您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (11): 65-70.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.0546

• • 上一篇    下一篇

孕早期行减胎术对胚胎移植助孕患者围产期母婴的影响

曹明雅,赵晗洁,冯腾飞,贾蕊,赵志明,郝桂敏   

  1. 河北医科大学第二医院生殖医学科, 河北 石家庄 050000
  • 发布日期:2020-11-04
  • 通讯作者: 赵志明. E-mail:zhaozhiming73@163.com

Effect of fetal reduction in early pregnancy on perinatal mothers and infants after embryo transfer

CAO Mingya, ZHAO Hanjie, FENG Tengfei, JIA Rui, ZHAO Zhiming, HAO Guimin   

  1. Department of Reproductive Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, China
  • Published:2020-11-04

摘要: 目的 探讨胚胎移植三胎妊娠后于孕早期行不同减灭数目减胎术对围产期母婴的影响。 方法 回顾性分析胚胎移植后三胎妊娠患者于孕早期行多胎妊娠减胎术后保留单胎和保留双胎共282例孕妇的资料,依据保留胎儿数将减胎组分为减至单胎组28例、减至双胎组254例。同时采用倾向性评分匹配法(PSM)与同期胚胎移植后未行减胎的单胎或双胎妊娠研究对象分别进行1∶3匹配。匹配完成后,共846例作为对照组,其中单胎对照组84例、双胎对照组762例。对4组患者的一般资料、妊娠结局、新生儿体质量及围产期并发症进行比较,并采用Logistic回归进一步做敏感性分析。 结果 (1)减胎组的流产率、晚期流产率、围产期并发症发生率高于对照组(P均<0.01),平均分娩孕周短于对照组(P=0.01),平均足月产儿体质量(P<0.01)、足月产率(P=0.016),剖宫产率(P=0.037)低于对照组;(2)减至单胎组剖宫产率低于减至双胎组(P=0.001),平均分娩孕周长于减至双胎组(P<0.01),平均足月产儿体质量高于减至双胎组(P<0.01);单胎对照组流产率、早期流产率、足月产率、足月产儿及早产儿体质量高于双胎对照组(P均<0.01),早产率低于双胎对照组(P<0.01)。 结论 妊早期行多胎妊娠减胎术并未增加早产、出生缺陷风险,但流产、围产期并发症及低体质量儿的发生风险增加。三胎妊娠后行多胎妊娠减胎术保留至单胎者比保留至双胎者,有更好的妊娠结局。

关键词: 多胎妊娠, 减胎术, 辅助生殖技术, 胚胎移植, 临床结局

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of different number of fetal reduction in early pregnancy on perinatal mothers and infants after triplet pregnancy in embryo transfer. Methods The clinical data of 282 cycles of triplet pregnancy with fetal reduction after embryo transfer were retrospectively analyzed. According to the keeping number of fetus, the reduction group was divided into singleton group with 28 cycles and twin group with 254 cycles. The subjects of single or twin pregnancy who did not reduce the fetus after embryo transfer were matched with propensity score matching(PSM)and 846 cycles were enrolled as the control group, including 84 cycles in the singleton control group and 762 cycles in the twin control group. The general information, pregnancy outcomes, neonatal weight and perinatal complications of the 4 groups were compared, and Logistic regression was used to make further sensitivity analysis. Results (1)Compared with the control group, the reduction group had higher abortion rate, late abortion rate and perinatal complications rate(P<0.01); shorter gestational weeks(P=0.01); lower full-term birth weight(P<0.01), full-term birth rate(P=0.016), and cesarean section rate(P=0.037). (2)Compared with the twin group, the singleton group had lower cesarean section rate(P=0.001), longer gestational weeks(P<0.01), and higher full-term birth weight(P<0.01). Compared with the twin control group, the singleton control group had higher abortion rate, early abortion birth rate, full-term birth weight and premature birth weight(P<0.01), but lower preterm birth rate(P<0.01). Conclusion Fetal reduction in early pregnancy dose not increase premature birth rate or birth defect rate. However, it does increase abortion rate, risk of perinatal complications and low birth weight. The pregnancy outcome is better in patients with reduction of triplets to singletons than in those to twins.

Key words: Multifetal pregnancy, Fetal reduction, Assisted reproductive technology, Embryo transfer, Clinical outcome

中图分类号: 

  • R714.23
[1] Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2008 [J]. Natl Vital Stat Rep, 2010, 59(1): 1, 3-71.
[2] 胡琳莉, 黄国宁, 孙海翔, 等. 多胎妊娠减胎术操作规范(2016)[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2017, 26(3): 193-198. HU Linli, HUANG Guoning, SUN Haixiang, et al. Operation specification for multiple pregnancy reduction(2016)[J]. Journal of reproductive medicine, 2017, 26(3): 193-198.
[3] Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A. Pregnancy outcome after assisted reproductive technology [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2006, 28(3): 220-250.
[4] 莫莉菁, 金聪聪, 吴永跟, 等. 辅助生殖技术治疗后单卵双胎的发生、处理及妊娠结局[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2015, 50(8): 586-590. MO Lijing, JIN Congcong, WU Yonggen, et al. Occurrence, management and pregnancy outcome of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015, 50(8): 586-590.
[5] 胡毅娜, 丁涛, 赵琰. 双胎与减胎后双胎妊娠结局比较分析[J]. 江西医药, 2015,50(2):98-100. HU Yina, DING Tao, ZHAO Yan. Comparative analysis of twin pregnancy outcome between twin pregnancy and reduced twin pregnancy[J]. Jiangxi medicine, 2015, 50(2):98-100.
[6] Antsaklis A, Anastasakis E, Selective reduction in twins and multiple pregnancies [J]. J Perinat Med, 2011, 39(1): 15-21.
[7] 张轶乐, 孙莹璞, 苏迎春, 等. 早期与中期多胎妊娠减胎术妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2011, 9(9): 1365-1366, 1461. ZHANG Yile, SUN Yingpu, SU Yingchun, et al. Analysis of pregnancy outcome in early and mid-term multiple pregnancy reduction [J]. Chinese general medicine, 2011, 9(9): 1365-1366, 1461.
[8] 赵霞. 123例多胎妊娠行选择性减胎患者妊娠结局临床因素分析[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2011.
[9] 孟庆霞, 吴惠华, 李建芬. 选择性减胎可以明显改善多胎妊娠的临床妊娠结局[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2017, 26(10): 84-89. MENG Qingxia, WU Huihua, LI Jianfen. Selective reduction can significantly improve the clinical outcome of multiple pregnancy [J]. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2017, 26(10): 84-89.
[10] Evans MI, Kaufman MI, Urban AJ, et al. Fetal reduction from twins to a singleton: a reasonable consideration? [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 104(1): 102-109.
[11] Brambati B, Tului L, Camurri L, et al. First-trimester fetal reduction to a singleton infant or twins: outcome in relation to the final number and karyotyping before reduction by transabdominal chcrionic villus sampling [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 191(6): 2035-2040.
[12] Carreno CA, Yaron Y, Feldman B, et al. First-trimester embryo size discordance: a predictor of premature birth following multifetal pregnancy reduction [J]. Fertil Steril, 2001, 75(2): 391-393.
[13] Evans MI, Berkowitz RL, Wapner RJ, et al. Improvement in outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction with increased experience [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001,184(2): 97-103.
[14] Stone J, Ferrara L, Kamrath J, et al. Contemporary outcomes with the latest 1000 cases of multifetal pregnancy reduction(MPR)[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 199(4): 406.e1-406.e4064.
[15] 李善玲, 王谢桐, 李红燕, 等. 三胎妊娠孕妇实施减胎术后双胎或单胎的妊娠结局及流产发生风险的分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2015, 50(4): 268-273. LI Shanling, WANG Xietong, LI Hongyan, et al. Analysis of pregnancy outcome and risk of miscarriage of twin or singleton in three pregnancy women [J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015, 50(4): 268-273.
