腰椎管狭窄单节段经椎间孔椎体间融合手术前后矢状位参数值的变化

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.037

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者行单节段经椎间孔椎体间融合术(TLIF)前后脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数变化。方法随访2010年1月至2016年10月接受同一组医生治疗且资料完整的行单节段TLIF手术的LSS患者102例,61~85岁,平均(66.4±4.8)岁。测量术前及术后2年矢状位参数,定义脊柱-骨盆垂直轴(SVA)≥40 mm为矢状位失衡,将患者分为术前平衡组(n=65,术前SVA<40 mm)和术前失衡组(n=37,术前SVA≥40 mm),术前失衡组又分为恢复平衡组(n=23,术后SVA<40 mm)和未恢复平衡组(n=14,术后SVA≥40 mm)。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、日本整形外科学会(JOA)腰痛评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估术前及术后临床症状。结果 LSS患者术前矢状位失衡发生率为36.3%。与术前平衡组相比,术前失衡组术前腰椎前凸角(LL)和胸椎后凸角(TK)较小,骨盆入射角(PI)-LL和骨盆倾斜角(PT)较大,且术前VAS、JOA和ODI评分较差(P<0.05),而术前失衡组术后SVA、LL、TK和PI-LL的变化值高于术前平衡组(P<0.05)。术后2年随访,23例(62.2%)恢复矢状位平衡,14例(37.8%)未恢复平衡者术前SVA均>90 mm,且PI-LL均>20°。与恢复平衡组相比,未恢复平衡组术前SVA和PI-LL较大,且术前LL和TK较小(P<0.05),而术后VAS、JOA和ODI评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论大多数术前矢状位失衡与患者保护性体位有关,单节段TLIF手术可有效改善矢状位失衡。研究亦未发现术后矢状位失衡与临床疗效的关联性,故术前矢状位失衡可能不适合单独作为LSS患者长节段矫形手术的依据。

关键词: 腰椎管狭窄症, 脊柱, 骨盆, 经椎间孔椎体间融合术, 矢状位, 失平衡

Abstract: Objective To explore the changes of anterior and posterior spinal-pelvic sagittal parameters in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS)who received single-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF). Methods The clinical data of 102 patients with LSS who underwent single-segment TLIF during Jan. 2010 and Oct. 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients aged 61-85 years, average(66.4±4.8)years. The preoperative and 2-year postoperative sagittal parameters were determined, including lumbar lordosis(LL), thoracic kyphosis(TK), thoracolumbar junctional angle(TLJA), pelvic incidence(PI), pelvic tilt(PT), sacral slope(SS), sagittal vertical axis(SVA)and mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis(PI-LL). SVA≥40 mm was defined as sagittal imbalance. Based on this, the patients were divided into the balance group(n=65, SVA<40 mm)and imbalance group (n=37, SVA≥40 mm)before operation. After operation, imbalance group were subdivided into the restoration group (n=23, 山东大学学报 (医学版)57卷5期 -贾军,等.腰椎管狭窄单节段经椎间孔椎体间融合手术前后矢状位参数值的变化 \=-SVA<40 mm)and non-restoration group (n=14, SVA≥40 mm). Visual Analog Scale(VAS)score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)score and Oswestry Disability Index(ODI)were used to evaluate preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes. Results The incidence of preoperative sagittal imbalance was 36.3%. Compared with the balance group, the imbalance group had smaller LL and TK, larger PI-LL and PT, and poorer VAS score, JOA score and ODI(all P<0.05). After operation, the imbalance group had greater changes in SVA, LL, TK and PI-LL than the balance group (P<0.05). After 2 years of follow-up, the sagittal balance was restored in 23 patients(62.2%). The 14 patients who failed to restore the balance had preoperative SVA>90 mm, and PI-LL>20°. Compared with the restoration group, the non-restoration group had larger preoperative SVA and PI-LL, but smaller LL and TK(all P<0.05), while there were no differences in postoperative VAS, JOA and ODI between the two groups(all P>0.05). Conclusion Most sagittal imbalance is related to patients’ protective position, and single-segment TLIF can effectively improve sagittal imbalance. In addition, there is no correlation between postoperative sagittal imbalance and short-term clinical outcome. Therefore, preoperative sagittal imbalance alone may not be used as the indication for long-segment orthopedic surgery.

