膝关节骨关节炎患者与正常人群膝关节冠状面对线分型的对比

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2026.0090

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨膝关节骨关节炎(knee osteoarthritis, KOA)患者与正常人群的膝关节冠状面对线(coronal plane alignment of the knee, CPAK)分型的异同,以期发现KOA患者CPAK表型的规律。方法回顾性分析2019年1月1日至2024年12月31日苏州大学附属第一医院完成站立位双下肢全长片检查的研究对象2 166例,以KOA为第一诊断患者1 785例,其中行全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty, TKA)患者1 299例(1 418膝)(TKA组),单髁置换术(unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, UKA)患者486例(551膝)(UKA组),正常对照组381例。采用影像测量软件测量胫骨近端内侧角(medial proximal tibial angle, MPTA)、股骨远端外侧角(lateral distal femoral angle, LDFA)、算术髋膝踝角(arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle, aHKA)和关节线倾斜度(joint line obliquity, JLO),并依据CPAK分型标准进行分型。比较正常对照组、TKA组和UKA组术前解剖参数与CPAK分型分布差异;对具有术后站立位双下肢全长片资料的患者,进一步比较TKA组和UKA组手术前后解剖参数和CPAK分型变化。结果 3组术前CPAK分布差异有统计学意义(P<0.001):正常对照组以Ⅲ型(281膝,36.88%)和Ⅱ型(216膝,28.35%)为主,TKA组以Ⅰ型(605膝,42.67%)和Ⅳ型(286膝,20.17%)为主,UKA组以Ⅰ型(232膝,42.11%)和Ⅱ型(119膝,21.60%)为主。3组术前MPTA、LDFA、aHKA和JLO差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。术后获得影像随访者中,TKA组768例(858膝),UKA组222例(265膝);两组术前术后CPAK分型分布均呈显著变化(P<0.001),且术后CPAK分型分布差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。其中,TKA组术后主要转为Ⅳ型(242膝,28.21%)和Ⅴ型(248膝,28.90%),UKA组术后仍以Ⅰ型(102膝,38.49%)和Ⅱ型(83膝,31.32%)为主。结论 CPAK分型有助于描述KOA相关冠状面形态特征及手术前后形态变化,但其在KOA发生风险评估及术式选择中的作用仍需进一步前瞻性研究验证。

关键词: 膝关节骨关节炎, 全膝关节置换术, 单髁置换术, 膝关节冠状面对线分型, 下肢力线

Abstract: Objective To compare the distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee(CPAK)phenotypes between patients with knee osteoarthritis(KOA)and asymptomatic controls,and to identify the phenotypic characteristics of CPAK distribution in patients with KOA. Methods This retrospective study included 2,166 individuals who underwent standing full-length lower-extremity radiography at The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2024. Among them, 1,785 patients were diagnosed with KOA as the primary diagnosis, who underwent total knee arthroplasty(TKA), involving 1,418 knees, and 486 patients who underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA), involving 551 knees. In addition, 381 normal controls were included. Medial proximal tibial angle(MPTA), lateral distal femoral angle(LDFA), arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle(aHKA), and joint line obliquity(JLO)were measured, and CPAK phenotypes were assigned according to the established CPAK classification system. Preoperative anatomical parameters and CPAK phenotype distributions were compared among the control, TKA, and UKA groups. In patients with available postoperative images, preoperative-to-postoperative changes in anatomical parameters and CPAK phenotypes were further analyzed. Results CPAK phenotype distribution differed significantly among the three groups (P<0.001). The predominant phenotypes were type Ⅲ(281 knees, 36.88%)and type Ⅱ(216 knees, 28.35%)in the control group, type Ⅰ(605 knees, 42.67%)and type Ⅳ(286 knees, 20.17%)in the TKA group, and type Ⅰ(232 knees, 42.11%)and type Ⅱ(119 knees, 21.60%)in the UKA group. Preoperative MPTA, LDFA, aHKA, and JLO also differed significantly among the three groups(P<0.001). Postoperative imaging follow-up was available for 768 patients(858 knees)in the TKA group and 222 patients(265 knees)in the UKA group. CPAK phenotype distribution changed significantly from preoperative to postoperative in both groups(Bowkers symmetry test, both P<0.001), and postoperative phenotype distribution differed significantly between the two groups(P<0.001). Postoperatively, the TKA group mainly shifted to type Ⅳ(242 knees, 28.21%)and type Ⅴ(248 knees, 28.90%), whereas the UKA group remained predominantly type Ⅰ(102 knees, 38.49%)and type Ⅱ(83 knees, 31.32%). Conclusion CPAK phenotypes may help characterize KOA-related coronal alignment features and morphological changes before and after surgery; however, its value in assessing KOA risk and surgical decision-making still requires further validation in prospective studies.

Key words: Knee osteoarthritis, Total knee arthroplasty, Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, Coronal plane alignment of the knee phenotypes, Lower limb alignment

中图分类号:

R684.3

金通,韦兴洲,金陈阳,饶肇滨,夏汉荣,朱锋,王熠军,张连方,陈广东,李荣群,徐耀增,周军. 膝关节骨关节炎患者与正常人群膝关节冠状面对线分型的对比[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(6): 43-49.

JIN Tong, WEI Xingzhou, JIN Chenyang, RAO Zhaobin, XIA Hanrong, ZHU Feng, WANG Yijun, ZHANG Lianfang, CHEN Guangdong, LI Rongqun, XU Yaozeng, ZHOU Jun. Comparison of coronal plane alignment of the knee phenotypes between knee osteoarthritis patients and asymptomatic controls[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2026, 64(6): 43-49.

参考文献

[1] 赵智博, 满振涛, 李伟. 胆固醇代谢在骨关节炎疾病中的作用及研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2024, 62(2): 1-9. ZHAO Zhibo, MAN Zhentao, LI Wei. Role of cholesterol metabolism in osteoarthritis: a review of research progresses[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2024, 62(2): 1-9.
[2] Kugelman DN, Wu KA, Goel RK, et al. Comparing functional recovery between totaland unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: aprospective health kit study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2025, 40(7S1): 84-87.
[3] Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS. The total condylar knee prosthesis. A report of two hundred andtwenty cases[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1979, 61(2): 173-180.
[4] Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, et al. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(1): 45-53.
[5] Sarzaeem MM, Movahedinia M, Kouhsari HJ, et al. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty is as effective in severe varus deformities as in mild deformities[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2026, 34(2): 608-617.
[6] Boutros M, Awad G, Mouawad A, et al. Kinematic versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Knee Surg, 2026, 39(6): 283-295.
[7] Franceschetti E, Giurazza G, Campi S, et al. Unrestricted kinematic alignment in varus total knee arthroplasty outperforms mechanical alignment in CPAK I phenotype, but yields comparable outcomes in CPAK IV: a retrospective analysis from the FP-UCBM knee study group[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2025. doi:10.1002/ksa.70084
[8] MacDessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Harris IA, et al. Coronal plane alignment of the knee(CPAK)classification[J]. Bone Joint J, 2021, 103-B(2): 329-337.
[9] 成佳,周桉黎,孙志航,等. 膝关节冠状面对线分型(CPAK)的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(3): 2940-2950. CHENG Jia, ZHOU Anli, SUN Zhihang, et al. Research progress of the coronal plane alignment of the knee(CPAK)classification[J]. Advances in Clinical Medicine, 2026, 16(3): 2940-2950.
[10] 王云鑫, 许平, 鲁宁, 等. 基于膝关节冠状面对线分型的膝关节生物力学研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2024, 38(12): 1466-1473. WANG Yunxin, XU Ping, LU Ning, et al. Biomechanical study of knee joint based on coronal plane alignment of the knee[J]. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2024, 38(12): 1466-1473.
[11] 王锋, 朱凤臣, 张铭华, 等. 1990—2021年中国膝关节骨关节炎疾病负担变化及趋势分析[J]. 现代医学, 2026, 54(1): 75-84.
[12] Hasani Satehi S, Razzaghof M, Rahimnia A, et al. Predictors of lower limb coronal malalignment after conventional total knee arthroplasty using a mechanical alignment strategy[J]. Arch Bone Jt Surg, 2025, 13(11): 726-737.
[13] León-Muñoz VJ, Hurtado-Avilés J, López-López M, et al. The distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification in a sample of Spanish southeast osteoarthritic population: aretrospective cross-sectional observational study[J]. Medicina, 2024, 60(10): 1612.
[14] Coetzee K, Charilaou J, Burger M, et al. Increased prevalence of valgus constitutional alignment subtypes in a South African arthritic population group using the coronal plane alignment of the knee(CPAK)classification[J]. Knee, 2024, 49: 158-166. doi:10.1016/j.knee
[15] Yang HY, Yoon TW, Kim JY, et al. Radiologic assessment of knee phenotypes based on the coronal plane alignment of the knee classification in a Korean population[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2024, 16(3): 422-429.
[16] Wong WK, Abu Bakar Sajak A, Chua HS. The distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee(CPAK)phenotypes in the Malaysian population and their correlation with demographic variables[J]. Arthroplasty, 2024, 6(1): 60. doi:10.1186/s42836-024-00281-z
[17] Insall J, Tria AJ, Scott WN. The total condylar knee prosthesis: the first 5 years[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1979(145): 68-77.
[18] Konishi T, Hamai S, Tsushima H, et al. Pre- and postoperative coronal plane alignment of the knee classification and its impact on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Bone Joint J, 2024, 106-B(10): 1059-1066.
[19] Franceschetti E, Campi S, Giurazza G, et al. Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty does not yield uniform outcomes across all coronal plane alignment of the knee(CPAK)phenotypes[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2024, 32(12): 3261-3271.
[20] Vermue H, Zambianchi F, Clemenza S, et al. An asymmetric medio-lateral flexion laxity target yields excellent results in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with functional knee positioning[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2025, S0883-5403(25)01486-X. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2025.11.030
[21] Jhurani A, Lavaniya S, Ardawatia G, et al. Computed tomography versus long-leg radiography for CPAK-based coronal alignment assessment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective evaluation[J]. J Robot Surg, 2025, 20(1): 120. doi:10.1007/s11701-025-03072-z
[22] Wynell-Mayow W, Hall TAG, Singh A, et al. Interobserver reliability of coronal plane alignment of the knee(CPAK)phenotype classification: external validation using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative[J]. Bone Jt Open, 2025, 6(11): 1425-1435.
[23] Stoltz MJ, Mullick M, Smith LS, et al. Primary total knee arthroplasty using a cementless highly porous titanium tibial baseplate: aminimum 10-year follow-up[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2025, S0883-5403(25)00956-8. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2025.07.053
[24] Beckers G, Kiss MO, Massé V, et al. Valgus knee deserves personalized total knee arthroplasty[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2026, 11(1): 34-45.
[25] Kim KI, Kim Y, Kim JH. Indications of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy would be different to achieve successful long-term outcome[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2025, 37(1):46. doi:10.1186/s43019-025-00296-z
[26] Ruderman LV, Bayoumi T, Ten Noever De Brauw GV, et al. Robotic-arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leads to high implant survival and patient satisfaction at mean 10-year follow-up[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2024, 32(9): 2297-2308.
[27] Kim SE, Yun KR, Lee JM, et al. Preserving coronal knee alignment of the knee(CPAK)in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty correlates with superior patient-reported outcomes[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2024, 36(1): 1. doi:10.1186/s43019-023-00204-3
[28] 苗壮, 刘培来, 卢群山, 等. 双柱活动型单髁假体治疗膝关节内侧骨关节炎的早期疗效分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59(5): 90-95. MIAO Zhuang, LIU Peilai, LU Qunshang, et al. Early efficacy of double-column mobile bearing unicompartmental knee prosthesis in treating medial knee osteoarthritis[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2021, 59(5): 90-95.
[29] Vossen RJM, Burger JA, Ten Noever De Brauw GV, et al. Preservation of prearthritic coronal knee phenotype and prearthritic coronal alignment yielded improved Kujala scores following ligament-guided medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2024, 32(12): 3185-3197.
[30] 鄢婷媛, 王姗姗. 影像组学预测膝关节骨关节炎发生的研究进展[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2026, 10(5): 18-20. YAN Tingyuan, WANG Shanshan. Research progress on radiomics for predicting the occurrence of knee osteoarthritis[J]. Journal of Imaging Research and Medical Applications, 2026, 10(5): 18-20.
[31] 刘小玉, 黄军, 漆琴, 等. 列线图、决策树构建的膝关节骨关节炎预测模型分析和比较[J]. 四川医学, 2026, 47(2): 152-158.
[32] Li S, Chen X, Liu S, et al. Gender, BMI, and age-related variations in lower limb alignment parameters and CPAK phenotypes in Chinese patients with knee osteoarthritis[J]. Orthop Surg, 2024, 16(12): 3098-3106.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed