您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版)

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

连续高质量结肠镜检查中大肠息肉漏诊率及相关因素分析

司志雯,李光春,吴洪磊,郭建强   

  1. 山东大学第二医院消化内科, 山东 济南 250033
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-27 出版日期:2014-06-10 发布日期:2014-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 郭建强。 E-mail:jianqiangg@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    济南市青年科技明星计划(2010117)

Factors influencing the miss rate of colorectal polyps in a back-to-back high-quality colonoscopy examination#br#

SI Zhiwen, LI Guangchun, WU Honglei, GUO Jianqiang   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Received:2013-12-27 Online:2014-06-10 Published:2014-06-10

摘要: 目的  探讨连续高质量结肠镜检查中大肠息肉漏诊情况及相关因素。方法  在对结肠镜检查的退镜时间、肠道准备情况和盲肠插管成功率进行限定的前提下,患者常规结肠镜检查后即进行第2次结肠镜检查,记录大肠息肉大小(直径)、部位、病理类型、息肉形态,统计2次检查结果  ,计算大肠息肉漏诊率,分析所得数据与相关因素之间关系。结果  164例大肠息肉患者行连续性结肠镜检查共发现462枚息肉,总漏诊率为17.7%,漏诊率与息肉大小(χ2=25.055, P<0.001)、部位(χ2=15.134, P=0.010)、息肉形态(χ2=22.901, P<0.001)有明显相关性。多因素统计分析显示,息肉大小是漏诊保护性因素,息肉越大,漏诊率越小,与直径≤5mm相比较,6~10mm(OR:0.38,95%CI:0.22~0.65)和>10mm(OR:0.10,95%CI:0.02~0.43)的漏诊率显著降低;与直肠比较,乙状结肠、横结肠、升结肠漏诊率明显升高;无蒂息肉(OR:4.77,95%CI:2.34~9.72)的漏诊率显著高于有蒂息肉。而息肉的病理类型与漏诊率无明显相关性。结论  大肠息肉患者行连续性结肠镜检查时存在一定程度漏诊,漏诊与息肉大小、部位、形态有关,而与息肉病理类型无明显相关性。

关键词: 漏诊率, 大肠息肉, 结肠镜

Abstract: Objective  To explore the miss rate of colorectal polyps and the relevant factors in back-to-back high-quality colonoscopy. Methods  Under the premise of limiting withdrawal time, intestinal preparation and successful rate of appendix intubation, patients were given a second colonoscopy after conventional colonoscopy. Size (diameter), location, shape and pathological type of colorectal polyps were recorded. Results   of the two tests were collected to calculate the misdiagnosis rate of colon polyps. The relationship between the obtained data and relevant factors was analyzed.  Results  A total of 462 polyps were found in 164 patients by continuous colonoscopy, the total miss rate being 17.7%. There was obvious correlation between miss rate and size (χ2=25.055, P<0.001), location (χ2=15.134, P=0.010) and shape (χ2=22.901, P<0.001) of polyps. Multi-factor statistical analysis of the relevant factors showed that polyp size was the protective factor of missed diagnosis. The larger the polyp was, the smaller the miss rate was. Compared with polyps with diameter ≤5mm, polyps with diameter 6~10mm had (OR: 0.38, 95%CI: 0.22-0.65), and polyps with diameter >10mm had (OR: 0.10, 95%CI: 0.02-0.43). Compared with the rectum, sigmoid colon, transverse colon and ascending colon had significantly increased miss rate. The miss rate was markedly higher in sessile polyps (OR: 4.77, 95%CI: 2.34-9.72) than in pedunculated polyps. The pathological type was not correlated to miss rate. Conclusion  Patients with colorectal polyps risk a certain degree of miss rate during continuous colonoscopy. Miss rate is associated with size, location, and shape but not with the pathological type of polyps.

Key words: Colonoscopy, Miss rate, Colorectal polyps

中图分类号: 

  • R574.6
[1] . 内镜模拟训练在结肠镜教学中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(9): 119-121.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!