[16] Kuhn Bx F, Moutel G, Weingertner AS, et al. Fetal reduction of triplet pregnancy: One or two? [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012, 32(2): 122-126.
[17] Dudenhausen JW, Maier RF. Perinatal problems in multiple births [J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2010, 107(38): 663-668.
[18] Wen SW, Demissie K, Yang Q, et al. Maternal morbidity and obstetric complications in triplet pregnancies and quadruplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 191(1): 254-258.
[19] Sebire NJ, Sherod C, Abbas A, et al. Preterm delivery and growth restriction in multifetal pregnancies reduced to twins [J]. Hum Reprod, 1997, 12(1): 173-175.
[20] 罗桂英, 王春艳, 袁爱群, 等. 医源性多胎妊娠4321例临床特征观察[J].安徽医科大学学报, 2020, 55(3): 465-470. LUO Guiying, WANG Chunyan, YUAN Aiqun, et al. Clinical characteristics of 4321 cases of iatrogenic multiple pregnancy [J]. Journal of Anhui Medical University, 2020, 55(3): 465-470.
[21] 陈絮, 李志凌. 辅助生殖技术受孕的妊娠结局[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2014, 33(5): 392-395. CHEN Xu, LI Zhiling. Pregnancy outcome of assisted reproductive technology [J]. International Journal of Reproductive Health / Family Planning, 2014, 33(5): 392-395.
[22] 徐冰, 路瑶, 何亚琼. 多胎减胎后单胎分娩与单胎妊娠分娩比较分析[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2017, 37(6): 485-488. XU Bing, LU Yao, HE Yaqiong. A comparative analysis of singleton delivery and singleton delivery after multiple birth reduction [J]. Chinese Journal of Reproduction and Contraception, 2017, 37(6): 485-488.
[23] 焦敏洁. 辅助生殖技术后多胎妊娠结局分析[D]. 天津: 天津医科大学, 2016.
[24] Mansour R, Serour G, Aboulghar M, et al. The impact of vanishing fetuses on the outcome of ICSI pregnancies [J]. Fertil Steril, 2010, 94(6): 2430-2432.
[25] 邱辉, 靳祖群, 杜鹃. 三胎和单胎妊娠分娩孕周、新生儿出生体质量及死亡率比较Meta分析[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2013, 29(4): 291-294. QIU Hui, JIN Zuqun, DU Juan. Meta analysis on the comparison of gestational weeks, birth weight and mortality between triplets and singletons [J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2013, 29(4): 291-294.
[1] 万文静,高姗姗. 低分子肝素在生殖领域的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 117-124.
[2] 韩馨玮,牛月,魏代敏. 激素替代方案准备内膜的冻胚移植前雌激素治疗时间对新生儿体质量的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 46-52.
[3] 杜娟,李秀芳,李元美,王慧丹. 孕康颗粒对冻融胚胎移植周期妊娠结局的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 84-90.
[4] 刘雯,冯文娟,杨阳,纪昌丽,晁岚. 体质量指数对卵巢正常反应患者累积分娩率的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 54-60.
[5] 许月明,张杰,姜蕾,尹力,赵畔,许欣,郝桂敏. 扳机日孕酮升高与获卵数对辅助生殖技术新鲜周期妊娠结局的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 44-50.
[6] 戚丹,张曦,于倩,崔琳琳,颜磊. 子宫内膜增生症及早期子宫内膜癌保留生育功能后冻胚移植妊娠结局[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 56-63.
[7] 张丽霞,田一正,吕尚格,张亚男,颜磊. GnRH-a预处理对子宫内膜异位症患者替代方案冻胚移植结局的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(10): 63-68.
[8] 于文澔,张倩,孙梅,李鸿昌,朱月婷,姜文杰,颜军昊. 激动剂长方案与拮抗剂方案对胚胎整倍体率的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(1): 45-50.
[9] 石玉华,潘烨,谢燕秋. 胚胎冷冻保存技术及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 12-18.
[10] 颜磊,岳彩欣,刘懿淳. 子宫内膜异位症的生育力保护[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 31-34.
[11] 郝桂敏,罗卓野,王奕卓. 生育力保存的伦理问题及思考[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 47-52.
[12] 颜磊,陈子江. 子宫腺肌病合并不孕的治疗[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 43-47.
[13] 吴日超,刘红,王泽,高姗姗,李秀芳,石玉华. 40岁及以上女性行体外受精-胚胎移植助孕的妊娠结局分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 35-39.
[14] 韩晓婷,高文丽,王婷,赵君利. 扳机日及其后添加重组人促黄体激素对黄体期长方案助孕结局的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(12): 31-38.
[15] 石玉华,王秋敏,戚丹. 辅助生殖技术前沿研究热点及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 97-102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!