日喀则市2011至2018年肺结核空间流行特征及预测分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.1105

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 108-113.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.1105

日喀则市2011至2018年肺结核空间流行特征及预测分析

张倍^1,2,张修磊³, 巴桑片多²,尼玛次仁²,石大春²,次仁加布²,尹亭亭¹,胡军^4,5

1. 潍坊医学院公共卫生学院公共卫生学系, 山东潍坊 261053;2. 日喀则市疾病预防控制中心, 西藏日喀则 857000;3. 山东省胸科医院结核内科, 山东济南 250101;4. 山东省疾病预防控制中心, 山东济南 250014;5. 国家卫生健康委员会卫生经济与政策研究重点实验室(山东大学), 山东济南 250012

发布日期:2021-03-05
通讯作者: 胡军. E-mail:sunnyhj@163.com
基金资助:
西藏自治区自然科学基金(XZ2017ZRG-83)

Spatial epidemiological characteristics and prediction of tuberculosis in Shigatse City from 2011 to 2018

ZHANG Bei^1,2, ZHANG Xiulei³, BASANG Pianduo², NIMA Ciren², SHI Dachun², CIREN Jiabu², YIN Tingting¹, HU Jun^4,5

1. Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, Shandong, China;
2. Shigatse Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shigatse 857000, Tibet, China;
3. Tuberculosis Medicine, Shandong Provincial Chest Hospital, Jinan 250101, Shandong, China;
4. Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
5. Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research, National Health Commission(Shandong University), Jinan 250012, Shandong, China

Published:2021-03-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析2011至2018年日喀则市肺结核的空间分布和传播特征,发现其分布、聚集情况与热点区域,为肺结核防控提供科学依据。方法运用空间自相关分析、热点分析和Kriging插值预测对日喀则市2011至2018年肺结核发病状况进行空间分布描述、分析和预测。结果日喀则市2011至2018年肺结核高发病率地区主要分布在江孜县、康马县、拉孜县、萨迦县;低发病率地区主要分布在仲巴县、萨嘎县、南木林县。全局自相关Morans I指数为0.331 2,Z=2.65,P=0.008 3。局部自相关LISA聚集图显示,高-高聚集区域为江孜县、白朗县;低-低聚集区域为萨嘎县。热点分析结果相对局部自相关结果出现新冷点区域仲巴县。Kriging插值预测结果显示,未来将出现新的高风险区域拉孜县与新的低风险区域南木林县、亚东县及其邻近县区,交叉评价指标结果M-PE=0.003 2、MS-PE=0.038 2、RMSS-PE=0.962 2、RMS-PE=0.063 3、ASE-PE=0.066 5。结论 2011至2018年日喀则市肺结核发病空间不均衡分布,全市肺结核疫情呈现正空间自相关,存在局部空间自相关,热点与冷点并存,并且未来高发病风险区域与低发病风险区域将持续扩大,应有针对性开展防控工作。

关键词: 肺结核, 地理信息系统, 热点分析, 预测

Abstract: Objective To analyze the spatial distribution and transmission characteristics of tuberculosis in Shigatse City from 2011 to 2018, explore the distribution and aggregation conditions and hot spots, provide scientific basis for prevention and control. Methods Spatial autocorrelation analysis, hotspot analysis and Kriging interpolation prediction were used to describe, analyze and predict the spatial distribution of tuberculosis incidence in Shigatse City from 2011 to 2018. Results From 2011 to 2018, the areas with high incidence of tuberculosis in Shigatse City were mainly distributed in Gyangzê County, Kangmar County, Lazi County and Saga. The low incidence areas were mainly distributed in Zhongba County, Saga County and Namling County. Global autocorrelation Morans I index is 0.331 2, Z=2.65, P=0.008 3. The local autocorrelation LISA aggregation map showed that the high-high aggregation areas were Gyangzê County and Bainang County. Low-low concentration area was Saga County. Compared with the local autocorrelation results, the hot spot analysis results showed a new cold point in Zhongba County. The Kriging interpolation prediction results showed that in the future, there would be a new high-risk area in Lazi County and new low-risk areas in Namling County, Yadong County and its neighboring counties. The cross-evaluation index results showed that M-PE=0.003 2, MS-PE=0.038 2, RSS-PE=0.962 2, RMS-PE=0.063 3, and ASE-PE=0.066 5. Conclusion From 2011 to 2018, the spatial distribution of tuberculosis incidence in Shigatse City is unbalanced, and the tuberculosis epidemic in Shigatse City presents positive spatial autocorrelation, with local spatial autocorrelation, hot spots and cold spots co-existing. In the future, areas with high risk and low risk will continue to expand. Therefore, targeted prevention and control work should be carried out.

Key words: Tuberculosis, Geographic information systems, Hot spot analysis, Prediction

中图分类号:

R181.3

张倍,张修磊, 巴桑片多,尼玛次仁,石大春,次仁加布,尹亭亭,胡军. 日喀则市2011至2018年肺结核空间流行特征及预测分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(2): 108-113.

ZHANG Bei, ZHANG Xiulei, BASANG Pianduo, NIMA Ciren, SHI Dachun, CIREN Jiabu, YIN Tingting, HU Jun. Spatial epidemiological characteristics and prediction of tuberculosis in Shigatse City from 2011 to 2018[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2021, 59(2): 108-113.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王烨,王刚,南海鸥,蔡雨玲,李嘉宇,王海锋,颜英杰,江志伟. 胃癌患者围手术期心率变异度与炎性指标的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 23-30.
[2]	段盈竹,董波,于睿. 内在情感与类风湿关节炎患者冠状动脉粥样硬化风险关系的孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 63-71.
[3]	廖原,门丹,李一帆,李怀臣,龙飞,刘铱. PM_2.5短期暴露对结核病发病风险的个体精准评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 116-123.
[4]	王建民,李晓峰,由志涛,董圣杰,赵宇驰,李占菊,邹德鑫,张剑锋,孙涛,杜伟. 基于可解释机器学习的后路腰椎椎体间融合术后慢性疼痛风险预测模型构建[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 78-88.
[5]	孙爽爽,仉率杰,张伯韬,袁莹,于媛媛,薛付忠. 基于真实世界研究的18~50岁人群急性缺血性卒中影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 40-46.
[6]	王梦星,薛付忠,杨帆. 基于多模态交叉注意力机制融合的1型糖尿病血糖浓度预测方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 41-50.
[7]	申路佳,逯天威,巩伟明,赵岩松,王淑康,袁中尚. 代谢风险评分在2型糖尿病人群心血管结局预测中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 69-78.
[8]	李千,杨帆,薛付忠. 基于多模态数据融合的多癌种风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 79-85.
[9]	李晓琪,刘佩丽,成红,赵艳艳. 基于自注意力机制预测ICU脓毒症患者的死亡率[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 86-93.
[10]	陈莹莹,王鲁,胡锡峰,朱高培,薛付忠. 基于贝叶斯网络的2型糖尿病患者并发脑卒中风险预测[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 94-102.
[11]	王丽云,高天勤,刘雨佳,陈青,陈柳,沙凯辉. 基于机器学习产后压力性尿失禁风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 55-66.
[12]	杜雪,李春霞,刘云霞,张涛. 基于MFPC-Cox的结直肠癌患者预后动态预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 101-110.
[13]	陈瑛翼,游倩,王意,张帆,李凤,季舒铭,徐浩源,饶志勇. 办公室职员肌肉质量减少预测模型的开发与验证[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 26-35.
[14]	王宝炫,焦杰,张厚君,刘奇,于冠英. 衰弱与肌少症评估在胃肠道肿瘤术后结局预测中的应用与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 51-58.
[15]	刘文钊,张远,马湘萍,魏峰涛,卜培莉. 内皮活化和应激指数预测值与心力衰竭患者死亡风险的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 27-35.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

日喀则市2011至2018年肺结核空间流行特征及预测分析

Spatial epidemiological characteristics and prediction of tuberculosis in Shigatse City from 2011 to 2018

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

多维度评价

本文评价

推荐阅读 0