您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 31-38.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.1139

• • 上一篇    下一篇

混合现实技术在侧颅底良性肿瘤手术中的应用

许玲1,2,孙岩2,陈良2,王锡温2   

  1. 1.青岛大学医学部, 山东 青岛 266071;2.青岛大学附属烟台毓璜顶医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 山东 烟台 264000
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 孙岩. E-mail:lenards@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    济南市科技发展计划(201805030)

Application of mixed reality technique in the resection of benign lateral skull base tumor

XU Ling1,2, SUN Yan2, CHEN Liang2, WANG Xiwen2   

  1. 1.Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China;
    2.Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

摘要: 目的 探讨混合现实技术在侧颅底良性肿瘤手术中的应用价值及其意义。 方法 回顾性分析2017年3月至2018年10月期间经手术治疗的侧颅底良性肿瘤患者19例,按照是否使用混合现实技术分为两组,A组8例患者术前均通过重建术区的三维影像解剖结构模型,并采用混合现实技术进行术前手术方案的制定、与患者及家属进行术前沟通,术中利用该技术来实时指导肿瘤的切除;B组11例患者术前术中均未使用混合现实技术。比较两组患者术中自开始切皮至肿瘤暴露的时间、肿瘤全切率、术后平均住院天数、并发症发生率及患者满意度评分。 结果 两组患者的肿瘤全切率、术后平均住院天数和并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但术中自开始切皮至肿瘤暴露的时间A组较B组明显缩短(P=0.003),患者满意度评分A组较B组明显提高(P=0.005)。 结论 在侧颅底良性肿瘤术前及术中使用混合现实技术,可缩短术中自开始切皮至肿瘤暴露的时间,便于医患沟通并提高患者满意度,作为一种新技术值得推广。

关键词: 混合现实技术, 侧颅底良性肿瘤, 手术, 临床应用

Abstract: Objective To explore the application value of mixed reality technique in the resection of benign lateral skull base tumor. Methods The clinical data of 19 patients with benign lateral skull base tumor during Mar. 2017 and Oct. 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group A(n=8)and B(n=11). In group A, before operation, 3D image fusion technique was applied to reconstruct anatomical structure, mixed reality technique was used to formulate operation scheme, and surgeons communicated fully with patients and their families. During operation, mixed reality technique was used to guide the resection of tumors. In group B, no mixed reality technique was applied before or during operation. The time needed from skin incision to tumor exposure, tumor removal rate, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of complications and patients satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in tumor removal rate, hospital stay and incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05). However, group A had shorter time from skin incision to tumor exposure(P=0.003)and higher patients satisfaction rate(P=0.005)than group B. Conclusion Pre- and intra-operative use of mixed reality technique in the resection of benign lateral skull base tumor can significantly shorten the time from the initial incision to tumor exposure, facilitate doctor-patient communication and improve patients satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: Mixed reality technique, Benign lateral skull base tumor, Surgery, Clinical application

中图分类号: 

  • R762
[1] Frederick JW, Sweeny L, Carroll WR, et al. Outcomes in head and neck reconstruction by surgical site and donor site[J]. Laryngoscope, 2013, 123(7): 1612-1617.
[2] Shen Y, Ma C, Wang L, et al. Surgical management of giant cell tumors in temporomandibular joint region involving lateral skull base: a multidisciplinary approach[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 74(11): 2295-2311.
[3] Guo Y, Guo C. Maxillary-fronto-temporal approach for removal of recurrent malignant infratemporal fossa tumors: anatomical and clinical study[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2014, 42(3): 206-212.
[4] Zuniga MG, Turner JH, Chandra RK. Updates in anterior skull base reconstruction[J]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 24(1): 75-82.
[5] Alotaibi FE, Alzhrani GA, Sabbagh AJ, et al. Neurosurgical assessment of metrics including judgment and dexterity using the virtual reality simulator neuro Touch(NAJD Metrics)[J]. Surg Innov, 2015, 22(6): 636-642.
[6] Ogawa H, Hasegawa S, Tsukada S, et al. A pilot study of augmented reality technology applied to the acetabular cup placement during total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(6): 1833-1837.
[7] Lee SC, Fuerst B, Tateno K, et al. Multi-modal imaging, model-based tracking, and mixed reality visualisation for orthopaedic surgery[J]. Healthc Technol Lett, 2017, 4(5): 168-173.
[8] He X, Karra S, Pakseresht P, et al. Effect of heated-air blanket on the dispersion of squames in an operating room[J]. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng, 2018, 34(5): 2960. doi: 10.1002/cnm.2960.
[9] Moffat D, Jones S, Smith W. Petrous temporal bone cholesteatoma: a new classification and long-term surgical outcomes[J]. Skull Base, 2008, 18(2): 107-115.
[10] Van der Feliz-Cornelis CM, Van Oppen P, Van Marwijk. A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire(PDRQ-9)in primary care: development and psychometric evaluation[J]. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 2004, 26(3): 115-120.
[11] 杨慧, 王洪奇. 医患关系量表PDRQ-15中文译本的信度和效度评价[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2011, 24(3): 350-353. YANG Hui, WANG Hongqi. Assessment of the Reliability and Validity on the Chinese Edition of Doctor-Patient Relationship Scale PDRQ-15[J]. Chinese Medical Ethics, 2011, 24(3): 350-353.
[12] Liu H, Auvinet E, Giles J, et al. Augmented reality based navigation for computer assisted hip resurfacing: a proof of concept study[J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2018, 46(10): 1595-1605.
[13] Cho HS, Park YK, Gupta S, et al. Augmented reality in bone tumour resection an experimental study[J]. Bone Joint Res, 2017, 6(3): 137-143.
[14] Ku J, Kim YJ, Cho S, et al. Three-dimensional augmented reality system for balance and mobility rehabilitation in the elderly: a randomized controlled Trial[J]. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2019, 22(2): 132-141.
[15] Yan R, Li X, Xiao J, et al. Exploration of the application of mixed reality technology in plastic surgery teaching[J]. Chin J Aesthetic Med, 2018, 27(2): 140-142.
[16] 余龙洋, 李亚楠, 岳志健, 等. 神经导航多影像融合在垂体腺瘤经蝶入路手术的临床应用[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2015, 20(3): 120-121.
[17] Rosahl SK, Gharabaghi A, Hubbe U, et al. Virtual reality augmentation in skull base surgeries[J]. Skull Base, 2006, 16(2): 59-66.
[18] 李杰飞, 张玉琪, 何乐, 等. 多模态影像融合技术在脑肿瘤手术中的应用[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2016, 32(5): 458-462.
[19] Mashiko T, Otani K, Kawan R, et al. Development of three-dim ensional hollow elastic m odel for cerebral aneurysm clipping sim ulation enabling rapid and low cost prototyping[J]. World Neurosurg, 2015, 83(3): 351-361.
[20] Moro C, Stromberga Z, Raikos A, et al. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy[J]. Anat Sci Educ, 2017, 10(6): 549-599.
[21] Belmustakov S, Bailey C, Weiss CR. Augmented and virtual reality navigation for interventions in the musculoskeletal system[J]. Curr Radiol Rep, 2018, 6(9): 33.
[22] Jiang B, Ju H, Zhao Y, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and efficiency of the use of virtual reality simulation with high-fidelity mannequins for simulation-based training of fiberoptic broncho-scope manipulation[J]. Simul Healthc, 2018, 13(2): 83-87.
[23] Sauer IM, Queisner M, Tang P, et al. Mixed reality in visceral surgery: development of a suitable workflow and evaluation of intraoperative use-cases[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 266(5): 706-712.
[24] Wu P, Yang X, Wang Y, et al. Clinical application of mixed reality technology combined with Da Vinci robot in partial nephrectomy for completely endogenous renal tumors[J]. J Mini Invas Urol, 2018, 7(4): 225-259.
[25] Namba K, Higaki A, Kaneko N, et al. Microcatheter shaping for intracranial aneurysm coiling using the 3-dimensional printing rapid prototyping technology: preliminary result in the first 10 consecutive cases[J]. World Neurosurg, 2015, 84(1): 178-186.
[26] Aoun RJ, Hamade YJ, Zammar SG, et al. Futuristic three-dimensional printing and personalized neurosurgery[J]. World Neurosurg, 2015, 84(4): 870-871.
[27] Gargiulo P, Risrnad T, Lafsson I, et al. New directions in 3D medical modeling: 3D-printing anatomy and functions in neuro-surgical planning[J]. J Health Care Eng, 2017(4): 1-8.
[28] Kondo K, Harada N, Masuda H, et al. A neurosurgical simulation of skull base tumors using a 3D printed rapid prototyping model containing mesh structures[J]. Acta Neurochirurgica, 2016, 158(6): 1-7.
[1] 徐宁宇 王磊 郝恩魁 苏国海. STEMI患者急诊PCI前口服阿托伐他汀对炎症介质及左心室功能的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 69-72.
[2] 张小艳 李刚 王令平. 不同剂量舒芬太尼对脊柱手术患者全麻诱导期血流动力学及血浆皮质醇的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 76-79.
[3] 梁晨,姚丽娟,吕龙飞,唐泽,秦达,崔有斌,余孝淇. 三维重建联合CT引导下穿刺定位在微创治疗肺磨玻璃结节中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(5): 74-82.
[4] 王烨,王刚,南海鸥,蔡雨玲,李嘉宇,王海锋,颜英杰,江志伟. 胃癌患者围手术期心率变异度与炎性指标的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 23-30.
[5] 周志远,石玉心,顾赫泽,侯奕阳,徐欣. 正颌手术对严重骨性Ⅲ 类患者上气道大小的影响及关键因素筛选[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 44-50.
[6] 机器人辅助经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术手术技术专家组. 机器人辅助经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术专家共识[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 11-21.
[7] 邵长秀,贺青卿,王宇男,宋泽辉,岳涛,周鹏,李小磊,庄大勇. 改良腋窝单孔非溶脂腔镜腺体切除治疗男性乳房发育症的学习曲线与疗效评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 109-117.
[8] 张蕾,潘叶,李家根,赵红. Hughes改良瓣修复大面积下睑全层缺损的临床效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 37-43.
[9] 温学龙,刘安慧,陈经纬,吴梦婷,杨岷. 急性非ST抬高型心肌梗死行冠状动脉旁路移植手术时机Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 60-70.
[10] 王宝炫,焦杰,张厚君,刘奇,于冠英. 衰弱与肌少症评估在胃肠道肿瘤术后结局预测中的应用与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 51-58.
[11] 张翼翔,梁原浩,杨文龙,李国强,吴文庆,刘垒. 基于术中C臂X光图像骨性标识的椎间孔镜手术路径构建[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 14-21.
[12] 山东省腔镜外科质量控制中心胸腔镜委员会. 山东省VATS/RATS非小细胞肺癌围术期质量控制指标专家共识(2025版)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 1-5.
[13] 丁仰坤,刘涛,刘宇,于嘉智,牟鹏飞. 金黄色葡萄球菌致儿童急性血源性骨髓炎首次术后细菌转阴的影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 53-60.
[14] 黄艳,周应芳,彭超. 青少年子宫内膜异位症的管理要点和策略[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(10): 8-12.
[15] 王伦常,覃淇,舒畅. 创伤性B型主动脉夹层的诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 19-25.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!