您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报（医学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (3): 81-86.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.263

• • 上一篇    下一篇

宝石能谱CT与常规超声对甲状腺结节良恶性诊断价值的对照分析

李进叶1,宋歌声2,宋吉清3,王大伟2,靳先文4,张成琪2   

  1. 1.山东大学医学院, 山东 济南 250012;2. 山东大学附属千佛山医院影像科, 山东 济南 250014;3. 山东大学附属省立医院影像科, 山东 济南 250021;4. 泰山医学院放射学院, 山东 泰安 271016
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-11 出版日期:2016-03-10 发布日期:2016-03-10
  • 通讯作者: 张成琪. E-mail:chengqizhangsd@126.com E-mail:chengqizhangsd@126.com

Comparative study of gemstone spectral CT and conventional ultrasound spectroscopy for the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules

LI Jinye1, SONG Gesheng2, SONG Jiqing3, WANG Dawei2, JIN Xianwen4, ZHANG Chengqi2   

  1. 1. School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Medical Imaging, Qianfoshan Hospital Affilicated to Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
    3. Department of Medical Imaging, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affilicated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China;
    4. College of Radiology, Taishan Medical College, Taian 271016, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-03-11 Online:2016-03-10 Published:2016-03-10

PDF (PC)

207

摘要： 目的 探讨宝石能谱CT对甲状腺结节良恶性的诊断价值,并与超声结果对照。 方法 回顾性分析经病理证实的44个甲状腺结节的能谱CT和超声图像,所有患者均行颈部能谱CT平扫、动脉期扫描及超声检查,根据病理结果,分为良性组和恶性组。能谱数据采用独立样本t检验或非参数检验,超声图像采用多因素Logistic回归分析。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,得出最佳诊断阈值、敏感性和特异性。 结果 良性组23个,恶性组21个。两组碘浓度、标准化碘浓度、能谱曲线斜率均值平扫期差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),动脉期差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。平扫期诊断甲状腺恶性结节最佳碘浓度值为0.32×100 μg/mL,敏感度为100%,特异度为79.5%。超声图像中结节的形态、边界、囊变情况在良恶性结节之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),敏感度为84.2%,特异度为68.1%。 结论 能谱CT平扫对甲状腺结节良恶性诊断有一定价值,在直径≥1 cm的结节中其诊断效能优于超声。

关键词: 甲状腺结节, 超声检查, 宝石能谱CT, 鉴别诊断

Abstract: Objective To explore the value of the gemstone spectral CT imaging in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules,and compare its diagnostic value with ultrasonography. Methods Forty-four thyroid nodules were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent gemstone spectral CT scanning, arterial phase enhanced CT imaging and ultrasonography. According to the pathology results, nodules were divided into benign group and malignant group. Data of spectral CT imaging and ultrasonography were analyzed by independent sample t test or nonparametric test and multivariate Logistic regression analysis respectively. The optimal iodine concentration threshold to predict malignancy was obtained by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve, and the sensitivity and specificity were achieved. Results A total of 44 nodules were detected, including 23 benign and 21 malignant nodules. Between the two groups, there was difference of the average iodine concentration, standardized iodine concentration, and slope of spectral curve in non-contrast CT imaging(P<0.05), while there was no difference in the arterial phase(P>0.05). The optimal iodine concentration to predict malignancy was 0.32×100 μg/mL in non-enhanced phase with 100% sensitivity and 79.5%specificity. The nodules form, border, cystic situation between the two groups were statistically different in ultrasonography with multivariate logistic regression analysis(P<0.05). The sensitivity and specificity was 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)54卷3期 -李进叶,等.宝石能谱CT与常规超声对甲状腺结节良恶性诊断价值的对照分析 \=-84.2% and 68.1%, respectively. Conclusion Gemstone spectral CT imaging in non-contrast phase has potential value in diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules, and is better than that of ultrasonic in diagnosis of the nodules whose diameter great than or equal to 1 cm.

Key words: Thyroid nodule, Ultrasonography, Gemstone spectral CT, Differential diagnosis

中图分类号: 

