您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 93-.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后的危险因素分析

李文元,丁士芳   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院ICU, 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2011-10-20 出版日期:2012-03-10 发布日期:2012-03-10
  • 通讯作者: 丁士芳(1967- ),男,主任医师,主要从事危重病医学的研究。E-mail:dingshifang@sdu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李文元(1976- ),男,硕士研究生,主要从事危重病医学的研究。

Clinical analysis of prognostic risk factors of acute respiratory
distress syndrome

LI Wen-yuan, DING Shi-fang   

  1. Department of ICU, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
  • Received:2011-10-20 Online:2012-03-10 Published:2012-03-10

摘要:

目的   研究影响急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者预后的危险因素。 方法   回顾分析2008年1月至2011年1月145例ARDS患者资料,分为存活组(n=80)和死亡组(n=65)。分别从年龄、APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分、器官功能不全数目、脓毒症严重程度、肺源性与非肺源性ARDS等方面分析与患者预后的关系。 结果   单因素分析显示存活组和死亡组之间,年龄(P<0.001)、APACHEⅡ评分(P<0.001)、SOFA评分(P=0.003)、器官功能不全数目(P<0.001)、脓毒症严重程度(P<0.001)、肺源性与非肺源性ARDS(P=0.043)、是否应用抗凝剂(P =0.006)差异有统计学意义。多因素分析显示,APACHEⅡ评分(P=0.016,OR:1.095,95% CI:1.017~1.179)、脓毒症严重程度(P<0.001,OR:2.559,95% CI: 1.609~4.072)、肺源性与非肺源性ARDS(P=0.033,OR:0.348,95% CI:0.131~0.920)影响预后。  结论   APACHEⅡ评分、脓毒症严重程度、ARDS诱发因素是影响ARDS患者预后的独立危险因素。

关键词: 呼吸窘迫综合征;急性病生理学和长期健康评价;脓毒症;预后

Abstract:

Objective   To investigate the risk factors influencing the outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods   The clinical data of 145 patients from January 2008 to January 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the survivor group (n=80) and the non-survivor group (n=65). The age, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA)  score, the number of dysfunctional organs, sepsis severity, ARDS originating from pulmonary disease (ARDSp) and extra-pulmonary disease (ARDSexp) were analyzed to evaluate the prognosis. Results   Univariate analysis showed that the age (P<0.001), APACHEⅡ score (P<0.001), SOFA score (P=0.003), number of dysfunctional organs (P<0.001), sepsis severity (P<0.001), ARDSp and ARDSexp (P=0.043), and anticoagulant application (P=0.006) had significant differences between the survivor group and the non-survivor group. Logistic regression analysis showed that APACHEⅡ(P=0.016, OR: 1.095, 95% CI: 1.0171.179), sepsis severity (P<0.001, OR: 2.559, 95%CI: 1.6094.072), and ARDSp and ARDSexp (P=0.033, OR: 0.348, 95% CI: 0.1310.920) were the independent predictors of the mortality in patients with ARDS. Conclusion   The APACHEⅡ scores, sepsis severity, and ARDS origin are the independent predictors of mortality in patients with ARDS.

Key words: Respiratory distress syndrome; APACHE; Sepsis; Prognosis

中图分类号: 

  • R563.8
[1] 丁士芳1, 吴大玮1, 许复郁2, 鹿伟3,李盛梅2. 从尸检肺组织病理特点反思ARDS患者机械通气策略[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(2): 161-163.
[2] 王岩1,李延忠1,王卫之2. P物质、血管活性肠肽在OSAHS患者舌根组织中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(12): 105-107.
[3] 王岩 李延忠 李春敏 祝希敏. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患者心脏结构及功能变化的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(12): 114-118.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!