冠状动脉旁路移植术后桡动脉桥血管通畅率的影响因素分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.752

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后桡动脉(RA)桥通畅率的影响因素。方法回顾性分析在CABG术中使用RA桥,并于术后1年复查冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CTA)患者65例。收集患者术前、术中及术后的相关资料,采用多因素logistic回归分析筛选RA桥通畅率的影响因素。结果 RA桥靶血管近端狭窄程度≥80%(OR=0.212, 95%CI: 0.049~0.912, P=0.037)和靶血管在左前降支区域(OR=0.104, 95%CI: 0.012~0.921, P=0.042)是RA桥术后通畅率的独立保护因素,而术后未规范联用抗痉挛药物(OR=6.825, 95%CI: 1.857~25.083, P=0.004)是RA桥通畅率的独立危险因素。结论 CABG术中RA桥靶血管的合理选择和术后联用抗痉挛药物是RA桥通畅率的独立影响因素。

关键词: 桡动脉, 通畅率, 影响因素, 冠状动脉旁路移植术

Abstract: Objective To analyze the influencing factors for the graft patency of radial artery(RA)after coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG). Methods Clinical data of 65 patients who adopted RA grafts in isolated CABG and underwent computed tomography angiography one year after operation were retrospectively analyzed, including preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the influencing factors for RA graft patency. Results Native stenosis of target vessel ≥80%(OR=0.212, 95%CI: 0.049-0.912, P=0.037), and target vessel in the left anterior descending artery territory(OR=0.104, 95%CI: 0.012-0.921, P=0.042)were independent protective factors for RA graft patency, while non-adherence to the postoperative combination of anti-spastic medications(OR=6.825, 95%CI: 1.857-25.083, P=0.004)was an independent risk factor. Conclusion Proper choice of target vessels during the operation and combination of anti-spastic medications after operation are independent influencing factors for RA graft patency.

Key words: Predictive factor, Coronary artery bypass grafting, Radial artery, Patency rate

中图分类号:

R654.2

叶聪. 冠状动脉旁路移植术后桡动脉桥血管通畅率的影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(8): 34-38.

YE Cong. Influencing factors for the graft patency of radial artery after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(8): 34-38.

参考文献

[1] Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial[J]. Lancet, 2013, 381(9867): 629-638.
[2] Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events[J]. N Engl J Med, 1986, 314(1): 1-6.
[3] Tranbaugh RF, Dimitrova KR, Friedmann P, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery: clinical outcomes, patency, and need for reintervention[J]. Circulation, 2012, 126(11 Suppl 1): 170-175.
[4] Locker C, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Multiple arterial grafts improve late survival of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of 8622 patients with multivessel disease[J]. Circulation, 2012, 126(9): 1023-1030.
[5] Deb S, Cohen EA, Singh SK, et al. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS(Radial Artery Patency Study)[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012, 60(1): 28-35.
[6] Goldman S, Sethi GK, Holman W, et al. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial[J]. JAMA, 2011, 305(2): 167-174.
[7] Athanasiou T, Saso S, Rao C, et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein conduits for coronary artery baypass surgery: forty years of competition-which conduit offers better patency? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J of Cardiothorac Surg, 2011, 40(1): 208-220.
[8] Sahiner L, Canpolat U, Yorgun H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts[J]. J Investig Med, 2012, 60(8): 1180-1185.
[9] Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, et al. A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351(22): 2302-2309.
[10] Khot UN, Friedman DT, Pettersson G, et al. Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts[J]. Circulation, 2004, 109(17): 2086-2091.
[11] Acar C, Jebara VA, Portoghese M, et al. Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1992, 54(4): 652-659.
[12] He GW, Fan L, Furnary A, et al. A new antispastic solution for arterial grafting: nicardipine and nitroglycerin cocktail in preparation of internal thoracic and radial arteries for coronary surgery[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008, 136(3): 673-680.
[13] Achouh P, Boutekadjirt R, Toledano D, et al. Long-term(5- to 20-year)patency of the radial artery for coronary bypass grafting[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 140(1): 73-79.
[14] Gaudino M, Glieca F, Luciani N, et al. Clinical and angiographic effects of chronic calcium channel blocker therapy continued beyond first postoperative year in patients with radial artery grafts: results of a prospective randomized investigation[J]. Circulation, 2001, 104(12 Suppl): 64-67.
[15] Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2011, 124(23): 2610-2642.
[16] Yie K, Na CY, Oh SS, et al. Angiographic results of the radial artery graft patency according to the degree of native coronary stenosis[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2008, 33(3): 341-348.
[17] Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trail: five-year angiographic follow-up[J]. Circulation, 2008, 117(22): 2859-2864.

相关文章 15

[1]	孙佳丽,王亮,王长凤,张杰,郭磊. Klippel-Trenaunay综合征儿童情绪与行为特征及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 78-82.
[2]	宋一鸣,王佳丰,韩晓娟,杜怡峰. 脑维持与认知功能:测量、影响因素和机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 1-7.
[3]	徐欣颖,颜伟,石兴龙,岳芳,吕婧,乔颖异,张宇琦,程传龙,左慧,李秀君. 山东省滨州市手足口病的流行特征及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 118-125.
[4]	孙爽爽,仉率杰,张伯韬,袁莹,于媛媛,薛付忠. 基于真实世界研究的18~50岁人群急性缺血性卒中影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 40-46.
[5]	国科,陈绪军,施超,罗俊辉,杨岷,王晓武,王振东,李有金,孟春营,陈文生. 游离右内乳动脉与桡动脉构建Y桥在全动脉冠脉旁路移植术多中心应用效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 84-91.
[6]	王宁,郝秀梅,牛翔,黄金明,徐静雅. 中国中老年高血糖、血脂异常、高血压人群健康体检服务利用现状及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 82-91.
[7]	肖飞,王联群,季强. STS多支动脉冠脉旁路移植应用解读[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 6-11.
[8]	陈绪军,申林,陈军,于涛,曹广庆,肖飞. 解剖完全再血管化是冠心病外科治疗的新策略[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 12-17.
[9]	国科,陈绪军,郑宝石,黄克力,王晓武,陈景伟,林宇,罗俊辉,王海晨,王振东,廖成全,李有金,陈文生. 解剖完全再血管化全动脉冠脉旁路移植术多中心应用中期结果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 18-25.
[10]	国科,陈绪军,郑宝石,施超,黄克力,曹勇,陈军,吴东凯,张晓慎,罗俊辉,申林,莫绪明,杨岷,王晓武,雷印胜,田茂州,王振东,孟自力,孙忠东,李有金,陆辉辉,孟春营,高峰,陈黔苏,郭能瑞,柳德斌,张楠,林宇,陈文生,宋保国,方智,王海晨,廖晓波,徐朝军. 快通道拔管在全动脉冠脉旁路移植术的多中心临床效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 26-32.
[11]	卢圣勋,邢亚闯,罗俊辉,刘杰,何厚乐,王志强,张娜. 糖尿病患者冠脉旁路移植手术中动脉桥的研究现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 33-39.
[12]	莫绪明,王庆峰. 冠状动脉旁路移植术在儿童心血管疾病中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 40-46.
[13]	王智琪,戚继荣,扈元利,陈绪军,王庆峰,莫绪明. 全动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗儿童川崎病后冠状动脉瘤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 47-53.
[14]	温学龙,刘安慧,陈经纬,吴梦婷,杨岷. 急性非ST抬高型心肌梗死行冠状动脉旁路移植手术时机Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 60-70.
[15]	张永媛,王清亮,连雪洪. 山东省某三级综合医院罕见病患者住院费用结构变动情况及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 111-119.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed