您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报（医学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 62-68.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2014.029

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

环肺静脉电隔离术的不同消融终点对房颤患者预后的影响

李曼, 钟敬泉, 岳欣, 朱清, 郑兆通, 荣冰, 衣少雷, 谢飞, 张运   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院心内科, 山东 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-12 修回日期:2015-01-23 出版日期:2015-03-10 发布日期:2015-03-10
  • 通讯作者: 钟敬泉, E-mail:gilman_zhong@hotmail.com E-mail:gilman_zhong@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81270238);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(博士生导师类, 20130131110065);山东省科技发展计划(2012G0021850)

Effect of different circumferential pulmonary vein ablation endpoints on prognosis of atrial fibrillation patients:bidirectional block between pulmonary veins and left atrium

LI Man, ZHONG Jingquan, YUE Xin, ZHU Qing, ZHENG Zhaotong, RONG Bing, YI Shaolei, XIE Fei, ZHANG Yun   

  1. Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Received:2014-01-12 Revised:2015-01-23 Online:2015-03-10 Published:2015-03-10

PDF (PC)

186

摘要： 目的 探讨环肺静脉(PVs)射频消融术的不同消融终点是否影响房颤(AF)患者的术后复发。方法 选取137例伴有症状的AF患者(113例阵发性AF及24例持续性AF), 经环PVs射频消融术实现PVs与左心房(LA)双向传导阻滞。术后均观察30 min, 110例AF患者(92例阵发性AF及18例持续性AF)消融成功。根据不同消融终点, 将92例阵发性AF患者分为两组:肺静脉电位消失组包括36例患者, 肺静脉电位(PVPs)均消失;肺静脉电位延迟组包括56例患者, 任一PVPs未消失, 延迟时间大于30 ms。结果 经过2年随访, 肺静脉电位消失与延迟两组AF患者的复发情况无统计学差异(P=0.159)。结论 与PVPs完全消失相比较, 双向阻滞对阵发性房颤患者的生活质量及复发情况无明显影响。

关键词: 消融, 双向阻滞, 房颤, 肺静脉, 心房

Abstract: Objective To study the effect of different endpoints of ablation on the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Methods A total of 137 patients with symptomatic AF (113 paroxysmal AF and 24 persistent AF) underwent 3D mapping. Radiofrequency energy was released in one encircling line to the endpoint of bidirectional conduction block between the pulmonary veins (PVs) and the left atrium (LA). After the postoperative observation with 30 minutes, isolation was successful in 110 AF patients (92 paroxysmal AF and 18 persistent AF). The 92 paroxysmal AF patients were divided into two groups:one group included 36 patients in which all PVPs disappeared, and the other group included 56 patients in which at least one of pulmonary vein potentials (PVPs) delayed by more than 30 ms. Results During two years follow-up, the recurrence of paroxysmal AF had no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.159). Conclusion Bidirectional block has no obvious effect on the living quality and recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients compared with those in which PVPs disappeared.

Key words: Atrial fibrillation, Bidirectional block, Ablation, Pulmonary veins, Atrium

中图分类号: 

  • R541.7
[1] Quyang F, Bänsch D, Ernst S, et al. Complete isolation of left atrium:surrounding the pulmonary veins:new insights from the Double-Lasso technique in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation[J]. Circulation, 2004, 110(15):2090-2096.
[2] Oral H, Scharf C, Chugh A, et al. Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation:segmental pulmonary vein ostial ablation versus left atrial ablation[J]. Circulation, 2003, 108(19):2355-2360.
[3] Emst S, Ouyang F, Löber F, et al. Catheter-induced linear lesions in the left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003, 42(7):1271-1282.
[4] Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, et al. Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation[J]. Circulation, 2005, 111(9):1100-1105.
[5] Chen S, Meng W, Sheng He D, et al. Blocking the pulmonary vein to left atrium conduction in addition to the entrance block enhances clinical efficacy in atrial fibrillation ablation[J]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2012, 35(5):524-531.
[6] De Bortoli A, Sun LZ, Solheim E, et al. Ablation effect indicated by impedance fall is correlated with contact force level during ablation for atrial fibrillation[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2013, 24(11):1210-1215.
[7] 刘少稳, 杨延宗.射频导管消融肺静脉电隔离过程中残存静脉电位的鉴别诊断[J].中华心律失常学杂志, 2005, 9(3):197-203. LIU Shaowen, YANG Yanzong. The differential diagnosis of remaining venous potentials after radiofrequency catheter ablation[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias, 2005, 9(3):197-203.
[8] Dong J, Liu X, Long D, et al. Single-catheter technique for pulmonary vein antrum isolation:is it sufficient to identify and close the residual gaps without a circular mapping catheter?[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2009, 20(3):273-279.
[9] Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation[J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2010, 3(1):32-38.
[10] Wylie JV Jr, Peters DC, Essebag V, et al. Left atrial function and scar after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2008, 5(5):656-662.
[11] Verma A, Kilicaslan F, Pisano E, et al. Response of atrial fibrillation to pulmonary vein antrum isolation is directly related to resumption and delay of pulmonary vein conduction[J]. Circulation, 2005, 112(5):627-635.
[12] Gerstenfeld EP, Callans DJ, Dixit S, et al. Incidence and location of focal atrial fibrillation triggers in patients undergoing repeat pulmonary vein isolation:implications for ablation strategies[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2003, 14(7):685-690.
[13] Callans DJ, Gerstenfeld EP, Dixit S, et al. Efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedures in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2004, 15(9):1050-1055.
[14] Kurotobi T, Ito H, Inoue K, et al. Marshall vein as arrhythmogenic source in patients with atrial fibrillation:correlation between its anatomy and electrophysiological findings[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2006, 17(10):1062-1067.
[15] Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins[J]. N Engl J Med, 1998, 339(10):659-666.
[16] Katritsis DG, Ellenbogen KA. Is isolation of all four pulmonary veins necessary in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?[J]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2004, 27(7):938-940.
[17] Off MK, Solheim E, Hoff PL, et al. Atrio-pulmonary vein conduction delay during pulmonary isolation for atrial fibrillation is related to vein anatomy, age, and focal activity[J]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2009, 32(Suppl 1):S207-210.
[18] Kumagai K, Naito S, Nakamura K, et al. ATP-induced dormant pulmonary veins originating from the carina region after circuferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2010, 21 (5):494-500.
[1] 王宁宁,曲琳莉,曹芳丽,梁磊. CT矢状位重建在膈顶部肝肿瘤微波消融治疗中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(8): 71-75.
[2] 杜福田,杜云龙,林洪峰. 部分脾栓塞联合腹腔镜下射频消融术治疗门脉高压性脾功能亢进的临床研究[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(7): 79-83.
[3] 魏金秋,张玉娇,李展,王曦敏,陈琳琳,杜娟娟,张勇,解新星,侯应龙. GCH1通过BH4通路对快速心房起搏犬自主神经重构的影响[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(5): 8-12.
[4] 张凯, 梁飞, 韩波, 马晓春, 朱小龙, 张军, 张涛, 邹承伟. 同期射频消融改良迷宫Ⅲ术+心脏神经节丛消融术与单纯射频消融改良迷宫Ⅲ术治疗合并风湿性二尖瓣病变的心房颤动比较[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(5): 66-70.
[5] 张风雷, 郑曼, 张琦, 顾磊, 徐新生. 代谢综合征与P波离散度关系的探讨[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(2): 52-55.
[6] 吕岩红, 高海青, 邱洁. 达比加群酯预防非瓣膜性房颤患者血栓栓塞的有效性和安全性[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(11): 37-40.
[7] 张伶俐, 周莹, 李小荷, 李慧, 钟明, 张薇. 中国房颤人群心肌组织中MMPs与TIMPs的mRNA表达水平的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(1): 47-53.
[8] 李丛, 王建春, 赵勇, 邹承伟, 孙慧, 张庆. 瓣膜病患者钙调神经磷酸酶-活化T细胞核因子通路与心房纤颤的关系[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(8): 47-51.
[9] 韩波1，2，王建春2，张涛2，朱小龙2，李丛2，王正军2，赵勇2，邹承伟2. 风湿性心房颤动患者左心房组织中钙蛋白酶-2的表达[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(4): 93-96.
[10] 刘晓军，钟敬泉，衣少雷，徐振兴，李曼，张运. 两种非经典部位起源的室性心动过速/室性早搏的心电图特点和射频消融治疗[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(4): 42-46.
[11] 程显峰,梁飞,张骞,朱小龙,张海洲,张涛,韩波,邹承伟. 同期射频消融改良迷宫Ⅲ术+心脏神经节丛消融治疗心房颤动[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(2): 53-56.
[12] 郑少华1，张玉娇1，李志远2，侯绪娟3，王曦敏1，段文昌4，侯应龙1. 持续性快速右心房起搏犬肺静脉-左心房连接处自主神经重构的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(12): 7-10.
[13] 付开丽1，张学义2，朱萌3，王志浩1，王华1，钟明1，张运1，张薇1. 不同病因心房颤动患者卒中危险的评估[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(06): 61-63.
[14] 孙雪林1,2，卜培莉1，刘军妮1，曹广庆3，李丽4，于琼4. 心房颤动患者心房组织SIRT1表达与心房纤维化的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(9): 68-72.
[15] 胡科，陈良华，宋尚明，刘同宝. 主动脉窦造影及局部电生理特点的临床应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(7): 92-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发