  • R445.3
[1] Bomel SR, Lebeau SO, Ferris RL. Evaluation of a thyroid nodule[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2010, 43(2):229-238.
[2] Dong W, Zhang H, Zhang P, et al. The changing incidence f thyroid carcinomain Shenyang, China before and after universal salt iodization[J]. MedSci Monit, 2013, 19(19):49-53.
[3] Hegedus L. Clinical practice:thyroid nodule[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351(17):1764-1772.
[4] Shimura H, Haraguchi K, Hiejima Y, et al. Distinct diagnostic criteria for ultrasonographic examination of papillary thyroid carcinoma:a multicenter study[J]. Thyroid, 2005, 15(3):252-258.
[5] 李恒国,卢绍辉,梁久平,等. 甲状腺结节的CT灌注评价[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2011, 45(9):831-834. LI Hengguo, LU Shaohui, LIANG Jiuping, et al. The evaluation of perfusion CT imaging in thyroid nodule[J]. Chin J Radiol, 2011, 45(9):831-834.
[6] 李红文,刘斌,吴兴旺,等. 能谱CT诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的价值[J].中华放射学杂志, 2014, 48(2):100-104. LI Hongwen, LIU Bin, WU Xingwang, et al. Investigation on the value of spectral CT imaging in diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules[J]. Chin J Radiol, 2014, 48(2):100-104.
[7] Lv P, Lin XZ, Chen K, et al. Spectral CT in patients with small HCC:investigation of image quality and diagnostic accuracy [J]. Eur Radiol, 2012, 22(10):2117-2124.
[8] Li HW, Wu XW, Liu B, et al. Clinical values of gemstone spectral CT in diagnosing thyroid disease[J]. J Xray Sci Technol, 2015, 23(1):45-56.
[9] Feine U, Lietzenmayer R, Hanke JP, et a1. Fluorin-18-FDG and iodine-131-iodide uptake in thyroid cancer[J]. J Nucl Med, 1996, 37(9):1468-1472.
[10] 沙炎,杨天锡,陈彤箴,等.甲状腺髓样癌的CT表现及病理基础[J].中华放射学杂志, 2002, 36(10):928-930. SHA Yan, YANG Tianxi, CHEN Tongzhen, et al. Medullary thyroid carcinoma:evaluation of CT and pathologic fingings[J]. Chin J Radiol, 2002, 36(10):928-930.
[11] 倪鸣飞,王丽君,董越,等.能谱CT成像鉴别诊断良恶性甲状腺结节[J].中国医学影像技术, 2012, 28(9):1642-1645. NI Mingfei, WANG Lijun, DONG Yue, et al. Spectral CT imaging in differential diagnosis of benign and maligant thyroid nodules[J]. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2012, 28(9):1642-1645.
[12] Mai KT, Landry DC, Thomas J, et al. Follicular adenoma with papillary architecture:a lesion mimicking papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Histopathology, 2011, 39(1):25-32.
[13] Li M, Zheng X, Li J, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography imaging of thyroid nodule specimens comparison with pathologic findings[J]. Invest Radiol, 2012, 41(1):58-64.
[14] 黄崑,刘艳君,赵一,等.量化评分鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的价值[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2014, 11(10):836-839. HUANG Kun, LIU Yanjun, ZHAO Yi, et al. The value of quantitive scoring method in differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules[J]. Chin J Med Ultrasound(Electronic Edition), 2014, 11(10):836-839.
[15] 范雪,姚兰辉.甲状腺结节的超声诊断新进展[J].医学综述, 2014, 20(11):2041-2044. FAN Xue, YAO Lanhui. Application progress of new utrasonic diagnosis of thyroid nodule[J]. Medical Recapitulate, 2014, 20(11):2041-2044.
[1] 徐平 于国放 李霞. 不同类型甲状腺上动脉PSV对Graves病与桥本氏甲状腺炎鉴别诊断的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 62-64.
[2] 魏旭鹏,常成,赵秀鹤. 模拟多系统萎缩的抗Homer3抗体相关自身免疫性小脑共济失调1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 95-100.
[3] 张鑫茹,李扬,孙萌,聂玮,马喆. Vision-LSTM模型在甲状腺影像报告与数据系统4b类甲状腺结节超声影像诊断中的应用与评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 68-74.
[4] 孙婧,杨瑞敏,王聪,张月,罗兵. 基于术前超声、炎症指标及超声影像组学联合模型预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 73-80.
[5] 宋艳艳,左淑英. 透明细胞肾细胞癌颌下腺转移1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(7): 120-124.
[6] 杨文欣,刘英姣,高雅,杨安逸,周恒宇,高俊茶. 以急性胰腺炎为首发表现的急性髓系白血病1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 109-117.
[7] 靳新娟,蔡大幸,范金蕾,邓展昊,李楠,于德新,李安宁. 显微镜高分辨率MRI鉴别皮肤良、恶性局灶隆起性结节[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(12): 51-61.
[8] 杨粒芝,孙霄,商蒙蒙,郭鲁,时丹丹,李杰. 基于中国版甲状腺影像报告与数据系统的甲状腺结节恶性风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 64-69.
[9] 查菁,郭婧,左秀丽. 少见类型肠梗阻病因病例报告1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 130-132.
[10] 李祥泽,王先明,宋歌声,崔晶,孙凯,王皓晨,王天成,韩绍奇,田虎. 合并乙肝肝硬化的肝上皮样血管内皮瘤1例报道并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(11): 89-95.
[11] 刘燕,曹广磊,陈丽. 超声引导下细针穿刺和BRAFV600E分子检测在甲状腺癌诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(10): 57-61.
[12] 陆梓文,李光兵,郑顺贞,杨洋,刘军. 肝脏胆管腺纤维瘤1例报道[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 120-122.
[13] 商蒙蒙,张岩,程琳,孙霄,时丹丹,闵香,李杰. 弹性应变率比值法与声触诊组织量化技术对乳腺肿块的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(6): 94-99.
[14] 毛羽,周昕. 超声检查对小儿十二指肠梗阻性疾病的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(2): 47-50.
[15] 刘朝娣,邓凯,靳先文,宋歌声,张成琪. 能谱CT对卵巢原发良恶性肿瘤的鉴别[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2017, 55(12): 43-50.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发