山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (9): 61-65.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0321
• 主动脉疾病基础与临床研究进展专刊—研究进展 • 上一篇 下一篇
梁博文,陆清声
LIANG Bowen, LU Qingsheng
摘要： 血管介入手术机器人在主动脉腔内修复术等领域具有显著优势,能提高操作精准性和操作效率。随着人工智能技术的发展,机器人辅助主动脉腔内修复术正朝着全流程自动化、高效率、高安全性方向发展。未来,通过构建手术评估、手术规划和手术导航三位一体的手术辅助模式架构,有望实现血管疾病治疗的精准化、智能化和微创化。
中图分类号:
| [1] Lederle FA, Kyriakides TC, Stroupe KT, et al. Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(22): 2126-2135. [2] Chiu P, Goldstone AB, Schaffer JM, et al. Endovascular versus open repair of intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73(6): 643-651. [3] 陆清声. 血管疾病诊治的精准智能微创时代 [J]. 中华医学杂志, 2022, 102(37): 2914-2917. LU Qingsheng. Diagnosis and treatment of vascular diseases in the era of precise, intelligent and minimally invasive surgery[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2022, 102(37): 2914-2917. [4] Ernst S, Ouyang FF, Linder C, et al. Initial experience with remote catheter ablation using a novel magnetic navigation system: magnetic remote catheter ablation[J]. Circulation, 2004, 109(12): 1472-1475. [5] Beyar R, Gruberg L, Deleanu D, et al. Remote-control percutaneous coronary interventions: concept, validation, and first-in-humans pilot clinical trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006, 47(2): 296-300. [6] Weisz G, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, et al. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: precise(Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention)Study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 61(15): 1596-1600. [7] Mahmud E, Naghi J, Ang L, et al. Demonstration of the safety and feasibility of robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: results of the CORA-PCI study(complex robotically AssistedPercutaneous coronary intervention)[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2017, 10(13): 1320-1327. [8] Durand E, Sabatier R, Smits PC, et al. Evaluation of the R-One robotic system for percutaneous coronary intervention: the R-EVOLUTION study[J]. EuroIntervention, 2023, 18(16): e1339-e1347. [9] Riga CV, Cheshire NJW, Hamady MS, et al. The role of robotic endovascular catheters in fenestrated stent grafting[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51(4): 810-819. [10] Cochennec F, Kobeiter H, Gohel M, et al. Feasibility and safety of renal and visceral target vessel cannulation using robotically steerable catheters during complex endovascular aortic procedures[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2015, 22(2): 187-193. [11] Khan EM, Frumkin W, Ng GA, et al. First experience with a novel robotic remote catheter system: amigoTM mapping trial[J]. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 2013, 37(2): 121-129. [12] Song C, Xia SB, Zhang H, et al. Novel endovascular interventional surgical robotic system based on biomimetic manipulation[J]. Micromachines, 2022, 13(10): 1587. [13] Kladko DV, Vinogradov VV. Magnetosurgery: principles, design, and applications[J]. Smart Mater Med, 2024, 5(1): 24-35. [14] Vidal V, Bargellini I, Bent C, et al. Performance evaluation of a miniature and disposable endovascular robotic device[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2024, 47(4): 503-507. [15] Riga DV, Bicknell CD, Cheshire N, et al. Initial clinical application of a robotically steerable catheter system in endovascular aneurysm repair[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2009, 16(2): 149-153. [16] Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Rolls A, et al. Robot-assisted fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair(FEVAR)using the Magellan system[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2013, 24(2): 191-196. [17] Perera AH, Riga CV, Monzon L, et al. Robotic arch catheter placement reduces cerebral embolization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR)[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2017, 53(3): 362-369. [18] Cheung S, Rahman R, Bicknell CD, et al. Comparison of manual versus robot-assisted contralateral gate cannulation in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair[J]. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 2020, 15(12): 2071-2078. [19] Song C, Xia SB, Zhang L, et al. A novel endovascular robotic-assisted system for endovascular aortic repair: first-in-human evaluation of practicability and safety[J]. Eur Radiol, 2023, 33(11): 7408-7418. [20] Wang KD, Liu JY, Yan WW, et al. Force feedback controls of multi-gripper robotic endovascular intervention: design, prototype, and experiments[J]. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 2021, 16(1): 179-192. [21] Wang KD, Mai XM, Xu HJ, et al. A novel SEA-based haptic force feedback master hand controller for robotic endovascular intervention system[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2020, 16(5): 1-10. [22] Lu QS, Shen Y, Xia SB, et al. A novel universal endovascular robot for peripheral arterial stent-assisted angioplasty: initial experimental results[J]. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2020, 54(7): 598-604. [23] Wang KD, Chen B, Lu QS, et al. Design and performance evaluation of real-time endovascular interventional surgical robotic system with high accuracy[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2018, 14(5): e1915. [24] 梁博文, 陆清声. 血管腔内修复术中导航技术的研究进展和展望 [J]. 中国血管外科杂志:电子版, 2023, 15(1): 75-79. LIANG Bowen, LU Qingsheng. Research progress and prospect of navigation technology in endovascular repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Vascular Surgery(Electronic Version), 2023, 15(1): 75-79. [25] Chen DD, Wei JY, Deng YM, et al. Virtual stenting with simplex mesh and mechanical contact analysis for real-time planning of thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. Theranostics, 2018, 8(20): 5758-5771. [26] Muluk SC, Elrakhawy M, Chess B, et al. Successful endovascular treatment of severe chronic mesenteric ischemia facilitated by intraoperative positioning system image guidance[J]. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech, 2022, 8(1): 60-65. [27] van Herwaarden JA, Jansen MM, Vonken EPA, et al. First in human clinical feasibility study of endovascular navigation with fiber optic RealShape(FORS)technology[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2021, 61(2): 317-325. [28] Maurel B, Martin-Gonzalez T, Chong D, et al. A prospective observational trial of fusion imaging in infrarenal aneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2018, 68(6): 1706-1713. [29] De Beaufort LM, Nasr B, Corvec TL, et al. Automated image fusion guidance during endovascular aorto-iliac procedures: a randomized controlled pilot study[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2021, 75: 86-93. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.023. [30] Pore A, Li Z, DallAlba D, et al. Autonomous navigation for robot-assisted intraluminal and endovascular procedures: a systematic review[J]. IEEE Trans Robot, 2023, 39(4): 2529-2548. |
| [1] | 梁晨,姚丽娟,吕龙飞,唐泽,秦达,崔有斌,余孝淇. 三维重建联合CT引导下穿刺定位在微创治疗肺磨玻璃结节中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(5): 74-82. |
| [2] | 中国医师协会骨科医师分会智能骨科学组,中华预防医学会脊柱疾病预防与控制专业委员会脊柱脊髓损伤疾病预防与控制学组. 人工智能脊柱退变影像学测量位点与标注专家共识(2025)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 1-10. |
| [3] | 机器人辅助经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术手术技术专家组. 机器人辅助经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术专家共识[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 11-21. |
| [4] | 季心宇,余思沂,孙圆圆,姬冰. 基于人工智能和步态分析的骨科疾病辅助诊疗方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 34-43. |
| [5] | 王建民,李晓峰,由志涛,董圣杰,赵宇驰,李占菊,邹德鑫,张剑锋,孙涛,杜伟. 基于可解释机器学习的后路腰椎椎体间融合术后慢性疼痛风险预测模型构建[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 78-88. |
| [6] | 王宝炫,焦杰,张厚君,刘奇,于冠英. 衰弱与肌少症评估在胃肠道肿瘤术后结局预测中的应用与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 51-58. |
| [7] | 山东省腔镜外科质量控制中心胸腔镜委员会. 山东省VATS/RATS非小细胞肺癌围术期质量控制指标专家共识(2025版)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 1-5. |
| [8] | 张鑫茹,李扬,孙萌,聂玮,马喆. Vision-LSTM模型在甲状腺影像报告与数据系统4b类甲状腺结节超声影像诊断中的应用与评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 68-74. |
| [9] | 武琪琪,成淼淼,肖晓燕. 多模态模型在肾脏病领域的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(10): 117-124. |
| [10] | 林长泼,符伟国. Stanford B型主动脉夹层的诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 7-12. |
| [11] | 卫任,郭伟. 腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 13-18. |
| [12] | 王伦常,覃淇,舒畅. 创伤性B型主动脉夹层的诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 19-25. |
| [13] | 杨建平,管圣,方青波,慈红波,戈小虎. 钝性胸主动脉损伤的诊治进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 36-41. |
| [14] | 张志炜,孟庆友,丁庆伟,张晓宇. 外科辅助短距离逆行针刺技术在主动脉弓原位开窗中的早期应用效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 93-100. |
| [15] | 赵文鹏,吕凡振,胡义良,陈晒,方华强,王世知,周为民. Stanford B型主动脉壁间血肿单中心治疗经验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 108-114. |
|
||
