MRI在宫颈癌T分期中的诊断价值

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.863

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨MRI在宫颈癌T分期中的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析经病理确诊的106例宫颈癌病例,评价MRI分期的准确率及阴道浸润和宫旁浸润的准确率。结果 MRI分期的准确率约84.0%(89/106);阴道浸润的准确率为85.8%(91/106),敏感度为72.7%(8/11),特异度为87.4%(83/95),阳性预测值为40%(8/20),阴性预测值为96.5%(83/86);宫旁浸润的准确率为96.2%(102/106),敏感度为75%(3/4),特异度为97.1%(99/102),阳性预测值为50%(3/6),阴性预测值为99%(99/100)(P<0.05)。结论 MRI在宫颈癌分期中准确率较高,并能较准确判断宫颈癌阴道浸润及宫旁浸润。

关键词: 宫颈肿瘤, 磁共振成像, 宫旁浸润, 阴道浸润, 分期

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of MRI in the T-staging of cervical cancer. Methods Clinical date of 106 confirmed cervical cancer cases were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the accuracy rate of staging by MRI, the accuracy rate of vaginal invasion and parametrial infiltration, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value. Results The accuracy rate of MRI staging was 84.0%(89/106). For vaginal invasion, the accuracy rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 85.8%(91/106), 72.7%(8/11), 87.4%(83/95), 40%(8/20), and 96.5%(83/86). For parametrial infiltration, the accuracy rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 96.2%(102/106), 75%(3/4), 97.1%(99/102), 50%(3/6), and 99%(99/100)(P<0.05). Conclusion The accuracy rate of MRI staging is high, and MRI can accurately assess vaginal invasion and parametrial infiltration.

Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging, Vaginal invasion, Staging, Parametrial infiltration, Cervical neoplasms

中图分类号:

R445.2

张湛,许相丰,刘海东,王玮. MRI在宫颈癌T分期中的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(5): 70-73.

ZHANG Zhan, XU Xiangfeng, LIU Haidong, WANG Wei. Diagnostic value of MRI in the T-staging of cervical cancer[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(5): 70-73.

参考文献

[1] Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2): 69-90.
[2] 周晖, 卢淮武, 彭永排, 等. 《2015年NCCN宫颈癌临床实践指南》解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2015, 3: 185-191.
[3] FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. FIGO Staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri[J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2014, 125(2): 97-98.
[4] Freeman SJ, Aly AM, Kataoka MY, et al. The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: implications for MR imaging[J]. Radiographics, 2012, 32(6): 1805-1827.
[5] Bhosale P, Peungjesada S, Devine C, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to clinical staging in cervical carcinoma[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2010, 34(6): 855-864.
[6] Noël P, Dubé M, Plante M, et al. Early cervical carcinoma and fertility treatment options: MR imaging as a tool in patient selection and a follow-up modality[J]. Radiographics, 2014, 34(4): 1099-1119.
[7] 江新青, 谢琦, 梁长虹, 等. 宫颈癌的MRI诊断及分期研究[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2002, 36(7): 621-625. JIANG Xinqing, XIE Qi, LIANG Changhong, et al. MRI diagnosis and staging of cervical carcinoma[J]. Chinese Joural of Radiology, 2002, 36(7): 621-625.
[8] Evan S, Siegelman. Body MRI[M]. Saunders, 2012: 286.
[9] Dhoot NM, Kumar V, Shinagare A, et al. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management[J]. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2012, 56(1): 58-65.
[10] 郝建成, 郝金刚. MRI在宫颈癌诊断与分期中的应用价值[J]. 肿瘤学杂志, 2014, 20(8): 673-676. HAO Jiancheng, HAO Jingang. The value of MRI in the diagnosis and staging for cervical cancer[J]. Journal of Chinese oncology, 2014, 20(8): 673-676.
[11] Akita A, Shinmoto H, Hayashi S, et al. Comparison of T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T for assessing the local extent of cervical carcinoma[J]. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(9): 1850-1857.
[12] Manfredi R, Gui B, Giovanzana A, et al. Localized cervical cancer(stage [13] Balleyguier C, Sala E, Da Cunha T, et al. Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology[J]. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(5): 1102-1110.
[14] Rauch GM, Kaur H, Choi H, et al. Optimization of MR Imaging for pretreatment evaluation of patients with endometrial and cervical cancer[J]. Radiographics, 2014, 34(4): 1082-1098.
[15] Iwata S, Joja I, Okuno K, et al. Cervical carcinoma with full-thickness stromal invasion: efficacy of dynamic MR imaging in the assessment of parametrial involvement[J]. Radiat Med, 2002, 20(5): 247-255.
[16] Testa AC, Di Legge A, De Blasis I, et al. Imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervical cancer[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2014, 28(5): 741-768.
[17] 任翠, 薛华丹. 磁共振成像在宫颈癌的临床应用[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2011, 2(3): 277-280.
[18] deSouza NM, Dina R, Mclndoe GA, et al. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2006, 102(1): 80-85.

相关文章 15

[1]	金晨曦,沈薇,李娜,孙建锋,杨驰,郭泾. ADDWoR关节镜下盘复位术盘-髁运动的定量分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 54-61.
[2]	刘晶晶,庞婧,赵晓丹,林昕,付敏,陈静静. 基于乳腺X线摄影及DCE-MRI机器学习模型预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗后病理完全缓解:双中心研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 60-72.
[3]	刘小文,曹永泉,侯明源,于德新. EOB-MRI多定量参数对肝胆期乏血供低信号结节进展风险的评估价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 31-39.
[4]	吴思雨,沈业隆,王锡明. 影像组学预测原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的Ki-67标记指数[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 67-72.
[5]	靳新娟,左立平,邓展昊,李安宁,于德新. MRI影像组学对135例肝癌耐药蛋白PFKFB3的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 79-86.
[6]	王磊,张帅,刘钢,由胜男,王植,朱珊,陈超,马信龙,杨强. MRI诊断140例腰椎智能网络自动检测分型MCs方法的比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 71-79.
[7]	杨咏青,赵鹏,汪玉,马文静,田迷迷,程亚旎,祖璐,林祥涛. 细胞外容积分数对62例不同病理类型肺癌的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 88-94.
[8]	靳新娟,蔡大幸,范金蕾,邓展昊,李楠,于德新,李安宁. 显微镜高分辨率MRI鉴别皮肤良、恶性局灶隆起性结节[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(12): 51-61.
[9]	赵恩举,赵硕,郭云亮,王锡明. 282例颈动脉钙化与脑小血管病MRI总负荷评分的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(1): 38-44.
[10]	陶国伟,王芳,董向毅,徐亚瑄,赵琳丽,胡蓓蓓. 子宫腺肌病的超声与MRI诊断及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 56-65.
[11]	李宏文,周子芙,王耸,霍然. 儿童面部色素痣分期切除对比一期切除的成本-效果分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 123-128.
[12]	冯宝民,王舟,徐晗,李佳存,于乔文,修建军. 抗髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白IgG抗体相关疾病临床及影像特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 45-50.
[13]	左立平,蒋丰洋,周斌彬,范金蕾,梁永锋,邓展昊,于德新. 术前MRI在预测169例肝细胞肝癌微血管侵犯及早期复发的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 89-95.
[14]	司海朋,张文灿,李乐,周鑫. Kümmell's病的危险因素和诊治研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 25-32.
[15]	刘学业,李齐明,唐弘毅,徐秋平,陈文倩,郭泾. 年轻成人颞下颌关节髁突体积、表面积与关节盘矢向位置的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 117-121.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed