您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 103-.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

轻度认知功能障碍患者海马区的磁共振弥散张量成像分析

赵强,康永军,王新怡,杨志强   

  1. 山东大学附属千佛山医院影像科,济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2011-08-03 出版日期:2012-03-10 发布日期:2012-03-10
  • 通讯作者: 王新怡(1960- ),女,教授,主要从事影像诊断研究。E-mail: wxy-88@163.com
  • 作者简介:赵强(1987- ),男,硕士研究生,主要从事影像诊断研究
  • 基金资助:

    山东省科技攻关项目(2009GG10002024);山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2009CL021)

A magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging analysis of
 the hippocampus in patients with mild cognitive impairment

ZHAO Qiang, KANG Yong-jun, WANG Xin-yi, YANG Zhi-qiang   

  1. Department of Imaging, Qianfoshan Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan  250014, China
  • Received:2011-08-03 Online:2012-03-10 Published:2012-03-10

摘要:

目的   探讨轻度认知功能障碍(MCI)患者与认知功能正常的老年人海马的平均弥散系数(ADC)及部分各向异性(FA)值的差异,评估海马磁共振弥散张量成像(MR-DTI)在MCI患者诊断中的应用价值。方法   采用MRDTI对18例MCI患者(MCI组)和18例性别、年龄、文化程度匹配的对照组(NC组)DTI参数进行分析,比较两组间海马ADC和FA值的差别,并将MCI患者的简易智能精神状态量表(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、日常生活能力量表(ADL)评分与其海马ADC、FA各自进行相关性分析。结果   MCI组与NC组比较:①双侧海马总ADC值及左侧海马ADC值明显增高(P<0.01),右侧海马ADC值略增高,差异不明显(P>0.05),左、右侧及双侧海马FA值无统计学差异(P>0.05);② MMSE、MoCA评分明显降低,ADL评分明显增高(P<0.01);③MMSE评分与左侧及双侧海马总ADC值呈明显负相关(P<0.01),MMSE评分与FA值及右侧海马ADC值无相关性(P>0.05),MoCA和ADL评分与ADC、FA值均无明显相关性(P>0.05)。结论   磁共振弥散张量成像对轻度认知功能障碍患者有一定的诊断价值。

关键词: 磁共振成像; 弥散张量成像; 轻度认知功能障碍;海马

Abstract:

Objective   To investigate the difference of average diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) in the hippocampus (HP) of aged groups that have mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and that have normal cognition, and to evaluate the applicability of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (MR-DTI) in MCI diagnosis. Methods   We selected a total of 18 MCI patients (MCI Group) and 18 individuals with normal cognition (NC Group), the two groups being matched by gender, age and education. A comparison was done for the two groups in ADC and FA in the HP. A possible correlation between the ADC and FA values of the MCI patients and their Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores was examined. Results   Compared with the NC Group, the MCI Group exhibited significantly high ADC for the left HP and the total bilateral HP(P<0.01), whereas the two groups were not significantly different in the right HP(P>0.05). With FA,the two groups were not significantly different in the left, right and total bilateral HP (P>0.05). The MCI Group had lower MMSE and MoCA scores, but higher ADL scores than the NC Group (P<0.01). In addition, MMSE showed a negative correlation with ADC of the left HP and total bilateral HP (P<0.01), but had no significant correlation with either FA or ADC of the right HP (P>0.05) . Furthermore, MoCA and ADL did not have significant correlation with either ADC or FA (P>0.05). Conclusion   MR-DTI is a helpful tool in MCI diagnosis.

Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion tensor imaging; Mild cognitive impairment; Hippocampus

中图分类号: 

  • R445.2
[1] 齐萌1,王颖2,陈绍明3,王一兵2,叶颖2,吴文浩2. 膝关节骨关节炎患者与健康成年人股骨髁间窝宽度、高度的MR测量及比较[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(06): 103-105.
[2] 李旭,秦东京,曹新山,姜兴岳,张迪,王静. 无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤DTI征象与JOA评分的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(1): 83-87.
[3] 王丽娟1,2,王光彬2,刘玉波3,耿明宾4,胡建滨1,白雪1,赵连新1. 脑干梗死的一种特殊MR征象分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(5): 111-.
[4] 张晓明,马祥兴,于德新,孟祥水,李传福. 3.0T磁共振动态增强扫描在直肠病变的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(4): 118-.
[5] 陈丽,张成琪,王新怡,杨志强. 轻度认知功能障碍与阿尔茨海默病患者小脑的MRI定量分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(10): 85-.
[6] 孟祥水1,柴相君2,马祥兴1,王青1,张晓明1,王茜1,李传福1,侯金文1. 3.0T磁共振DTI在单侧大脑中动脉闭塞中的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(8): 83-87.
[7] 刘玉波1,2,王光彬2,王强修3,耿明宾4,王丽娟1,胡建滨1. 左右利手人脑铁含量差异的磁共振成像研究初探[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(5): 135-.
[8] 刘圣源,张敬,李威,张权,张云亭. 脊髓室管膜瘤的MRI表现分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(3): 124-126.
[9] 曹金凤1,林祥涛1,2,王光彬2,肖连祥1,苗明明1,杨金永3. DWI及DCE-MRI在良恶性骨病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(3): 144-148.
[10] 任庆国,康笑水,郑金勇,于荣,侯金文. MRI在新生儿胆红素脑病中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(2): 91-93.
[11] 王韶卿 刘毅慧 付婷婷 成金勇 刘强. 肝癌31磷磁共振波谱数据的分类[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 42-46.
[12] 王韶卿 刘毅慧 付婷婷 成金勇 刘强. 肝癌31磷磁共振波谱数据的分类[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(6): 42-46.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!