移植肾患者体质量指数与移植肾皮下深度对声触诊组织量化成像结果的影响

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2018.722

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过分析不同体型患者声触诊组织量化成像(VTIQ)中质控模式图像,研究移植肾患者体质量指数(BMI)与移植肾皮下深度对VTIQ结果的影响。方法选取2017年11月至2018年5月在山东省千佛山医院接受肾移植手术及术后复查中肾功能正常患者119例。首先测量患者身高、体质量,计算BMI值;然后于移植肾皮质选择感兴趣区,测量移植肾表面与体表的距离即移植肾皮下深度;最后利用VTIQ技术获取质控模式图像并评估,将图像质量分为等级A、B、C。患者BMI和质控图像质量等级记入BMI组,患者移植肾皮下深度和质控图像质量等级记入Depth组,并对两组数据进行统计学分析。结果移植肾VTIQ质控模式图像质量在不同BMI患者或移植肾皮下深度之间存在差异(P<0.05)。对两组数据ROC曲线分析可知,AUC(BMI组)>AUC(Depth组),质控模式图像等级B与C之间的截断值为23.99,敏感度为0.800,特异度为0.731。结论移植肾VTIQ质控模式图像质量与患者BMI或移植肾皮下深度有关,BMI或者皮下深度越大,移植肾质控图像质量越差,VTIQ结果准确度越低。相对于移植肾皮下深度,患者BMI对VTIQ结果的评估具有更高的准确性。

关键词: 肾移植, 声触诊组织量化成像, 剪切波弹性成像技术, 质量控制, 体质量指数, 移植肾皮下深度

Abstract: Objective Effects of the BMI and the subcutaneous depth of the transplanted kidney on results of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification(VTIQ)were studied by analyzing the quality control pattern images in VTIQ of patients with different somatotypes. Methods A total of 119 patients undergoing renal transplantation and postoperatively reexaminated as normal were selected from November 2017 to May 2018 in Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University. Firstly, the height and weight of the patients were measured and the body mass index(BMI)value was calculated. Then the region of interest(ROI)was selected from the transplanted kidney cortex to measure the distance from the surface of the transplanted kidney to the body surface which was defined as a subcutaneous depth of the transplanted kidney. Finally, VTIQ was used to obtain the image in quality control mode and the images were divided into grades A, B and C according to the quality. Patients BMI and grades of images quality were recorded as BMI group, subcutaneous depths of transplanted kidneys and grades of images quality were recorded as Depth group, and the datas of two groups were statistically analyzed. Results The image quality of VTIQ quality control mode of transplanted kidney was different between the patients with different BMI and the different subcutaneous depth of the transplanted kidney(P<0.05). 山东大学学报 (医学版)56卷12期 -盛璇,等.移植肾患者体质量指数与移植肾皮下深度对声触诊组织量化成像结果的影响 \=-ROC curves of two groups showed that AUC(BMI group)was greater than AUC(Depth group), the cut-off value between grades B and C was 23.99, the sensitivity was 0.800, and the specificity was 0.731. Conclusion The images quality of the VTIQ quality control model of transplanted kidney is related to the BMI and subcutaneous depth of the transplanted kidney. The greater the BMI or subcutaneous depth are, the worse the quality of the transplanted kidney quality control images is, that means the lower accuracy of the measured VTIQ results. Compared with the subcutaneous depth of transplanted kidney, the BMI of patient has a higher accuracy in the evalution of VTIQ results.

Key words: Kidney transplantation, Virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, Elastography, Quality control, Body mass index, Subcutaneous depth of the transplanted kidney

中图分类号:

R445.1

盛璇,王永娥,郭丹,兰梦,范凤景,丁红宇. 移植肾患者体质量指数与移植肾皮下深度对声触诊组织量化成像结果的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(12): 68-72.

SHENG Xuan, WANG Yonge, GUO Dan, LAN Meng, FAN Fengjing, DING Hongyu. Effects of body mass index and renal subcutaneous depth on the results of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification in renal transplant patients[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2018, 56(12): 68-72.

参考文献

[1] Tabriziani H, Lipkowitz MS, Vuong N. Chronic kidney disease, kidney transplantation and oxidative stress: a new look to successful kidney transplantation [J]. Clin Kidney J, 2018, 11(1): 130-135.
[2] Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, et al. Banff-05 meeting report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy(CAN)[J]. Am J Transplant, 2007, 7(3): 518-526.
[3] 李嫚,刘好田,柳澄,等.基于超声弹性成像技术诊断移植肾慢性排斥反应的探索[J].中国医疗设备, 2012, 27(10): 162-165. LI Man, LIU Haotian, LIU Cheng, et al. Exploration of diagnosis of chronic rejection after kidney transplant based on ultrasonic elastrography[J]. China Medical Devices, 2012, 27(10): 162-165.
[4] Monaco AP, Burke JF Jr, Ferguson RM, et al. Current thinking on chronic renal allograft rejection: issues, concerns, and recommendations from a 1997 roundtable discussion[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 1999, 33(1): 150-160.
[5] Furness PN, Taub N. Convergence of European Renal Transplant Pathology Assessment Procedures Project. International variation in the interpretation of renal transplant biopsies: report of the CERTPAP Project[J]. Kidney Int, 2001, 60(5): 1998-2012.
[6] Naesens M, Kuypers DR, De Vusser K, et al. Chronic histological damage in early indication biopsies is an independent risk factor for late renal allograft failure[J]. Am J Transplant, 2013, 13(1): 86-99.
[7] Seron D, Moreso F. Protocol biopsies in renal transplantation: prognostic value of structural monitoring [J]. Kidney Int, 2007, 72(6): 690-697.
[8] Tsochatzis EA, Gurusamy KS, Ntaoula S, et al. Elastography for the diagnosis of severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy [J]. J Hepatol, 2011, 54(4): 650-659.
[9] Mao F, Xu HX, Zhou H, et al. Assessment of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification and the ultrasound thyroid imaging reporting and data system in patients with thyroid nodules referred for biopsy [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2018, 37(3): 725-736.
[10] Zhang Y, Zhao CK, Li XL, et al. Virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification: value in malignancy prediction for complex cystic and solid breast lesions [J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 7807-7817.
[11] Stock KF, Klein BS, Vo Cong MT, et al. ARFI-based tissue elasticity quantification in comparison to histology for the diagnosis of renal transplant fibrosis [J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2010, 46(2-3): 139-148.
[12] Kahn J, Slowinski T, Thomas A, et al. TSI ultrasound elastography for the diagnosis of chronic allograft nephropathy in kidney transplanted patients [J]. J Ultrason, 2013, 13(54): 253-262.
[13] Ozkan F, Yavuz YC, Inci MF, et al. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography in transplant kidneys: correlations with clinical-Doppler parameters [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2013, 39(1): 4-9.
[14] Wang HK, Lai YC, Lin YH, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the transplant kidney: correlation between cortical stiffness and arterial resistance in early post-transplant period [J]. Transplant Proc, 2017, 49(5): 1001-1004.
[15] 刘妍,刘聪聪,时丹丹,等.声触诊组织定量分析在肾移植术后慢性移植肾肾病诊断中的价值[J].山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(8): 78-81. LIU Yan, LIU Congcong, SHI Dandan, et al. Value of virtual touch tissue quantification in the diagnosis of chronic allograft nephropathy after renal transplantation [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2013, 51(8): 78-81.
[16] 姚春晓,傅宁华,杨斌,等.声触诊组织定量分析在慢性肾病中应用的初步探讨[J].中国超声医学杂志, 2009, 25(12): 1169-1172. YAO Chunxiao, FU Ninghua, YANG Bin, et al. Clinical application of virtual touch quantization in patients with nephropathy[J]. Chinese J Ultrasound Med, 2009, 25(12): 1169-1172.
[17] 傅宁华,杨斌,姚春晓,等.声触诊组织定量分析评估慢性肾病患者肾脏弹性[J].中华医学超声杂志, 2010, 7(12): 2122-2126. FU Ninghua, YANG Bin, YAO Chunxiao, et al. A pilot study of virtual touch quantization in patients with chronic kidney disease [J]. Chin J Med Ultrasound, 2010, 7(12): 2122-2126.
[18] 曾碧丹,祝志敏,陈菲,等.超声弹性成像定量分析技术诊断慢性移植肾肾病的临床应用研究[J].中国临床医学影像杂志, 2014, 25(3): 179-181. ZENG Bidan, ZHU Zhimin, CHEN Fei, et al. Quantitative analysis of ultrasonic elastography in the diagnosis of chronic allograft nephropathy: a clinical application study [J]. J Chin Clin Med Imaging, 2014, 25(3): 179-181.
[19] Syversveen T, Brabrand K, Midtvedt K, et al. Assessment of renal allograft fibrosis by acoustic radiation force impulse quantification: a pilot study[J]. Transpl Int, 2011, 24(1): 100-105.
[20] Juhan L, Young TO, Dong JJ, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse measurement in renal transplantation: a prospective, longitudinal study with protocol biopsies [J]. Medicine, 2015, 94(39): 1590-1596.
[21] 戴茜,刘明辉,郭勇,等.移植肾纤维化的声触诊定量评估[J].中南大学学报(医学版), 2014, 39(2): 173-177. DAI Xi, LIU Minghui, GUO Yong, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of renal allograft fibrosis by virtual touch tissues quantification [J]. J Cent South Univ(Med Sci), 2014, 39(2): 173-177.
[22] Lukenda V, Mikolasevic I, Racki S, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive diagnostic tool for assessment of chronic allograft nephropathy[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014, 46(7): 1435-1440.
[23] Early H, Aguilera J, Cheang E, et al. Challenges and considerations when using shear wave elastography to evaluate the transplanted kidney, with pictorial review [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2017, 36(9): 1771-1782.
[24] Bota S, Bob F, Sporea I, et al. Factors that influence kidney shear wave speed assessed by acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in patients without kidney pathology[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2015, 41(1): 1-6.
[25] Wang Z, Yang H, Suo C, et al. Application of ultrasound elastography for chronic allograft dysfunction in kidney transplantation[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2017, 36(9): 1759-1769.

相关文章 15

[1]	张椿卉,王超艺,杨靖涵,张文霞,孔雨佳,石福艳,王素珍. 基于倾向性评分匹配法的体质量指数与高尿酸血症的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 100-108.
[2]	刘凯林,郭莹,王志昊,耿冲,王娜娜. 基础生理指标对甲状旁腺功能的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 100-106.
[3]	山东省腔镜外科质量控制中心胸腔镜委员会. 山东省VATS/RATS非小细胞肺癌围术期质量控制指标专家共识(2025版)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 1-5.
[4]	杨瀚,张宗亮,赵凯,尹心宝,朱冠群,张玉莲,王振林,闫学川,王科. 腹腔镜下膀胱全切和原位新膀胱术治疗肾移植术后膀胱癌1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 122-124.
[5]	刘雯,冯文娟,杨阳,纪昌丽,晁岚. 体质量指数对卵巢正常反应患者累积分娩率的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 54-60.
[6]	丁汉东,钟金彪,王琴,廖贵益. ABO血型不相容亲属肾移植12例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 67-73.
[7]	郭浩男,贺青卿,周鹏,李小磊,庄晓璇,岳涛,高远,徐婧,邵长秀,李陈钰,庄大勇. 4例难治性继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者外科治疗后肾移植疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(1): 58-61.
[8]	赵美茹,朱迪,刘淋,管庆波,张栩. 简易胰岛素抵抗指标与698例2型糖尿病患者发生高尿酸血症风险的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(12): 44-51.
[9]	田辉,李树海,李林,亓磊,鲁铭,程传乐. 微创食管切除术质量控制之齐鲁实践[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 78-82.
[10]	郑凤杰,宋玉文,孙爱丽,潘喆,王殿辉,娄能俊,吕丽, 庄向华,陈诗鸿. 糖尿病周围神经病变与肌少症的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 38-44.
[11]	刘晓菲,梁瀛,张丛溪,王娟,潘云,徐嘉蔚,常春,董亮. 92例哮喘患者血清瘦素与诱导痰嗜酸性粒细胞的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(9): 27-33.
[12]	宋海霞,袁彩霞,范玲玲. 体质量指数对夫精人工授精妊娠结局的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(1): 49-53.
[13]	卯怡杰,张旭峰,刘双德,刘晓立,焉杰克,徐东升,潘稳固,田川. 直接抗病毒治疗肾移植术后丙肝患者的疗效和安全性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(1): 75-80.
[14]	张素萍,王泽,周亚丽, 李敬,路西兰,柏宏伟,石玉华. 来曲唑治疗不同体质量指数多囊卵巢综合征患者的临床效果[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(5): 81-85.
[15]	刘妍，刘聪聪，时丹丹，孙霄，李杰. 声触诊组织定量分析在肾移植术后慢性移植肾肾病诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(8): 78-81.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed