您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (5): 61-66.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2026.0013

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

子宫下段收缩不良导致的产后出血的危险因素及早期干预

刘惠君1,吴兆婷2,王玉立1,徐明阳3,刘霄1,康燕2,王红梅1   

  1. 1.山东第一医科大学附属省立医院产科, 山东 济南 250021;2.青岛大学附属山东省妇幼保健院产科, 山东 济南 250014;3.山东大学齐鲁医学院, 山东 济南 250012
  • 发布日期:2026-05-13
  • 通讯作者: 王红梅. E-mail:whmeisd@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    济南市临床医学科技创新计划项目(202225045)

Risk factors and early intervention for postpartum hemorrhage caused by lower uterine segment atony

LIU Huijun1, WU Zhaoting2, WANG Yuli1, XU Mingyang3, LIU Xiao1, KANG Yan2, WANG Hongmei1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Obstetrics, Shandong Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
    3. Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Published:2026-05-13

PDF (PC)

4

摘要： 目的 探讨阴道分娩后子宫下段收缩不良导致产后出血的发生率、高危因素及早期识别对改善产后不良结局的影响。 方法 回顾性分析2020年7月至2025年6月两家三级围产中心足月单胎阴道分娩产妇(n=42 253)的临床资料,提取产后出血产妇(n=1 408)的产科特征,比较每年严重产后出血组(≥1 000 mL,n=428)和轻度产后出血组(500~1 000 mL,n=980)子宫下段收缩不良导致的产后出血的发生率,采用二元logistic回归分析子宫下段收缩不良导致的产后出血的高危因素,并比较其早期识别和干预(胎盘娩出后30 min内,早期干预组,n=214)、晚期识别和干预(胎盘娩出后30 min后,晚期干预组,n=53)对于产后出血量、开腹手术率的影响。 结果 子宫下段收缩不良导致的产后出血267例,占产后出血的18.96%。严重产后出血组子宫下段收缩不良导致的产后出血发生率(24.53%)显著高于轻度产后出血组(16.53%)(P<0.001)。二元logistic回归分析显示,年龄增大(5岁)(OR=1.245, 95%CI:1.040~1.491)、瘢痕子宫(OR=18.760, 95%CI:2.155~163.282)、巨大胎儿(OR=1.801, 95%CI:1.031~3.146)和低置胎盘(OR=5.426, 95%CI:1.796~16.389)是子宫下段收缩不良导致的产后出血的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。早期干预组的红细胞输注率(19.16% vs. 39.62%)、开腹手术率(0% vs. 5.66%)和出血量≥2 000 mL发生率(1.87% vs. 13.21%)均显著低于晚期干预组(P<0.05),晚期干预组中1例子宫切除后死亡。 结论 阴道分娩后的产后出血约1/5源于子宫下段收缩不良,年龄、瘢痕子宫、巨大胎儿及低置胎盘是其高危因素,早期识别并针对性干预可显著降低不良结局风险。

关键词: 产后出血, 子宫下段收缩不良, 高危因素, 早期干预

Abstract: Objective To investigate the incidence, risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage caused by lower segment atony(PPH-LSA)after vaginal delivery and the impact of its early identification and intervention on improving adverse postpartum outcomes. Methods Clinical data of all consecutive term singleton vaginal deliveries in two tertiary perinatal centers from July 2020 to June 2025(n=42,253)were retrospectively analyzed. Obstetric characteristics of women with postpartum hemorrhage(PPH, n=1,408)were extracted. The incidence of PPH-LSA was compared between the severe PPH group(≥1,000 mL, n=428)and the mild PPH group(500-1,000 mL, n=980). Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for PPH-LSA. The effects of early intervention(within 30 minutes after placental delivery, n=214)versus late intervention(after 30 minutes after placental delivery, n=53)on postpartum blood loss volume and laparotomy rate were further evaluated. Results A total of 42,253 term singleton vaginal deliveries were included, among whom 1,408 women(3.33%)were diagnosed with PPH. Of these, 267 cases(18.96%)were classified as PPH-LSA. The incidence of PPH-LSA in the severe PPH group(24.53%)was significantly higher than that in the mild PPH group(16.53%)(P<0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age(per 5-year increment)(OR=1.245, 95%CI: 1.040-1.491), uterine scar(OR=18.760, 95%CI: 2.155-163.282), macrosomia(OR=1.801, 95%CI: 1.031-3.146), and low-lying placenta(OR=5.426, 95%CI: 1.796-16.389)were independent risk factors for PPH-LSA(P<0.05). Compared with the late intervention group, the early intervention group had significantly lower rates of red blood cell transfusion(19.16% vs. 39.62%), laparotomy(0% vs. 5.66%), and severe blood loss(≥2,000 mL, 1.87% vs. 13.21%)(P<0.05). One case of hysterectomy followed by maternal death occurred in the late intervention group. Conclusion Approximately one-fifth of PPH cases after vaginal delivery are attributed to PPH-LSA. Advanced age, uterine scar, macrosomia, and low-lying placenta are independent risk factors for this condition. Early identification and targeted intervention can significantly reduce the risk of severe adverse maternal outcomes.

Key words: Postpartum hemorrhage, Lower segment atony, Risk factors, Early intervention

中图分类号: 

  • R714
[1] Cresswell JA, Alexander M, Chong MYC, et al. Global and regional causes of maternal deaths 2009-20: a WHO systematic analysis[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2025, 13(4): 626-634.
[2] 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组, 中华医学会围产医学分会.产后出血预防与处理指南(2023)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2023, 58(6): 401-409.
[3] Widmer M, Piaggio G, Hofmeyr GJ, et al. Maternal characteristics and causes associated with refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a secondary analysis of the WHO CHAMPION trial data[J]. BJOG, 2020, 127(5): 628-634.
[4] Habek D, Marton I, Prka M, et al. Transvaginally surgical treatment of early postpartum hemorrhage caused by lower uterine segment atony[J]. Perinat Med, 2022, 50(7): 933-938.
[5] Panda B, Laifer S, Stiller R, et al. Primary atony of the lower uterine segment as a distinct cause of early postpartum haemorrhage: a case series and management recommendations[J]. Obstet Gynaecol, 2009, 29(7): 628-632.
[6] Zhang Q, Li T, Xu Y, et al. The new clinical application of bilateral-contralateral cervix clamp in postpartum hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2021, 21(1): 53. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03518-2
[7] Liu X, Kang Y, Cao NN, et al. Early identification and conservative treatment of postpartum hemorrhage in the lower uterine segment after vaginal delivery[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2024, 37(1): 2386081. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2386081
[8] 孔北华, 马丁, 段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 10版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2024: 198-202.
[9] Bohren MA, Miller S, Mammoliti KM, et al. Early detection and a treatment bundle strategy for postpartum haemorrhage: a mixed-methods process evaluation[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2025, 13(2): 329-344.
[10] 刘会, 任茁, 杨红, 等. 宫颈缝合、穹隆填塞联合宫腔球囊和水囊放置术治疗前置胎盘产后出血[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2022, 22(3): 265-268. LIU Hui, REN Zhuo, YANG Hong, et al. Cervical suture and vaginal fornix yarn filling combined with uterine balloon and water sac placement in the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage with placenta previa[J]. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2022, 22(3): 265-268.
[11] Kwak JW, Cho SB, Sung DJ, et al. Effectiveness of transarterial embolisation for intractable postpartum haemorrhage in a disseminated intravascular coagulation state, despite emergency hysterectomy[J]. Clin Radiol, 2023, 78(1): 55-60.
[12] 王西, 张龙华, 陈瑜. 爱佑球囊联合改良 B-Lynch缝合术治疗难治性产后出血的临床观察[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志, 2023, 17(6): 692-695. WANG Xi, ZHANG Longhua, CHEN Yu. Clinical observation of Aiyou balloon combined with modified B-Lynch suture in the treatment of intractable postpartum hemorrhage[J]. Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery, 2023, 17(6): 692-695.
[13] 付颖睿, 马悦, 郭松, 等. 子宫B-Lynch缝合术后并发子宫坏死2例[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59(5): 113-115.
[14] Luo L, Wan J, Chen X, et al. Uterine necrosis, infection, and subinvolution: complications observed after combined application of modified B-Lynch suture and vascular ligation[J]. J Int Med Res, 2021, 49(5): 3000605211010730. doi: 10.1177/03000605211010730
[15] Zhang XQ, Chen XT, Zhang YT, et al. The emergent pelvic artery embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2021, 76(4): 234-244.
[16] Gallos I, Devall A, Martin J, et al. Randomized trial of early detection and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 389(1):11-21.
[17] World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on the assessment of postpartum blood loss and use of a treatment bundle for postpartum haemorrhage[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2023.
[18] Suarez S, Conde-Agudelo A, Borovac-Pinheiro A, et al. Uterine balloon tamponade for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 222(4): 293. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1287
[19] Diaz V, Abalos E, Carroli G. Methods for blood loss estimation after vaginal birth[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 9(9): CD010980. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010980.pub2
[20] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Quantitative blood loss in obstetric hemorrhage: ACOG committee opinion No.794[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 134(6): 150-156.
[21] 中华医学会围产医学分会, 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 高龄妇女孕期管理专家共识[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2024, 27(6): 441-449.
[22] Boujenah J, Belabbas M, Tigaizin A, et al. A history of cesarean birth as a risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage even after successful planned vaginal birth[J]. Birth, 2025, 52(2):337-346.
[23] Davey MA, Flood M, Pollock W, et al. Risk factors for severe postpartum haemorrhage: a population-based retrospective cohort study[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2020, 60(4): 522-532.
[24] Bevilacqua E, Shainker SA, Modest AM, et al. Postpartum hemorrhage in patients with a low-lying placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2025, 146(6): 830-841
[25] Hu H, Wang L, Gao J, et al. Risk factors of severe postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant women with placenta previa or low-lying placenta: a retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2024, 24(1): 674.
[26] 张国华, 沈雪艳, 崔文华. 继发性子宫收缩乏力出血病因查找、联合处置及弥散性血管内凝血防控[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2022, 38(2): 161-164. ZHANG Guohua, SHEN Xueyan, CUI Wenhua. Cause of secondary uterine contraction hemorrhage, joint treatment and DIC prevention and control[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 38(2):161-164.
[27] Escobar MF, Nassar AH, Theron G, et al. FIGO Safe Motherhood and Newborn Health Committee. FIGO recommendations on the management of postpartum hemorrhage 2022[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2022, 157(Suppl1): 3-50.
[28] Williams EV, Goranitis I, Oppong R, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of early detection and bundled treatment of postpartum hemorrhage alongside the E-MOTIVE trial[J]. Nat Med, 2024, 30(8): 2343-2348.
[29] Yoshimura S, Iwagoi Y, Saito F, et al. Early detection of intractable postpartum hemorrhage[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1): 11409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96114-3
[1] 张红媛,顾永忠,侯哲. 产科47例子宫切除的临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 96-100.
[2] 慈倩倩,武胜英,万秋花,马运荣,赵建文,张健. 10 265例高龄孕妇的产前筛查与诊断方法分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(1): 51-57.
[3] 付颖睿,马悦,郭松,吕洪涛,张国翔,荣风年. 子宫B-Lynch缝合术后并发子宫坏死2例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(5): 113-115.
[4] 田宁,陈奕,韩文莉,张晓峰. 盆腔动脉栓塞术治疗产后出血的临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(12): 86-91.
[5] 曾海燕,李睿,孙新东,谢鹏,孟雪,范秉杰,李万龙,袁双虎. 局限期小细胞肺癌患者预防性脑照射后脑转移的关联分析:双中心研究[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(7): 61-66.
[6] 王耸,程洪斌,伊龙,王培申,孙宪昶,安沂华. 1 060例脑性瘫痪患者MRI表现及其与临床特征的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2017, 55(12): 36-42.
[7] 左常婷, 连岩. 凶险性前置胎盘诊治现状[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(9): 1-6.
[8] 黄安翠, 田维云. 子宫背带式缝合术在剖宫产产后出血中的应用探讨[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(S1): 43-44.
[9] 谭林,李莎莎,高学武. 抗病毒联合糖皮质激素和血浆置换早期干预肝衰竭倾向乙肝患者观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(3): 90-92.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发