您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (9): 26-35.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2025.1202

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

血浆与尿液代谢物对阿尔茨海默病的因果效应:全代谢组孟德尔随机化研究

彭强1,2,张雪芹2,文俊1,2,王凯2,张晓娟2,刘世平3   

  1. 1.川北医学院临床医学院, 四川 南充 637100;2.广元市精神卫生中心(川北医学院附属广元市第三人民医院), 四川 广元 628001;3.川北医学院附属医院, 四川 南充 637000
  • 发布日期:2026-09-09
  • 通讯作者: 刘世平. E-mail:liusp@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    四川省卫生健康委员会医学科技项目(25QNMP064)

Causal effects of plasma and urinary metabolites on Alzheimers disease: a metabolome-wide Mendelian randomization study

PENG Qiang1,2, ZHANG Xueqin2, WEN Jun1,2, WANG Kai2, ZHANG Xiaojuan2, LIU Shiping3   

  1. 1. School of Clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637100, Sichuan, China;
    2.Guangyuan Mental Health Centre(Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Guangyuan Third Peoples Hospital), Guangyuan 628001, Sichuan, China;
    3. Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan, China
  • Published:2026-09-09

摘要: 目的 基于孟德尔随机化(Mendelian randomization, MR)方法与代谢组学技术,筛选阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimers disease, AD)相关的代谢标志物,探索其相关风险因素,并揭示代谢物在其中的中介机制。 方法 采用双样本MR评估690种血浆代谢物和211种尿液代谢物与AD之间的因果关联,通过MetOrigin平台对潜在代谢标志物进行功能富集分析,利用DrugBank进行成药性评价;进一步分析可改变风险因素与候选代谢物之间的因果关系,并采用两步法MR分析代谢物的中介效应。 结果 初步筛选出13种血浆代谢物和7种尿液代谢物与AD存在因果关系(P<0.05),功能富集分析确定5条相关的代谢途径(P<0.05),成药性评价显示2种代谢物可作为潜在治疗靶点。此外,确定5个与AD相关的可改变风险因素(P<0.05),中介分析确认2种代谢物在风险因素介导AD中发挥中介作用。 结论 13种血浆代谢物和7种尿液代谢物与AD存在因果关联,其中S-腺苷同型半胱氨酸和乳糖可作为潜在治疗靶点,硫酸表雄酮和1-棕榈酰-2-油酰-GPI分别在抑郁症状和帕金森病与AD的关联中发挥中介作用。

关键词: 阿尔茨海默病, 孟德尔随机化, 代谢物, 因果效应, 风险因素, 中介机制

Abstract: Objective To identify metabolic biomarkers causally associated with Alzheimers disease(AD)using Mendelian randomization(MR)and metabolomics, explore related risk factors, and elucidate the mediating role of metabolites. Methods Two-sample MR was used to evaluate the causal associations of 690 plasma metabolites and 211 urinary metabolites with AD. Functional enrichment analysis of potential metabolic markers was performed using Met Origin, and druggability assessment was conducted via Drug Bank. MR analyses were further performed to identify modifiable risk factors for AD and their causal relationships with candidate metabolites, followed by two-step MR to assess mediating effects of metabolites. Results Thirteen plasma metabolites and seven urinary metabolites showed significant causal associations with AD(P<0.05). Functional enrichment analysis identified five significantly enriched metabolic pathways(P<0.05). Druggability assessment indicated two metabolites as potential therapeutic targets. Additionally, five modifiable risk factors for AD were identified(P<0.05), and mediation analysis confirmed the mediating roles of two metabolites in risk factor-induced AD. Conclusion Thirteen plasma metabolites and seven urinary metabolites were causally associated with AD. Among them, S-adenosylhomocysteine and lactose emerged as potential therapeutic targets, while epiandrosterone sulfate and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-GPI mediated the effects of depressive symptoms and Parkinsons disease on AD, respectively.

Key words: Alzheimers disease, Mendelian randomization, Metabolites, Causal association, Risk factors, Mediation

中图分类号: 

  • R749.1+6
[1] Gauthier, Webster C, Servaes S, et al. World Alzheimer Report 2022: life after diagnosis: navigating treatment, care and support[R]. London, England: Alzheimers Disease International, 2022 [2025-10-20]. https://www.alzint.org/resource/world-alzheimer-report-2022/
[2] Wilson R S, Segawa E, Boyle P A, et al. The natural history of cognitive decline in Alzheimers disease[J]. Psychol Aging, 2012, 27(4): 1008-1017.
[3] Marucci G, Buccioni M, Ben D D, et al. Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimers disease[J]. Neuropharmacology, 2021, 190: 108352. DOI:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108352
[4] Rani S, Dhar S B, Khajuria A, et al. Advanced overview of biomarkers and techniques for early diagnosis of Alzheimers disease[J]. Cell Mol Neurobiol, 2023, 43(6): 2491-2523.
[5] Yuan Y, Zhao G, Zhao Y. Dysregulation of energy metabolism in Alzheimers disease[J]. J Neurol, 2024, 272(1): 2. DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12800-8
[6] Han R R, Liang J, Zhou B. Glucose metabolic dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases: new mechanistic insights and the potential of hypoxia as a prospective therapy targeting metabolic reprogramming[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(11): 5887. DOI:10.3390/ijms22115887
[7] Butterfield D A, Halliwell B. Oxidative stress, dysfunctional glucose metabolism and Alzheimer disease[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2019, 20(3): 148-160.
[8] Li H M, Qiu C S, Du L Y, et al. Causal association between circulating metabolites and dementia: a Mendelian randomization study[J]. Nutrients, 2024, 16(17): 2879. DOI:10.3390/nu16172879
[9] Cao D, Zhang Y N, Zhang S B, et al. Risk of Alzheimers disease and genetically predicted levels of 1,400 plasma metabolites: a Mendelian randomization study[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14: 26078. DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-77921-6
[10] Kurbatova N, Garg M, Whiley L, et al. Urinary metabolic phenotyping for Alzheimers disease[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10: 21745. DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-78031-9
[11] Wang Y Y, Sun Y, Wang Y, et al. Urine metabolomics phenotyping and urinary biomarker exploratory in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimers disease[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2023, 15: 1273807. DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2023.1273807
[12] Bellenguez C, Küçükali F, Jansen I E, et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimers disease and related dementias[J]. Nat Genet, 2022, 54(4): 412-436.
[13] Schwartzentruber J, Cooper S, Liu J Z, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis, fine-mapping and integrative prioritization implicate new Alzheimers disease risk genes[J]. Nat Genet, 2021, 53(3): 392-402.
[14] Chen Y H, Lu T Y, Pettersson-Kymmer U, et al. Genomic atlas of the plasma metabolome prioritizes metabolites implicated in human diseases[J]. Nat Genet, 2023, 55(1): 44-53.
[15] Schlosser P, Li Y, Sekula P, et al. Genetic studies of urinary metabolites illuminate mechanisms of detoxification and excretion in humans[J]. Nat Genet, 2020, 52(2): 167-176.
[16] Burgess S, Thompson S G. Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2011, 40(3): 755-764.
[17] Bowden J, Smith G D, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2015, 44(2): 512-525.
[18] Sun J, Zhao J H, Zhou S Y, et al. Systematic investigation of genetically determined plasma and urinary metabolites to discover potential interventional targets for colorectal cancer[J]. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst, 2024, 116(8): 1303-1312.
[19] Zhang X X, Tian Y, Wang Z T, et al. The epidemio-logy of Alzheimers disease modifiable risk factors and prevention[J]. J Prev Alzheimers Dis, 2021, 8(3): 313-321.
[20] Hersi M, Irvine B, Gupta P, et al. Risk factors associated with the onset and progression of Alzheimers disease: a systematic review of the evidence[J]. NeuroToxicology, 2017, 61: 143-187. DOI:10.1016/j.neuro.2017.03.006
[21] Liu Y L, Xiao X W, Yang Y, et al. The risk of Alzheimers disease and cognitive impairment characteristics in eight mental disorders: a UK Biobank observational study and Mendelian randomization analysis[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2024, 20(7): 4841-4853.
[22] Xue F, Gao L Y, Chen T T, et al. Parkinsons disease rs117896735 variant Regulates INPP5F expression in brain tissues and increases risk of Alzheimers disease[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2022, 89(1): 67-77.
[23] Huang H, Fang C M, Niu H X, et al. Effects of donepezil treatment on plasma and urine metabolites in amyloid beta-induced Alzheimers disease rats[J]. J Chromatogr B, 2023, 1224: 123766. DOI:10.1016/j.jchromb.2023.123766
[24] Yang J Z, Wu S, Yang J, et al. Amyloid beta-correlated plasma metabolite dysregulation in Alzheimers disease: an untargeted metabolism exploration using high-resolution mass spectrometry toward future clinical diagnosis[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2023, 15: 1189659. DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2023.1189659
[25] Zhang S, Lachance B B, Mattson M P, et al. Glucose metabolic crosstalk and regulation in brain function and diseases[J]. Prog Neurobiol, 2021, 204: 102089. DOI:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102089
[26] Minhas P S, Jones J R, Latif-Hernandez A, et al. Restoring hippocampal glucose metabolism rescues cognition across Alzheimers disease pathologies[J]. Science, 2024, 385(6711): eabm6131. DOI:10.1126/science.abm6131
[27] Castro M B, Ferreira B K, Cararo J H, et al. Evidence of oxidative stress in brain and liver of young rats submitted to experimental galactosemia[J]. Metab Brain Dis, 2016, 31(6): 1381-1390.
[28] Wachsmuth H R, Weninger S N, Duca F A. Role of the gut-brain axis in energy and glucose metabolism[J]. Exp Mol Med, 2022, 54(4): 377-392.
[29] López-Gambero A J, Martínez F, Salazar K, et al. Brain glucose-sensing mechanism and energy homeostasis[J]. Mol Neurobiol, 2019, 56(2): 769-796.
[30] Escribano BM, Muñoz-Jurado A, Luque E, et al. Lactose and casein cause changes on biomarkers of oxidative damage and dysbiosis in an experimental model of multiple sclerosis[J]. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets, 2022, 21(8): 680-692.
[31] Megur A, Baltriukien(·overe)D, Bukelskien(·overe)V, et al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis and Alzheimers disease: neuroinflammation is to blame?[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 13(1): 37. DOI:10.3390/nu13010037
[32] Vitku J, Hill M, Kolatorova L, et al. Steroid sulfation in neurodegenerative diseases[J]. Front Mol Biosci, 2022, 9: 839887. DOI:10.3389/fmolb.2022.839887
[33] Strac DS, Konjevod M, Perkovic MN, et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone(DHEA)and its sulphate(DHEAS)in Alzheimers disease[J]. Curr Alzheimer Res, 2020, 17(2): 141-157.
[34] Upadhyayula PS, Higgins DM, Mela A, et al. Dietary restriction of cysteine and methionine sensitizes gliomas to ferroptosis and induces alterations in energetic metabolism[J]. Nat Commun, 2023, 14: 1187. DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-36630-w
[35] Paul B D, Sbodio J I, Snyder S H. Cysteine metabolism in neuronal redox homeostasis[J]. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2018, 39(5): 513-524.
[36] Prudova A, Bauman Z, Braun A, et al. S-adenosylmethionine stabilizes cystathionine β-synthase and modulates redox capacity[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006, 103(17): 6489-6494.
[37] Yang H B, Luo K, Peters B A, et al. Diet, gut micro-biota, and histidine metabolism toward imidazole propionate production in relation to type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Care, 2025, 48(7): 1225-1232.
[38] Li D, Zhou L H, Cao Z, et al. Associations of environmental factors with neurodegeneration: an exposome-wide Mendelian randomization investigation[J]. Ageing Res Rev, 2024, 95: 102254. DOI:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102254
[39] Kusters C D J, Paul K C, Romero T, et al. Among men, androgens are associated with a decrease in Alzheimers disease risk[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2023, 19(9): 3826-3834.
[40] Souza-Teodoro L H, Davies N M, Warren H R, et al. DHEA and response to antidepressant treatment: a Mendelian randomization analysis[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 2024, 173: 151-156.
[41] Wang R C, Hatano T, Hattori N, et al. Interplay of GBA1 with lysosomal dysfunction and inflammation in Parkinsons disease[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2025. DOI:10.4103/nrr.nrr-d-25-01082
[42] Qin B Q, Fu Y, Raulin A C, et al. Lipid metabolism in health and disease: mechanistic and therapeutic insights for Parkinsons disease[J]. Chin Med J, 2025, 138(12): 1411-1423.
[1] 闫鹏 王蓉 杜怡峰 沈伦乾. 老年性痴呆患者尿中AD7c-NTP含量的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 106-.
[2] 陈昌海,张秀美,袁中尚,王淑康. 降压药物和降脂药物与眼部疾病的因果关联:一项跨种族药物靶点孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(7): 69-80.
[3] 吉寒冰,吴雨桐,吴思佳,黄鑫,李洪凯,陈昊. 二甲双胍靶点对胎儿神经系统畸形影响的遗传学证据[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(6): 86-93.
[4] 于皓瑞,陈昌海,张秀美,袁中尚. 降脂药物与两种骨骼疾病的因果关联:一项跨种族药物靶点孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(6): 94-103.
[5] 杨宇凡,李悦,谢灏,林春华. 胆固醇水平与神经源性膀胱风险的因果关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(5): 67-73.
[6] 段盈竹,董波,于睿. 内在情感与类风湿关节炎患者冠状动脉粥样硬化风险关系的孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 63-71.
[7] 赵万霞,詹群璋,金婷,刘玉新,曲崇正,吴剑纯. 基于孟德尔随机化分析肠道菌群、血液代谢物和肥胖的因果关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(4): 72-82.
[8] 吴志晓,赵红洋. 孟德尔随机化分析免疫细胞表型与孤独症谱系障碍的因果关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 83-92.
[9] 陈婵,李巨章,何稳,吴巧珍. 基于两样本孟德尔随机化研究抑郁症和抗抑郁药物靶基因与睡眠呼吸暂停的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 28-36.
[10] 吕明阅,孙汉辰,罗清馨,徐朝珂,徐瑞泽,张硕,严鲁宁,胡锡峰,赵青波,朱高培,薛付忠. 硝苯地平和美托洛尔对心脏病的治疗效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 1-10.
[11] 王乐,罗清馨,吴思佳,吴雨桐,葛祎蕾,俞一凡,韦云,吉寒冰,刘铁梅,张紫妍,修佳伟,薛付忠,李洪凯. 虚弱和癫痫关联研究:前瞻性队列和孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 20-30.
[12] 王雪梅,杨豪,宋洋,程世超,张婷婷,王艳春. 抗糖尿病药物与女性恶性肿瘤的因果关联:一项两样本孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 67-77.
[13] 贾若曦,吕丽,刘涵云,吴寅平,李凤彩,赵泽华,王凯,范玉琛. 血细胞计数相关标志物对慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭患者28天预后的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 89-99.
[14] 黄馨,王梦雪,付书璠,张琦悦,徐力. 代谢综合征及其组分与消化系统恶性肿瘤的因果关联:两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 86-94.
[15] 李建锋,张展,丁新华,高奋堂,何勤利,谢萍. 欧洲人群饮食因素与认知功能障碍关系的孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 36-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!