您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 64 ›› Issue (9): 50-59.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2025.1060

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

阿司匹林与全表型疾病的因果关联:一项药物靶点孟德尔随机化研究

张秀美,陈昌海,袁中尚,王淑康   

  1. 1.山东大学齐鲁医学院公共卫生学院生物统计学系, 山东 济南 250012;2.国家健康医疗大数据研究院, 山东 济南 250003
  • 出版日期:2026-09-10 发布日期:2026-09-09
  • 通讯作者: 王淑康. E-mail:wsk2001@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82373686);中央高校青年教师科研创新能力支持项目(SRICSPYF-ZY2025123);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2024JQ029);山东省泰山学者项目(tsqn202211025)

Causal effects of aspirin on phenome-wide diseases: a drug target Mendelian randomization study

ZHANG Xiumei, CHEN Changhai, YUAN Zhongshang, WANG Shukang   

  1. 1. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. National Institute of Health and Medical Big Data, Jinan 250003, Shandong, China
  • Online:2026-09-10 Published:2026-09-09

摘要: 目的 采用药物靶点孟德尔随机化(mendelian randomization, MR)以及多基因评分方法,系统探讨遗传代理的阿司匹林与全表型疾病之间的因果关联。 方法 暴露数据来源于eQTLGen联盟(31 684名健康个体的外周血样本),筛选与阿司匹林作用靶点相关的顺式基因表达数量性状位点(cis-expression quantitative trait locus, cis-eQTL)作为工具变量;疾病结局数据来源于FinnGen数据库R12版本(500 348名芬兰裔参与者,2 502个疾病终点),纳入病例数≥1 000的1 265种疾病进行分析。采用逆方差加权法(inverse variance weighted, IVW)作为主要分析方法,加权中位数法、MR-Egger回归、简单模式法和加权模式法进行验证;通过Cochrans Q检验、MR-Egger 回归的截距项检验和留一法分别评估异质性和水平多效性。基于9个阿司匹林作用相关基因构建多基因评分,在英国生物银行队列(402 700人)中验证显著关联。 结果 共筛选出27个SNP作为工具变量。经多重检验校正后,IVW分析显示遗传代理的阿司匹林暴露与34种疾病存在显著因果关联,其中13种疾病的因果关联得到至少3种补充MR方法的支持(重复验证)。具体而言:胎儿生长受限(OR=0.471,95%CI:0.348~0.636,P<0.001)、其他栓塞和血栓(OR=0.665,95%CI:0.495~0.894,P=0.007)、未特指风湿病(OR=0.651,95%CI:0.489~0.867,P=0.003)、小肠良性肿瘤(OR=0.449,95%CI:0.251~0.802,P=0.003)、老年性白内障(OR=0.840,95%CI:0.760~0.929,P=0.001)风险降低;慢性溃疡性回肠结肠炎(OR=2.427,95%CI:1.363~4.320,P=0.003)、大肠克罗恩病(OR=1.843,95%CI:1.156~2.938,P=0.003)风险增加。多基因评分分析显示,阿司匹林与老年性白内障风险呈负相关(OR=0.985,95%CI:0.974~0.996,P=0.007)。 结论 阿司匹林在全表型层面表现出多系统效应,其对血栓栓塞、胎儿生长受限、风湿性疾病及小肠良性肿瘤具有保护作用,但可能增加炎症性肠病风险。本研究为阿司匹林的临床合理应用与药物再定位提供了遗传学依据。

关键词: 阿司匹林, 全表型疾病, 药物靶点孟德尔随机化, 因果关联

Abstract: Objective To systematically investigate the causal effects of genetically proxied aspirin exposure on a broad range of phenotypes using drug-target Mendelian randomization(MR)and polygenic score analysis. Methods Exposure data were obtained from the eQTLGen consortium(31,684 healthy European individuals). Cis-expression quantitative trait loci(cis-eQTL)significantly associated with aspirin target genes were selected as instrumental variables(IVs). Outcome data were derived from the FinnGen study R12 release(500,348 Finnish participants, 2,502 disease endpoints), with 1,265 diseases(case count ≥1,000)included for analysis. The inverse variance weighted(IVW)method was used as the primary MR analysis, complemented by weighted median, MR-Egger regression, simple mode, and weighted mode methods for verification. Heterogeneity and pleiotropy were assessed using Cochrans Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, and leave-one-out analysis. A polygenic score was constructed based on nine aspirin-related genes and tested for associations with disease outcomes in the UK Biobank cohort(402,700 participants). Results A total of 27 SNPs were selected as instrumental variables. After multiple testing correction, the IVW analysis showed that genetically proxied aspirin exposure was significantly causally associated with 34 diseases, among which 13 associations were supported by at least three complementary MR methods(replication evidence). Specifically, reduced risks were observed for fetal growth restriction(OR=0.471, 95%CI: 0.348-0.636, P<0.001), other embolism and thrombosis(OR=0.665, 95%CI: 0.495-0.894, P=0.007), unspecified rheumatic disease(OR=0.651, 95% CI: 0.489-0.867, P=0.003), benign neoplasm of the small intestine(OR=0.449, 95%CI: 0.251-0.802, P=0.003), and senile cataract(OR=0.840, 95%CI: 0.760-0.929, P=0.001).In contrast, increased risks were observed for chronic ulcerative ileocolitis(OR=2.427, 95%CI: 1.363-4.320, P=0.003)and Crohns disease of the large intestine(OR=1.843, 95%CI: 1.156-2.938, P=0.003). Polygenic risk score analysis further indicated a negative association between aspirin use and the risk of senile cataract(OR=0.985, 95% CI: 0.974-0.996, P=0.007). Conclusion Aspirin exhibits pleiotropic effects across multiple disease systems, with protective effects against thromboembolism, fetal growth restriction, rheumatic diseases, and benign small intestinal tumors, but potential risks for inflammatory bowel diseases. This study provides genetic evidence to inform clinical application and drug repurposing of aspirin.

Key words: Aspirin, Phenome-wide Diseases, Drug target Mendelian randomization, Causal association

中图分类号: 

  • R969.4
[1] Awtry E H, Loscalzo J. Aspirin[J]. Circulation, 2000, 101(10): 1206-1218.
[2] Vane J R, Botting R M. The mechanism of action of aspirin[J]. Thromb Res, 2003, 110(5/6): 255-258.
[3] Patrono C. Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease[J]. Eur Heart J, 2024, 45(27): 2362-2376.
[4] Gaziano J M, Brotons C, Coppolecchia R, et al. Use of aspirin to reduce risk of initial vascular events in patients at moderate risk of cardiovascular disease(ARRIVE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10152): 1036-1046.
[5] Rolnik D L, Nicolaides K H, Poon L C. Prevention of preeclampsia with aspirin[J]. Am J ObstetGynecol, 2022, 226(2S): 1108-1119.
[6] Guo C G, Ma W J, Drew D A, et al. Aspirin use and risk of colorectal cancer among older adults[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2021, 7(3): 428-435.
[7] Drew D A, Cao Y, Chan A T. Aspirin and colorectal cancer: the promise of precision chemoprevention[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2016, 16(3): 173-186.
[8] Jiang Y, Su Z X, Li C C, et al. Association between the use of aspirin and risk of lung cancer: results from pooled cohorts and Mendelian randomization analyses[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2021, 147(1): 139-151.
[9] Huang E S, Strate L L, Ho W W, et al. Long-term use of aspirin and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. Am J Med, 2011, 124(5): 426-433.
[10] Lu J L, Shrestha P, Streja E, et al. Association of long-term aspirin use with kidney disease progression[J]. Front Med, 2023, 10: 1283385. DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1283385
[11] Schmidt A F, Finan C, Gordillo-Marañón M, et al. Genetic drug target validation using Mendelian randomisation[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 3255. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-16969-0
[12] Võsa U, Claringbould A, Westra H J, et al. Large-scale cis- and trans-eQTL analyses identify thousands of genetic loci and polygenic scores that regulate blood gene expression[J]. Nat Genet, 2021, 53(9): 1300-1310.
[13] Kurki M I, Karjalainen J, Palta P, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population[J]. Nature, 2023, 613(7944): 508-518.
[14] Ma R N, Zhang D, Li Z Z, et al. Pharmacogenetics polygenic response score predicts outcomes in aspirin-treated stroke patients[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2025, 16: 1519383. DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1519383
[15] Wang L J, Mesa-Eguiagaray I, Campbell H, et al. A phenome-wide association and factorial Mendelian randomization study on the repurposing of uric acid-lowering drugs for cardiovascular outcomes[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2024, 39(8): 869-880.
[16] Bowden J, Del Greco M F, Minelli C, et al. Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2019, 48(3): 728-742.
[17] Verbanck M, Chen C Y, Neale B, et al. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases[J]. Nat Genet, 2018, 50(5): 693-698.
[18] Wilson L M, Anderson T S. Trends in preventive aspirin use by atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk[J]. JAMA, 2025, 333(10): 904-907.
[19] Shah D, Di Re A, Toh J W T. Aspirin chemoprevention in colorectal cancer: network meta-analysis of low, moderate, and high doses[J]. Br J Surg, 2023, 110(12): 1691-1702.
[20] 常鑫, 刘世佳, 韩璐. 服用阿司匹林与子宫内膜癌发病风险的孟德尔随机化关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2023, 61(10): 58-62. Chang Xin, Liu Shijia, Han Lu. A Mendelian randomization study of aspirin use and the risk of endometrial cancer[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Science), 2023, 61(10): 58-62.
[21] Barker A L, Soh S E, Sanders K M, et al. Aspirin and fracture risk: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. BMJ Open, 2020, 10(2): e026876. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026876
[22] Bonten T N, de Mutsert R, Rosendaal F R, et al. Chronic use of low-dose aspirin is not associated with lower bone mineral density in the general population[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2017, 244: 298-302. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.089
[23] Carron M, Tamburini E, Pettenuzzo T, et al. Aspirin for the extended prevention of venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1): 17213. DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-02171-z
[24] Weitz J I, Lensing A W A, Prins M H, et al. Rivaroxaban or aspirin for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 376(13): 1211-1222.
[25] Johnson S T, Puca K E. Evaluating patients with autoimmune hemolytic Anemia in the transfusion service and immunohematology reference laboratory: pretransfusion testing challenges and best transfusion-management strategies[J]. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program, 2022, 2022(1): 96-104.
[26] Schafer A I. Effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on platelet function and systemic hemostasis[J]. J Clin Pharmacol, 1995, 35(3): 209-219.
[27] Weyrich A S, Lindemann S, Zimmerman G A. The evolving role of platelets in inflammation[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2003, 1(9): 1897-1905.
[28] Bjarnason I, Scarpignato C, Holmgren E, et al. Mechanisms of damage to the gastrointestinal tract from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs[J]. Gastroenterology, 2018, 154(3): 500-514.
[29] Vakil N. Peptic ulcer disease: a review[J]. JAMA, 2024, 332(21): 1832-1842.
[30] Davidson K W, Barry M J, Mangione C M, et al. Aspirin use to prevent preeclampsia and related morbidity and mortality: us preventive services task force recommendation statement[J]. JAMA, 2021, 326(12): 1186-1191.
[31] Hoffman M K, Goudar S S, Kodkany B S, et al. Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of preterm delivery in nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy(ASPIRIN): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10220): 285-293.
[32] Wang Y X, Guo X J, Obore N, et al. Aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 9: 936560. DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.936560
[33] Shadick N A, Karlson E W, Cook N R, et al. Low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of rheumatoid arthritis: the Womens Health Study[J]. Arthritis Care Res, 2010, 62(4): 545-550.
[34] Kyle M E, Wang J C, Shin J J. Ubiquitous aspirin: a systematic review of its impact on sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 152(1): 23-41.
[35] Bisht A, Sharma M, Sharma S, et al. Carrier-free self-built aspirin nanorods as anti-aggregation agents towards alpha-crystallin-derived peptide aggregates: potential implications in non-invasive cataract therapy[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2019, 7(44): 6945-6954.
[36] Di Bella S, Luzzati R, Principe L, et al. Aspirin and infection: a narrative review[J]. Biomedicines, 2022, 10(2): 263. DOI:10.3390/biomedicines10020263
[1] 陈昌海,张秀美,袁中尚,王淑康. 降压药物和降脂药物与眼部疾病的因果关联:一项跨种族药物靶点孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(7): 69-80.
[2] 黄馨,王梦雪,付书璠,张琦悦,徐力. 代谢综合征及其组分与消化系统恶性肿瘤的因果关联:两样本孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 86-94.
[3] 常鑫,刘世佳,韩璐. 服用阿司匹林与子宫内膜癌发病风险的孟德尔随机化关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(10): 58-62.
[4] 吴新莹,冯一平,常开锋,贾贤杰,薛付忠. 绿色覆盖与癌症发病的因果关联分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 115-119.
[5] 王建丽1,张涌2,朱媛媛3,李彬2,管益超1,耿婷4. 急性脑梗死患者阿司匹林抵抗与血小板miR126的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(5): 77-81.
[6] 张晓月1,2,张维东1,王兆朋1,王朝霞1,张月英1,贾青1. 阿司匹林对小鼠S180肉瘤生长及血管和淋巴管生成的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(1): 1-.
[7] 陈丽君1,尚慧5,罗霞1,王谦2,张建平3,王立祥4. 阿司匹林对小鼠子痫前期防治效果的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(11): 53-.
[8] 周慧1,于宗琴2,李军3,李刚1,纪洪生1. 三种镇静催眠药对阿司匹林酯酶活性的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(4): 151-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 索东阳,申飞,郭皓,刘力畅,杨惠敏,杨向东. Tim-3在药物性急性肾损伤动物模型中的表达及作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 1 -6 .
[2] 李宁,李娟,谢艳,李培龙,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 长链非编码RNA AL109955.1在80例结直肠癌组织中的表达及对细胞增殖与迁移侵袭的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 38 -46 .
[3] 史爽,李娟,米琦,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 胃癌miRNAs预后风险评分模型的构建与应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 47 -52 .
[4] 肖娟,肖强,丛伟,李婷,丁守銮,张媛,邵纯纯,吴梅,刘佳宁,贾红英. 两种甲状腺超声数据报告系统诊断效能的比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 53 -59 .
[5] 吕龙飞,李林,李树海,亓磊,鲁铭,程传乐,田辉. 腔镜下细针导管空肠造瘘在微创McKeown食管癌切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 77 -81 .
[6] 李松林,刘培来,卢群山,马贺然. 胫骨高位截骨术联合自体脂肪间充质干细胞注射在膝关节软骨修复中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 82 -88 .
[7] 张娟,张璐嘉,肖伟,李顺平. 住院医师规范化培训学员压力知觉与留职意愿及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 108 -114 .
[8] 李刚,薛皓,邱伟,赵荣荣. 脑胶质瘤抑制性免疫微环境形成机制及研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 67 -73 .
[9] 焉传祝,王伟,纪坤乾,赵玉英. 线粒体与脑疾病[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 34 -41 .
[10] 张迪,于猛,刘霞. 神经调控技术简述[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 50 -60 .