Key words: Lumbar spinal stenosis, Spine, Pelvis, Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, Sagittal view, Imbalance

中图分类号:

R681.5

贾军,赵钇伟,原所茂,田永昊,刘新宇,郑燕平. 腰椎管狭窄单节段经椎间孔椎体间融合手术前后矢状位参数值的变化[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(5): 36-42.

JIA Jun, ZHAO Yiwei, YUAN Suomao, TIAN Yonghao, LIU Xinyu, ZHENG Yanping. Effects of single-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on global sagittal balance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2019, 57(5): 36-42.

参考文献

[1] Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study [J]. Spine, 2012, 37(12): 1077-1082.
[2] Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, et al. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery [J]. Spine, 2010, 35(25): 2224-2231.
[3] Lim JK, Kim SM. Comparison of sagittal spinopelvic alignment between lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and degenerative spinal stenosis [J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2014, 55(6): 331-336.
[4] Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy [J]. Spine, 2009, 34(8): 785-791.
[5] Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity(fixed sagittal imbalance)[J]. Spine, 1999, 24(16): 1712-1720.
[6] 马清伟, 李危石, 孙卓然, 等. 中老年人群脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数及其序列拟合关系[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2016, 26(2): 146-150. MA Qingwei, LI Weishi, SUN Zhuoran, et al. Spino-pelvic sagittal parameters in middle-aged and elderly Chinese: measurements and correlationship [J]. Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord, 2016, 26(2): 146-150.
[7] Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity [J]. Spine, 2005, 30(18):2024-2029.
[8] Neal CJ, McClendon J, Halpin R, et al. Predicting ideal spinopelvic balance in adult spinal deformity [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2011, 15(1): 82-91.
[9] Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, et al. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient [J]. Spine, 2009, 34(17): 1828-1833.
[10] Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH, et al. Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36" radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques [J]. Spine, 2005, 30(4): 427-433.
[11] Haro H, Maekawa S, Hamada Y, et al. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis [J]. Spine J, 2008, 8(2): 380-384.
[12] Ng LCL, Tafazal S, Sell P. The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis [J]. Eur Spine J, 2007, 16(2): 199-206.
[13] Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index [J]. Spine, 2000, 25(22): 2940-2953.
[14] Abbas J, Hamoud K, May H, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spine configuration [J]. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(11): 1865-1873.
[15] Funao H, Tsuji T, Hosogane N, et al. Comparative study of spinopelvic sagittal alignment between patients with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis [J]. Eur Spine J, 2012, 21(11): 2181-2187.
[16] Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, et al. Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases [J]. Eur Spine J, 2007, 16(9): 1459-1467.
[17] Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC, et al. Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine [J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 6(6): 834-841.
[18] Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, et al. Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? [J]. Eur Spine J, 2011, 20(Suppl 5): 626-633.
[19] Hikata T, Watanabe K, Fujita N, et al. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2015, 23(4): 451-458.
[20] Cho JH, Joo YS, Lim C, et al. Effect of 1- or 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion on global sagittal balance [J]. Spine J, 2017, 17(12): 1794-1802.
[21] Shin EK, Kim CH, Chung CK, et al. Sagittal imbalance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and outcomes after simple decompression surgery [J]. Spine J, 2017, 17(2): 175-182.
[22] Dohzono S, Toyoda H, Matsumoto T, et al. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2015, 23(1): 49-54.
[23] 刘辉, 希腊本大, 郑召民, 等. 腰椎间盘退变与脊柱-骨盆矢状面平衡的相关[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2013, 93(15): 1123-1128. LIU Hui, Shrivastava SR, ZHENG Zhaomin, et al. Correlation of lumbar disc degeneration and spinal-pelvic sagittal balance [J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics, 2013, 93(15): 1123-1128.
[24] Lamartina C, Berjano P. Classification of sagittal imbalance based on spinal alignment and compensatory mechanisms [J]. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(6): 1177-1189.
[25] Jang JS, Lee SH, Min JH, et al. Changes in sagittal alignment after restoration of lower lumbar lordosis in patients with degenerative flat back syndrome [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 7(4): 387-392.
[26] Jang JS, Lee SH, Min JH, et al. Influence of lumbar lordosis restoration on thoracic curve and sagittal position in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients [J]. Spine, 2009, 34(3): 280-284.
[27] Shin MH, Ryu KS, Hur JW, et al. Comparative study of lumbopelvic sagittal alignment between patients with and without sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar interbody fusion [J]. Spine, 2013, 38(21): 1334-1341.
[28] Fujii K, Kawamura N, Ikegami M, et al. Radiological improvements in global sagittal alignment after lumbar decompression without fusion [J]. Spine, 2015, 40(10): 703-709.

相关文章 15

[1]	张小艳李刚王令平. 不同剂量舒芬太尼对脊柱手术患者全麻诱导期血流动力学及血浆皮质醇的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 76-79.
[2]	中国医师协会骨科医师分会智能骨科学组,中华预防医学会脊柱疾病预防与控制专业委员会脊柱脊髓损伤疾病预防与控制学组. 人工智能脊柱退变影像学测量位点与标注专家共识(2025)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 1-10.
[3]	代广鑫,王辉,王连雷,刘新宇,张梦华,黄伟杰. 基于多模态融合的脊柱图像分割方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 66-77.
[4]	李鑫源,张心之,狄德润,原所茂,刘新宇,王连雷. Cobb角负重位三维自动成像与X线平片的对比分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 89-95.
[5]	齐硕,刘可宇,徐展望,谭国庆,张强. 改良活检优化宏基因组二代测序腰椎间盘感染早期诊断策略[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 96-103.
[6]	胡冰涛,张文灿,王崇怡,林翔宇,王凯斌,冯运泽,刘郴,徐万龙,李乐,司海朋. 基于加速康复外科理念的单孔分体内镜微创技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床效果分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 1-7.
[7]	司海朋,王崇怡,宫桂青,张文灿,郭英俊,王凯斌,冯运泽,徐万龙,李乐. 加速康复外科在脊柱外科中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 8-17.
[8]	吴南,仉建国,朱源棚,陈癸霖,陈泽夫. 人工智能在脊柱畸形诊疗中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 14-20.
[9]	刘新宇,李冬来,赵文龙,王政,李超,王连雷,原所茂,田永昊. 机器人/导航辅助下椎弓根螺钉植入在脊柱畸形矫正中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 21-28.
[10]	杜付鑫,张体冲,李倩倩,宋锐. 脊柱手术机器人研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 46-56.
[11]	刘亚军,袁强,吴静晔,韩晓光,郎昭,张勇. 130例锥形束CT影像腰椎椎弓根螺钉自动规划的初步分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 80-89.
[12]	李超,孙小刚,李昊,田永昊,原所茂,刘新宇,王连雷. 机器人联合三维“C”型臂辅助置钉在44例脊柱侧弯矫形术中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 107-114.
[13]	王辉,王连雷,吴天驰,田永昊,原所茂,王霞,吕维加,刘新宇. 人工智能辅助设计3D打印手术导板在脊柱侧凸矫形术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 127-133.
[14]	李明波,黄燕波,刘俊城,任东成,谭成双,徐继禧,丁金勇. 黄芪桂枝五物汤治疗强直性脊柱炎的网络药理学探讨[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 29-38.
[15]	田吉光,王志勇,程林,桑锡光. 一种新式骨盆及髋臼通道螺钉的置钉方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(10): 17-26.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed