您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (7): 98-105.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0166

• 公共卫生与预防医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

山东省主动健康示范区域老年人慢病管理知信行现状及影响机制

郭艳童1,2,于媛媛1,2,陈莹莹1,2,付雨1,2,张伯韬1,2,袁莹1,2,孙爽爽1,2,赵英淇1,2,朱高培1,2,薛付忠1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学齐鲁医学院公共卫生学院生物统计学系, 山东 济南 250012;2.国家健康医疗大数据研究院, 山东 济南 250003
  • 发布日期:2024-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 薛付忠. E-mail:xuefzh@sdu.edu.cn朱高培. E-mail:zhugaopei717@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(82330108);国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC2003500);山东省重点研发计划项目(2021SFGC0504)

Current situation and influencing mechanism of knowledge, attitude and practice about chronic disease management among elderly people in Shandong Provinces proactive health demonstration area

GUO Yantong1,2, YU Yuanyuan1,2, CHEN Yingying1,2, FU Yu1,2, ZHANG Botao1,2, YUAN Ying1,2, SUN Shuangshuang1,2, ZHAO Yingqi1,2, ZHU Gaopei1,2, XUE Fuzhong1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. National Institute of Health Data Science of China, Jinan 250003, Shandong, China
  • Published:2024-09-20

摘要: 目的 探索山东省主动健康示范区域老年人慢病管理知信行水平及其影响机制。 方法 采用多阶段随机抽样方法,共抽取5 447名65岁以上的老年人进行问卷调查,采用t检验和单因素方差分析比较慢病管理知信行得分情况,并用多元线性回归模型分析其影响因素,以中介分析探讨其影响机制。 结果 山东省主动健康示范区域老年人慢病管理知识平均得分为7.47±2.83;态度平均得分为8.47±2.47;行为平均得分为4.94±1.79。回归分析表明,性别、年龄、居住方式、自评健康状况是知识的影响因素;年龄和居住方式影响态度,而性别和年龄是行为的影响因素。中介分析显示,慢病管理知识对态度(β=0.670 1,P<0.001)、行为意愿(β=0.046 8,P<0.01)和行为(β=0.305 6,P<0.001)均具有预测作用,态度对行为意愿(β=0.169 8,P<0.001)和行为(β=0.216 1,P<0.001)具有预测作用,行为意愿正向预测行为(β=0.029 1,P<0.05)。知识对行为的直接效应值为0.193 9,占总效应的56.46%,间接效应值为0.149 5,占总效应的43.54%。 结论 山东省主动健康示范区域老年人慢病管理知识和态度水平均较高,但行为转化水平有待进一步提高;慢病管理态度、行为意愿在知识和行为之间起中介作用,且态度还可以通过提升行为意愿来改善行为水平。

关键词: 老年人, 慢病管理, 知识, 态度, 行为意愿, 行为

Abstract: Objective To explore the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice and its influential mechanism of chronic disease management among the elderly in the proactive health demonstration area of Shandong Province, China. Methods Using a multi-stage random sampling approach, a total of 5 447 elderly people aged ≥65 were selected for questionnaire survey. T-test and one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA)were used to compare the scores of knowledge, attitude, and practice in chronic disease management. A multiple linear regression model was performed to analyze the influencing factors, and mediation analysis was used to explore the influencing mechanism. Results In the proactive health demonstration area of Shandong Province, the average knowledge score was 7.47±2.83, the average attitude score was 8.47±2.47, and the average practice score was 4.94±1.79. Regression analysis revealed that gender, age, living style, and self-assessed health status were the influencing factors of knowledge; age and living style were influencing factors of attitude; gender and age were influencing factors of practice. The mediation analysis showed that knowledge had predictive effect on attitude(β=0.670 1, P<0.001), behavioral intention(β=0.046 8, P<0.01), and practice(β=0.305 6, P<0.001). Attitude had predictive effect on behavioral intention (β=0.169 8, P<0.001)and practice (β=0.216 1, P<0.001), and behavioral intention positively predicts practice (β=0.029 1, P<0.05). The direct effect value of knowledge on practice was 0.193 9, accounting for 56.46% of the total effect. The value of indirect effect was 0.149 5, accounting for 43.54% of the total effect. Conclusion The level of knowledge and attitude about chronic disease management among the elderly in the proactive health demonstration area of Shandong Province is relatively high, but the level of behavioral transformation needs to be further improved. Attitude and behavioral intention towards chronic disease management play a mediatory role between knowledge and practice, and attitude can also improve the level of practice by changing the behavioral intention.

Key words: Elderly people, Chronic disease management, Knowledge, Attitude, Behavioral intention, Practice

中图分类号: 

  • R195
[1] 国家统计局, 国务院第七次全国人口普查领导小组办公室. 第七次全国人口普查公报(第五号): 人口年龄构成情况[J]. 中国统计, 2021(5): 10-11.
[2] 国家卫生健康委, 教育部, 科技部, 等. 关于印发“十四五”健康老龄化规划的通知[J]. 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会公报, 2022(2): 16-25.
[3] 郝文婷, 李洁, 景正月, 等. 衰弱在农村慢性病老年人睡眠质量与生活质量间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59(2): 102-107. HAO Wenting, LI Jie, JING Zhengyue, et al. Physical frailty as a mediator between sleep quality and quality of life in rural elderly with chronic diseases in Shandong Province, China[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2021, 59(2): 102-107.
[4] 谭忠良. 社区健康管理结合健康教育对老年高血压的控制效果[J]. 中国社区医师, 2021, 37(35): 158-159. TAN Zhongliang. The control effect of community health management combined with health education on senile hypertension[J]. Chinese Community Doctors, 2021, 37(35): 158-159.
[5] Zhang XM, Li CY, Liu M, et al. The mediation effect of health literacy on social support and health lifestyle of patients with chronic diseases[J]. Appl Nurs Res, 2024, 75: 151763.
[6] 胡秀静, 吴小亚, 王家骥, 等. 慢性病防治视角下的我国医养结合与健康管理发展回顾[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2019, 27(8): 561-564.
[7] Hong E, Mao J, Ke ZC, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards community-acquired pneumonia and COVID-19 among general population: a cross-sectional study[J]. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2024, 13(1): 6.
[8] Jeong JY, Lee H. Determinants of restaurant consumers intention to practice COVID-19 preventive behavior: an application of the theory of planned behavior[J]. Nutr Res Pract, 2021, 15(Suppl 1): S79-S93.
[9] Youngcharoen P, Vincent C, Park CG. Theory of planned behavior constructs associated with nurses pain assessment and pro Re Nata(PRN)opioid analgesic administration: a cross-sectional study[J]. Pain Manag Nurs, 2017, 18(3): 153-169.
[10] Abdi IH, Firdos R, Ali Laghari Q, et al. Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in geriatric patients(>60 years of age)[J]. Prof Med J, 2020, 27(1): 62-67.
[11] Entriken C, Pritts TA. Perioperative pulmonary support of the elderly[J]. Curr Geriatr Rep, 2021, 10(4): 167-174.
[12] Alkaabi I, Abita M, Mahdi Y, et al. Knowledge, attitude, practices, and sources of information(KAPS)toward COVID-19 during the second wave pandemic among university population in Qatar: a cross-sectional study[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 906159. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.906159.
[13] Doan DA, Ho HH, Tran LD, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of university students regarding COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in Vietnam[J]. BMC Public Health, 2022, 22(1): 2016.
[14] Aldhamy H, Maniatopoulos G, McCune VL, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of infection prevention and control precautions among laboratory staff: a mixed-methods systematic review[J]. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2023, 12(1): 57.
[15] Wang WW, Peng YY, Tang KQ, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among middle-aged and elderly population towards ultrasound screening for strokes[J]. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2024, 17: 147-157. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S44.3865.
[16] Yazew BG, Abate HK, MekonnenE CK. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 in Ethiopia: asystematic review; 2020 [J]. Patient Prefer Adherence, 2021, 15: 337-348. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S288186.
[17] Conner M, Norman P. Understanding the intention-behavior gap: the role of intention strength[J]. Front Psychol, 2022, 13: 923464. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923464.
[18] Mukosha M, Muyunda D, Mudenda S, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards cervical cancer screening among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: implication for prevention strategy uptake[J]. Nurs Open, 2023, 10(4): 2132-2141.
[19] 王琢, 韩严敏, 张健, 等. 老年传染病防治知信行现状及影响因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(23): 5869-5873.
[20] Liu LF, Qian XJ, Chen Z, et al. Health literacy and its effect on chronic disease prevention: evidence from Chinas data[J]. BMC Public Health, 2020, 20(1): 690.
[21] Yang KH, Liu H, Ma LH, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of residents in the prevention and control of COVID-19: an online questionnaire survey[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2021, 77(4): 1839-1855.
[22] 阚超杰, 张晓. 应用Fairlie分解法的老年人自评健康状况性别差异研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2019, 23(1): 75-79. KAN Chaojie, ZHANG Xiao. Disparity in self-rated health between male and female elderly: a Fairlie decomposition analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention, 2019, 23(1): 75-79.
[23] 陆一鸣, 朱泽善, 文建强, 等. 2015年甘肃省15~69岁居民健康素养水平及影响因素研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2018, 22(3): 235-239. LU Yiming, ZHU Zeshan, WEN Jianqiang, et al. Health literacy and associated factors among residents aged 15-69 years in Gansu, 2015[J]. Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention, 2018, 22(3): 235-239.
[24] 宋江宇, 周素红, 柳林, 等. 日常活动视角下居民健康影响的性别差异: 以广州为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(7): 999-1010.
[25] 刘清, 王志, 徐春华, 等. 奉贤区老年护理院护工传染病防治素养及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(4): 420-422.
[26] 王兴华, 李倩, 周虎. 2013年芜湖市镜湖区居民健康素养调查报告[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2014, 18(8): 768-771. WANG Xinghua, LI Qian, ZHOU Hu. Investigation on health literacy levels of residents in Jinghu District of Wuhu City, 2013[J]. Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention, 2014, 18(8): 768-771.
[27] Chowdhury SR, Chandra Das D, Sunna TC, et al. Global and regional prevalence of multimorbidity in the adult population in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. eClinicalMedicine, 2023, 57: 101860. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101860.
[28] Rakhshani T, Dada M, Kashfi SM, et al. The effect of educational intervention on knowledge, attitude, and practice of women towards breast cancer screening[J]. Int J Breast Cancer, 2022, 2022: 5697739. doi:10.1155/2022/5697739.
[29] 尹淑英, 梁亚楠, 纪晓倩, 等. 山东省农村不同性别老年人健康状况及影响因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2021, 41(9): 1965-1967.
[30] Clark CR, Ommerborn MJ, Moran K, et al. Predicting self-rated health across the life course: health equity insights from machine learning models[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2021, 36(5): 1181-1188.
[31] Kananen L, Enroth L, Raitanen J, et al. Self-rated health in individuals with and without disease is associated with multiple biomarkers representing multiple biological domains[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 6139.
[32] Reinwarth AC, Wicke FS, Hettich N, et al. Self-rated physical health predicts mortality in aging persons beyond objective health risks[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 19531.
[33] Yang HL, Deng Q, Geng QS, et al. Association of self-rated health with chronic disease, mental health symptom and social relationship in older people[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 14653.
[34] Stodolska A, Zawisza K, Wizner B, et al. Neglect and self-rated health among older adults-a cross-sectional study in Poland[J]. Folia Med Cracov, 2023, 63(2): 5-28.
[35] Li H, Zhang JY, Wang L, et al. A health promoting-lifestyle prediction model for dementia prevention among Chinese adults: based on the health belief model[J]. BMC Public Health, 2022, 22(1): 2450.
[36] 于瑞莹, 李庆信, 张浩然, 等. “健康中国”背景下不同群体老年人健康管理认知现状调查与对策[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2022, 40(22): 126-129.
[1] 方婷婷,胡章捷,禚凤,解欣然,杨楹,孔令华. 青少年网络偏差行为潜在剖面与网络分析——以江西省为例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 35-44.
[2] 孙佳丽,王亮,王长凤,张杰,郭磊. Klippel-Trenaunay综合征儿童情绪与行为特征及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 78-82.
[3] 魏书生,吴海波,李松林,温镇璘,杨昌骜,卢群山,刘培来. 大型语言模型在骨科手术术前管理中的决策性能及辅助价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 104-110.
[4] 周朝雄,付屹. 甲状腺激素与皮质醇水平对双相障碍患者攻击行为的预测[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 37-42.
[5] 杨贺旻,孙茂林,刘适,殷玥,张娜,张明龙. EGCG对孤独症小鼠小脑浦肯野细胞及行为学的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 43-56.
[6] 王悦祺,宋东玉,李玉丽,谢昊,张月蓉. 儿童困难问题和亲社会行为在家庭弹性与祖辈隔代教养压力间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 57-64.
[7] 逄锦宏,苏萍,乔俊鹏,陈巧巧,陈学禹,赵颖颖,施婕,孙晓茹,李秋春,何蕊言,范轶欧,迟蔚蔚. 老年人群可改变心血管危险因素聚集模式与脑卒中的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 11-19.
[8] 付雨,姜伟,朱高培,薛付忠. 基于多水平模型的山东省老年人健康相关生命质量及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 57-64.
[9] 刘国伟,翟艳,王薇,吕军城. 潍坊市某城区65岁及以上老年人社会适应能力现状及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 104-110.
[10] 杨兆鑫,徐晓莉. 基于CiteSpace的医院韧性研究可视化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 111-117.
[11] 王利红,窦少坤,栾惠,李宝瑞,宗爱珍,徐同成. 多糖在吞咽障碍食品中应用的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 1-8.
[12] 宋东玉,吕靖然,李玉丽,刘宇舟. 基于安德森模型的城市中老年人隔代抚养培训需求影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 108-115.
[13] 古玥琳,肖晓. 小鼠二选一赌博实验范式设计及验证[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 1-10.
[14] 姜淑伟,马良,康保絮,王志浩. FRAIL量表在老年关节置换术后压力性损伤风险预测中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 54-66.
[15] 王琼,李欣宇,徐磊,周成超,江帆. 社区听力康复对老年听力障碍患者沟通能力的干预效果评估:一项随机对照试验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 96-104.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!