术前规划与进展[J]. 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志, 2022, 22(5): 435-438. YANG Wenli. Preoperative planning and progress of refractive cataract surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, 2022, 22(5): 435-438.
[11] 廖珊, 刘可. 白内障术前角膜散光检查的新进展[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2022, 22(7): 1123-1126. LIAO Shan, LIU Ke. Development of approaches to assess corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery[J]. International Eye Science, 2022, 22(7): 1123-1126.
[12] Yang Z, Zhou YW, Jin TR, et al. An evaluation of the accuracy of toric intraocular lens power calculation based on measured total corneal refractive power[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2023, 71(2): 541-546.
[13] Cummings AB, Naughton S, Coen AM, et al. Comparative analysis of swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry biometers in the prediction of cataract surgery refractive outcomes[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2020, 14: 4209-4220. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S278589.
[14] Kaushik J, Singh A, Bhatta S, et al. Posterior keratometry changes after steep axis phacoemulsification: a prospective study[J]. Rom J Ophthalmol, 2023, 67(3): 275-282.
[15] Kanclerz P, Khoramnia R, Wang XG. Current developments in corneal topography and tomography[J]. Diagnostics, 2021,11(8): 1466. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11081466.
[16] 陶露莎, 董登昊, 郎敏, 等. CASIA2与IOL Master 700测量白内障患者角膜屈光力及散光的差异性和一致性[J].国际眼科杂志, 2023, 23(6): 1017-1023. TAO Lusha, DONG Denghao, LANG Min, et al. Difference and consistency of corneal refractive power and astigmatism in cataract patients measured by CASIA2 and IOL Master 700[J]. International Eye Science, 2023, 23(6): 1017-1023.
[17] Ferrer-Blasco T, Domínguez-Vicent A, Esteve-Taboada JJ, et al. Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters[J]. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Fur Klin Und Exp Ophthalmol, 2017, 255(2): 343-349.
[18] Chen XY, Wu QR, Xie MY, et al. Bibliometric analysis of research relating to refractive cataract surgery over a 20-year period: from 2003 to 2022[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2023, 16(10): 1692-1701.
[19] Owusu S, Zaabaar E, Kwarteng MA, et al. Scheimpflug-derived keratometric, pachymetric and pachymetric progression indices in the diagnosis of keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2023, 17: 3941-3964. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S436492.
[20] Sardari S, Khabazkhoob M, Jafarzadehpur E, et al. The repeatability of axial length measurements using a scheimpflug-based system[J]. J Ophthalmic Vis Res, 2023, 18(4): 396-404.
[21] 唐唯,李元彬. 屈光性白内障手术新进展[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2019, 33(2):149-158. TANG Wei, LI Yuanbin. New progress in refractive cataract surgery[J]. J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ, 2019, 33(2): 149-158.
[22] Tañá-Rivero P, Aguilar-Córcoles S, Tello-Elordi C, et al. Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2021, 47(4): 488-495.
[23] 陈果, 李霄, 郑广瑛. 三种仪器测量白内障术前角膜生物学参数的比较[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2021, 21(7): 1261-1265. CHEN Guo, LI Xiao, ZHENG Guangying. Comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal biological parameters before cataract surgery[J]. International Eye Science, 2021, 21(7): 1261-1265.
[24] 武静, 高鹏, 范建武, 等. Verion数字导航系统与IOLMaster700、Pentacam白内障摘除手术前测量角膜散光的比较研究[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2020, 56(1):47-52. WU Jing, GAO Peng, FAN Jianwu, et al. Comparison of keratometric measurements obtained by the Verion image guided system with the IOLMaster and the Pentacam before cataract extraction surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, 56(1):47-52.
[25] Karmiris E, Gartaganis PS, Ntravalias T, et al. Agreement between swept-source optical biometry and Scheimpflug-based tomography in eyes with previous myopic refractive surgery[J]. Saudi J Ophthalmol, 2022, 36(2): 229-236.
[26] Chalkiadaki E, Gartaganis PS, Ntravalias T, et al. Agreement in anterior segment measurements between swept-source and Scheimpflug-based optical biometries in keratoconic eyes: a pilot study[J]. Ther Adv Ophthalmol, 2022, 14: 25158414211063283. doi:10.1177/25158414211063283.
[27] Savini G, Taroni L, Schiano-Lomoriello D, et al. Repeatability of total Keratometry and standard Keratometry by the IOLMaster 700 and comparison to total corneal astigmatism by Scheimpflug imaging[J]. Eye, 2021, 35(1): 307-315.
[28] Shajari M, Sonntag R, Ramsauer M, et al. Evaluation of total corneal power measurements with a new optical biometer[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2020, 46(5): 675-681.
[29] 王婷婷, 王抒阳, 张敏, 等. CASIA2、IOLMaster 700和Pentacam对白内障眼角膜屈光力及散光测量的比较[J].中华实验眼科杂志, 2022, 40(11): 1055-1061. WANG Tingting, WANG Shuyang, ZHANG Min, et al. Comparison of corneal refractive power and astigmatism measured by CASIA2, IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam in cataract patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmdogy, 2022, 40(11):1055-1061.
[30] Kern C, El Kaissi L, Kortuem K, et al. Comparing refractive outcomes of a standard industry toric IOL calculator using anterior corneal astigmatism and total corneal refractive power[J]. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Fur Klin Und Exp Ophthalmol, 2020, 258(2): 345-350.
[31] Muzyka-Wo zniak M, Oleszko A, Grzybowski A. Measurements of anterior and posterior corneal curvatures with OCT and scheimpflug biometers in patients with low total corneal astigmatism[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(23): 6921. doi:10.3390/jcm11236921.
[32] 马山, 刘秀花, 姜雅琴. IOLMaster700光学生物测量仪与Pentacam三维眼前节分析仪检测白内障患者眼部参数的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(5): 280-285. MA Shan, LIU Xiuhua, JIANG Yaqin. Comparisons of biometric parameters measurements by Pentacam and IOLMaster700 in cataract patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmologic Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(5): 280-285.
[33] Shajari M, Cremonese C, Petermann K, et al. Comparison of axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth measurements of 2 recently introduced devices to a known biometer[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2017, 178: 58-64. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.02.027.
[34] Asena L, Akman A, Güngör SG, et al. Comparison of keratometry obtained by a swept source OCT-based biometer with a standard optical biometer and scheimpflug imaging[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2018, 43(7): 882-888.
[35] Sel S, Stange J, Kaiser D, et al. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements[J]. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2017, 40(5): 318-322.
[36] Özyol P, Özyol E. Agreement between swept-source optical biometry and scheimpflug-based topography measurements of anterior segment parameters[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2016, 169: 73-78. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.020.
[37] 范巍, 张广斌. 飞秒激光辅助超乳联合Toric IOL植入术矫正高度近视白内障合并角膜规则散光[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2023, 23(2): 325-328. FAN Wei, ZHANG Guangbin. Femtosecond laser- assisted cataract phacoemulsification combined with Toric intraocular lenses implantation in correction of high myopia cataract and corneal astigmatism[J]. International Eye Science, 2023, 23(2): 325-328.
[1] 宋媛媛,李桂梅. 婴儿Lowe综合征1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(4): 119-121.
[2] 于媛媛,王春霞,苏萍,孙苑潆,薛付忠,刘言训. 健康管理队列白内障发病风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(6): 104-107.
[3] 陶丹, 许江涛, 肖亦爽. 86例儿童眼球穿通伤临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(S1): 90-91.
[4] 陈红梅1,卓建2. 白内障超声乳化吸除术后泪膜的变化及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(4): 133-.
[5] 郭媛媛,蔡可丽,蒋欣桐. 褪黑素对抑制过氧化氢诱导大鼠白内障形成的实验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(5): 67-71.
[6] 蒋欣桐1,蔡可丽1,郭媛媛1,王荣2. 牛磺酸熊脱氧胆酸对高糖环境下晶状体上皮细胞的保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(3): 74-77.
[7] 潘虹,王利华,马鲁新. Pentacam与IOLMaster测量角膜曲率及前房深度的比较[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(6): 624-627.
[8] 杨雪莉,蔡可丽,高雪,吴晓莉,卓建,杨博,刘德荣,王荣 . 未折叠蛋白应答在晶状体上皮细胞凋亡中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(1): 52-56.
[9] 张慧卿,李 艳,牟国营 . 准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术治疗中高度循规性散光[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(1): 80-82.
[10] 高雪,蔡可丽,吴晓莉,杨雪丽,霍伟. 雷帕霉素抑制兔眼后发性白内障的实验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(6): 634-637.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!