您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (9): 7-9.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.546

• • 上一篇    下一篇

MRI在凶险性前置胎盘诊断中的价值

王光彬   

  1. 山东省医学影像学研究所磁共振研究室, 山东 济南 250021
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-16 出版日期:2016-09-10 发布日期:2016-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 王光彬. E-mail:cjr.wangguangbin@vip.163.com E-mail:cjr.wangguangbin@vip.163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81371534);山东省科技发展计划(2014GGB14176)

Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pernicious placenta previa

WANG Guangbin   

  1. Department of Radiology, Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-05-16 Online:2016-09-10 Published:2016-09-10

摘要: 产前诊断凶险性前置胎盘的关键是明确是否伴有胎盘植入。胎盘植入是指妊娠进展的过程中,当子宫蜕膜发育不良而绒毛外滋养细胞未停止侵入,胎盘绒毛直接附着到子宫肌层或深入到子宫肌层甚至达到或穿透浆膜层。磁共振成像(MRI)具有较高的空间分辨率和组织分辨率,可准确识别有无胎盘植入并评估植入深度、部位及范围,也已成为产前评估胎盘植入的重要补充方法。

关键词: 胎盘植入, 磁共振成像, 凶险性前置胎盘

Abstract: Confirmation of pernicious placenta previa with or without placental accreta is crucial for the prenatal diagnosis. Placental accreta will occur when deficient development of the decidua results in abnormal attachment of the placenta to myometrium without invasion of the muscle, invasion into the deep myometrium, or even accreta through the myometrium and uterine serosa. High spatial and tissue resolution ratio of MRI can accurately identify whether placental accreta occurs and evaluate the depth, size and range of accreta. Above all, MRI has been a vital complementary technique in the evaluation of placental accreta.

Key words: Placental accreta, Pernicious placenta previa, Magnetic resonance imaging

中图分类号: 

  • R445.5
[1] Chattopadhyay SK, Kharif H, Sherbeeni MM. Placenta praevia and accreta after previous caesarean section[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1993, 52(3):151-156.
[2] Silver RM, Fox KA, Barton JR, et al. Center of excellence for placenta accrete[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212(5):561-568.
[3] Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107(6):1226-1232.
[4] Aitken K, Allen L, Pantazi S, et al. MRI significantly improves disease staging to direct surgical planning for abnormal invasive placentation:a single centre experience[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2016, 38(3):246-251.
[5] D'Antonio F, Iacovella C, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, et al. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging:systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 44(1):8-16.
[6] Masselli G, Brunelli R, Casciani E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of placental adhesive disorders:correlation with color Doppler ultrasound[J]. Eur Radiol, 2008, 18(6):1292-1299.
[7] Palacios Jaraquemada JM, Bruno CH. Magnetic resonance imaging in 300 cases of placenta accreta:surgical correlation of new findings[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2005, 84(8):716-724.
[8] Algebally AM, Yousef RR, Badr SS, et al. The value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnostics and prediction of morbidity in cases of placenta previa with abnormal placentation[J]. Pol J Radiol, 2014, 79:409-416.
[9] 刘炳光, 曹满瑞, 张方璟, 等. 比较快速自旋回波序列和平衡式快速场回波序列对胎盘植入征象的显示效能[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2013, 29(2):302-305.
[10] Allen BC, Leyendecker JR. Placental evaluation with magnetic resonance[J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2013, 51(6):955-966.
[11] Marcos HB, Semelka RC, Worawattanakul S. Normal placenta:gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 1997, 205(2):493-496.
[12] Tanaka YO, Sohda S, Shigemitsu S, et al. High temporal resolution dynamic contrast MRI in a high risk group for placenta accrete[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2001, 19(5):635-642.
[13] Morita S, Ueno E, Fujimura M, et al. Feasibility of diffusion-weighted MRI for defining placental invasion[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009, 30(3):666-671.
[14] Meng X, Xie L. Comparing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for placenta accreta:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2013, 39(11):1958-1965.
[15] Kumar I, Verma A, Ojha R, et al. Invasive placental disorders:a prospective US and MRI comparative analysis[J]. Acta Radiol, 2016, pii:0284185116638567.[Epub ahead of print].
[16] Masselli G, Gualdi G. MR imaging of the placenta:what a radiologist should know[J]. Abdom Imaging, 2013, 38(3):573-587.
[17] Baughman WC, Corteville JE, Shah RR. Placenta accreta:spectrum of US and MR imaging findings[J]. Radiographics, 2008, 28(7):1905-1916.
[18] Leyendecker JR, Dubose M, Hosseinzadeh K, et al. MRI of pregnancy-related issues:abnormal placentation[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2012, 198(2):311-320.
[19] Ueno Y, Kitajima K, Kawakami F, et al. Novel MRI finding for diagnosis of invasive placenta praevia: evaluation of findings for 65 patients using clinical and histopathological correlations[J]. Eur Radiol, 2014, 24(4):881-888.
[20] Bour L, Plac PV, Bendavid S, et al. Suspected invasive placenta:evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Eur Radiol, 2014, 24(12):3150-3160.
[21] Ueno Y, Maeda T, Tanaka U, et al. Evaluation of interobserver variability and diagnostic performance of developed MRI-based radiological scoring system for invasive placenta previa[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 21. doi:10.1002/jmri.25184.[Epub ahead of print].
[22] Rahaim NS, Whitby EH. The MRI features of placental adhesion disorder and their diagnostic significance:systematic review[J]. Clin Radiol, 2015, 70(9):917-925.
[23] Mar WA, Berggruen S, Atueyi U, et al. Ultrasound imaging of placenta accreta with MR correlation[J]. Ultrasound Q, 2015, 31(1):23-33.
[24] 陈欣, 单瑞芹, 王光彬, 等. 穿透性胎盘植入的MRI表现[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2015, 49(11):833-837. CHEN Xin, SHAN Ruiqin, WANG Guangbin, et al. MRI features of placenta percreta[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiology, 2015, 49(11):833-837.
[1] 金晨曦,沈薇,李娜,孙建锋,杨驰,郭泾. ADDWoR关节镜下盘复位术盘-髁运动的定量分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 54-61.
[2] 刘晶晶,庞婧,赵晓丹,林昕,付敏,陈静静. 基于乳腺X线摄影及DCE-MRI机器学习模型预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗后病理完全缓解:双中心研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 60-72.
[3] 刘小文,曹永泉,侯明源,于德新. EOB-MRI多定量参数对肝胆期乏血供低信号结节进展风险的评估价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 31-39.
[4] 吴思雨,沈业隆,王锡明. 影像组学预测原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的Ki-67标记指数[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(11): 67-72.
[5] 张红媛,顾永忠,侯哲. 产科47例子宫切除的临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 96-100.
[6] 靳新娟,左立平,邓展昊,李安宁,于德新. MRI影像组学对135例肝癌耐药蛋白PFKFB3的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 79-86.
[7] 王磊,张帅,刘钢,由胜男,王植,朱珊,陈超,马信龙,杨强. MRI诊断140例腰椎智能网络自动检测分型MCs方法的比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 71-79.
[8] 杨咏青,赵鹏,汪玉,马文静,田迷迷,程亚旎,祖璐,林祥涛. 细胞外容积分数对62例不同病理类型肺癌的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 88-94.
[9] 靳新娟,蔡大幸,范金蕾,邓展昊,李楠,于德新,李安宁. 显微镜高分辨率MRI鉴别皮肤良、恶性局灶隆起性结节[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(12): 51-61.
[10] 赵恩举,赵硕,郭云亮,王锡明. 282例颈动脉钙化与脑小血管病MRI总负荷评分的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(1): 38-44.
[11] 陶国伟,王芳,董向毅,徐亚瑄,赵琳丽,胡蓓蓓. 子宫腺肌病的超声与MRI诊断及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 56-65.
[12] 冯宝民,王舟,徐晗,李佳存,于乔文,修建军. 抗髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白IgG抗体相关疾病临床及影像特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 45-50.
[13] 左立平,蒋丰洋,周斌彬,范金蕾,梁永锋,邓展昊,于德新. 术前MRI在预测169例肝细胞肝癌微血管侵犯及早期复发的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 89-95.
[14] 刘学业,李齐明,唐弘毅,徐秋平,陈文倩,郭泾. 年轻成人颞下颌关节髁突体积、表面积与关节盘矢向位置的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 117-121.
[15] 张高瑞,张玉婷,赵雨萱,王方青,于德新. MnFe2O4@CNS纳米探针在胰腺癌诊疗一体化中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 48-55.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!