您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (7): 95-99.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.1706

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

经腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗原发性膀胱憩室临床效果比较

徐加龙,孙小刚,王军锋,刘倩,马楠,李殿国,陈维秀,李金良,王若义   

  1. 山东大学第二医院小儿外科, 山东 济南 250033
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-26 出版日期:2017-07-10 发布日期:2017-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 王若义. E-mail:wangruoyi1974@163.com E-mail:wangruoyi1974@163.com

Comparision of the therapeutic effects of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery on primary bladder diverticula

XU Jialong, SUN Xiaogang, WANG Junfeng, LIU Qian, MA Nan, LI Dianguo, CHEN Weixiu, LI Jinliang, WANG Ruoyi   

  1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-12-26 Online:2017-07-10 Published:2017-07-10

摘要: 目的 比较经腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗原发性膀胱憩室的临床效果。 方法 回顾性分析2009年9月至2016年7月收治的22例原发性膀胱憩室患者的临床资料,分为开放手术组12例,腹腔镜手术组10例。采用两独立样本均数t检验,比较两组患者手术时间及术中出血量。采用配对t检验,分别比较两组患者术前、术后排尿时膀胱压力及尿流率结果。采用两独立样本均数近似t检验,比较两组患者术前、术后排尿时膀胱压力及尿流率数值变化。 结果 腹腔镜手术组较开放手术组手术时间延长(P<0.05),出血量减少(P<0.05)。开放手术组术后随访(13.6±4.0)个月,腹腔镜手术组术后随访(13.6±5.7)个月。两组患者术后排尿时膀胱压力均较术前降低(P<0.05);术后最大尿流率均较术前增加(P<0.05)。术后患者尿流曲线改善。比较两组患者术前、术后排尿时膀胱压力及尿流率数值变化,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后均未再出现膀胱输尿管返流,无膀胱憩室复发,排尿正常,未再出现排尿困难。 结论 经腹腔镜切除原发性膀胱憩室,手术创伤小,出血少,与开放手术效果无明显差异,是理想的微创手术方式。

关键词: 膀胱憩室, 儿童, 憩室切除, 原发性, 腹腔镜

Abstract: Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery on primary bladder diverticula. Methods The data of 22 patients with primary bladder diverticula enrolled from September 2009 to July 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve patients underwent open bladder diverticulectomy(open surgery group), ten patients underwent laparoscopic diverticulectomy(laparoscopy group). The operation time and operative hemorrhage of the two groups were compared with independent sample t test. The pre-operative and post-operative urodynamics were separately compared with paired-samples t test.The numerical variations of voiding detrusor pressure and maximum pressure flow in the two groups were compared with separate variance estimation t test. Results The operation time in laparoscopy group was longer than that in open surgery group(P<0.05). The operative hemorrhage in laparoscopy group was less than that in open surgery group(P<0.05). The follow-up time of open surgery group was(13.6±4.0)months. The follow-up time of laparoscopy group was(13.6±5.7)months. The post-operative voiding detrusor pressure was lower than that in pre-operation in both groups(P<0.05). The maximum pressure flow increased after the operation in both groups(P<0.05). Urine flow curve was improved after the operation. The numerical variations of voiding detrusor pressure and maximum pressure flow pre-operation and post-operation in both groups showed no statistical difference(P>0.05). Pre-operative ipsilateral vesicoureteric refluxes disappeared after the surgery. There were 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)55卷7期 -徐加龙,等.经腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗原发性膀胱憩室临床效果比较 \=-no recurrence of bladder diverticula. The patients were asymptomatic in the follow up. Conclusion There is no difference between the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy and open surgery.Laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy is an ideal way of minimally invasive surgery, with small trauma and less bleeding.

Key words: Laparoscopy, Children, Primary, Bladder diverticula, Diverticulectomy

中图分类号: 

  • R726.9
[1] Psutka SP, Cendron M. Bladder diverticula in children[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2013, 9(2): 129-138.
[2] 宋宏程, 赵学强, 白继武, 等. 小儿先天性膀胱憩室[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2007, 28(12): 816-818. SONG Hongcheng, ZHAO Xueqiang, BAI Jiwu, et al. Congenital bladder diverticula in children[J]. Chin J Urol, 2007, 28(12): 816-818.
[3] Khemakhem R, Ghorbel S, Jlidi S, et al. Management of congenital bladder diverticulum in children: a report of seven cases[J]. Afr J Paediatr Surg, 2013, 10(2): 160-163.
[4] Noh PH, Bansal D. Pediatric robotic assisted laparoscopy for paraureteral bladder diverticulum excision with ureteral reimplantation[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2013, 9(1): e28-30.
[5] Macedo A, Jr, Garrone G, Ottoni SL, et al. Primary congenital bladder diverticula: where does the ureter drain?[J]. Afr J Paediatr Surg, 2015, 12(4): 280-285.
[6] Stephens FD. The vesicoureteral hiatus and paraureteral diverticula[J]. J Urol, 1979, 121(6): 786-791.
[7] Linke C, Mongiat-Artus P. Management of vesical diverticula[J]. Ann Urol(Paris), 2004, 38(3): 103-111.
[8] Pieretti RV, Pieretti-Vanmarcke RV. Congenital bladder diverticula in children[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 1999, 34(3): 468-473.
[9] Celebi S, Sander S, Kuzdan O, et al. Current diagnosis and management of primary isolated bladder diverticula in children[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2015, 11(2): 61 e61-65.
[10] Alexander RE, Kum JB, Idrees M. Bladder diverticulum: clinicopathologic spectrum in pediatric patients[J]. Pediatr Dev Pathol, 2012, 15(4): 281-285.
[11] Azahouani A, Hida M, Lasseri A, et al. Acute retention of urine secondary to a congenital diverticulum of the bladder[J]. Arch Pediatr, 2016, 23(10): 1059-1062.
[12] Evangelidis A, Castle EP, Ostlie DJ, et al. Surgical management of primary bladder diverticula in children[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2005, 40(4): 701-703.
[13] Karakus SC, Ceylan H, Ozokutan BH, et al. A bladder stone within a congenital paraureteral diverticulum: a case report[J]. Urology, 2014, 84(2): 475-477.
[14] Miller M, Baker LA, Tannin G, et al. Lower extremity venous obstruction secondary to congenital bladder diverticulum[J]. J Urol, 2007, 177(5): 1891.
[15] Gaudet R, Heim N, Merviel P, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a congenital bladder diverticulum. Case report and benefits of prenatal diagnosis[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 1999, 14(5): 301-305.
[16] Bhat A, Bothra R, Bhat MP, et al. Congenital bladder diverticulum presenting as bladder outlet obstruction in infants and children[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2012, 8(4): 348-353.
[17] Porpiglia F, Tarabuzzi R, Cossu M, et al. Is laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate safe and effective? Comparison with open surgery[J]. J Endourol, 2004, 18(1): 73-76.
[18] Marte A, Cavaiuolo S, Esposito M, et al. Vesicoscopic treatment of symptomatic congenital bladder diverticula in children: a 7-year experience[J]. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2016, 26(3): 240-244.
[19] 李关彬, 王翰博, 郭旭东, 等. 经腹腔路径腹腔镜输尿管膀胱角悬提吻合术治疗输尿管中下段长段狭窄的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(7): 90-93. LI Guanbin, WANG Hanbo, GUO Xudong, et al. Laparoscopic bladdeconstr horn technique long-distance ureteral stenosis[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2014, 52(7): 90-93.
[20] Appeadu-Mensah W, Hesse AA, Yaw MB. Giant bladder diverticulum: a rare cause of bladder outlet obstruction in children[J]. Afr J Paediatr Surg, 2012, 9(1): 83-87.
[21] El Abiad Y, Bakloul F. Squamous cell carcinoma in a giant bladder diverticulum[J]. Pan Afr Med J, 2015, 20: 378.
[22] Dong WX, Ping YX, Liang WC, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder diverticulum: a case report and review of the literature[J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2013, 9(1): 151-153.
[23] Fu LY, Adeniran AJ. Adenocarcinoma Arising from a Bladder Diverticulum[J]. J Urol, 2015, 194(2): 527-528.
[24] Abou Ghaida RR, Saoud RM, Bulbul M. Primary osteosarcoma in a bladder diverticulum[J]. Can J Urol, 2014, 21(4): 7393-7395.
[25] Golijanin D, Yossepowitch O, Beck SD, et al. Carcinoma in a bladder diverticulum: presentation and treatment outcome[J]. J Urol, 2003, 170(5): 1761-1764.
[1] 李东梅,边天帅,王晓华,张静,赵炎,孙素芬,牟鸿,许安廷. 儿童前庭神经炎的前庭诱发肌源性电位结果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 38-43.
[2] 孙红林,管玉强,于培儒,李磊,杜庆霞,丁浩. 支架植入治疗儿童主动脉缩窄并高血压的可行性及近中期疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 58-62.
[3] 况利,徐何雁. 从精准评估到整合干预:儿童青少年心理健康问题诊疗范式的革新与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 10-16.
[4] 李芳华,刘娜,李晓宇,许殿花,王倩. 儿童青少年抑郁障碍患者服药依从性研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 24-34.
[5] 孙佳丽,王亮,王长凤,张杰,郭磊. Klippel-Trenaunay综合征儿童情绪与行为特征及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 78-82.
[6] 王倩,胡晓婧,王爱青,孙强,孟春燕,李芳华. 儿童青少年抑郁障碍患者非自杀性自伤文献的可视化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 93-107.
[7] 王悦祺,宋东玉,李玉丽,谢昊,张月蓉. 儿童困难问题和亲社会行为在家庭弹性与祖辈隔代教养压力间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 57-64.
[8] 张政,王建伟,杨玉娟,张宇,宋西成. 哮喘儿童2008及2019年免疫球蛋白E变化及相关危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 32-36.
[9] 曹洛菲,王珊珊,王金荣,姜荷云,苗瑜,马光增. 哮喘发作期FeNO升高儿童肺功能舒张试验的特点分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 38-44.
[10] 陈绪军, 何国伟. 着力进一步推进动脉桥在我国冠心病冠脉旁路移植术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 1-5.
[11] 莫绪明,王庆峰. 冠状动脉旁路移植术在儿童心血管疾病中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 40-46.
[12] 李玲,闫宇晗,孔清玉,王敏敏,赵海招,赵翠芬. 直立不耐受症状评分及儿茶酚胺与血管迷走性晕厥患儿情绪障碍的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 71-78.
[13] 王梦园,张春艳,于文文,寇琳娜,王世富. 2018—2021年山东省儿童与成人临床分离真菌的构成与主要菌种的体外抗真菌药物敏感性监测[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 83-93.
[14] 龚蓉,崔乃雪,陈恺悦,赵佳,单瑞洁,张训琪. 体感游戏在儿童癌症幸存者中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 94-99.
[15] 王刚,徐鹏演,赵旭安,王海锋,葛苗苗,潘华峰,江志伟. ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸对腹腔镜结直肠癌术后迷走神经和肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 36-42.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!