山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (9): 46-52.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2017.030
赵姗姗,李晓梅,梁婷,张超,宋静,侯桂华
ZHAO Shanshan, LI Xiaomei, LIANG Ting, ZHANG Chao, SONG Jing, HOU Guihua
摘要: 目的 探讨自噬对放射性碘125标记抗Toll样受体5(125I-anti-TLR5)靶向同种移植排斥显像的影响及特点。 方法 建立小鼠皮肤同种移植模型,分为对照组(无药物处理)、雷帕霉素组、3-甲基腺嘌呤(3MA)组和联合组(雷帕霉素+3MA处理)。采用Iodogen法常规制备125I-anti-TLR5,测定其在生理盐水和血清中的稳定性;体外根据浓度不同将细胞分为对照组、雷帕霉素组(10 ng/mL)、3MA组(10 mmol/L)和联合组(10 ng/mL雷帕霉素+10 mmol/L3MA),研究125I-anti-TLR5与处理细胞的结合与解离;在移植后9 d,在小鼠同种皮肤移植模型尾静脉注射125I-anti-TLR5,72 h后进行生物学分布研究,24、48、72 h进行全身磷屏自显影显像,分析T/NT比值(靶与非靶比值);采用病理及免疫组化染色法分析移植皮片Beclin1/TLR5的表达。 结果 125I-anti-TLR5标记率高,稳定性好。与雷帕霉素组相比,联合组细胞与125I-anti-TLR5结合率与解离率无明显改变。注射125I-anti-TLR5后72 h,标记物主要经肝肾代谢。移植皮片放射性浓聚,雷帕霉素组和联合组T/NT 比值显著高于对照组(P<0.001, P<0.001)。全身动态磷屏放射自显影显像显示,各组48 h移植皮片即可显像,其中雷帕霉素组移植皮片放射性浓聚最明显(P<0.001);雷帕霉素组和联合组72 h显像明显,放射性活度比均显著高于对照组(P<0.001)。移植后12 d对照组移植皮片炎症细胞浸润明显,而雷帕霉素组与联合组炎性浸润减少;对照组及雷帕霉素组自噬分子Beclin1表达增高,而联合组无明显降低;雷帕霉素组及联合组TLR5 表达无显著变化。 结论 自噬抑制对雷帕霉素作用下TLR5表达及125I-anti-TLR5靶向同种移植排斥显像无明显影响,125I-anti-TLR5可用于免疫耐受状态下同种移植排斥显像。
中图分类号:
| [1] Lodhi SA, Lamb KE, Meierkriesche HU. Solid organ allograft survival improvement in the United States: the long-term does not mirror the dramatic short-term success[J]. Am J Transplant, 2011, 11(6): 1226-1235. [2] Moreau A, Varey E, Anegon I, et al. Effector mechanisms of rejection[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2013, 5(11): 165-171. [3] Hao J, Zhang C, Liang T, et al. rFliC prolongs allograft survival in association with the activation of recipient Tregs in a TLR5-dependent manner[J]. Cell Mol Immunol, 2014, 11(2): 206-214. [4] Li C, Capan E, Zhao Y, et al. Autophagy is induced in CD4+ T Cells and important for the growth factor-withdrawal cell death[J]. J Immunol,2006, 177(8): 5163-5168. [5] Verghese DA, Yadav A, Bizargity P, et al. Costimulatory blockade-induced allograft survival requires Beclin1[J]. Am J Transplant, 2014, 14(3): 545-553. [6] Shi M, Yao Y, Han F, et al. MAP1S controls breast cancer cell TLR5 signaling pathway and promotes TLR5 signaling-based tumor suppression[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1): 86839. [7] 薛莹,张超,梁婷,等. 125I-rFlic及125I-rFlicΔ180-400的制备及其在同种移植排斥监测中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(10): 34-39. XUE Ying, ZHANG Chao, LIANG Ting, et al. Preparation and evaluation of 125I-rFlic and 125I-rFlicΔ180-400 noninvasive radioimaging of allorejection[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2016, 54(10): 34-39. [8] Sun H, Yang G, Liang T, et al. Non-invasive imaging of allogeneic transplanted skin graft by 131 I-anti-TLR5 mAb[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2014, 18(12): 2437-2444. [9] 刘现忠, 王轩. 雷帕霉素抗排斥作用机制及其在肝移植中的应用[J]. 免疫学杂志, 2014, 30(1): 79-83. LIU Xianzhong, WANG Xuan. The anti-rejection mechanism of rapamycin and its application in liver transplantation[J]. Immunological Journal, 2014, 30(1): 79-83. [10] Klionsky DJ, Abdelmohsen K, Abe A, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy(3rd edition)[J]. Autophagy, 2016, 12(1): 1-222. [11] 李璐娜,侯桂华,梁婷,等. MIF在小鼠同种皮肤移植排斥过程中的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2004, 42(1): 16-18. LI Luna, HOU Guihua, LIANG Ting, et al. Expression of MIF mRNA in murine skin allograft rejection[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2004, 42(1): 16-18. [12] Lee LM, Ji M, Sinha M, et al. Determinants of divergent adaptive immune responses after airway sensitization with ligands of Toll-like receptor 5 or Toll-like receptor 9[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(12): 167693. [13] Didierlaurent A, Ferrero I, Otten LA, et al. Flagellin promotes myeloid differentiation factor 88-dependent development of Th2-type response[J]. J Immunol, 2004, 172(11): 6922-6930. [14] Ding X, Bian G, Leigh ND, et al. A TLR5 agonist enhances CD8(+)T cell-mediated graft-versus-tumor effect without exacerbating graft-versus-host disease[J]. J Immunol, 2012, 189(10): 4719-4727. [15] Sagoo P, Perucha E, Sawitzki B, et al. Development of a cross-platform biomarker signature to detect renal transplant tolerance in humans[J]. J Clin Invest, 2010, 120(6): 1848-1861. [16] Sawitzki B, Brunstein C, Meisel C, et al. Prevention of graft-versus-host disease by adoptive T regulatory therapy is associated with active repression of peripheral blood Toll-like receptor 5 mRNA expression[J]. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2014, 20(2): 173-182. [17] Newell KA, Turka LA. Tolerance signatures in transplant recipients[J]. Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2015, 20(4): 400-405. [18] Brouard S, Mansfield E, Braud C, et al. Identification of a peripheral blood transcriptional biomarker panel associated with operational renal allograft tolerance[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007, 104(39): 15448-15453. [19] Braza F, Dugast E, Panov I, et al. Central role of CD45RA- Foxp3hi memory regulatory T cells in clinical kidney transplantation tolerance[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2015, 26(8): 1795-1805. [20] Andreola G, Chittenden M, Shaffer J, et al. Mechanisms of donor-specific tolerance in recipients of haploidentical combined bone marrow/kidney transplantation[J]. Am J Transplant, 2011, 11(6): 1236-1247. [21] Martínezllordella M, Lozano JJ, Puigpey I, et al. Using transcriptional profiling to develop a diagnostic test of operational tolerance in liver transplant recipients[J]. J Clin Invest, 2008, 118(8): 2845-2857. [22] San SD, Ruiz P, Irure J, et al. Serum levels of interleukin-34 during acute rejection in liver transplantation[J]. Transplantation Proc, 2016, 48(9): 2977-2979. [23] Dandel M, Hetzer R. Post-transplant surveillance for acute rejection and allograft vasculopathy by echocardiography: Usefulness of myocardial velocity and deformation imaging[J]. J Heat Lung Transplant, 2017, 36(2): 117-131. [24] Liu S, Zhang J, Yu B, et al. The role of autophagy in lung ischemia/reperfusion injury after lung transplantation in rat[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2016, 8(8): 3593-3602. [25] Shi CS, Kehrl JH. MyD88 and Trif target Beclin 1 to trigger autophagy in macrophages[J]. J Biol Chem, 2008, 283(48): 33175-33182. |
| [1] | 董萍,沈海涛,乔亚琴,路燕. 自噬在APAP肝损伤及肝再生过程中的调控作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(5): 42-49. |
| [2] | 陈杨,冯莹,卢晓,郑蓉. 半乳糖凝集素-3通过PI3K/Akt/mTOR通路促进巨噬细胞自噬分化[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 14-22. |
| [3] | 张秋萍,朱慧志,吕川,夏咏琪,张秀. 基于生物信息学分析鉴定哮喘潜在的关键自噬和铁死亡相关基因[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 74-87. |
| [4] | 宋彦威,付振美,徐静怡,马铭泽,孙琳琳. 弗林蛋白酶靶向同源性磷酸-张力蛋白调控线粒体自噬及肝纤维化进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 59-68. |
| [5] | 刘爱静,李雁儒,高惠茹,段伟丽,李培龙,李娟,杜鲁涛,王传新. 自噬相关蛋白5在结肠癌中的表达及对结肠癌细胞迁移及侵袭能力的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 14-23. |
| [6] | 于丽,王弋嘉,杨勇,刘学焕,万雪花,包翠萍,苗蓓亮,李斯琪,李静,刘筠. 基于光学表面波技术探究具核梭杆菌介导的自噬与细胞折射率的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 87-97. |
| [7] | 郑荣慧,李攀,曹秀琴,贺瑞霞,陈民佳,陈海霞,杨志伟. SQSTM1蛋白在嗜肺军团菌感染RAW264.7细胞自噬中的作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 10-21. |
| [8] | 任慧欣,郑茂金,韩文灿,王超群,周云,裴冬生. 过氧化氢通过调控自噬增强宫颈癌的放疗敏感性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 22-28. |
| [9] | 何静,严如根,武志红,李长忠. 消癥抑癌方对卵巢癌SKOV3细胞增殖、迁移的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 1-10. |
| [10] | 徐兵,李勇,刘明,刘永辉. 沉默PRRX1基因表达可增强前列腺癌耐药细胞株PC-3/DTX对多西他赛的敏感性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 103-110. |
| [11] | 张华宇,殷思源,刘健,马嘉旭,宋茹,曹国起,王一兵. 氧糖剥夺条件下培养表皮干细胞的定量蛋白质组学分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 17-27. |
| [12] | 张小红,周云,杜秋莹,任慧欣,王超群. Atg7-siRNA通过调节精氨酸循环干扰食管癌ECA109细胞放疗敏感性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 28-34. |
| [13] | 索东阳,申飞,郭皓,刘力畅,杨惠敏,杨向东. Tim-3在药物性急性肾损伤动物模型中的表达及作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 1-6. |
| [14] | 孙盼盼,赵旭,林小雯,傅志俭. 医用臭氧对大鼠骨关节炎软骨细胞中PPARγ及自噬水平表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(6): 14-21. |
| [15] | 孙文凯,孙卉,邬信芳,高伟,孟朝暾,李钦. 自噬标志物Beclin-1和P62与增殖因子Ki67在鼻息肉不同部位的表达及其意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(6): 76-82. |
|
||